Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind
Identifieur interne : 001672 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 001671; suivant : 001673Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind
Auteurs : Lisa Feldman Barrett ; Michele M. TugadeSource :
- Psychological bulletin [ 0033-2909 ] ; 2004.
Abstract
Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.
Url:
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553
PubMed: 15250813
PubMed Central: 1351135
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :001672
Links to Exploration step
PMC:1351135Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind</title><author><name sortKey="Barrett, Lisa Feldman" sort="Barrett, Lisa Feldman" uniqKey="Barrett L" first="Lisa Feldman" last="Barrett">Lisa Feldman Barrett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tugade, Michele M" sort="Tugade, Michele M" uniqKey="Tugade M" first="Michele M." last="Tugade">Michele M. Tugade</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">15250813</idno><idno type="pmc">1351135</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1351135</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:1351135</idno><idno type="doi">10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">001672</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">001672</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind</title><author><name sortKey="Barrett, Lisa Feldman" sort="Barrett, Lisa Feldman" uniqKey="Barrett L" first="Lisa Feldman" last="Barrett">Lisa Feldman Barrett</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tugade, Michele M" sort="Tugade, Michele M" uniqKey="Tugade M" first="Michele M." last="Tugade">Michele M. Tugade</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Psychological bulletin</title><idno type="ISSN">0033-2909</idno><imprint><date when="2004">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">0376473</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">6774</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Psychol Bull</journal-id><journal-title>Psychological bulletin</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0033-2909</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">15250813</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">1351135</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.553</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS2917</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Barrett</surname><given-names>Lisa Feldman</given-names></name><xref rid="FN1" ref-type="author-notes"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Tugade</surname><given-names>Michele M.</given-names></name></contrib><aff id="A1">Boston College</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Engle</surname><given-names>Randall W.</given-names></name></contrib><aff id="A2">Georgia Institute of Technology</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="FN1">Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Lisa Feldman Barrett, Department of Psychology, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467-3807. E-mail:<email>barretli@bc.edu</email></corresp><fn id="FN2"><p>Lisa Feldman Barrett and Michele M. Tugade, Department of Psychology, Boston College; Randall W. Engle, School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>31</day><month>5</month><year>2005</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>7</month><year>2004</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>25</day><month>1</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><volume>130</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>553</fpage><lpage>573</lpage><abstract><p id="P1">Dual-process theories of the mind are ubiquitous in psychology. A central principle of these theories is that behavior is determined by the interplay of automatic and controlled processing. In this article, the authors examine individual differences in the capacity to control attention as a major contributor to differences in working memory capacity (WMC). The authors discuss the enormous implications of this individual difference for a host of dual-process theories in social, personality, cognitive, and clinical psychology. In addition, the authors propose several new areas of investigation that derive directly from applying the concept of WMC to dual-process theories of the mind.</p></abstract><contract-num rid="MH1">K02 MH001981-01A2</contract-num><contract-sponsor id="MH1">National Institute of Mental Health : NIMH</contract-sponsor></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001672 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 001672 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:1351135
|texte= Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity and Dual-Process Theories of the Mind
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15250813" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |