HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 001255

Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases

Identifieur interne : 001255 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001254; suivant : 001256

Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases

Auteurs : Josef M. Schmidbauer ; QUN PENG ; David J. Apple ; Suresh K. Pandey ; Marcela Escobar-Gomez ; Gerd U. Auffarth ; Liliana Werner ; Luis G. Vargas

Source :

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2002.

RBID : Pascal:02-0421275

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Lentille intraoculaire, Implanté, Complication, Extraction, Peropératoire, Risque élevé, Biomatériau, Siloxane polymère, Etiologie, Structure en voile plissé, Lentille dure, Etude comparative, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Biomaterial, Comparative study, Complication, Etiology, Extraction, Folded structure, Hard lens, High risk, Human, Implanted, Intraocular lens, Intraoperative, Siloxane polymer.

Abstract

Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0886-3350`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCSUEV`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cataract refractive surg.`
A05				`@2 28`
A06				`@2 7`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 SCHMIDBAUER (Josef M.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 QUN PENG`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 APPLE (David J.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 PANDEY (Suresh K.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 ESCOBAR-GOMEZ (Marcela)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 WERNER (Liliana)`
A11	`08`	`1`		`@1 VARGAS (Luis G.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina @2 Charleston, South Carolina @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 7 aut. @Z 8 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg @2 Heidelberg @3 DEU @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 1223-1228`
A21				`@1 2002`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000108890470170`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 13 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 02-0421275`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Implanté @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Implanted @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Implantado @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Complication @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Complication @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Complicación @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Extraction @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Extraction @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Extracción @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Peropératoire @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraoperative @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Peroperatorio @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Risque élevé @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 High risk @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Riesgo alto @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Biomatériau @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Biomaterial @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Biomaterial @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Siloxane polymère @2 NK @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Siloxane polymer @2 NK @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Siloxano polímero @2 NK @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etiologie @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Etiology @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Etiología @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Structure en voile plissé @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Folded structure @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estructura plegada @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille dure @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hard lens @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente duro @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 12`
C03	`13`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 13`
C03	`13`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 13`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 37`
N21				`@1 245`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 02-0421275 INIST
ET :	Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases
AU :	SCHMIDBAUER (Josef M.); QUN PENG; APPLE (David J.); PANDEY (Suresh K.); ESCOBAR-GOMEZ (Marcela); AUFFARTH (Gerd U.); WERNER (Liliana); VARGAS (Luis G.)
AF :	Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina/Charleston, South Carolina/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.); Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg/Heidelberg/Allemagne (6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2002; Vol. 28; No. 7; Pp. 1223-1228; Bibl. 13 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Lentille intraoculaire; Implanté; Complication; Extraction; Peropératoire; Risque élevé; Biomatériau; Siloxane polymère; Etiologie; Structure en voile plissé; Lentille dure; Etude comparative; Homme
FG :	Chirurgie
ED :	Intraocular lens; Implanted; Complication; Extraction; Intraoperative; High risk; Biomaterial; Siloxane polymer; Etiology; Folded structure; Hard lens; Comparative study; Human
EG :	Surgery
SD :	Lente intraocular; Implantado; Complicación; Extracción; Peroperatorio; Riesgo alto; Biomaterial; Siloxano polímero; Etiología; Estructura plegada; Lente duro; Estudio comparativo; Hombre
LO :	INIST-20937.354000108890470170
ID :	02-0421275

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:02-0421275

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schmidbauer, Josef M" sort="Schmidbauer, Josef M" uniqKey="Schmidbauer J" first="Josef M." last="Schmidbauer">Josef M. Schmidbauer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Qun Peng" sort="Qun Peng" uniqKey="Qun Peng" last="Qun Peng">QUN PENG</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J." last="Apple">David J. Apple</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K." last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" sort="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" uniqKey="Escobar Gomez M" first="Marcela" last="Escobar-Gomez">Marcela Escobar-Gomez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U." last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G." last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">02-0421275</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 02-0421275 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:02-0421275</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001255</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases</title>
<author><name sortKey="Schmidbauer, Josef M" sort="Schmidbauer, Josef M" uniqKey="Schmidbauer J" first="Josef M." last="Schmidbauer">Josef M. Schmidbauer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Qun Peng" sort="Qun Peng" uniqKey="Qun Peng" last="Qun Peng">QUN PENG</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Apple, David J" sort="Apple, David J" uniqKey="Apple D" first="David J." last="Apple">David J. Apple</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pandey, Suresh K" sort="Pandey, Suresh K" uniqKey="Pandey S" first="Suresh K." last="Pandey">Suresh K. Pandey</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" sort="Escobar Gomez, Marcela" uniqKey="Escobar Gomez M" first="Marcela" last="Escobar-Gomez">Marcela Escobar-Gomez</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Auffarth, Gerd U" sort="Auffarth, Gerd U" uniqKey="Auffarth G" first="Gerd U." last="Auffarth">Gerd U. Auffarth</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Werner, Liliana" sort="Werner, Liliana" uniqKey="Werner L" first="Liliana" last="Werner">Liliana Werner</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vargas, Luis G" sort="Vargas, Luis G" uniqKey="Vargas L" first="Luis G." last="Vargas">Luis G. Vargas</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2002">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biomaterial</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Etiology</term>
<term>Extraction</term>
<term>Folded structure</term>
<term>Hard lens</term>
<term>High risk</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Implanted</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Intraoperative</term>
<term>Siloxane polymer</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Implanté</term>
<term>Complication</term>
<term>Extraction</term>
<term>Peropératoire</term>
<term>Risque élevé</term>
<term>Biomatériau</term>
<term>Siloxane polymère</term>
<term>Etiologie</term>
<term>Structure en voile plissé</term>
<term>Lentille dure</term>
<term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>28</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SCHMIDBAUER (Josef M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>QUN PENG</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>APPLE (David J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>PANDEY (Suresh K.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>ESCOBAR-GOMEZ (Marcela)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>AUFFARTH (Gerd U.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>WERNER (Liliana)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>VARGAS (Luis G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina</s1>
<s2>Charleston, South Carolina</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg</s1>
<s2>Heidelberg</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1223-1228</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2002</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000108890470170</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>13 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>02-0421275</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Implanté</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Implanted</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Implantado</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Complication</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Complicación</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Extraction</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Extraction</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Extracción</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Peropératoire</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraoperative</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Peroperatorio</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Risque élevé</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>High risk</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Riesgo alto</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biomatériau</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biomaterial</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Siloxane polymère</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Siloxane polymer</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Siloxano polímero</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etiologie</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Etiology</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Etiología</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Structure en voile plissé</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Folded structure</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estructura plegada</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille dure</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hard lens</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente duro</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>245</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 02-0421275 INIST</NO>
<ET>Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases</ET>
<AU>SCHMIDBAUER (Josef M.); QUN PENG; APPLE (David J.); PANDEY (Suresh K.); ESCOBAR-GOMEZ (Marcela); AUFFARTH (Gerd U.); WERNER (Liliana); VARGAS (Luis G.)</AU>
<AF>Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of South Carolina/Charleston, South Carolina/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.); Eye Hospital and Outpatient Center, University of Heidelberg/Heidelberg/Allemagne (6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2002; Vol. 28; No. 7; Pp. 1223-1228; Bibl. 13 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To analyze the rates of and reasons for intraoperative explantation of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses (lOLs) to determine the complication profile of each IOL design. Setting: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. Methods: The study comprised data analysis of foldable (n = 85) and rigid (n = 15) IOL specimens that were explanted immediately after primary implantation. Results: Eighty-five foldable intraoperative explants were accessioned. These comprised 14.5% of the 586 foldable IOL explants received between January 1988 and September 2000. There were 15 rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraoperative explants out of 2077 rigid explant specimens (0.7%). Fifty-one (60%) of the foldable lOLs requiring intraoperative explantation were the 1-piece silicone plate-haptic large-hole design, and 29 (34.1 %) were the 3-piece silicone polyimide-haptic design. The most frequent reason for explantation of both designs was optic damage, 37.3% in the large-hole design and 55.2% in the polyimide design. Optic damage did not occur in rigid PMMA lOLs. Conclusion: Some foldable IOL designs have a higher risk of damage during surgical insertion than rigid designs. Two modern foldable lOLs, the silicone plate-haptic large-hole and the silicone polyimide-haptic, appear to be more prone to damage during folding, loading, and implantation than other lOLs.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Lentille intraoculaire; Implanté; Complication; Extraction; Peropératoire; Risque élevé; Biomatériau; Siloxane polymère; Etiologie; Structure en voile plissé; Lentille dure; Etude comparative; Homme</FD>
<FG>Chirurgie</FG>
<ED>Intraocular lens; Implanted; Complication; Extraction; Intraoperative; High risk; Biomaterial; Siloxane polymer; Etiology; Folded structure; Hard lens; Comparative study; Human</ED>
<EG>Surgery</EG>
<SD>Lente intraocular; Implantado; Complicación; Extracción; Peroperatorio; Riesgo alto; Biomaterial; Siloxano polímero; Etiología; Estructura plegada; Lente duro; Estudio comparativo; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000108890470170</LO>
<ID>02-0421275</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001255 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001255 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:02-0421275
   |texte=   Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases

Rates and causes of intraoperative removal of foldable and rigid intraocular lenses: Clinicopathological analysis of 100 cases

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri