HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001306

Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion

Identifieur interne : 001306 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001305; suivant : 001307

Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion

Auteurs : Carolyn Macgregor ; Alice Thomas ; P. Gray ; J. Höhle ; H. Stiegler ; K. Schneider ; S. Greenberg ; L. Nigay

Source :

Lecture notes in computer science [ 0302-9743 ] ; 2001.

RBID : Pascal:02-0174663

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Interface utilisateur, Relation homme machine, Rétroaction, Audition, Sensibilité tactile.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Feedback regulation, Hearing, Man machine relation, Tactile sensitivity, User interface.

Abstract

A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0302-9743`
A05				`@2 2254`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion`
A09	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 EHCI 2001 : engineering for human-computer interaction : Toronto On, 11-13 May 2001, revised papers`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 MACGREGOR (Carolyn)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 THOMAS (Alice)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 GRAY (P.) @9 comment.`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 HÖHLE (J.) @9 comment.`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 STIEGLER (H.) @9 comment.`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 SCHNEIDER (K.) @9 comment.`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 GREENBERG (S.) @9 comment.`
A11	`08`	`1`		`@1 NIGAY (L.) @9 comment.`
A12	`01`	`1`		`@1 LITTLE (Murray Reed) @9 ed.`
A12	`02`	`1`		`@1 NIGAY (Laurence) @9 ed.`
A14	`01`			`@1 Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo @2 Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1 @3 CAN @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 724 Solutions Inc. @2 Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4 @3 USA @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 251-262`
A21				`@1 2001`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A26	`01`			`@0 3-540-43044-X`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 16343 @5 354000097055430190`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 11 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 02-0174663`
A60				`@1 P @2 C @3 AR @3 CT`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Lecture notes in computer science`
A66	`01`			`@0 DEU`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 001D02B04`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Interface utilisateur @5 03`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 User interface @5 03`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Interfase usuario @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Relation homme machine @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Man machine relation @5 04`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Relación hombre máquina @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rétroaction @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Feedback regulation @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Retroacción @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Audition @5 18`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hearing @5 18`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Audición @5 18`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sensibilité tactile @5 19`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tactile sensitivity @5 19`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 19`
N21				`@1 098`
N82				`@1 PSI`

A30	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Engineering for human-computer interactions. IFIP International conference @2 8 @3 Toronto ON CAN @4 2001-05-11`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 02-0174663 INIST
ET :	Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion
AU :	MACGREGOR (Carolyn); THOMAS (Alice); GRAY (P.); HÖHLE (J.); STIEGLER (H.); SCHNEIDER (K.); GREENBERG (S.); NIGAY (L.); LITTLE (Murray Reed); NIGAY (Laurence)
AF :	Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo/Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1/Canada (1 aut.); 724 Solutions Inc./Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Congrès; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique
SO :	Lecture notes in computer science; ISSN 0302-9743; Allemagne; Da. 2001; Vol. 2254; Pp. 251-262; Bibl. 11 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.
CC :	001D02B04
FD :	Interface utilisateur; Relation homme machine; Rétroaction; Audition; Sensibilité tactile
ED :	User interface; Man machine relation; Feedback regulation; Hearing; Tactile sensitivity
SD :	Interfase usuario; Relación hombre máquina; Retroacción; Audición; Sensibilidad tactil
LO :	INIST-16343.354000097055430190
ID :	02-0174663

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:02-0174663

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Macgregor, Carolyn" sort="Macgregor, Carolyn" uniqKey="Macgregor C" first="Carolyn" last="Macgregor">Carolyn Macgregor</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo</s1>
<s2>Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomas, Alice" sort="Thomas, Alice" uniqKey="Thomas A" first="Alice" last="Thomas">Alice Thomas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>724 Solutions Inc.</s1>
<s2>Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gray, P" sort="Gray, P" uniqKey="Gray P" first="P." last="Gray">P. Gray</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hohle, J" sort="Hohle, J" uniqKey="Hohle J" first="J." last="Höhle">J. Höhle</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stiegler, H" sort="Stiegler, H" uniqKey="Stiegler H" first="H." last="Stiegler">H. Stiegler</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schneider, K" sort="Schneider, K" uniqKey="Schneider K" first="K." last="Schneider">K. Schneider</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Greenberg, S" sort="Greenberg, S" uniqKey="Greenberg S" first="S." last="Greenberg">S. Greenberg</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nigay, L" sort="Nigay, L" uniqKey="Nigay L" first="L." last="Nigay">L. Nigay</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">02-0174663</idno>
<date when="2001">2001</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 02-0174663 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:02-0174663</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001306</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion</title>
<author><name sortKey="Macgregor, Carolyn" sort="Macgregor, Carolyn" uniqKey="Macgregor C" first="Carolyn" last="Macgregor">Carolyn Macgregor</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo</s1>
<s2>Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Thomas, Alice" sort="Thomas, Alice" uniqKey="Thomas A" first="Alice" last="Thomas">Alice Thomas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>724 Solutions Inc.</s1>
<s2>Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Gray, P" sort="Gray, P" uniqKey="Gray P" first="P." last="Gray">P. Gray</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Hohle, J" sort="Hohle, J" uniqKey="Hohle J" first="J." last="Höhle">J. Höhle</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Stiegler, H" sort="Stiegler, H" uniqKey="Stiegler H" first="H." last="Stiegler">H. Stiegler</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schneider, K" sort="Schneider, K" uniqKey="Schneider K" first="K." last="Schneider">K. Schneider</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Greenberg, S" sort="Greenberg, S" uniqKey="Greenberg S" first="S." last="Greenberg">S. Greenberg</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Nigay, L" sort="Nigay, L" uniqKey="Nigay L" first="L." last="Nigay">L. Nigay</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Lecture notes in computer science</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0302-9743</idno>
<imprint><date when="2001">2001</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Lecture notes in computer science</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0302-9743</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Feedback regulation</term>
<term>Hearing</term>
<term>Man machine relation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>User interface</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Interface utilisateur</term>
<term>Relation homme machine</term>
<term>Rétroaction</term>
<term>Audition</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0302-9743</s0>
</fA01>
<fA05><s2>2254</s2>
</fA05>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>EHCI 2001 : engineering for human-computer interaction : Toronto On, 11-13 May 2001, revised papers</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>MACGREGOR (Carolyn)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>THOMAS (Alice)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>GRAY (P.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>HÖHLE (J.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>STIEGLER (H.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>SCHNEIDER (K.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>GREENBERG (S.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>NIGAY (L.)</s1>
<s9>comment.</s9>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LITTLE (Murray Reed)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>NIGAY (Laurence)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo</s1>
<s2>Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>724 Solutions Inc.</s1>
<s2>Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>251-262</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2001</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA26 i1="01"><s0>3-540-43044-X</s0>
</fA26>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>16343</s2>
<s5>354000097055430190</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>11 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>02-0174663</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
<s3>AR</s3>
<s3>CT</s3>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Lecture notes in computer science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>001D02B04</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interface utilisateur</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>User interface</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interfase usuario</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Relation homme machine</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Man machine relation</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Relación hombre máquina</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétroaction</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Feedback regulation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retroacción</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Audition</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Audición</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>098</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
<pR><fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Engineering for human-computer interactions. IFIP International conference</s1>
<s2>8</s2>
<s3>Toronto ON CAN</s3>
<s4>2001-05-11</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 02-0174663 INIST</NO>
<ET>Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion</ET>
<AU>MACGREGOR (Carolyn); THOMAS (Alice); GRAY (P.); HÖHLE (J.); STIEGLER (H.); SCHNEIDER (K.); GREENBERG (S.); NIGAY (L.); LITTLE (Murray Reed); NIGAY (Laurence)</AU>
<AF>Dept. Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo/Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1/Canada (1 aut.); 724 Solutions Inc./Toronto, Ontario M2P 2G4/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Congrès; Article; Commentaire; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Lecture notes in computer science; ISSN 0302-9743; Allemagne; Da. 2001; Vol. 2254; Pp. 251-262; Bibl. 11 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>A study was conducted to investigate the effects of auditory and haptic feedback for a "point and select" computing task at two levels of cognitive workload. Participants were assigned to one of three computer-mouse haptic feedback groups (regular non-haptic mouse, haptic mouse with kinesthetic feedback, and haptic mouse with kinesthetic and force feedback). Each group received two auditory feedback conditions (sound on, sound off) for each of the cognitive workload conditions (single task or dual task). Even though auditory feedback did not significantly improve task performance, all groups rated the sound-on conditions as requiring less work than the sound-off conditions. Similarly, participants believed that kinesthetic feedback improved their detection of errors, even though mouse feedback did not produce significant differences in performance. Implications for adding multi-modal feedback to computer-based tasks are discussed.</EA>
<CC>001D02B04</CC>
<FD>Interface utilisateur; Relation homme machine; Rétroaction; Audition; Sensibilité tactile</FD>
<ED>User interface; Man machine relation; Feedback regulation; Hearing; Tactile sensitivity</ED>
<SD>Interfase usuario; Relación hombre máquina; Retroacción; Audición; Sensibilidad tactil</SD>
<LO>INIST-16343.354000097055430190</LO>
<ID>02-0174663</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001306 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001306 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:02-0174663
   |texte=   Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion

Does multi-modal feedback help in everyday computing tasks? Discussion

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri