A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Identifieur interne : 000D71 ( PascalFrancis/Curation ); précédent : 000D70; suivant : 000D72A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery
Auteurs : Shaphan R. Jernigan [États-Unis] ; Guillaume Chanoit [États-Unis] ; Arun Veeramani [États-Unis] ; Stephen B. Owen [États-Unis] ; Matthew Hilliard [États-Unis] ; Denis Cormier [États-Unis] ; Bryan Laffitte [États-Unis] ; Gregory Buckner [États-Unis]Source :
- European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery [ 1010-7940 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Objective: Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying can complicate, prolong or preclude minimally invasive surgical procedures, reducing their advantages over conventional approaches. An automated knot-tying device has been developed to speed suture fixation during minimally invasive cardiac surgery while retaining the desirable characteristics of conventional hand-tied surgeon's knots: holding strength and visual and haptic feedback. A rotating slotted disc (at the instrument's distal end) automates overhand throws, thereby eliminating the need to manually pass one suture end through a loop in the opposing end. The electronic actuation of this disc produces left or right overhand knots as desired by the operator. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of this technology, seven surgeons with varying laparoscopic experience tied knots within a simulated minimally invasive setting, using both the automated knot-tying tool and conventional laparoscopic tools. Suture types were 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament. Results: Mean knot-tying times were 246 ± 116 s and 102 ± 46 s for conventional and automated methods, respectively, showing an average 56% reduction in time per surgeon (p = 0.003, paired t-test). The peak holding strength of each knot (the force required to break the suture or loosen the knot) was measured using tensile-testing equipment. These peak holding strengths were normalised by the ultimate tensile strength of each suture type (57.5 N and 22.1 N for 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament, respectively). Mean normalised holding strengths for all knots were 68.2% and 71.8% of ultimate tensile strength for conventional and automated methods, respectively (p = 0.914, paired t-test). Conclusions: Experimental data reveal that the automated suturing device has great potential for advancing minimally invasive surgery: it significantly reduced knot-tying times while providing equivalent or greater holding strength than conventionally tied knots.
pA |
|
---|
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PascalFrancis, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000634
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0205172Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jernigan, Shaphan R" sort="Jernigan, Shaphan R" uniqKey="Jernigan S" first="Shaphan R." last="Jernigan">Shaphan R. Jernigan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chanoit, Guillaume" sort="Chanoit, Guillaume" uniqKey="Chanoit G" first="Guillaume" last="Chanoit">Guillaume Chanoit</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St</s1>
<s2>Raleigh, NC 27606</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Veeramani, Arun" sort="Veeramani, Arun" uniqKey="Veeramani A" first="Arun" last="Veeramani">Arun Veeramani</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owen, Stephen B" sort="Owen, Stephen B" uniqKey="Owen S" first="Stephen B." last="Owen">Stephen B. Owen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hilliard, Matthew" sort="Hilliard, Matthew" uniqKey="Hilliard M" first="Matthew" last="Hilliard">Matthew Hilliard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Cormier, Denis" sort="Cormier, Denis" uniqKey="Cormier D" first="Denis" last="Cormier">Denis Cormier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Laffitte, Bryan" sort="Laffitte, Bryan" uniqKey="Laffitte B" first="Bryan" last="Laffitte">Bryan Laffitte</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buckner, Gregory" sort="Buckner, Gregory" uniqKey="Buckner G" first="Gregory" last="Buckner">Gregory Buckner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0205172</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0205172 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0205172</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000634</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000D71</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jernigan, Shaphan R" sort="Jernigan, Shaphan R" uniqKey="Jernigan S" first="Shaphan R." last="Jernigan">Shaphan R. Jernigan</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Chanoit, Guillaume" sort="Chanoit, Guillaume" uniqKey="Chanoit G" first="Guillaume" last="Chanoit">Guillaume Chanoit</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St</s1>
<s2>Raleigh, NC 27606</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Veeramani, Arun" sort="Veeramani, Arun" uniqKey="Veeramani A" first="Arun" last="Veeramani">Arun Veeramani</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Owen, Stephen B" sort="Owen, Stephen B" uniqKey="Owen S" first="Stephen B." last="Owen">Stephen B. Owen</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hilliard, Matthew" sort="Hilliard, Matthew" uniqKey="Hilliard M" first="Matthew" last="Hilliard">Matthew Hilliard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Cormier, Denis" sort="Cormier, Denis" uniqKey="Cormier D" first="Denis" last="Cormier">Denis Cormier</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Laffitte, Bryan" sort="Laffitte, Bryan" uniqKey="Laffitte B" first="Bryan" last="Laffitte">Bryan Laffitte</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buckner, Gregory" sort="Buckner, Gregory" uniqKey="Buckner G" first="Gregory" last="Buckner">Gregory Buckner</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. j. cardio-thorac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1010-7940</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. j. cardio-thorac. surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1010-7940</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cardiology</term>
<term>Circulatory system</term>
<term>Device</term>
<term>Fixation</term>
<term>Heart</term>
<term>Laparoscopy</term>
<term>Minimally invasive surgery</term>
<term>Pneumology</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Laparoscopie</term>
<term>Dispositif</term>
<term>Chirurgie miniinvasive</term>
<term>Coeur</term>
<term>Fixation</term>
<term>Appareil circulatoire</term>
<term>Cardiologie</term>
<term>Pneumologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying can complicate, prolong or preclude minimally invasive surgical procedures, reducing their advantages over conventional approaches. An automated knot-tying device has been developed to speed suture fixation during minimally invasive cardiac surgery while retaining the desirable characteristics of conventional hand-tied surgeon's knots: holding strength and visual and haptic feedback. A rotating slotted disc (at the instrument's distal end) automates overhand throws, thereby eliminating the need to manually pass one suture end through a loop in the opposing end. The electronic actuation of this disc produces left or right overhand knots as desired by the operator. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of this technology, seven surgeons with varying laparoscopic experience tied knots within a simulated minimally invasive setting, using both the automated knot-tying tool and conventional laparoscopic tools. Suture types were 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament. Results: Mean knot-tying times were 246 ± 116 s and 102 ± 46 s for conventional and automated methods, respectively, showing an average 56% reduction in time per surgeon (p = 0.003, paired t-test). The peak holding strength of each knot (the force required to break the suture or loosen the knot) was measured using tensile-testing equipment. These peak holding strengths were normalised by the ultimate tensile strength of each suture type (57.5 N and 22.1 N for 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament, respectively). Mean normalised holding strengths for all knots were 68.2% and 71.8% of ultimate tensile strength for conventional and automated methods, respectively (p = 0.914, paired t-test). Conclusions: Experimental data reveal that the automated suturing device has great potential for advancing minimally invasive surgery: it significantly reduced knot-tying times while providing equivalent or greater holding strength than conventionally tied knots.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1010-7940</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>EJCSE7</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Eur. j. cardio-thorac. surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>37</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>JERNIGAN (Shaphan R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>CHANOIT (Guillaume)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>VEERAMANI (Arun)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>OWEN (Stephen B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>HILLIARD (Matthew)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>CORMIER (Denis)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>LAFFITTE (Bryan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>BUCKNER (Gregory)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolina State University, 4700 Hillsborough St</s1>
<s2>Raleigh, NC 27606</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Department of Industrial Design, North Carolina State University</s1>
<s2>NC</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>626-630</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21307</s2>
<s5>354000180608640220</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>17 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0205172</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objective: Intracorporeal suturing and knot tying can complicate, prolong or preclude minimally invasive surgical procedures, reducing their advantages over conventional approaches. An automated knot-tying device has been developed to speed suture fixation during minimally invasive cardiac surgery while retaining the desirable characteristics of conventional hand-tied surgeon's knots: holding strength and visual and haptic feedback. A rotating slotted disc (at the instrument's distal end) automates overhand throws, thereby eliminating the need to manually pass one suture end through a loop in the opposing end. The electronic actuation of this disc produces left or right overhand knots as desired by the operator. Methods: To evaluate the effectiveness of this technology, seven surgeons with varying laparoscopic experience tied knots within a simulated minimally invasive setting, using both the automated knot-tying tool and conventional laparoscopic tools. Suture types were 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament. Results: Mean knot-tying times were 246 ± 116 s and 102 ± 46 s for conventional and automated methods, respectively, showing an average 56% reduction in time per surgeon (p = 0.003, paired t-test). The peak holding strength of each knot (the force required to break the suture or loosen the knot) was measured using tensile-testing equipment. These peak holding strengths were normalised by the ultimate tensile strength of each suture type (57.5 N and 22.1 N for 2/0 braided and 4/0 monofilament, respectively). Mean normalised holding strengths for all knots were 68.2% and 71.8% of ultimate tensile strength for conventional and automated methods, respectively (p = 0.914, paired t-test). Conclusions: Experimental data reveal that the automated suturing device has great potential for advancing minimally invasive surgery: it significantly reduced knot-tying times while providing equivalent or greater holding strength than conventionally tied knots.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B11</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B12</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002B25E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="04" i2="X"><s0>002B24E06</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Laparoscopie</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Laparoscopy</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Laparoscopia</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dispositif</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Device</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dispositivo</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie miniinvasive</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Minimally invasive surgery</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía mini invasiva</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Coeur</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Heart</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Corazón</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Fixation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Fixation</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Fijación</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Appareil circulatoire</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Circulatory system</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aparato circulatorio</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cardiologie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cardiology</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cardiología</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pneumologie</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Pneumology</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Neumología</s0>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Endoscopie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Endoscopy</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Endoscopía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>137</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D71 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000D71 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Curation |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:10-0205172 |texte= A laparoscopic knot-tying device for minimally invasive cardiac surgery }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |