HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000F37

The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience

Identifieur interne : 000F37 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F36; suivant : 000F38

The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience

Auteurs : Julie Jacko ; V. Kathlene Emery ; Paula J. Edwards ; Mahima Ashok ; Leon Barnard ; Thitima Kongnakorn ; Kevin P. Moloney ; Francois Sainfort

Source :

Behaviour & information technology : (Print) [ 0144-929X ] ; 2004.

RBID : Pascal:04-0504478

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Informatique, Ordinateur, Interface graphique, Etude utilisateur, Etude utilisation, Personne âgée, Evaluation performance, Aptitude technologique, Rétroaction, Stimulus multimodal, Critère âge, Conception.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Age criterion, Computer, Computer science, Design, Elderly, Feedback regulation, Graphical interface, Multimodal stimulus, Performance evaluation, Processing quality, Use study, User study.

Abstract

This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0144-929X`
A02	`01`			`@0 BEITD5`
A03		`1`		`@0 Behav. inf. technol. : (Print)`
A05				`@2 23`
A06				`@2 4`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 JACKO (Julie)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 EMERY (V. Kathlene)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 EDWARDS (Paula J.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 ASHOK (Mahima)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 BARNARD (Leon)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 KONGNAKORN (Thitima)`
A11	`07`	`1`		`@1 MOLONEY (Kevin P.)`
A11	`08`	`1`		`@1 SAINFORT (Francois)`
A14	`01`			`@1 School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology @2 Atlanta, GA 30332-0205 @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut. @Z 7 aut. @Z 8 aut.`
A20				`@1 247-264`
A21				`@1 2004`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20184 @5 354000110367540030`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.3/4`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 04-0504478`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Behaviour & information technology : (Print)`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 001A01A05`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 205`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Informatique @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Computer science @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Informática @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ordinateur @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Computer @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Computadora @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Interface graphique @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Graphical interface @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Interfaz grafica @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude utilisateur @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 User study @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio usuario @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude utilisation @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Use study @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio utilización @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Personne âgée @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Elderly @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Anciano @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Evaluation performance @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Performance evaluation @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Evaluación prestación @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Aptitude technologique @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Processing quality @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aptitud tecnológica @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Rétroaction @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Feedback regulation @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Retroacción @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Stimulus multimodal @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Multimodal stimulus @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estímulo multimodal @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Critère âge @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Age criterion @5 11`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Criterio edad @5 11`
C03	`12`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Conception @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Design @5 12`
C03	`12`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Diseño @5 12`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre`
N21				`@1 285`
N44	`01`			`@1 PSI`
N82				`@1 PSI`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 04-0504478 INIST
ET :	The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience
AU :	JACKO (Julie); EMERY (V. Kathlene); EDWARDS (Paula J.); ASHOK (Mahima); BARNARD (Leon); KONGNAKORN (Thitima); MOLONEY (Kevin P.); SAINFORT (Francois)
AF :	School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Atlanta, GA 30332-0205/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Behaviour & information technology : (Print); ISSN 0144-929X; Coden BEITD5; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2004; Vol. 23; No. 4; Pp. 247-264; Bibl. 1 p.3/4
LA :	Anglais
EA :	This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.
CC :	001A01A05; 205
FD :	Informatique; Ordinateur; Interface graphique; Etude utilisateur; Etude utilisation; Personne âgée; Evaluation performance; Aptitude technologique; Rétroaction; Stimulus multimodal; Critère âge; Conception
FG :	Homme
ED :	Computer science; Computer; Graphical interface; User study; Use study; Elderly; Performance evaluation; Processing quality; Feedback regulation; Multimodal stimulus; Age criterion; Design
EG :	Human
SD :	Informática; Computadora; Interfaz grafica; Estudio usuario; Estudio utilización; Anciano; Evaluación prestación; Aptitud tecnológica; Retroacción; Estímulo multimodal; Criterio edad; Diseño
LO :	INIST-20184.354000110367540030
ID :	04-0504478

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:04-0504478

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jacko, Julie" sort="Jacko, Julie" uniqKey="Jacko J" first="Julie" last="Jacko">Julie Jacko</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Emery, V Kathlene" sort="Emery, V Kathlene" uniqKey="Emery V" first="V. Kathlene" last="Emery">V. Kathlene Emery</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Edwards, Paula J" sort="Edwards, Paula J" uniqKey="Edwards P" first="Paula J." last="Edwards">Paula J. Edwards</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ashok, Mahima" sort="Ashok, Mahima" uniqKey="Ashok M" first="Mahima" last="Ashok">Mahima Ashok</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Barnard, Leon" sort="Barnard, Leon" uniqKey="Barnard L" first="Leon" last="Barnard">Leon Barnard</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kongnakorn, Thitima" sort="Kongnakorn, Thitima" uniqKey="Kongnakorn T" first="Thitima" last="Kongnakorn">Thitima Kongnakorn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Moloney, Kevin P" sort="Moloney, Kevin P" uniqKey="Moloney K" first="Kevin P." last="Moloney">Kevin P. Moloney</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sainfort, Francois" sort="Sainfort, Francois" uniqKey="Sainfort F" first="Francois" last="Sainfort">Francois Sainfort</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">04-0504478</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 04-0504478 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:04-0504478</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F37</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience</title>
<author><name sortKey="Jacko, Julie" sort="Jacko, Julie" uniqKey="Jacko J" first="Julie" last="Jacko">Julie Jacko</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Emery, V Kathlene" sort="Emery, V Kathlene" uniqKey="Emery V" first="V. Kathlene" last="Emery">V. Kathlene Emery</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Edwards, Paula J" sort="Edwards, Paula J" uniqKey="Edwards P" first="Paula J." last="Edwards">Paula J. Edwards</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Ashok, Mahima" sort="Ashok, Mahima" uniqKey="Ashok M" first="Mahima" last="Ashok">Mahima Ashok</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Barnard, Leon" sort="Barnard, Leon" uniqKey="Barnard L" first="Leon" last="Barnard">Leon Barnard</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Kongnakorn, Thitima" sort="Kongnakorn, Thitima" uniqKey="Kongnakorn T" first="Thitima" last="Kongnakorn">Thitima Kongnakorn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Moloney, Kevin P" sort="Moloney, Kevin P" uniqKey="Moloney K" first="Kevin P." last="Moloney">Kevin P. Moloney</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sainfort, Francois" sort="Sainfort, Francois" uniqKey="Sainfort F" first="Francois" last="Sainfort">Francois Sainfort</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Behaviour & information technology : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Behav. inf. technol. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0144-929X</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Behaviour & information technology : (Print)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Behav. inf. technol. : (Print)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0144-929X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Age criterion</term>
<term>Computer</term>
<term>Computer science</term>
<term>Design</term>
<term>Elderly</term>
<term>Feedback regulation</term>
<term>Graphical interface</term>
<term>Multimodal stimulus</term>
<term>Performance evaluation</term>
<term>Processing quality</term>
<term>Use study</term>
<term>User study</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Informatique</term>
<term>Ordinateur</term>
<term>Interface graphique</term>
<term>Etude utilisateur</term>
<term>Etude utilisation</term>
<term>Personne âgée</term>
<term>Evaluation performance</term>
<term>Aptitude technologique</term>
<term>Rétroaction</term>
<term>Stimulus multimodal</term>
<term>Critère âge</term>
<term>Conception</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0144-929X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>BEITD5</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Behav. inf. technol. : (Print)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>23</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>4</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>JACKO (Julie)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>EMERY (V. Kathlene)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>EDWARDS (Paula J.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>ASHOK (Mahima)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>BARNARD (Leon)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>KONGNAKORN (Thitima)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>MOLONEY (Kevin P.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>SAINFORT (Francois)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology</s1>
<s2>Atlanta, GA 30332-0205</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>247-264</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20184</s2>
<s5>354000110367540030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2004 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>04-0504478</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Behaviour & information technology : (Print)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>001A01A05</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>205</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Informatique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Computer science</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Informática</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ordinateur</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Computer</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Computadora</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Interface graphique</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Graphical interface</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Interfaz grafica</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude utilisateur</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>User study</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio usuario</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude utilisation</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Use study</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio utilización</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Personne âgée</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Elderly</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Anciano</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Evaluation performance</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Performance evaluation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Evaluación prestación</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Aptitude technologique</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Processing quality</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aptitud tecnológica</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétroaction</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Feedback regulation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retroacción</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Stimulus multimodal</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Multimodal stimulus</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estímulo multimodal</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Critère âge</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Age criterion</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Criterio edad</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Conception</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Design</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diseño</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>285</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 04-0504478 INIST</NO>
<ET>The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience</ET>
<AU>JACKO (Julie); EMERY (V. Kathlene); EDWARDS (Paula J.); ASHOK (Mahima); BARNARD (Leon); KONGNAKORN (Thitima); MOLONEY (Kevin P.); SAINFORT (Francois)</AU>
<AF>School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology/Atlanta, GA 30332-0205/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Behaviour & information technology : (Print); ISSN 0144-929X; Coden BEITD5; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2004; Vol. 23; No. 4; Pp. 247-264; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>This experiment examines the effect that computer experience and various combinations of feedback (auditory, haptic, and/or visual) have on the performance of older adults completing a drag-and-drop task on a computer. Participants were divided into three computer experience groups, based on their frequency of use and breadth of computer knowledge. Each participant completed a series of drag-and-drop tasks under each of seven feedback conditions (three unimodal, three bimodal, one trimodal). Performance was assessed using measures of efficiency and accuracy. Experienced users responded well to all multimodal feedback while users without experience responded well to auditory-haptic bimodal, but poorly to haptic-visual bimodal feedback. Based on performance benefits for older adults seen in this experiment, future research should extend investigations to effectively integrate multimodal feedback into GUI (Graphical User Interfaces) in order to improve usability for this growing and diverse user group.</EA>
<CC>001A01A05; 205</CC>
<FD>Informatique; Ordinateur; Interface graphique; Etude utilisateur; Etude utilisation; Personne âgée; Evaluation performance; Aptitude technologique; Rétroaction; Stimulus multimodal; Critère âge; Conception</FD>
<FG>Homme</FG>
<ED>Computer science; Computer; Graphical interface; User study; Use study; Elderly; Performance evaluation; Processing quality; Feedback regulation; Multimodal stimulus; Age criterion; Design</ED>
<EG>Human</EG>
<SD>Informática; Computadora; Interfaz grafica; Estudio usuario; Estudio utilización; Anciano; Evaluación prestación; Aptitud tecnológica; Retroacción; Estímulo multimodal; Criterio edad; Diseño</SD>
<LO>INIST-20184.354000110367540030</LO>
<ID>04-0504478</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F37 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F37 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:04-0504478
   |texte=   The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience

The effects of multimodal feedback on older adults' task performance given varying levels of computer experience

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri