Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer
Identifieur interne : 000F16 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F15; suivant : 000F17Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer
Auteurs : Helene IntraubSource :
- Cognition [ 0010-0277 ] ; 2004.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Viewers who study photographs of scenes tend to remember having seen beyond the boundaries of the view [boundary extension; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 179]. Is this a fundamental aspect of scene representation? Forty undergraduates explored bounded regions of six common (3D) scenes, visually or haptically (while blindfolded) and then the delimiting borders were removed. Minutes later they reconstructed boundary placement.- Boundary extension occurred: mean areas were increased by 53% (vision) and by 17% (haptics). Adeaf-and-blind woman (KC) haptically explored the same regions. Although a "haptic expert", she too remembered having explored beyond the boundaries, with performance similar to that of the blindfolded-sighted. Boundary extension appears to be a fundamental aspect of spatial cognition. Possibly constrained by the "scope" of the input modality (vision > haptics), this anticipatory spatial representation may facilitate integration of successively perceived regions of the world irrespective of modality and the perceiver's sensory history.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 05-0020029 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer |
AU : | INTRAUB (Helene) |
AF : | Psychology Department, University of Delaware/Newark, DE 19716/Etats-Unis (1 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2004; Vol. 94; No. 1; Pp. 19-37; Bibl. 2 p.1/4 |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Viewers who study photographs of scenes tend to remember having seen beyond the boundaries of the view [boundary extension; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 179]. Is this a fundamental aspect of scene representation? Forty undergraduates explored bounded regions of six common (3D) scenes, visually or haptically (while blindfolded) and then the delimiting borders were removed. Minutes later they reconstructed boundary placement.- Boundary extension occurred: mean areas were increased by 53% (vision) and by 17% (haptics). Adeaf-and-blind woman (KC) haptically explored the same regions. Although a "haptic expert", she too remembered having explored beyond the boundaries, with performance similar to that of the blindfolded-sighted. Boundary extension appears to be a fundamental aspect of spatial cognition. Possibly constrained by the "scope" of the input modality (vision > haptics), this anticipatory spatial representation may facilitate integration of successively perceived regions of the world irrespective of modality and the perceiver's sensory history. |
CC : | 002A26F05A |
FD : | Surdité; Cécité; Perception espace; Mémoire spatiale; Sensibilité tactile; Vision; Représentation spatiale; Espace 3 dimensions; Etude expérimentale; Etude cas; Homme |
FG : | ORL pathologie; Trouble audition; Oeil pathologie; Trouble vision |
ED : | Hearing loss; Blindness; Space perception; Spatial memory; Tactile sensitivity; Vision; Spatial representation; Three dimensional space; Experimental study; Case study; Human |
EG : | ENT disease; Auditory disorder; Eye disease; Vision disorder |
SD : | Sordera; Ceguera; Percepción espacio; Memoria espacial; Sensibilidad tactil; Visión; Representación espacial; Espacio 3 dimensiones; Estudio experimental; Estudio caso; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-15966.354000122644880020 |
ID : | 05-0020029 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:05-0020029Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer</title>
<author><name sortKey="Intraub, Helene" sort="Intraub, Helene" uniqKey="Intraub H" first="Helene" last="Intraub">Helene Intraub</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Psychology Department, University of Delaware</s1>
<s2>Newark, DE 19716</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0020029</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0020029 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0020029</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F16</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer</title>
<author><name sortKey="Intraub, Helene" sort="Intraub, Helene" uniqKey="Intraub H" first="Helene" last="Intraub">Helene Intraub</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Psychology Department, University of Delaware</s1>
<s2>Newark, DE 19716</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Blindness</term>
<term>Case study</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hearing loss</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Spatial memory</term>
<term>Spatial representation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Three dimensional space</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Surdité</term>
<term>Cécité</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Mémoire spatiale</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Représentation spatiale</term>
<term>Espace 3 dimensions</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Etude cas</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Viewers who study photographs of scenes tend to remember having seen beyond the boundaries of the view [boundary extension; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 179]. Is this a fundamental aspect of scene representation? Forty undergraduates explored bounded regions of six common (3D) scenes, visually or haptically (while blindfolded) and then the delimiting borders were removed. Minutes later they reconstructed boundary placement.- Boundary extension occurred: mean areas were increased by 53% (vision) and by 17% (haptics). Adeaf-and-blind woman (KC) haptically explored the same regions. Although a "haptic expert", she too remembered having explored beyond the boundaries, with performance similar to that of the blindfolded-sighted. Boundary extension appears to be a fundamental aspect of spatial cognition. Possibly constrained by the "scope" of the input modality (vision > haptics), this anticipatory spatial representation may facilitate integration of successively perceived regions of the world irrespective of modality and the perceiver's sensory history.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0010-0277</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>CGTNAU</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>94</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>INTRAUB (Helene)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Psychology Department, University of Delaware</s1>
<s2>Newark, DE 19716</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>19-37</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15966</s2>
<s5>354000122644880020</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>2 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0020029</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Viewers who study photographs of scenes tend to remember having seen beyond the boundaries of the view [boundary extension; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 179]. Is this a fundamental aspect of scene representation? Forty undergraduates explored bounded regions of six common (3D) scenes, visually or haptically (while blindfolded) and then the delimiting borders were removed. Minutes later they reconstructed boundary placement.- Boundary extension occurred: mean areas were increased by 53% (vision) and by 17% (haptics). Adeaf-and-blind woman (KC) haptically explored the same regions. Although a "haptic expert", she too remembered having explored beyond the boundaries, with performance similar to that of the blindfolded-sighted. Boundary extension appears to be a fundamental aspect of spatial cognition. Possibly constrained by the "scope" of the input modality (vision > haptics), this anticipatory spatial representation may facilitate integration of successively perceived regions of the world irrespective of modality and the perceiver's sensory history.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26F05A</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Surdité</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing loss</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sordera</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cécité</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Blindness</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ceguera</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mémoire spatiale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spatial memory</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Memoria espacial</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Représentation spatiale</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spatial representation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Representación espacial</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Espace 3 dimensions</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Three dimensional space</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Espacio 3 dimensiones</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude cas</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Case study</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio caso</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>ORL pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>ENT disease</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>ORL patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Trouble audition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Auditory disorder</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trastorno auditivo</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Oeil pathologie</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Eye disease</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo patología</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Trouble vision</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision disorder</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trastorno visión</s0>
<s5>46</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>010</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 05-0020029 INIST</NO>
<ET>Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer</ET>
<AU>INTRAUB (Helene)</AU>
<AF>Psychology Department, University of Delaware/Newark, DE 19716/Etats-Unis (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2004; Vol. 94; No. 1; Pp. 19-37; Bibl. 2 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Viewers who study photographs of scenes tend to remember having seen beyond the boundaries of the view [boundary extension; J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 15 (1989) 179]. Is this a fundamental aspect of scene representation? Forty undergraduates explored bounded regions of six common (3D) scenes, visually or haptically (while blindfolded) and then the delimiting borders were removed. Minutes later they reconstructed boundary placement.- Boundary extension occurred: mean areas were increased by 53% (vision) and by 17% (haptics). Adeaf-and-blind woman (KC) haptically explored the same regions. Although a "haptic expert", she too remembered having explored beyond the boundaries, with performance similar to that of the blindfolded-sighted. Boundary extension appears to be a fundamental aspect of spatial cognition. Possibly constrained by the "scope" of the input modality (vision > haptics), this anticipatory spatial representation may facilitate integration of successively perceived regions of the world irrespective of modality and the perceiver's sensory history.</EA>
<CC>002A26F05A</CC>
<FD>Surdité; Cécité; Perception espace; Mémoire spatiale; Sensibilité tactile; Vision; Représentation spatiale; Espace 3 dimensions; Etude expérimentale; Etude cas; Homme</FD>
<FG>ORL pathologie; Trouble audition; Oeil pathologie; Trouble vision</FG>
<ED>Hearing loss; Blindness; Space perception; Spatial memory; Tactile sensitivity; Vision; Spatial representation; Three dimensional space; Experimental study; Case study; Human</ED>
<EG>ENT disease; Auditory disorder; Eye disease; Vision disorder</EG>
<SD>Sordera; Ceguera; Percepción espacio; Memoria espacial; Sensibilidad tactil; Visión; Representación espacial; Espacio 3 dimensiones; Estudio experimental; Estudio caso; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-15966.354000122644880020</LO>
<ID>05-0020029</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F16 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:05-0020029 |texte= Anticipatory spatial representation of 3D regions explored by sighted observers and a deaf-and-blind-observer }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |