Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments

Identifieur interne : 000709 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000708; suivant : 000710

Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments

Auteurs : Patrick A. Cabe

Source :

RBID : Francis:10-0247193

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Many studies invoke moment of inertia (Iii) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that Iii is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for Iii not involving m or M imply length, so Iii could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal Iii (the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, Iii is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when Iii is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0096-1523
A02 01      @0 JPHPDH
A03   1    @0 J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.
A05       @2 36
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments
A11 01  1    @1 CABE (Patrick A.)
A14 01      @1 University of North Carolina @2 Pembroke @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.
A20       @1 373-394
A21       @1 2010
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 3032D @5 354000181121030090
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 2 p.
A47 01  1    @0 10-0247193
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
A66 01      @0 USA
C01 01    ENG  @0 Many studies invoke moment of inertia (Iii) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that Iii is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for Iii not involving m or M imply length, so Iii could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal Iii (the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, Iii is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when Iii is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.
C02 01  X    @0 770B05E @1 II
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Longueur @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Length @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Longitud @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Jugement @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Judgment @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Juicio @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Perception espace @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Space perception @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Percepción espacio @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Etude expérimentale @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Experimental study @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Estudio experimental @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Inertie @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Inertia @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Inercia @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Perception @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Perception @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Percepción @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 38
N21       @1 165

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : FRANCIS 10-0247193 INIST
ET : Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments
AU : CABE (Patrick A.)
AF : University of North Carolina/Pembroke/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance; ISSN 0096-1523; Coden JPHPDH; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 36; No. 2; Pp. 373-394; Bibl. 2 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : Many studies invoke moment of inertia (Iii) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that Iii is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for Iii not involving m or M imply length, so Iii could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal Iii (the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, Iii is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when Iii is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.
CC : 770B05E
FD : Sensibilité tactile; Longueur; Jugement; Perception espace; Etude expérimentale; Inertie; Homme
FG : Perception; Cognition
ED : Tactile sensitivity; Length; Judgment; Space perception; Experimental study; Inertia; Human
EG : Perception; Cognition
SD : Sensibilidad tactil; Longitud; Juicio; Percepción espacio; Estudio experimental; Inercia; Hombre
LO : INIST-3032D.354000181121030090
ID : 10-0247193

Links to Exploration step

Francis:10-0247193

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cabe, Patrick A" sort="Cabe, Patrick A" uniqKey="Cabe P" first="Patrick A." last="Cabe">Patrick A. Cabe</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of North Carolina</s1>
<s2>Pembroke</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0247193</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 10-0247193 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:10-0247193</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000709</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cabe, Patrick A" sort="Cabe, Patrick A" uniqKey="Cabe P" first="Patrick A." last="Cabe">Patrick A. Cabe</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of North Carolina</s1>
<s2>Pembroke</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0096-1523</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Inertia</term>
<term>Judgment</term>
<term>Length</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Longueur</term>
<term>Jugement</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Inertie</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Many studies invoke moment of inertia (I
<sub>ii</sub>
) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that I
<sub>ii</sub>
is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for I
<sub>ii</sub>
not involving m or M imply length, so I
<sub>ii</sub>
could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal I
<sub>ii</sub>
(the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, I
<sub>ii</sub>
is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when I
<sub>ii</sub>
is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0096-1523</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>JPHPDH</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>J. exp. psychol. Hum. percept. perform.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>36</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>CABE (Patrick A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>University of North Carolina</s1>
<s2>Pembroke</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>373-394</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>3032D</s2>
<s5>354000181121030090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>10-0247193</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Many studies invoke moment of inertia (I
<sub>ii</sub>
) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that I
<sub>ii</sub>
is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for I
<sub>ii</sub>
not involving m or M imply length, so I
<sub>ii</sub>
could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal I
<sub>ii</sub>
(the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, I
<sub>ii</sub>
is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when I
<sub>ii</sub>
is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>770B05E</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Longueur</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Length</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Longitud</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Jugement</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Judgment</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Juicio</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Inertie</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Inertia</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Inercia</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>165</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>FRANCIS 10-0247193 INIST</NO>
<ET>Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments</ET>
<AU>CABE (Patrick A.)</AU>
<AF>University of North Carolina/Pembroke/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance; ISSN 0096-1523; Coden JPHPDH; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 36; No. 2; Pp. 373-394; Bibl. 2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Many studies invoke moment of inertia (I
<sub>ii</sub>
) as necessary and sufficient information to perceive cylinder length via wielding, yet some assert that I
<sub>ii</sub>
is neither necessary (weight, m, or static moment, M, are sufficient) nor sufficient for length judgments (m or M is necessary). Mathematical expressions for I
<sub>ii</sub>
not involving m or M imply length, so I
<sub>ii</sub>
could be sufficient for cylinder length judgments. In 5 experiments (N = 113), only longitudinal I
<sub>ii</sub>
(the smallest principal value) informed cylinder length estimates in a novel task, rolling. Experiment 1 yielded reliable length judgments. Varying diameter supported length scaling (Experiment 2); similar length estimates occurred with both rolling and wielding (Experiment 3); feedback improved rolling length judgments to levels commensurate with wielding (Experiment 4); and length judgments shifted predictably with added mass (Experiment 5). Contrary to proposals in the literature, I
<sub>ii</sub>
is sufficient information for cylinder length judgments, absent m or M information, even when I
<sub>ii</sub>
is of minimal magnitude and the task quite novel.</EA>
<CC>770B05E</CC>
<FD>Sensibilité tactile; Longueur; Jugement; Perception espace; Etude expérimentale; Inertie; Homme</FD>
<FG>Perception; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Tactile sensitivity; Length; Judgment; Space perception; Experimental study; Inertia; Human</ED>
<EG>Perception; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Sensibilidad tactil; Longitud; Juicio; Percepción espacio; Estudio experimental; Inercia; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-3032D.354000181121030090</LO>
<ID>10-0247193</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000709 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000709 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:10-0247193
   |texte=   Sufficiency of Longitudinal Moment of Inertia for Haptic Cylinder Length Judgments
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024