Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching
Identifieur interne : 000462 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000461; suivant : 000463Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching
Auteurs : Jens FörsterSource :
- Journal of experimental psychology. General [ 0096-3445 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMOsys; Forster & Dannenberg, 2010).
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
| pA |
|
|---|
Format Inist (serveur)
| NO : | PASCAL 11-0364400 INIST |
|---|---|
| ET : | Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching |
| AU : | FÖRSTER (Jens) |
| AF : | University of Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut.) |
| DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
| SO : | Journal of experimental psychology. General; ISSN 0096-3445; Coden JPGEDD; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 140; No. 3; Pp. 364-389; Bibl. 3 p.1/4 |
| LA : | Anglais |
| EA : | It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMOsys; Forster & Dannenberg, 2010). |
| CC : | 002A26E08; 002A26E03; 002A26E04 |
| FD : | Perception intermodale; Vision; Audition; Traitement information; Style cognitif; Effet amorçage; Etude expérimentale; Gustation; Olfaction; Sensibilité tactile; Traitement global local; Homme |
| FG : | Cognition; Perception |
| ED : | Intermodal perception; Vision; Hearing; Information processing; Cognitive style; Priming effect; Experimental study; Gustation; Olfaction; Tactile sensitivity; Global local processing; Human |
| EG : | Cognition; Perception |
| SD : | Percepción intermodal; Visión; Audición; Procesamiento información; Estilo cognitivo; Efecto priming; Estudio experimental; Gusto; Olfación; Sensibilidad tactil; Procesamiento global local; Hombre |
| LO : | INIST-3032B.354000191110210050 |
| ID : | 11-0364400 |
Links to Exploration step
Pascal:11-0364400Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching</title><author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Förster">Jens Förster</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno><idno type="inist">11-0364400</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0364400 INIST</idno><idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0364400</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000462</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching</title><author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Förster">Jens Förster</name><affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></inist:fA14></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol., Gen.</title><idno type="ISSN">0096-3445</idno><imprint><date when="2011">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Journal of experimental psychology. General</title><title level="j" type="abbreviated">J. exp. psychol., Gen.</title><idno type="ISSN">0096-3445</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Cognitive style</term><term>Experimental study</term><term>Global local processing</term><term>Gustation</term><term>Hearing</term><term>Human</term><term>Information processing</term><term>Intermodal perception</term><term>Olfaction</term><term>Priming effect</term><term>Tactile sensitivity</term><term>Vision</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Perception intermodale</term><term>Vision</term><term>Audition</term><term>Traitement information</term><term>Style cognitif</term><term>Effet amorçage</term><term>Etude expérimentale</term><term>Gustation</term><term>Olfaction</term><term>Sensibilité tactile</term><term>Traitement global local</term><term>Homme</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>; Forster & Dannenberg, 2010).</div></front></TEI><inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0096-3445</s0></fA01><fA02 i1="01"><s0>JPGEDD</s0></fA02><fA03 i2="1"><s0>J. exp. psychol., Gen.</s0></fA03><fA05><s2>140</s2></fA05><fA06><s2>3</s2></fA06><fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching</s1></fA08><fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>FÖRSTER (Jens)</s1></fA11><fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1><s3>NLD</s3><sZ>1 aut.</sZ></fA14><fA20><s1>364-389</s1></fA20><fA21><s1>2011</s1></fA21><fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0></fA23><fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1><s2>3032B</s2><s5>354000191110210050</s5></fA43><fA44><s0>0000</s0><s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1></fA44><fA45><s0>3 p.1/4</s0></fA45><fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>11-0364400</s0></fA47><fA60><s1>P</s1></fA60><fA61><s0>A</s0></fA61><fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Journal of experimental psychology. General</s0></fA64><fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0></fA66><fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>; Forster & Dannenberg, 2010).</s0></fC01><fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>002A26E08</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>002A26E03</s0></fC02><fC02 i1="03" i2="X"><s0>002A26E04</s0></fC02><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception intermodale</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intermodal perception</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción intermodal</s0><s5>01</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0><s5>02</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Audition</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Audición</s0><s5>03</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement information</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Information processing</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Procesamiento información</s0><s5>04</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Style cognitif</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognitive style</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estilo cognitivo</s0><s5>05</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Effet amorçage</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Priming effect</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Efecto priming</s0><s5>06</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0><s5>07</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Gustation</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Gustation</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Gusto</s0><s5>08</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Olfaction</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Olfaction</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Olfación</s0><s5>09</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0><s5>10</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement global local</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Global local processing</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Procesamiento global local</s0><s5>11</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0><s5>18</s5></fC03><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0><s5>37</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0><s5>38</s5></fC07><fN21><s1>249</s1></fN21></pA></standard><server><NO>PASCAL 11-0364400 INIST</NO><ET>Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching</ET><AU>FÖRSTER (Jens)</AU><AF>University of Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut.)</AF><DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT><SO>Journal of experimental psychology. General; ISSN 0096-3445; Coden JPGEDD; Etats-Unis; Da. 2011; Vol. 140; No. 3; Pp. 364-389; Bibl. 3 p.1/4</SO><LA>Anglais</LA><EA>It is suggested that the distinction between global versus local processing styles exists across sensory modalities. Activation of one-way of processing in one modality should affect processing styles in a different modality. In 12 studies, auditory, haptic, gustatory or olfactory global versus local processing was induced, and participants were tested with a measure of their global versus local visual attention; the content of this measure was unrelated to the inductions. In a different set of 4 studies, the effect of local versus global visual processing on the way people listen to a poem or touch, taste, and smell objects was examined. In all experiments, global/local processing in 1 modality shifted to global/local processing in the other modality. A final study found more pronounced shifts when compatible processing styles were induced in 2 rather than 1 modality. Moreover, the study explored mediation by relative right versus left hemisphere activation as measured with the line bisection task and accessibility of semantic associations. It is concluded that the effects reflect procedural rather than semantic priming effects that occurred out of participants' awareness. Because global/local processing has been shown to affect higher order processing, future research may activate processing styles in other sensory modalities to produce similar effects. Furthermore, because global/local processing is triggered by a variety of real world variables, one may explore effects on other sensory modalities than vision. The results are consistent with the global versus local processing model, a systems account (GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>; Forster & Dannenberg, 2010).</EA><CC>002A26E08; 002A26E03; 002A26E04</CC><FD>Perception intermodale; Vision; Audition; Traitement information; Style cognitif; Effet amorçage; Etude expérimentale; Gustation; Olfaction; Sensibilité tactile; Traitement global local; Homme</FD><FG>Cognition; Perception</FG><ED>Intermodal perception; Vision; Hearing; Information processing; Cognitive style; Priming effect; Experimental study; Gustation; Olfaction; Tactile sensitivity; Global local processing; Human</ED><EG>Cognition; Perception</EG><SD>Percepción intermodal; Visión; Audición; Procesamiento información; Estilo cognitivo; Efecto priming; Estudio experimental; Gusto; Olfación; Sensibilidad tactil; Procesamiento global local; Hombre</SD><LO>INIST-3032B.354000191110210050</LO><ID>11-0364400</ID></server></inist></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000462 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000462 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= PascalFrancis
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= Pascal:11-0364400
|texte= Local and Global Cross-Modal Influences Between Vision and Hearing, Tasting, Smelling, or Touching
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |