Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction
Identifieur interne : 000D76 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000D75; suivant : 000D77Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction
Auteurs : Stefan Sacu ; Rupert Menapace ; Oliver FindlSource :
- American journal of ophthalmology [ 0002-9394 ] ; 2006.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
● PURPOSE: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction. ● DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. ● METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively. ● RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic lOLs (P =.87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P >.05). ● CONCLUSION: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge lOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 06-0185671 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction |
| AU : | SACU (Stefan); MENAPACE (Rupert); FINDL (Oliver) |
| AF : | Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | American journal of ophthalmology; ISSN 0002-9394; Coden AJOPAA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2006; Vol. 141; No. 3; Pp. 488-493; Bibl. 18 ref. |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | ● PURPOSE: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction. ● DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. ● METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively. ● RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic lOLs (P =.87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P >.05). ● CONCLUSION: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge lOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction. |
| CC : | 002B09N |
| FD : | Optique; Conception; Antérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Contraction; Ophtalmologie |
| ED : | Optics; Design; Anterior; Capsule; Opacification; Contraction; Ophthalmology |
| SD : | Optica; Diseño; Anterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Contracción; Oftalmología |
| LO : | INIST-2012.354000133105380080 |
| ID : | 06-0185671 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:06-0185671Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction</title><author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">06-0185671</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 06-0185671 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:06-0185671</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000D76</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction</title><author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">American journal of ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. ophthalmol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9394</idno><imprint><date when="2006">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">American journal of ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">Am. j. ophthalmol.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-9394</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Anterior</term><term>Capsule</term><term>Contraction</term><term>Design</term><term>Opacification</term><term>Ophthalmology</term><term>Optics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Optique</term><term>Conception</term><term>Antérieur</term><term>Capsule</term><term>Opacification</term><term>Contraction</term><term>Ophtalmologie</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">● PURPOSE: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction. ● DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. ● METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively. ● RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic lOLs (P =.87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P >.05). ● CONCLUSION: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge lOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction.</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0002-9394</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>AJOPAA</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>Am. j. ophthalmol.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>141</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>SACU (Stefan)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>MENAPACE (Rupert)</s1></fA11><fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>FINDL (Oliver)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1><s2>Vienna</s2><s3>AUT</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ><sZ>2 aut.</sZ><sZ>3 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>488-493</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2006</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>2012</s2><s5>354000133105380080</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2006 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>18 ref.</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>06-0185671</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>American journal of ophthalmology</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>● PURPOSE: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction. ● DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. ● METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively. ● RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic lOLs (P =.87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P >.05). ● CONCLUSION: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge lOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction.</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B09N</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Optique</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Optics</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Optica</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Conception</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Design</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Diseño</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Antérieur</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Anterior</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Anterior</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Contraction</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Contraction</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Contracción</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fN21><s1>114</s1></fN21><fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1></fN44><fN82><s1>OTO</s1></fN82></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 06-0185671 INIST</NO><ET>Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction</ET><AU>SACU (Stefan); MENAPACE (Rupert); FINDL (Oliver)</AU><AF>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>American journal of ophthalmology; ISSN 0002-9394; Coden AJOPAA; Etats-Unis; Da. 2006; Vol. 141; No. 3; Pp. 488-493; Bibl. 18 ref.</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>● PURPOSE: To examine the influence of optic material (silicone and hydrophobic acrylic) and haptic design (one-piece and three-piece open loop) of sharp optic edge intraocular lenses (IOL) on anterior capsule opacification (ACO) and capsulorrhexis contraction. ● DESIGN: Randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. ● METHODS: This study was performed at the Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria, and comprised 210 eyes of 105 patients with bilateral age-related cataract. In group 1 (n = 53 patients), a three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with a three-piece silicone IOL. In group 2 (n = 52 patients), the three-piece acrylic IOL was compared with the one-piece acrylic IOL. One year after the operation, standardized digital slit-lamp images of ACO were taken; 1 week and 1 year after the operation, digital retroillumination images were taken to assess capsulorrhexis size. The intensity of ACO was graded objectively (score, 0% to 100%), and the capsulorrhexis area (square millimeters) was determined objectively. ● RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean ACO score was 21% for the acrylic and 20% for the silicone IOL (P = .4) in group 1 and 18% for both the three-piece and one-piece acrylic lOLs (P =.87) in group 2. Concerning the amount of capsulorrhexis contraction, there was no significant difference between the IOL types that were evaluated in this study (after Bonferroni-Holm correction, P >.05). ● CONCLUSION: In the hydrophobic sharp optic edge lOLs that were examined, neither the optic material nor the haptic design had an influence on the amount of ACO or capsulorrhexis contraction.</EA><CC>002B09N</CC><FD>Optique; Conception; Antérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Contraction; Ophtalmologie</FD><ED>Optics; Design; Anterior; Capsule; Opacification; Contraction; Ophthalmology</ED><SD>Optica; Diseño; Anterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Contracción; Oftalmología</SD><LO>INIST-2012.354000133105380080</LO><ID>06-0185671</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000D76 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000D76 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:06-0185671
|texte= Effect of optic material and haptic design on anterior capsule opacification and capsulorrhexis contraction
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |