Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
Identifieur interne : 000518 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000517; suivant : 000519Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
Auteurs : Astrid M. L. Kappers ; Wouter B. SchakelSource :
- Experimental brain research [ 0014-4819 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task |
AU : | KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); SCHAKEL (Wouter B.) |
AF : | Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8/3584 CH Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2011; Vol. 208; No. 3; Pp. 467-473; Bibl. 1/2 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition. |
CC : | 002A25I; 002A25E |
FD : | Tâche visuelle; Perception visuelle; Homme; Perception haptique |
ED : | Visual task; Visual perception; Human; Haptic perception |
SD : | Tarea visual; Percepción visual; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-12535.354000194360300140 |
ID : | 11-0107287 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0107287Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schakel, Wouter B" sort="Schakel, Wouter B" uniqKey="Schakel W" first="Wouter B." last="Schakel">Wouter B. Schakel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0107287</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0107287</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000518</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</title>
<author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Schakel, Wouter B" sort="Schakel, Wouter B" uniqKey="Schakel W" first="Wouter B." last="Schakel">Wouter B. Schakel</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint><date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Haptic perception</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Visual perception</term>
<term>Visual task</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Tâche visuelle</term>
<term>Perception visuelle</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Perception haptique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>208</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>467-473</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000194360300140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0107287</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A25I</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A25E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Tâche visuelle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual task</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Tarea visual</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception visuelle</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Visual perception</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción visual</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception haptique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Haptic perception</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21><s1>066</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST</NO>
<ET>Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</ET>
<AU>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)</AU>
<AF>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8/3584 CH Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2011; Vol. 208; No. 3; Pp. 467-473; Bibl. 1/2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</EA>
<CC>002A25I; 002A25E</CC>
<FD>Tâche visuelle; Perception visuelle; Homme; Perception haptique</FD>
<ED>Visual task; Visual perception; Human; Haptic perception</ED>
<SD>Tarea visual; Percepción visual; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000194360300140</LO>
<ID>11-0107287</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000518 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000518 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Pascal:11-0107287 |texte= Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |