Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?

Identifieur interne : 001121 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 001120; suivant : 001122

Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?

Auteurs : Michèle Robert ; Elane Chevrier

Source :

RBID : Pascal:04-0051550

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0090-502X
A02 01      @0 MYCGAO
A03   1    @0 Mem. cogn.
A05       @2 31
A06       @2 7
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?
A11 01  1    @1 ROBERT (Michèle)
A11 02  1    @1 CHEVRIER (Elane)
A14 01      @1 Université de Montréal @2 Montréal, Québec @3 CAN @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 1136-1145
A21       @1 2003
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 13280D @5 354000118960170140
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 04-0051550
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Memory & cognition
A66 01      @0 USA
A99       @0 10 notes
C01 01    ENG  @0 In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.
C02 01  X    @0 002A26H03
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Etude expérimentale @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Experimental study @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Estudio experimental @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Sexe @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Sex @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Sexo @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Rotation mentale @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Mental rotation @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Rotación mental @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Espace 3 dimensions @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Three dimensional space @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Espacio 3 dimensiones @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Aptitude spatiale @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Spatial ability @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Aptitude espacial @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Vision @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Vision @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Visión @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Perception @5 13
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Perception @5 13
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Percepción @5 13
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 17
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 17
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 17
C03 10  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 10  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 10  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
N21       @1 033
N82       @1 PSI

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 04-0051550 INIST
ET : Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?
AU : ROBERT (Michèle); CHEVRIER (Elane)
AF : Université de Montréal/Montréal, Québec/Canada (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Memory & cognition; ISSN 0090-502X; Coden MYCGAO; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 31; No. 7; Pp. 1136-1145; Bibl. 1 p.1/4
LA : Anglais
EA : In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.
CC : 002A26H03
FD : Etude expérimentale; Sexe; Rotation mentale; Espace 3 dimensions; Aptitude spatiale; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Perception; Cognition; Homme
ED : Experimental study; Sex; Mental rotation; Three dimensional space; Spatial ability; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Perception; Cognition; Human
SD : Estudio experimental; Sexo; Rotación mental; Espacio 3 dimensiones; Aptitude espacial; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción; Cognición; Hombre
LO : INIST-13280D.354000118960170140
ID : 04-0051550

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:04-0051550

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robert, Michele" sort="Robert, Michele" uniqKey="Robert M" first="Michèle" last="Robert">Michèle Robert</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Université de Montréal</s1>
<s2>Montréal, Québec</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chevrier, Elane" sort="Chevrier, Elane" uniqKey="Chevrier E" first="Elane" last="Chevrier">Elane Chevrier</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Université de Montréal</s1>
<s2>Montréal, Québec</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">04-0051550</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 04-0051550 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:04-0051550</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">001121</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Robert, Michele" sort="Robert, Michele" uniqKey="Robert M" first="Michèle" last="Robert">Michèle Robert</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Université de Montréal</s1>
<s2>Montréal, Québec</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chevrier, Elane" sort="Chevrier, Elane" uniqKey="Chevrier E" first="Elane" last="Chevrier">Elane Chevrier</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Université de Montréal</s1>
<s2>Montréal, Québec</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Memory & cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mem. cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-502X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Memory & cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Mem. cogn.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0090-502X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Mental rotation</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Sex</term>
<term>Spatial ability</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Three dimensional space</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Sexe</term>
<term>Rotation mentale</term>
<term>Espace 3 dimensions</term>
<term>Aptitude spatiale</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Perception</term>
<term>Cognition</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0090-502X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>MYCGAO</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Mem. cogn.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>31</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>7</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>ROBERT (Michèle)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>CHEVRIER (Elane)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Université de Montréal</s1>
<s2>Montréal, Québec</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>1136-1145</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>13280D</s2>
<s5>354000118960170140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>04-0051550</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Memory & cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fA99>
<s0>10 notes</s0>
</fA99>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A26H03</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sexe</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Sex</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sexo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Rotation mentale</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Mental rotation</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Rotación mental</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Espace 3 dimensions</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Three dimensional space</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Espacio 3 dimensiones</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Aptitude spatiale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Spatial ability</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aptitude espacial</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>033</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82>
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 04-0051550 INIST</NO>
<ET>Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?</ET>
<AU>ROBERT (Michèle); CHEVRIER (Elane)</AU>
<AF>Université de Montréal/Montréal, Québec/Canada (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Memory & cognition; ISSN 0090-502X; Coden MYCGAO; Etats-Unis; Da. 2003; Vol. 31; No. 7; Pp. 1136-1145; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In several spatial tasks in which men outperform women in the processing of visual input, the sex difference has been eliminated in matching contexts limited to haptic input. The present experiment tested whether such contrasting results would be reproduced in a mental rotation task. A standard visual condition involved two-dimensional illustrations of three-dimensional stimuli; in a haptic condition, three-dimensional replicas of these stimuli were only felt; in an additional visual condition, these replicas were seen. The results indicated that, irrespective of condition, men's response times were shorter than women's, although accuracy did not significantly differ according to sex. For both men and women, response times were shorter and accuracy was higher in the standard condition than in the haptic one, the best performances being recorded when full replicas were shown. Self-reported solving strategies also varied as a function of sex and condition. The discussion emphasizes the robustness of men's faster speed in mental rotation. With respect to both speed and accuracy, the demanding sequential processing called for in the haptic setting, relative to the standard condition, is underscored, as is the benefit resulting from easier access to depth cues in the visual context with real three-dimensional objects.</EA>
<CC>002A26H03</CC>
<FD>Etude expérimentale; Sexe; Rotation mentale; Espace 3 dimensions; Aptitude spatiale; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Perception; Cognition; Homme</FD>
<ED>Experimental study; Sex; Mental rotation; Three dimensional space; Spatial ability; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Perception; Cognition; Human</ED>
<SD>Estudio experimental; Sexo; Rotación mental; Espacio 3 dimensiones; Aptitude espacial; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Percepción; Cognición; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-13280D.354000118960170140</LO>
<ID>04-0051550</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001121 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 001121 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:04-0051550
   |texte=   Does men's advantage in mental rotation persist when real three-dimensional objects are either felt or seen?
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024