HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000F08

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial

Identifieur interne : 000F08 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000F07; suivant : 000F09

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial

Auteurs : Stefan Sacu ; Oliver Findl ; Rupert Menapace ; Wolf Buehl ; Mathias Wirtitsch

Source :

Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN) [ 0161-6420 ] ; 2004.

RBID : Pascal:05-0067783

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Etude comparative, Postérieur, Capsule, Gélule, Opacification, Lentille intraoculaire, Randomisation, Ophtalmologie, Traitement.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Capsule, Comparative study, Hard capsule, Intraocular lens, Opacification, Ophthalmology, Posterior, Randomization, Treatment.

Abstract

Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0161-6420`
A02	`01`			`@0 OPHTDG`
A03		`1`		`@0 Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)`
A05				`@2 111`
A06				`@2 10`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 SACU (Stefan)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 FINDL (Oliver)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 MENAPACE (Rupert)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 BUEHL (Wolf)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 WIRTITSCH (Mathias)`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna @2 Vienna @3 AUT @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A20				`@1 1840-1846`
A21				`@1 2004`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 18914 @5 354000122306790070`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 29 ref.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 05-0067783`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 002B25B`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude comparative @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Comparative study @5 02`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio comparativo @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Postérieur @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Posterior @5 03`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Posterior @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Capsule @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Capsule @5 05`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Gélule @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hard capsule @5 06`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cápsula dura @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Opacification @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Opacification @5 08`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Opacificación @5 08`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Lentille intraoculaire @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Intraocular lens @5 09`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Lente intraocular @5 09`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Randomisation @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Randomization @5 11`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aleatorización @5 11`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Ophtalmologie @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Ophthalmology @5 12`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Oftalmología @5 12`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Traitement @5 25`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Treatment @5 25`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Tratamiento @5 25`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Chirurgie @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Surgery @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cirugía @5 37`
N21				`@1 038`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	PASCAL 05-0067783 INIST
ET :	Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial
AU :	SACU (Stefan); FINDL (Oliver); MENAPACE (Rupert); BUEHL (Wolf); WIRTITSCH (Mathias)
AF :	Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 2004; Vol. 111; No. 10; Pp. 1840-1846; Bibl. 29 ref.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.
CC :	002B25B
FD :	Etude comparative; Postérieur; Capsule; Gélule; Opacification; Lentille intraoculaire; Randomisation; Ophtalmologie; Traitement
FG :	Chirurgie
ED :	Comparative study; Posterior; Capsule; Hard capsule; Opacification; Intraocular lens; Randomization; Ophthalmology; Treatment
EG :	Surgery
SD :	Estudio comparativo; Posterior; Cápsula; Cápsula dura; Opacificación; Lente intraocular; Aleatorización; Oftalmología; Tratamiento
LO :	INIST-18914.354000122306790070
ID :	05-0067783

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:05-0067783

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wirtitsch, Mathias" sort="Wirtitsch, Mathias" uniqKey="Wirtitsch M" first="Mathias" last="Wirtitsch">Mathias Wirtitsch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">05-0067783</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 05-0067783 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:05-0067783</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000F08</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wirtitsch, Mathias" sort="Wirtitsch, Mathias" uniqKey="Wirtitsch M" first="Mathias" last="Wirtitsch">Mathias Wirtitsch</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
<imprint><date when="2004">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsule</term>
<term>Comparative study</term>
<term>Hard capsule</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Randomization</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Etude comparative</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Gélule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Randomisation</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0161-6420</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>OPHTDG</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>111</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>10</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SACU (Stefan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>FINDL (Oliver)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>MENAPACE (Rupert)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>BUEHL (Wolf)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>WIRTITSCH (Mathias)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1840-1846</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2004</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18914</s2>
<s5>354000122306790070</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2005 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>29 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>05-0067783</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude comparative</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Comparative study</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio comparativo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Gélule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hard capsule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula dura</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Randomisation</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Randomization</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aleatorización</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>038</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 05-0067783 INIST</NO>
<ET>Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial</ET>
<AU>SACU (Stefan); FINDL (Oliver); MENAPACE (Rupert); BUEHL (Wolf); WIRTITSCH (Mathias)</AU>
<AF>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 2004; Vol. 111; No. 10; Pp. 1840-1846; Bibl. 29 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To compare intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of an open-loop hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Design: A randomized, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1-piece Acrysof IOL in one eye and a 3-piece Acrysof IOL in the fellow eye. Follow-up examinations were at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years. Patients were examined at the slit lamp, visual acuity (VA) was determined, and standardized high-resolution digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken. The intensity of PCO was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between IOL styles in best-corrected VA, rhexis/IOL overlap, capsular folds, and amount of anterior capsule opacification during the follow-up period. One year postoperatively, the amount of regeneratory PCO was higher for the 1-piece Acrysof eyes (image analysis software score: 1.3) than for the 3-piece Acrysof eyes (score: 0.9; P = 0.002). However, 2 years postoperatively, there was no significant difference between the 2 IOL styles (1-piece: 1.5; 3-piece: 1.3; P = 0.3). Neodymium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet capsulotomy was not performed in the study. Conclusion: One year postoperatively, the 1 -piece Acrysof showed slightly more regeneratory PCO than the 3-piece Acrysof. However, 2 years postoperatively, the barrier effect of the 1-piece design was comparable to that of the 3-piece haptic design, with low PCO intensity.</EA>
<CC>002B25B</CC>
<FD>Etude comparative; Postérieur; Capsule; Gélule; Opacification; Lentille intraoculaire; Randomisation; Ophtalmologie; Traitement</FD>
<FG>Chirurgie</FG>
<ED>Comparative study; Posterior; Capsule; Hard capsule; Opacification; Intraocular lens; Randomization; Ophthalmology; Treatment</ED>
<EG>Surgery</EG>
<SD>Estudio comparativo; Posterior; Cápsula; Cápsula dura; Opacificación; Lente intraocular; Aleatorización; Oftalmología; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-18914.354000122306790070</LO>
<ID>05-0067783</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F08 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F08 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:05-0067783
   |texte=   Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial

Comparison of posterior capsule opacification between the 1-piece and 3-piece Acrysof intraocular lenses: Two-year results of a randomized trial

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri