Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults
Identifieur interne : 001231 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001230; suivant : 001232Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults
Auteurs : Gunvor L. Klevberg ; David I. AndersonSource :
- Human movement science [ 0167-9457 ] ; 2002.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults |
AU : | KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.); ANDERSON (David I.) |
AF : | Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave./San Francisco, CA 94132-4161/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Institute of Human Development, University of California/Berkeley/Etats-Unis (2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Human movement science; ISSN 0167-9457; Coden HMSCDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 21; No. 2; Pp. 169-186; Bibl. 2 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children. |
CC : | 002A25F |
FD : | Perception visuelle; Orthostatisme; Posture; Sensibilité tactile; Ajustement postural; Contrôle moteur; Vision; Contrôle visuel; Coordination oculomotrice; Age; Développement; Enfant; Adulte |
FG : | Homme |
ED : | Visual perception; Orthostatism; Posture; Tactile sensitivity; Postural fitting; Motor control; Vision; Visual control; Oculomotor coordination; Age; Development; Child; Adult |
EG : | Human |
SD : | Percepción visual; Ortostatismo; Postura; Sensibilidad tactil; Ajuste postural; Control motor; Visión; Control visual; Coordinación oculomotora; Edad; Desarrollo; Niño; Adulto |
LO : | INIST-19996.354000104657560040 |
ID : | 02-0554010 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:02-0554010Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</title>
<author><name sortKey="Klevberg, Gunvor L" sort="Klevberg, Gunvor L" uniqKey="Klevberg G" first="Gunvor L." last="Klevberg">Gunvor L. Klevberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Anderson, David I" sort="Anderson, David I" uniqKey="Anderson D" first="David I." last="Anderson">David I. Anderson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">02-0554010</idno>
<date when="2002">2002</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:02-0554010</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001231</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</title>
<author><name sortKey="Klevberg, Gunvor L" sort="Klevberg, Gunvor L" uniqKey="Klevberg G" first="Gunvor L." last="Klevberg">Gunvor L. Klevberg</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Anderson, David I" sort="Anderson, David I" uniqKey="Anderson D" first="David I." last="Anderson">David I. Anderson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Human movement science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. mov. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-9457</idno>
<imprint><date when="2002">2002</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Human movement science</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Hum. mov. sci.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0167-9457</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term>
<term>Age</term>
<term>Child</term>
<term>Development</term>
<term>Motor control</term>
<term>Oculomotor coordination</term>
<term>Orthostatism</term>
<term>Postural fitting</term>
<term>Posture</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Visual control</term>
<term>Visual perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perception visuelle</term>
<term>Orthostatisme</term>
<term>Posture</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Ajustement postural</term>
<term>Contrôle moteur</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Contrôle visuel</term>
<term>Coordination oculomotrice</term>
<term>Age</term>
<term>Développement</term>
<term>Enfant</term>
<term>Adulte</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0167-9457</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>HMSCDO</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Hum. mov. sci.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>21</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ANDERSON (David I.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave.</s1>
<s2>San Francisco, CA 94132-4161</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Institute of Human Development, University of California</s1>
<s2>Berkeley</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>169-186</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2002</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>19996</s2>
<s5>354000104657560040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2002 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>02-0554010</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Human movement science</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A25F</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception visuelle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual perception</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción visual</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Orthostatisme</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Orthostatism</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ortostatismo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Posture</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posture</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Postura</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ajustement postural</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Postural fitting</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ajuste postural</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contrôle moteur</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motor control</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Control motor</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contrôle visuel</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual control</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Control visual</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Coordination oculomotrice</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Oculomotor coordination</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Coordinación oculomotora</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Age</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Age</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Edad</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Développement</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Development</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Desarrollo</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Enfant</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Child</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Niño</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Adulte</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Adult</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Adulto</s0>
<s5>55</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>329</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 02-0554010 INIST</NO>
<ET>Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults</ET>
<AU>KLEVBERG (Gunvor L.); ANDERSON (David I.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Kinesiology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Ave./San Francisco, CA 94132-4161/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut.); Institute of Human Development, University of California/Berkeley/Etats-Unis (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Human movement science; ISSN 0167-9457; Coden HMSCDO; Pays-Bas; Da. 2002; Vol. 21; No. 2; Pp. 169-186; Bibl. 2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The present study compared how children and adults perceived affordances for upright stance when information was available either visually or haptically. 12 adults (mean age = 26.5 years) and 13 children (mean age = 4.5 years) examined an adjustable wooden platform that was randomly set at five different degrees of inclination (17, 22, 27, 33, 39). In the haptic condition, a masking curtain excluded vision of the platform and the surface was explored with a hand-held, wooden dowel. Results showed that for both children and adults there was closer agreement between perceptual judgments and action capabilities in the visual condition. Children overestimated their ability to stand on the steeper slopes, took equal amounts of time to make their judgments across all slopes, and were equally confident in their judgments across all slopes. In contrast, adults were more accurate than children at judging the affordances for upright stance, took longer to respond close to the actual action boundary, and were less confident close to the action boundary. Furthermore, adults took longer to respond and were less confident in the haptic condition whereas children had similar response times and were equally confident in both conditions. These important differences between adults and children in the perception of a basic affordance are discussed with reference to the coupling between perception and action at different phases of the lifespan and to the factors that might influence the organization of this coupling. Finally, implications are drawn for the prevention of accidents and the promotion of basic motor competence in children.</EA>
<CC>002A25F</CC>
<FD>Perception visuelle; Orthostatisme; Posture; Sensibilité tactile; Ajustement postural; Contrôle moteur; Vision; Contrôle visuel; Coordination oculomotrice; Age; Développement; Enfant; Adulte</FD>
<FG>Homme</FG>
<ED>Visual perception; Orthostatism; Posture; Tactile sensitivity; Postural fitting; Motor control; Vision; Visual control; Oculomotor coordination; Age; Development; Child; Adult</ED>
<EG>Human</EG>
<SD>Percepción visual; Ortostatismo; Postura; Sensibilidad tactil; Ajuste postural; Control motor; Visión; Control visual; Coordinación oculomotora; Edad; Desarrollo; Niño; Adulto</SD>
<LO>INIST-19996.354000104657560040</LO>
<ID>02-0554010</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001231 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001231 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:02-0554010 |texte= Visual and haptic perception of postural affordances in children and adults }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |