Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size
Identifieur interne : 000711 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000710; suivant : 000712Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size
Auteurs : George H. Van Doorn ; Barry L. Richardson ; Dianne B. Wuillemin ; Marka. SymmonsSource :
- Attention, perception & psychophysics [ 1943-3921 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 10-0213278 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size |
AU : | VAN DOORN (George H.); RICHARDSON (Barry L.); WUILLEMIN (Dianne B.); SYMMONS (MarkA.) |
AF : | Monash University/Churchill, Victoria/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Attention, perception & psychophysics; ISSN 1943-3921; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 72; No. 3; Pp. 813-822; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other. |
CC : | 770B05C; 770B05E; 770B05H |
FD : | Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Etude expérimentale; Dimension stimulus; Perception espace; Perception intermodale; Kinesthésie; Homme |
FG : | Perception; Cognition |
ED : | Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Experimental study; Stimulus size; Space perception; Intermodal perception; Kinesthesia; Human |
EG : | Perception; Cognition |
SD : | Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Estudio experimental; Dimensión estímulo; Percepción espacio; Percepción intermodal; Kinestesia; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-14257.354000181726930260 |
ID : | 10-0213278 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:10-0213278Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Doorn, George H" sort="Van Doorn, George H" uniqKey="Van Doorn G" first="George H." last="Van Doorn">George H. Van Doorn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Richardson, Barry L" sort="Richardson, Barry L" uniqKey="Richardson B" first="Barry L." last="Richardson">Barry L. Richardson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wuillemin, Dianne B" sort="Wuillemin, Dianne B" uniqKey="Wuillemin D" first="Dianne B." last="Wuillemin">Dianne B. Wuillemin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Symmons, Marka" sort="Symmons, Marka" uniqKey="Symmons M" first="Marka." last="Symmons">Marka. Symmons</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0213278</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 10-0213278 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:10-0213278</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000711</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size</title>
<author><name sortKey="Van Doorn, George H" sort="Van Doorn, George H" uniqKey="Van Doorn G" first="George H." last="Van Doorn">George H. Van Doorn</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Richardson, Barry L" sort="Richardson, Barry L" uniqKey="Richardson B" first="Barry L." last="Richardson">Barry L. Richardson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wuillemin, Dianne B" sort="Wuillemin, Dianne B" uniqKey="Wuillemin D" first="Dianne B." last="Wuillemin">Dianne B. Wuillemin</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Symmons, Marka" sort="Symmons, Marka" uniqKey="Symmons M" first="Marka." last="Symmons">Marka. Symmons</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Atten. percept. psychophys. </title>
<idno type="ISSN">1943-3921</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Atten. percept. psychophys. </title>
<idno type="ISSN">1943-3921</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intermodal perception</term>
<term>Kinesthesia</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Stimulus size</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Vision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Dimension stimulus</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Perception intermodale</term>
<term>Kinesthésie</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1943-3921</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Atten. percept. psychophys. </s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>72</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VAN DOORN (George H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RICHARDSON (Barry L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>WUILLEMIN (Dianne B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>SYMMONS (MarkA.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Monash University</s1>
<s2>Churchill, Victoria</s2>
<s3>AUS</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>813-822</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14257</s2>
<s5>354000181726930260</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0213278</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Attention, perception & psychophysics</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B05C</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>770B05E</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>770B05H</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Dimension stimulus</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus size</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Dimensión estímulo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception intermodale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intermodal perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción intermodal</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Kinesthésie</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Kinesthesia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Kinestesia</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>144</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 10-0213278 INIST</NO>
<ET>Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size</ET>
<AU>VAN DOORN (George H.); RICHARDSON (Barry L.); WUILLEMIN (Dianne B.); SYMMONS (MarkA.)</AU>
<AF>Monash University/Churchill, Victoria/Australie (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Attention, perception & psychophysics; ISSN 1943-3921; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 72; No. 3; Pp. 813-822; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In six experiments, subjects judged the sizes of squares that were presented visually and/or haptically, in unimodal or bimodal conditions. We were interested in which mode most affected size judgments in the bimodal condition when the squares presented to each mode actually differed in size. Three factors varied: whether haptic exploration was passive or active, whether the choice set from which the subjects selected their responses was visual or haptic, and whether cutaneous information was provided in addition to kinesthetic information. To match the task for each mode, visual presentations consisted of a cursor that moved along a square pathway to correspond to the haptic experience of successive segments revealed during exploration. We found that the visual influence on size judgments was greater than the influence of haptics when the haptic experience involved only kinesthesis, passive movement, and a visual choice set. However, when cutaneous input was added to kinesthetic information, size judgments were most influenced by the haptic mode. The results support hypotheses of sensory integration, rather than capture of one sense by the other.</EA>
<CC>770B05C; 770B05E; 770B05H</CC>
<FD>Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Etude expérimentale; Dimension stimulus; Perception espace; Perception intermodale; Kinesthésie; Homme</FD>
<FG>Perception; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Experimental study; Stimulus size; Space perception; Intermodal perception; Kinesthesia; Human</ED>
<EG>Perception; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Estudio experimental; Dimensión estímulo; Percepción espacio; Percepción intermodal; Kinestesia; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-14257.354000181726930260</LO>
<ID>10-0213278</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000711 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000711 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:10-0213278 |texte= Visual and haptic influence on perception of stimulus size }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |