HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000F24

Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses

Identifieur interne : 000F24 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F23; suivant : 000F25

Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses

Auteurs : Stephen S. Lane ; Paula Burgi ; Gregory S. Milios ; Michael W. Orchowski ; Michael Vaughan ; Eric Schwarte

Source :

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2004.

RBID : Pascal:05-0000426

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude comparative, Comportement, Lentille intraoculaire, Chirurgie, Ophtalmologie, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Behavior, Comparative study, Intraocular lens, Ophthalmology, Surgery, Treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0886-3350`
A02	`01`			`@0 JCSUEV`
A03		`1`		`@0 J. cataract refractive surg.`
A05				`@2 30`
A06				`@2 11`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LANE (Stephen S.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 BURGI (Paula)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 MILIOS (Gregory S.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 ORCHOWSKI (Michael W.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 VAUGHAN (Michael)`
A11	`06`	`1`		`@1 SCHWARTE (Eric)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Alcon Research, Ltd. @2 Fort Worth, Texas @3 USA @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut. @Z 6 aut.`
A20				`@1 2397-2402`
A21				`@1 2004`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 20937 @5 354000122632170240`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 5 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 05-0000426`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Journal of cataract and refractive surgery`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C02	`02`	`X`		`@0 002B26B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Comportement @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Behavior @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Conducta @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ophtalmologie @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ophthalmology @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oftalmología @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 25`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 25`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 25`
N21				`@1 004`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 05-0000426 INIST
ET :	Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses
AU :	LANE (Stephen S.); BURGI (Paula); MILIOS (Gregory S.); ORCHOWSKI (Michael W.); VAUGHAN (Michael); SCHWARTE (Eric)
AF :	Alcon Research, Ltd./Fort Worth, Texas/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2004; Vol. 30; No. 11; Pp. 2397-2402; Bibl. 5 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.
CC :	002B25B; 002B26B
FD :	Etude comparative; Comportement; Lentille intraoculaire; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement
ED :	Comparative study; Behavior; Intraocular lens; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment
SD :	Estudio comparativo; Conducta; Lente intraocular; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-20937.354000122632170240
ID :	05-0000426

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:05-0000426

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lane, Stephen S" sort="Lane, Stephen S" uniqKey="Lane S" first="Stephen S." last="Lane">Stephen S. Lane</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burgi, Paula" sort="Burgi, Paula" uniqKey="Burgi P" first="Paula" last="Burgi">Paula Burgi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Milios, Gregory S" sort="Milios, Gregory S" uniqKey="Milios G" first="Gregory S." last="Milios">Gregory S. Milios</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Orchowski, Michael W" sort="Orchowski, Michael W" uniqKey="Orchowski M" first="Michael W." last="Orchowski">Michael W. Orchowski</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vaughan, Michael" sort="Vaughan, Michael" uniqKey="Vaughan M" first="Michael" last="Vaughan">Michael Vaughan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schwarte, Eric" sort="Schwarte, Eric" uniqKey="Schwarte E" first="Eric" last="Schwarte">Eric Schwarte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0000426</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0000426 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0000426</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F24</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lane, Stephen S" sort="Lane, Stephen S" uniqKey="Lane S" first="Stephen S." last="Lane">Stephen S. Lane</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Burgi, Paula" sort="Burgi, Paula" uniqKey="Burgi P" first="Paula" last="Burgi">Paula Burgi</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Milios, Gregory S" sort="Milios, Gregory S" uniqKey="Milios G" first="Gregory S." last="Milios">Gregory S. Milios</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Orchowski, Michael W" sort="Orchowski, Michael W" uniqKey="Orchowski M" first="Michael W." last="Orchowski">Michael W. Orchowski</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vaughan, Michael" sort="Vaughan, Michael" uniqKey="Vaughan M" first="Michael" last="Vaughan">Michael Vaughan</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schwarte, Eric" sort="Schwarte, Eric" uniqKey="Schwarte E" first="Eric" last="Schwarte">Eric Schwarte</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Behavior</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Comportement</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>30</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>11</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LANE (Stephen S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BURGI (Paula)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MILIOS (Gregory S.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>ORCHOWSKI (Michael W.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>VAUGHAN (Michael)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>SCHWARTE (Eric)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Alcon Research, Ltd.</s1>
<s2>Fort Worth, Texas</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>2397-2402</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000122632170240</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>5 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0000426</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B26B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Comportement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Behavior</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Conducta</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>004</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 05-0000426 INIST</NO>
<ET>Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses</ET>
<AU>LANE (Stephen S.); BURGI (Paula); MILIOS (Gregory S.); ORCHOWSKI (Michael W.); VAUGHAN (Michael); SCHWARTE (Eric)</AU>
<AF>Alcon Research, Ltd./Fort Worth, Texas/Etats-Unis (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2004; Vol. 30; No. 11; Pp. 2397-2402; Bibl. 5 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To compare a standardized battery of biomechanical laboratory tests to assess the performance of popular foldable intraocular lenses (lOLs). Setting: Biomedical testing facilities, Alcon Research, Ltd., Fort Worth, Texas, USA. Methods: Using industry-standard biomechanical testing techniques, 1- and 3-piece foldable lOLs (Alcon AcrySof® MA60BM, MA30BA, SA30AL, SA60AT; Allergan Sensar® AR40, PhacoFlex® II SI-40NB; Bausch & Lomb Soflex® LI61U; Pharmacia & Upjohn CeeOn® 920) and a 1-piece all-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL (Alcon MZ30BD) were tested under identical conditions with regard to (1) tensile/elastic properties by comparing haptic pull strength and haptic elongation and (2) compression properties by comparing haptic compression forces, haptic compression force decay over time, and axial displacement. All tests were performed with the IOLs submersed in a controlled-temperature water bath (mean 35°C ± 2°C [SD]). Results: For all lOLs, the ultimate elongation and pull strength of the haptics before failure was highest with the Alcon SA30AL and SA60AT. Similarly, the force required to compress haptics to a prescribed 10.0 mm diameter was least with the SA30AL and the SA60AT lenses. These 1-piece lenses also showed the least decay of residual compression force as a function of time. Optic displacement along the optical axis with haptic compression to 10.0 mm was least with the Alcon 1-piece lOLs and the all-PMMA control IOL. Conclusion: AcrySof 1-piece SA30AL and SA60AT lOLs demonstrated superior biomechanical characteristics over other foldable IOL desians.</EA>
<CC>002B25B; 002B26B</CC>
<FD>Etude comparative; Comportement; Lentille intraoculaire; Chirurgie; Ophtalmologie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Comparative study; Behavior; Intraocular lens; Surgery; Ophthalmology; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Estudio comparativo; Conducta; Lente intraocular; Cirugía; Oftalmología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000122632170240</LO>
<ID>05-0000426</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F24 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:05-0000426
   |texte=   Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses

Comparison of the biomechanical behavior of foldable intraocular lenses

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri