Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane

Identifieur interne : 001315 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001314; suivant : 001316

Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane

Auteurs : Astrid M. L. Kappers

Source :

RBID : Pascal:02-0095279

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0001-6918
A02 01      @0 APSOAZ
A03   1    @0 Acta psychol.
A05       @2 109
A06       @2 1
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane
A11 01  1    @1 KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)
A14 01      @1 Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5 @2 3584 CC Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut.
A20       @1 25-40
A21       @1 2002
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 2174 @5 354000103422450020
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 19 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 02-0095279
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Acta psychologica
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26E05
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Etude expérimentale @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Experimental study @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Estudio experimental @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Perception espace @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Space perception @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Percepción espacio @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Orientation spatiale @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Spatial orientation @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Orientación espacial @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Perception @5 17
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Perception @5 17
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Percepción @5 17
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Cadre référence @4 CD @5 96
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Frame of reference @4 CD @5 96
N21       @1 049

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 02-0095279 INIST
ET : Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane
AU : KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)
AF : Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5/3584 CC Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 109; No. 1; Pp. 25-40; Bibl. 19 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.
CC : 002A26E05
FD : Etude expérimentale; Sensibilité tactile; Perception espace; Orientation spatiale; Perception; Homme; Cadre référence
ED : Experimental study; Tactile sensitivity; Space perception; Spatial orientation; Perception; Human; Frame of reference
SD : Estudio experimental; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción espacio; Orientación espacial; Percepción; Hombre
LO : INIST-2174.354000103422450020
ID : 02-0095279

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:02-0095279

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">02-0095279</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 02-0095279 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:02-0095279</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001315</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Frame of reference</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Spatial orientation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Orientation spatiale</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Cadre référence</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0001-6918</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>APSOAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Acta psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>109</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5</s1>
<s2>3584 CC Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>25-40</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2002</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2174</s2>
<s5>354000103422450020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>19 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>02-0095279</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Acta psychologica</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26E05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Orientation spatiale</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spatial orientation</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Orientación espacial</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cadre référence</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Frame of reference</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>049</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 02-0095279 INIST</NO>
<ET>Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane</ET>
<AU>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</AU>
<AF>Helmholtz Instituut, Princetonplein 5/3584 CC Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 109; No. 1; Pp. 25-40; Bibl. 19 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Previous studies [Perception 28 (1999) 1001; Perception 28 (1999) 781] on the haptic perception of parallelity on a horizontal plane showed that what subjects haptically perceive as being parallel deviates considerably from what is physically parallel. The deviations could be described with a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the left-right direction. The gradients found in the bimanual conditions were significantly larger (about 70%) than those in the unimanual conditions. The questions to be answered in the present study are the following: (1) Does the haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane also show systematic deviations from veridicality? (2) Are the unimanual and bimanual performances again quantitatively but not qualitatively different? The set-up consisted of a plate positioned in the midsagittal plane of the subject. The subject touched the right side of the plate with his/her right hand and the left side with the left hand. The results show again large systematic deviations. The major part of the deviations can be described by means of a subject-dependent orientation gradient in the vertical direction. The quantitative (but not qualitative) difference between the unimanual and the bimanual conditions is much larger in the midsagittal plane than in the horizontal plane.</EA>
<CC>002A26E05</CC>
<FD>Etude expérimentale; Sensibilité tactile; Perception espace; Orientation spatiale; Perception; Homme; Cadre référence</FD>
<ED>Experimental study; Tactile sensitivity; Space perception; Spatial orientation; Perception; Human; Frame of reference</ED>
<SD>Estudio experimental; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción espacio; Orientación espacial; Percepción; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-2174.354000103422450020</LO>
<ID>02-0095279</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001315 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001315 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:02-0095279
   |texte=   Haptic perception of parallelity in the midsagittal plane
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024