Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial
Identifieur interne : 000B18 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000B17; suivant : 000B19Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial
Auteurs : Christina Leydolt ; Sofija Davidovic ; Stefan Sacu ; Rupert Menapace ; Thomas Neumayer ; Ana Prinz ; Wolf Buehl ; Oliver FindlSource :
- Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN) [ 0161-6420 ] ; 2007.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period. Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1 -piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between the 1 -piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7±1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3±1.4; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 07-0410735 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial |
AU : | LEYDOLT (Christina); DAVIDOVIC (Sofija); SACU (Stefan); MENAPACE (Rupert); NEUMAYER (Thomas); PRINZ (Ana); BUEHL (Wolf); FINDL (Oliver) |
AF : | Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.); Novi Sad Clinical Centre Eye Clinic/Novi Sad/Serbie-et-Monténégro (2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 114; No. 9; Pp. 1663-1669; Bibl. 31 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period. Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1 -piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between the 1 -piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7±1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3±1.4; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery. |
CC : | 002B09N |
FD : | Long terme; Acrylique dérivé polymère; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Randomisation; Ophtalmologie |
ED : | Long term; Acrylic polymer; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Randomization; Ophthalmology |
SD : | Largo plazo; Acrilico derivado polímero; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Aleatorización; Oftalmología |
LO : | INIST-18914.354000161579690100 |
ID : | 07-0410735 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:07-0410735Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Leydolt, Christina" sort="Leydolt, Christina" uniqKey="Leydolt C" first="Christina" last="Leydolt">Christina Leydolt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Davidovic, Sofija" sort="Davidovic, Sofija" uniqKey="Davidovic S" first="Sofija" last="Davidovic">Sofija Davidovic</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Novi Sad Clinical Centre Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Novi Sad</s2>
<s3>SCG</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Neumayer, Thomas" sort="Neumayer, Thomas" uniqKey="Neumayer T" first="Thomas" last="Neumayer">Thomas Neumayer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Prinz, Ana" sort="Prinz, Ana" uniqKey="Prinz A" first="Ana" last="Prinz">Ana Prinz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">07-0410735</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 07-0410735 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:07-0410735</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000B18</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial</title>
<author><name sortKey="Leydolt, Christina" sort="Leydolt, Christina" uniqKey="Leydolt C" first="Christina" last="Leydolt">Christina Leydolt</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Davidovic, Sofija" sort="Davidovic, Sofija" uniqKey="Davidovic S" first="Sofija" last="Davidovic">Sofija Davidovic</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>Novi Sad Clinical Centre Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Novi Sad</s2>
<s3>SCG</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Sacu, Stefan" sort="Sacu, Stefan" uniqKey="Sacu S" first="Stefan" last="Sacu">Stefan Sacu</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Menapace, Rupert" sort="Menapace, Rupert" uniqKey="Menapace R" first="Rupert" last="Menapace">Rupert Menapace</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Neumayer, Thomas" sort="Neumayer, Thomas" uniqKey="Neumayer T" first="Thomas" last="Neumayer">Thomas Neumayer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Prinz, Ana" sort="Prinz, Ana" uniqKey="Prinz A" first="Ana" last="Prinz">Ana Prinz</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Buehl, Wolf" sort="Buehl, Wolf" uniqKey="Buehl W" first="Wolf" last="Buehl">Wolf Buehl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Findl, Oliver" sort="Findl, Oliver" uniqKey="Findl O" first="Oliver" last="Findl">Oliver Findl</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
<imprint><date when="2007">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Acrylic polymer</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Long term</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Posterior</term>
<term>Randomization</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Long terme</term>
<term>Acrylique dérivé polymère</term>
<term>Postérieur</term>
<term>Capsule</term>
<term>Opacification</term>
<term>Randomisation</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period. Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1 -piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between the 1 -piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7±1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3±1.4; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0161-6420</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>OPHTDG</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester MN)</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>114</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>9</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LEYDOLT (Christina)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>DAVIDOVIC (Sofija)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>SACU (Stefan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>MENAPACE (Rupert)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>NEUMAYER (Thomas)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>PRINZ (Ana)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1"><s1>BUEHL (Wolf)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1"><s1>FINDL (Oliver)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna</s1>
<s2>Vienna</s2>
<s3>AUT</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>Novi Sad Clinical Centre Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Novi Sad</s2>
<s3>SCG</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1663-1669</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2007</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>18914</s2>
<s5>354000161579690100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2007 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>31 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>07-0410735</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN)</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period. Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1 -piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between the 1 -piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7±1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3±1.4; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B09N</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Long terme</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Long term</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Largo plazo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Acrylique dérivé polymère</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acrylic polymer</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Acrilico derivado polímero</s0>
<s2>NK</s2>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Postérieur</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Posterior</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Capsule</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cápsula</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Opacification</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Opacificación</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Randomisation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Randomization</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aleatorización</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>267</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 07-0410735 INIST</NO>
<ET>Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial</ET>
<AU>LEYDOLT (Christina); DAVIDOVIC (Sofija); SACU (Stefan); MENAPACE (Rupert); NEUMAYER (Thomas); PRINZ (Ana); BUEHL (Wolf); FINDL (Oliver)</AU>
<AF>Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Vienna/Vienna/Autriche (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut., 7 aut., 8 aut.); Novi Sad Clinical Centre Eye Clinic/Novi Sad/Serbie-et-Monténégro (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Ophthalmology : (Rochester, MN); ISSN 0161-6420; Coden OPHTDG; Etats-Unis; Da. 2007; Vol. 114; No. 9; Pp. 1663-1669; Bibl. 31 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Purpose: To compare the intensity of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) between the 1-piece and 3-piece haptic designs of the foldable hydrophobic acrylic AcrySof intraocular lens (IOL) over a 5-year period. Design: Randomized, prospective, patient- and examiner-masked clinical trial with intraindividual comparison. Participants: Fifty-two patients with bilateral age-related cataract (104 eyes). Methods: Each study patient had cataract surgery in both eyes and received a 1 -piece AcrySof IOL in 1 eye and a 3-piece AcrySof IOL in the other eye. Follow-up examinations were performed at 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 1, 2, and 5 years. Digital retroillumination images were obtained of each eye. The amount of posterior capsule opacification (score range, 0-10) was assessed subjectively at the slit lamp and objectively using automated image analysis software 1, 2, and 5 years after surgery. Main Outcome Measure: Posterior capsule opacification score (scale, 0-10). Results: There was no significant difference between the 1 -piece and 3-piece AcrySof IOL in best-corrected visual acuity, overlap of rhexis and IOL, capsular folds, anterior capsule opacification, and posterior capsule opacification (1-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.7±1.7; 3-piece AcrySof PCO score, 1.3±1.4; P = 0.30). Conclusions: Modification of the IOL haptic design of the sharp optic edged AcrySof IOL from a 3-piece to a 1-piece haptic design caused no significant change in PCO intensity and neodymium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser treatment rate 5 years after surgery.</EA>
<CC>002B09N</CC>
<FD>Long terme; Acrylique dérivé polymère; Postérieur; Capsule; Opacification; Randomisation; Ophtalmologie</FD>
<ED>Long term; Acrylic polymer; Posterior; Capsule; Opacification; Randomization; Ophthalmology</ED>
<SD>Largo plazo; Acrilico derivado polímero; Posterior; Cápsula; Opacificación; Aleatorización; Oftalmología</SD>
<LO>INIST-18914.354000161579690100</LO>
<ID>07-0410735</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000B18 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000B18 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:07-0410735 |texte= Long-term effect of 1-piece and 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification : A Randomized Trial }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |