Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults

Identifieur interne : 001231 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001230; suivant : 001232

Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults

Auteurs : Gunvor L. Klevberg ; David I. Anderson

Source :

RBID : Pascal:02-0554010

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0167-9457
A02 01      @0 HMSCDO
A03   1    @0 Hum. mov. sci.
A05       @2 21
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults
A11 01  1    @1 KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.)
A11 02  1    @1 ANDERSON (David I.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave. @2 San Francisco, CA 94132-4161 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A14 02      @1 Institute of Human Development, University of California @2 Berkeley @3 USA @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 169-186
A21       @1 2002
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 19996 @5 354000104657560040
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 2 p.
A47 01  1    @0 02-0554010
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Human movement science
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.
C02 01  X    @0 002A25F
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Perception visuelle @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Visual perception @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Percepción visual @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Orthostatisme @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Orthostatism @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Ortostatismo @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Posture @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Posture @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Postura @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Ajustement postural @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Postural fitting @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Ajuste postural @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Contrôle moteur @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Motor control @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Control motor @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Vision @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Vision @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Visión @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Contrôle visuel @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Visual control @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Control visual @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Coordination oculomotrice @5 10
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Oculomotor coordination @5 10
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Coordinación oculomotora @5 10
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Age @5 11
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Age @5 11
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Edad @5 11
C03 11  X  FRE  @0 Développement @5 13
C03 11  X  ENG  @0 Development @5 13
C03 11  X  SPA  @0 Desarrollo @5 13
C03 12  X  FRE  @0 Enfant @5 54
C03 12  X  ENG  @0 Child @5 54
C03 12  X  SPA  @0 Niño @5 54
C03 13  X  FRE  @0 Adulte @5 55
C03 13  X  ENG  @0 Adult @5 55
C03 13  X  SPA  @0 Adulto @5 55
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Homme
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Human
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Hombre
N21       @1 329

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST
ET : Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults
AU : KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.); ANDERSON (David I.)
AF : Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave./San Francisco, CA 94132-4161/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Institute of Human Development, University of California/Berkeley/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Human movement science; ISSN 0167-9457; Coden HMSCDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 21; No. 2; Pp. 169-186; Bibl. 2 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.
CC : 002A25F
FD : Perception visuelle; Orthostatisme; Posture; Sensibilité tactile; Ajustement postural; Contrôle moteur; Vision; Contrôle visuel; Coordination oculomotrice; Age; Développement; Enfant; Adulte
FG : Homme
ED : Visual perception; Orthostatism; Posture; Tactile sensitivity; Postural fitting; Motor control; Vision; Visual control; Oculomotor coordination; Age; Development; Child; Adult
EG : Human
SD : Percepción visual; Ortostatismo; Postura; Sensibilidad tactil; Ajuste postural; Control motor; Visión; Control visual; Coordinación oculomotora; Edad; Desarrollo; Niño; Adulto
LO : INIST-19996.354000104657560040
ID : 02-0554010

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:02-0554010

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Klevberg, Gunvor L" sort="Klevberg, Gunvor L" uniqKey="Klevberg G" first="Gunvor L." last="Klevberg">Gunvor L. Klevberg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Anderson, David I" sort="Anderson, David I" uniqKey="Anderson D" first="David I." last="Anderson">David I. Anderson</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">02-0554010</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:02-0554010</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001231</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Klevberg, Gunvor L" sort="Klevberg, Gunvor L" uniqKey="Klevberg G" first="Gunvor L." last="Klevberg">Gunvor L. Klevberg</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Anderson, David I" sort="Anderson, David I" uniqKey="Anderson D" first="David I." last="Anderson">David I. Anderson</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Human movement science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. mov. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-9457</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Human movement science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. mov. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-9457</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Age</term>
<term>Child</term>
<term>Development</term>
<term>Motor control</term>
<term>Oculomotor coordination</term>
<term>Orthostatism</term>
<term>Postural fitting</term>
<term>Posture</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Visual control</term>
<term>Visual perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Perception visuelle</term>
<term>Orthostatisme</term>
<term>Posture</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Ajustement postural</term>
<term>Contrôle moteur</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Contrôle visuel</term>
<term>Coordination oculomotrice</term>
<term>Age</term>
<term>Développement</term>
<term>Enfant</term>
<term>Adulte</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0167-9457</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>HMSCDO</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Hum. mov. sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>21</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>ANDERSON (David I.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>169-186</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2002</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19996</s2>
<s5>354000104657560040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>02-0554010</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Human movement science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A25F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception visuelle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Visual perception</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción visual</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Orthostatisme</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Orthostatism</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ortostatismo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Posture</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Posture</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Postura</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Ajustement postural</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Postural fitting</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ajuste postural</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Contrôle moteur</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Motor control</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Control motor</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Contrôle visuel</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Visual control</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Control visual</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Coordination oculomotrice</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Oculomotor coordination</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Coordinación oculomotora</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Age</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Age</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Edad</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Développement</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Development</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Desarrollo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Enfant</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Child</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Niño</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Adulte</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Adult</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Adulto</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>329</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST</NO>
<ET>Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</ET>
<AU>KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.); ANDERSON (David I.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave./San Francisco, CA 94132-4161/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Institute of Human Development, University of California/Berkeley/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Human movement science; ISSN 0167-9457; Coden HMSCDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 21; No. 2; Pp. 169-186; Bibl. 2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</EA>
<CC>002A25F</CC>
<FD>Perception visuelle; Orthostatisme; Posture; Sensibilité tactile; Ajustement postural; Contrôle moteur; Vision; Contrôle visuel; Coordination oculomotrice; Age; Développement; Enfant; Adulte</FD>
<FG>Homme</FG>
<ED>Visual perception; Orthostatism; Posture; Tactile sensitivity; Postural fitting; Motor control; Vision; Visual control; Oculomotor coordination; Age; Development; Child; Adult</ED>
<EG>Human</EG>
<SD>Percepción visual; Ortostatismo; Postura; Sensibilidad tactil; Ajuste postural; Control motor; Visión; Control visual; Coordinación oculomotora; Edad; Desarrollo; Niño; Adulto</SD>
<LO>INIST-19996.354000104657560040</LO>
<ID>02-0554010</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001231 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001231 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:02-0554010
   |texte=   Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024