Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task

Identifieur interne : 000518 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000517; suivant : 000519

Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task

Auteurs : Astrid M. L. Kappers ; Wouter B. Schakel

Source :

RBID : Pascal:11-0107287

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0014-4819
A02 01      @0 EXBRAP
A03   1    @0 Exp. brain res.
A05       @2 208
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
A11 01  1    @1 KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)
A11 02  1    @1 SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)
A14 01      @1 Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8 @2 3584 CH Utrecht @3 NLD @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.
A20       @1 467-473
A21       @1 2011
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 12535 @5 354000194360300140
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1/2 p.
A47 01  1    @0 11-0107287
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Experimental brain research
A66 01      @0 DEU
C01 01    ENG  @0 Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.
C02 01  X    @0 002A25I
C02 02  X    @0 002A25E
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Tâche visuelle @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Visual task @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Tarea visual @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Perception visuelle @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Visual perception @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Percepción visual @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 54
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 54
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 54
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Perception haptique @4 CD @5 96
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Haptic perception @4 CD @5 96
N21       @1 066
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST
ET : Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
AU : KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)
AF : Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8/3584 CH Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2011; Vol. 208; No. 3; Pp. 467-473; Bibl. 1/2 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.
CC : 002A25I; 002A25E
FD : Tâche visuelle; Perception visuelle; Homme; Perception haptique
ED : Visual task; Visual perception; Human; Haptic perception
SD : Tarea visual; Percepción visual; Hombre
LO : INIST-12535.354000194360300140
ID : 11-0107287

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0107287

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schakel, Wouter B" sort="Schakel, Wouter B" uniqKey="Schakel W" first="Wouter B." last="Schakel">Wouter B. Schakel</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0107287</idno>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0107287</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000518</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M. L." last="Kappers">Astrid M. L. Kappers</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schakel, Wouter B" sort="Schakel, Wouter B" uniqKey="Schakel W" first="Wouter B." last="Schakel">Wouter B. Schakel</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2011">2011</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Haptic perception</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Visual perception</term>
<term>Visual task</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Tâche visuelle</term>
<term>Perception visuelle</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Perception haptique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>208</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8</s1>
<s2>3584 CH Utrecht</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>467-473</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2011</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000194360300140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1/2 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>11-0107287</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A25I</s0>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>002A25E</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Tâche visuelle</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Visual task</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tarea visual</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception visuelle</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Visual perception</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción visual</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception haptique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Haptic perception</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>066</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 11-0107287 INIST</NO>
<ET>Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task</ET>
<AU>KAPPERS (Astrid M. L.); SCHAKEL (Wouter B.)</AU>
<AF>Helmholtz Institute, Physics of Man, Utrecht University, Padualaan 8/3584 CH Utrecht/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2011; Vol. 208; No. 3; Pp. 467-473; Bibl. 1/2 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Deviations in both haptic and visual spatial experiments are thought to be caused by a biasing influence of an egocentric reference frame. The strength of this influence is strongly participant-dependent. By using a parallelity test, it is studied whether this strength is modality-independent. In both haptic and visual conditions, large, systematic and participant-dependent deviations were found. However, although the correlation between the haptic and visual deviations was significant, the explained variance due to a common factor was only 20%. Therefore, the degree to which a participant is "egocentric" depends on modality and possibly even more generally, on experimental condition.</EA>
<CC>002A25I; 002A25E</CC>
<FD>Tâche visuelle; Perception visuelle; Homme; Perception haptique</FD>
<ED>Visual task; Visual perception; Human; Haptic perception</ED>
<SD>Tarea visual; Percepción visual; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000194360300140</LO>
<ID>11-0107287</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000518 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000518 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0107287
   |texte=   Comparison of the haptic and visual deviations in a parallelity task
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024