Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses
Identifieur interne : 000618 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000617; suivant : 000619Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses
Auteurs : Abhay R. Vasavada ; Shetal M. Raj ; Shrihari Karve ; Viraj Vasavada ; Vaishali Vasavada ; Panagiotis TheoulakisSource :
- Journal of cataract and refractive surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2010.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic location of the haptic and optic of single-piece sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their proximity to the iris and ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised eyes that had primary sulcus implantation of a single-piece IOL. Eyes had an intact anterior capsulorhexis that could provide uniform IOL support and a preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) greater than 2.7 mm. The fixation site of the haptics, distance between the optic edge and iris, optic tilt, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central ACD, and ciliary body edema were evaluated by UBM. RESULTS: The time from surgery to UBM examination was 7 to 85 months. Both haptics were in the sulcus in 7 of the 10 eyes, 1 haptic was abutting the iris and the other was in the sulcus in 2 eyes, and both haptics were embedded in ciliary body in 1 eye. The mean distance between the optic edge and iris was 0.16 mm ± 0.07 (SD), 0.15 ± 0.03 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. The mean ACA was 40.2 ± 4.5 degrees (range 30.9 to 45.2 degrees), 34.1 ± 4.5 degrees, and 44.1 degrees, respectively. The mean ACD was 3.47 ± 0.24 mm, 3.50 ± 0.23 mm, and 3.57 mm, respectively. No eye had optic tilt or ciliary body edema. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of both haptics in the sulcus was not achieved in all eyes. The haptics and optics remained in close proximity to the posterior iris surface. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 10-0287039 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses |
AU : | VASAVADA (Abhay R.); RAJ (Shetal M.); KARVE (Shrihari); VASAVADA (Viraj); VASAVADA (Vaishali); THEOULAKIS (Panagiotis) |
AF : | Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic/Memnagar, Ahmedabad/Inde (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 36; No. 5; Pp. 771-777; Bibl. 27 ref. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic location of the haptic and optic of single-piece sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their proximity to the iris and ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised eyes that had primary sulcus implantation of a single-piece IOL. Eyes had an intact anterior capsulorhexis that could provide uniform IOL support and a preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) greater than 2.7 mm. The fixation site of the haptics, distance between the optic edge and iris, optic tilt, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central ACD, and ciliary body edema were evaluated by UBM. RESULTS: The time from surgery to UBM examination was 7 to 85 months. Both haptics were in the sulcus in 7 of the 10 eyes, 1 haptic was abutting the iris and the other was in the sulcus in 2 eyes, and both haptics were embedded in ciliary body in 1 eye. The mean distance between the optic edge and iris was 0.16 mm ± 0.07 (SD), 0.15 ± 0.03 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. The mean ACA was 40.2 ± 4.5 degrees (range 30.9 to 45.2 degrees), 34.1 ± 4.5 degrees, and 44.1 degrees, respectively. The mean ACD was 3.47 ± 0.24 mm, 3.50 ± 0.23 mm, and 3.57 mm, respectively. No eye had optic tilt or ciliary body edema. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of both haptics in the sulcus was not achieved in all eyes. The haptics and optics remained in close proximity to the posterior iris surface. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned. |
CC : | 002B09; 002B25B |
FD : | Rétrospective; Ultrason; Biomicroscopie; Analyse; Lentille intraoculaire; Ophtalmologie; Chirurgie; Traitement |
ED : | Retrospective; Ultrasound; Biomicroscopy; Analysis; Intraocular lens; Ophthalmology; Surgery; Treatment |
SD : | Retrospectiva; Ultrasonido; Biomicroscopía; Análisis; Lente intraocular; Oftalmología; Cirugía; Tratamiento |
LO : | INIST-20937.354000182188840100 |
ID : | 10-0287039 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:10-0287039Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Abhay R" sort="Vasavada, Abhay R" uniqKey="Vasavada A" first="Abhay R." last="Vasavada">Abhay R. Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raj, Shetal M" sort="Raj, Shetal M" uniqKey="Raj S" first="Shetal M." last="Raj">Shetal M. Raj</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Karve, Shrihari" sort="Karve, Shrihari" uniqKey="Karve S" first="Shrihari" last="Karve">Shrihari Karve</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Viraj" sort="Vasavada, Viraj" uniqKey="Vasavada V" first="Viraj" last="Vasavada">Viraj Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Vaishali" sort="Vasavada, Vaishali" uniqKey="Vasavada V" first="Vaishali" last="Vasavada">Vaishali Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Theoulakis, Panagiotis" sort="Theoulakis, Panagiotis" uniqKey="Theoulakis P" first="Panagiotis" last="Theoulakis">Panagiotis Theoulakis</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">10-0287039</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 10-0287039 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:10-0287039</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000618</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses</title>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Abhay R" sort="Vasavada, Abhay R" uniqKey="Vasavada A" first="Abhay R." last="Vasavada">Abhay R. Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Raj, Shetal M" sort="Raj, Shetal M" uniqKey="Raj S" first="Shetal M." last="Raj">Shetal M. Raj</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Karve, Shrihari" sort="Karve, Shrihari" uniqKey="Karve S" first="Shrihari" last="Karve">Shrihari Karve</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Viraj" sort="Vasavada, Viraj" uniqKey="Vasavada V" first="Viraj" last="Vasavada">Viraj Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Vasavada, Vaishali" sort="Vasavada, Vaishali" uniqKey="Vasavada V" first="Vaishali" last="Vasavada">Vaishali Vasavada</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Theoulakis, Panagiotis" sort="Theoulakis, Panagiotis" uniqKey="Theoulakis P" first="Panagiotis" last="Theoulakis">Panagiotis Theoulakis</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
<imprint><date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. cataract refractive surg.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Analysis</term>
<term>Biomicroscopy</term>
<term>Intraocular lens</term>
<term>Ophthalmology</term>
<term>Retrospective</term>
<term>Surgery</term>
<term>Treatment</term>
<term>Ultrasound</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Rétrospective</term>
<term>Ultrason</term>
<term>Biomicroscopie</term>
<term>Analyse</term>
<term>Lentille intraoculaire</term>
<term>Ophtalmologie</term>
<term>Chirurgie</term>
<term>Traitement</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic location of the haptic and optic of single-piece sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their proximity to the iris and ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised eyes that had primary sulcus implantation of a single-piece IOL. Eyes had an intact anterior capsulorhexis that could provide uniform IOL support and a preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) greater than 2.7 mm. The fixation site of the haptics, distance between the optic edge and iris, optic tilt, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central ACD, and ciliary body edema were evaluated by UBM. RESULTS: The time from surgery to UBM examination was 7 to 85 months. Both haptics were in the sulcus in 7 of the 10 eyes, 1 haptic was abutting the iris and the other was in the sulcus in 2 eyes, and both haptics were embedded in ciliary body in 1 eye. The mean distance between the optic edge and iris was 0.16 mm ± 0.07 (SD), 0.15 ± 0.03 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. The mean ACA was 40.2 ± 4.5 degrees (range 30.9 to 45.2 degrees), 34.1 ± 4.5 degrees, and 44.1 degrees, respectively. The mean ACD was 3.47 ± 0.24 mm, 3.50 ± 0.23 mm, and 3.57 mm, respectively. No eye had optic tilt or ciliary body edema. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of both haptics in the sulcus was not achieved in all eyes. The haptics and optics remained in close proximity to the posterior iris surface. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0886-3350</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>JCSUEV</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. cataract refractive surg.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>36</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>5</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>VASAVADA (Abhay R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>RAJ (Shetal M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>KARVE (Shrihari)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1"><s1>VASAVADA (Viraj)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1"><s1>VASAVADA (Vaishali)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1"><s1>THEOULAKIS (Panagiotis)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic</s1>
<s2>Memnagar, Ahmedabad</s2>
<s3>IND</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>771-777</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>20937</s2>
<s5>354000182188840100</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2010 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>27 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>10-0287039</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic location of the haptic and optic of single-piece sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their proximity to the iris and ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised eyes that had primary sulcus implantation of a single-piece IOL. Eyes had an intact anterior capsulorhexis that could provide uniform IOL support and a preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) greater than 2.7 mm. The fixation site of the haptics, distance between the optic edge and iris, optic tilt, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central ACD, and ciliary body edema were evaluated by UBM. RESULTS: The time from surgery to UBM examination was 7 to 85 months. Both haptics were in the sulcus in 7 of the 10 eyes, 1 haptic was abutting the iris and the other was in the sulcus in 2 eyes, and both haptics were embedded in ciliary body in 1 eye. The mean distance between the optic edge and iris was 0.16 mm ± 0.07 (SD), 0.15 ± 0.03 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. The mean ACA was 40.2 ± 4.5 degrees (range 30.9 to 45.2 degrees), 34.1 ± 4.5 degrees, and 44.1 degrees, respectively. The mean ACD was 3.47 ± 0.24 mm, 3.50 ± 0.23 mm, and 3.57 mm, respectively. No eye had optic tilt or ciliary body edema. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of both haptics in the sulcus was not achieved in all eyes. The haptics and optics remained in close proximity to the posterior iris surface. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002B09</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002B25B</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Rétrospective</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Retrospective</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Retrospectiva</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ultrason</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ultrasound</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ultrasonido</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Biomicroscopie</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Biomicroscopy</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Biomicroscopía</s0>
<s5>11</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Analyse</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Analysis</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Análisis</s0>
<s5>12</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Lentille intraoculaire</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intraocular lens</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lente intraocular</s0>
<s5>13</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Ophtalmologie</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Ophthalmology</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Oftalmología</s0>
<s5>14</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Chirurgie</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Surgery</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cirugía</s0>
<s5>15</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement</s0>
<s5>78</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Treatment</s0>
<s5>78</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tratamiento</s0>
<s5>78</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>186</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 10-0287039 INIST</NO>
<ET>Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses</ET>
<AU>VASAVADA (Abhay R.); RAJ (Shetal M.); KARVE (Shrihari); VASAVADA (Viraj); VASAVADA (Vaishali); THEOULAKIS (Panagiotis)</AU>
<AF>Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Centre, Raghudeep Eye Clinic/Memnagar, Ahmedabad/Inde (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut., 6 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Journal of cataract and refractive surgery; ISSN 0886-3350; Coden JCSUEV; Etats-Unis; Da. 2010; Vol. 36; No. 5; Pp. 771-777; Bibl. 27 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>PURPOSE: To evaluate the anatomic location of the haptic and optic of single-piece sulcus-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) and their proximity to the iris and ciliary body using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). SETTING: Iladevi Cataract & IOL Research Center, Ahmedabad, India. METHODS: This retrospective study comprised eyes that had primary sulcus implantation of a single-piece IOL. Eyes had an intact anterior capsulorhexis that could provide uniform IOL support and a preoperative anterior chamber depth (ACD) greater than 2.7 mm. The fixation site of the haptics, distance between the optic edge and iris, optic tilt, anterior chamber angle (ACA), central ACD, and ciliary body edema were evaluated by UBM. RESULTS: The time from surgery to UBM examination was 7 to 85 months. Both haptics were in the sulcus in 7 of the 10 eyes, 1 haptic was abutting the iris and the other was in the sulcus in 2 eyes, and both haptics were embedded in ciliary body in 1 eye. The mean distance between the optic edge and iris was 0.16 mm ± 0.07 (SD), 0.15 ± 0.03 mm, and 0.38 mm, respectively. The mean ACA was 40.2 ± 4.5 degrees (range 30.9 to 45.2 degrees), 34.1 ± 4.5 degrees, and 44.1 degrees, respectively. The mean ACD was 3.47 ± 0.24 mm, 3.50 ± 0.23 mm, and 3.57 mm, respectively. No eye had optic tilt or ciliary body edema. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of both haptics in the sulcus was not achieved in all eyes. The haptics and optics remained in close proximity to the posterior iris surface. Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</EA>
<CC>002B09; 002B25B</CC>
<FD>Rétrospective; Ultrason; Biomicroscopie; Analyse; Lentille intraoculaire; Ophtalmologie; Chirurgie; Traitement</FD>
<ED>Retrospective; Ultrasound; Biomicroscopy; Analysis; Intraocular lens; Ophthalmology; Surgery; Treatment</ED>
<SD>Retrospectiva; Ultrasonido; Biomicroscopía; Análisis; Lente intraocular; Oftalmología; Cirugía; Tratamiento</SD>
<LO>INIST-20937.354000182188840100</LO>
<ID>10-0287039</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000618 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000618 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:10-0287039 |texte= Retrospective ultrasound biomicroscopic analysis of single-piece sulcus-fixated acrylic intraocular lenses }}
![]() | This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. | ![]() |