HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000702

Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits

Identifieur interne : 000702 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000701; suivant : 000703

Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits

Auteurs : Marius V. Peelen ; Jack Rogers ; Alan M. Wing ; Paul E. Downing ; R. Martyn Bracewell

Source :

Experimental brain research [ 0014-4819 ] ; 2010.

RBID : Francis:10-0349782

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Imagerie RMN, Bâtonnet, Main, Encéphale, Perception haptique.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Encephalon, Hand, Haptic perception, Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging, Rod.

Abstract

How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0014-4819`
A02	`01`			`@0 EXBRAP`
A03		`1`		`@0 Exp. brain res.`
A05				`@2 204`
A06				`@2 3`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits`
A09	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Body Representation`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 PEELEN (Marius V.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 ROGERS (Jack)`
A11	`03`	`1`		`@1 WING (Alan M.)`
A11	`04`	`1`		`@1 DOWNING (Paul E.)`
A11	`05`	`1`		`@1 BRACEWELL (R. Martyn)`
A12	`01`	`1`		`@1 POLIAKOFF (Ellen) @9 ed.`
A14	`01`			`@1 Department of Psychology, Harvard University @2 Cambridge, MA @3 USA @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`02`			`@1 School of Psychology, Bangor University @2 Gwynedd LL57 2AS @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.`
A14	`03`			`@1 MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit @2 Cambridge @3 GBR @Z 2 aut.`
A14	`04`			`@1 Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham @2 Birmingham @3 GBR @Z 3 aut. @Z 5 aut.`
A14	`05`			`@1 School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University @2 Wales @3 GBR @Z 4 aut.`
A15	`01`			`@1 School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Oxford Road @2 Manchester M13 9PL @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 457-464`
A21				`@1 2010`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 12535 @5 354000191696980160`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 10-0349782`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Experimental brain research`
A66	`01`			`@0 DEU`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770D03C @1 IV`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Imagerie RMN @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Imaginería RMN @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Bâtonnet @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Rod @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Bastoncillo @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Main @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hand @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mano @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Encéphale @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Encephalon @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Encéfalo @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception haptique @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Haptic perception @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Système nerveux central @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Central nervous system @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sistema nervioso central @5 20`
N21				`@1 221`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 10-0349782 INIST
ET :	Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits
AU :	PEELEN (Marius V.); ROGERS (Jack); WING (Alan M.); DOWNING (Paul E.); BRACEWELL (R. Martyn); POLIAKOFF (Ellen)
AF :	Department of Psychology, Harvard University/Cambridge, MA/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); School of Psychology, Bangor University/Gwynedd LL57 2AS/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.); MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit/Cambridge/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham/Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (3 aut., 5 aut.); School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University/Wales/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.); School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Oxford Road/Manchester M13 9PL/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2010; Vol. 204; No. 3; Pp. 457-464; Bibl. 1/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.
CC :	770D03C
FD :	Imagerie RMN; Bâtonnet; Main; Encéphale; Perception haptique
FG :	Système nerveux central
ED :	Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; Rod; Hand; Encephalon; Haptic perception
EG :	Central nervous system
SD :	Imaginería RMN; Bastoncillo; Mano; Encéfalo
LO :	INIST-12535.354000191696980160
ID :	10-0349782

Links to Exploration step

Francis:10-0349782

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits</title>
<author><name sortKey="Peelen, Marius V" sort="Peelen, Marius V" uniqKey="Peelen M" first="Marius V." last="Peelen">Marius V. Peelen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Harvard University</s1>
<s2>Cambridge, MA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Gwynedd LL57 2AS</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rogers, Jack" sort="Rogers, Jack" uniqKey="Rogers J" first="Jack" last="Rogers">Jack Rogers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit</s1>
<s2>Cambridge</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wing, Alan M" sort="Wing, Alan M" uniqKey="Wing A" first="Alan M." last="Wing">Alan M. Wing</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Downing, Paul E" sort="Downing, Paul E" uniqKey="Downing P" first="Paul E." last="Downing">Paul E. Downing</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Wales</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bracewell, R Martyn" sort="Bracewell, R Martyn" uniqKey="Bracewell R" first="R. Martyn" last="Bracewell">R. Martyn Bracewell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0349782</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 10-0349782 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:10-0349782</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000702</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits</title>
<author><name sortKey="Peelen, Marius V" sort="Peelen, Marius V" uniqKey="Peelen M" first="Marius V." last="Peelen">Marius V. Peelen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Harvard University</s1>
<s2>Cambridge, MA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Gwynedd LL57 2AS</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Rogers, Jack" sort="Rogers, Jack" uniqKey="Rogers J" first="Jack" last="Rogers">Jack Rogers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="03"><s1>MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit</s1>
<s2>Cambridge</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Wing, Alan M" sort="Wing, Alan M" uniqKey="Wing A" first="Alan M." last="Wing">Alan M. Wing</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Downing, Paul E" sort="Downing, Paul E" uniqKey="Downing P" first="Paul E." last="Downing">Paul E. Downing</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Wales</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Bracewell, R Martyn" sort="Bracewell, R Martyn" uniqKey="Bracewell R" first="R. Martyn" last="Bracewell">R. Martyn Bracewell</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="04"><s1>Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Encephalon</term>
<term>Hand</term>
<term>Haptic perception</term>
<term>Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging</term>
<term>Rod</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Imagerie RMN</term>
<term>Bâtonnet</term>
<term>Main</term>
<term>Encéphale</term>
<term>Perception haptique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>204</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Body Representation</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>PEELEN (Marius V.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>ROGERS (Jack)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>WING (Alan M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>DOWNING (Paul E.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>BRACEWELL (R. Martyn)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>POLIAKOFF (Ellen)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, Harvard University</s1>
<s2>Cambridge, MA</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02"><s1>School of Psychology, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Gwynedd LL57 2AS</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03"><s1>MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit</s1>
<s2>Cambridge</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04"><s1>Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham</s1>
<s2>Birmingham</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05"><s1>School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University</s1>
<s2>Wales</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Oxford Road</s1>
<s2>Manchester M13 9PL</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>457-464</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000191696980160</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0349782</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770D03C</s0>
<s1>IV</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Imagerie RMN</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Imaginería RMN</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Bâtonnet</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Rod</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Bastoncillo</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Main</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hand</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mano</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Encéphale</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Encephalon</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Encéfalo</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception haptique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Haptic perception</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Système nerveux central</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Central nervous system</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sistema nervioso central</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>221</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 10-0349782 INIST</NO>
<ET>Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits</ET>
<AU>PEELEN (Marius V.); ROGERS (Jack); WING (Alan M.); DOWNING (Paul E.); BRACEWELL (R. Martyn); POLIAKOFF (Ellen)</AU>
<AF>Department of Psychology, Harvard University/Cambridge, MA/Etats-Unis (1 aut.); School of Psychology, Bangor University/Gwynedd LL57 2AS/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.); MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit/Cambridge/Royaume-Uni (2 aut.); Behavioural Brain Sciences Centre, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham/Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (3 aut., 5 aut.); School of Medical Sciences, Bangor University/Wales/Royaume-Uni (4 aut.); School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Zochonis Building, Brunswick Street, Oxford Road/Manchester M13 9PL/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2010; Vol. 204; No. 3; Pp. 457-464; Bibl. 1/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>How do we achieve unitary perception of an object when it touches two parts of the sensory epithelium that are not contiguous? We investigated this problem with a simple psychophysical task, which we then used in an fMRI experiment. Two wooden rods were moved over two digits positioned to be spatially adjacent. The digits were either from one foot (or hand) or one digit was from either foot (or hand). When the rods were moving in phase, one object was reliably perceived. By contrast, when the rods were moving out of phase, two objects were reliably perceived. fMRI revealed four cortical areas where activity was higher when the moving rods were perceived as one object relative to when they were perceived as two separate objects. Areas in the right inferior parietal lobule, the left inferior temporal sulcus and the left middle frontal gyrus were activated for this contrast regardless of the anatomical configuration of the stimulated sensory epithelia. By contrast, the left intraparietal sulcus was activated specifically when integration across the midline was required, irrespective of whether the stimulation was applied to the hands or feet. These results reveal a network of brain areas involved in generating a unified percept of the presence of an object that comes into contact with different parts of the body surface.</EA>
<CC>770D03C</CC>
<FD>Imagerie RMN; Bâtonnet; Main; Encéphale; Perception haptique</FD>
<FG>Système nerveux central</FG>
<ED>Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; Rod; Hand; Encephalon; Haptic perception</ED>
<EG>Central nervous system</EG>
<SD>Imaginería RMN; Bastoncillo; Mano; Encéfalo</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000191696980160</LO>
<ID>10-0349782</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000702 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000702 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:10-0349782
   |texte=   Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits

Unitary haptic perception: integrating moving tactile inputs from anatomically adjacent and non-adjacent digits

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri