HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001513

Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion

Identifieur interne : 001513 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001512; suivant : 001514

Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion

Auteurs : C. K. Patel ; S. Ormonde ; P. H. Rosen ; A. J. Bron ; D. J. Apple

Source :

Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN) [ 0161-6420 ] ; 1999.

RBID : Pascal:00-0006847

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Lentille intraoculaire, Chambre postérieure, Cataracte, Traitement, Rotation, Postopératoire, Complication, Iatrogène, Etude comparative, Implant, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Cataract, Comparative study, Complication, Human, Iatrogenic, Implant, Intraocular lens, Posterior chamber, Postoperative, Rotation, Treatment.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0161-6420`
A02	`01`			`@0 OPHTDG`
A03		`1`		`@0 Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)`
A05				`@2 106`
A06				`@2 11`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 PATEL (C. K.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 ORMONDE (S.)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 ROSEN (P. H.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 BRON (A. J.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 APPLE (D. J.) @9 comment.`
A14	`01`			`@1 Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary @2 Oxford @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676 @2 Charleston, SC 29425 @3 USA @Z 5 aut.`
A20				`@1 2190-2196`
A21				`@1 1999`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 18914 @5 354000080356520270`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 18 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 00-0006847`
A60				`@1 P @3 AR @3 CT`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chambre postérieure @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior chamber @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cámara posterior @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cataracte @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cataract @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Catarata @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rotation @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Rotation @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Rotación @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postopératoire @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Postoperative @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Postoperatorio @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Complication @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Complication @5 08`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Complicación @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Iatrogène @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Iatrogenic @5 09`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Iatrógeno @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 10`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implant @5 11`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implant @5 11`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implante @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 20`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 20`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Oeil pathologie @5 45`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Eye disease @5 45`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Ojo patología @5 45`
C07	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cristallin pathologie @5 46`
C07	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Lens disease @5 46`
C07	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cristalino patología @5 46`
C07	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Segment antérieur pathologie @2 NM @5 47`
C07	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Anterior segment disease @2 NM @5 47`
C07	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Segmento anterior patología @2 NM @5 47`
N21				`@1 003`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 00-0006847 INIST
ET :	Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion
AU :	PATEL (C. K.); ORMONDE (S.); ROSEN (P. H.); BRON (A. J.); APPLE (D. J.)
AF :	Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676/Charleston, SC 29425/Etats-Unis (5 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique
SO :	Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 1999; Vol. 106; No. 11; Pp. 2190-2196; Bibl. 18 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Lentille intraoculaire; Chambre postérieure; Cataracte; Traitement; Rotation; Postopératoire; Complication; Iatrogène; Etude comparative; Implant; Homme
FG :	Chirurgie; Oeil pathologie; Cristallin pathologie; Segment antérieur pathologie
ED :	Intraocular lens; Posterior chamber; Cataract; Treatment; Rotation; Postoperative; Complication; Iatrogenic; Comparative study; Implant; Human
EG :	Surgery; Eye disease; Lens disease; Anterior segment disease
SD :	Lente intraocular; Cámara posterior; Catarata; Tratamiento; Rotación; Postoperatorio; Complicación; Iatrógeno; Estudio comparativo; Implante; Hombre
LO :	INIST-18914.354000080356520270
ID :	00-0006847

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:00-0006847

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K." last="Patel">C. K. Patel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ormonde, S" sort="Ormonde, S" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="S." last="Ormonde">S. Ormonde</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rosen, P H" sort="Rosen, P H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="P. H." last="Rosen">P. H. Rosen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bron, A J" sort="Bron, A J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="A. J." last="Bron">A. J. Bron</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Apple, D J" sort="Apple, D J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="D. J." last="Apple">D. J. Apple</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676</s1>
<s2>Charleston, SC 29425</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">00-0006847</idno>
<date when="1999">1999</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 00-0006847 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:00-0006847</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001513</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K." last="Patel">C. K. Patel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ormonde, S" sort="Ormonde, S" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="S." last="Ormonde">S. Ormonde</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rosen, P H" sort="Rosen, P H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="P. H." last="Rosen">P. H. Rosen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bron, A J" sort="Bron, A J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="A. J." last="Bron">A. J. Bron</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Apple, D J" sort="Apple, D J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="D. J." last="Apple">D. J. Apple</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676</s1>
<s2>Charleston, SC 29425</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
<imprint><date when="1999">1999</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cataract</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Iatrogenic</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Posterior chamber</term>
<term>Postoperative</term>
<term>Rotation</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Chambre postérieure</term>
<term>Cataracte</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
<term>Rotation</term>
<term>Postopératoire</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Iatrogène</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Implant</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0161-6420</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>OPHTDG</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>106</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>11</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PATEL (C. K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ORMONDE (S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>ROSEN (P. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>BRON (A. J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>APPLE (D. J.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</s1>
<s2>Oxford</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676</s1>
<s2>Charleston, SC 29425</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>2190-2196</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>1999</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18914</s2>
<s5>354000080356520270</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2000 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>18 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>00-0006847</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s3>AR</s3>
<s3>CT</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chambre postérieure</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior chamber</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cámara posterior</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cataracte</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cataract</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Catarata</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rotation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rotation</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Rotación</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postopératoire</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Postoperative</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Postoperatorio</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Iatrogène</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Iatrogenic</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Iatrógeno</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implant</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implante</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Oeil pathologie</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Eye disease</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo patología</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cristallin pathologie</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Lens disease</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cristalino patología</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Segment antérieur pathologie</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>47</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anterior segment disease</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>47</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Segmento anterior patología</s0>
<s2>NM</s2>
<s5>47</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>003</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 00-0006847 INIST</NO>
<ET>Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion</ET>
<AU>PATEL (C. K.); ORMONDE (S.); ROSEN (P. H.); BRON (A. J.); APPLE (D. J.)</AU>
<AF>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary/Oxford/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.); Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of South Carolina, 167 Ashley Avenue, Box 250676/Charleston, SC 29425/Etats-Unis (5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 1999; Vol. 106; No. 11; Pp. 2190-2196; Bibl. 18 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objective: To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (lOLs). Design: Randomized, controlled trial. Participants: Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification. Method: Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted. Main Outcome Measures: Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study. Results: Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic lOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic lOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic lOLs (P = 0.0081). Conclusions: Plate haptic lOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Lentille intraoculaire; Chambre postérieure; Cataracte; Traitement; Rotation; Postopératoire; Complication; Iatrogène; Etude comparative; Implant; Homme</FD>
<FG>Chirurgie; Oeil pathologie; Cristallin pathologie; Segment antérieur pathologie</FG>
<ED>Intraocular lens; Posterior chamber; Cataract; Treatment; Rotation; Postoperative; Complication; Iatrogenic; Comparative study; Implant; Human</ED>
<EG>Surgery; Eye disease; Lens disease; Anterior segment disease</EG>
<SD>Lente intraocular; Cámara posterior; Catarata; Tratamiento; Rotación; Postoperatorio; Complicación; Iatrógeno; Estudio comparativo; Implante; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-18914.354000080356520270</LO>
<ID>00-0006847</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001513 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001513 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:00-0006847
   |texte=   Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion

Postoperative intraocular lens rotation : A randomized comparison of Plate and loop haptic implants. Discussion

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri