When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities
Identifieur interne : 000399 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000398; suivant : 000400When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities
Auteurs : Jens Forster ; Daniela BeckerSource :
- European journal of social psychology [ 0046-2772 ] ; 2012.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Four studies examined the effect of primed temporal distance on global versus local perception, using auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory stimuli. The studies show that thinking of the more distant (versus proximal) future facilitated Gestalt perception and impaired perception of details across all four modalities: Participants thinking about the distant future listened more to the Gestalt than to the details of an artificial poem, they grasped more the overall shape than the single parts of a set of boxes, they tasted more the overall flavor than the ingredients of a müsli, and they smelled more the general aroma than the ingredients of everyday objects. The participants' self-reported curiosity mediated our results, which is consistent with Novelty Categorization Theory. Moreover, the results are discussed within the framework of Construal Level Theory of psychological distance and GLOMOsys.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 12-0328614 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities |
AU : | FORSTER (Jens); BECKER (Daniela); EPSTUDE (Kai); PEETZ (Johanna) |
AF : | University of Amsterdam/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Psychology, University of Groningen/9712 Ts Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Psychology Department, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive/Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6/Canada (2 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | European journal of social psychology; ISSN 0046-2772; Coden EJSPA6; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2012; Vol. 42; No. 3; Pp. 334-341; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Four studies examined the effect of primed temporal distance on global versus local perception, using auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory stimuli. The studies show that thinking of the more distant (versus proximal) future facilitated Gestalt perception and impaired perception of details across all four modalities: Participants thinking about the distant future listened more to the Gestalt than to the details of an artificial poem, they grasped more the overall shape than the single parts of a set of boxes, they tasted more the overall flavor than the ingredients of a müsli, and they smelled more the general aroma than the ingredients of everyday objects. The participants' self-reported curiosity mediated our results, which is consistent with Novelty Categorization Theory. Moreover, the results are discussed within the framework of Construal Level Theory of psychological distance and GLOMOsys. |
CC : | 770B08I |
FD : | Traitement information; Effet amorçage; Intervalle temps; Curiosité; Modalité stimulus; Perception sensorielle; Modèle théorique; Catégorisation; Homme |
FG : | Cognition |
ED : | Information processing; Priming effect; Time interval; Curiosity; Stimulus modality; Sensorial perception; Theoretical model; Categorization; Human |
EG : | Cognition |
SD : | Procesamiento información; Efecto priming; Intervalo tiempo; Curiosidad; Modalidad estímulo; Percepción sensorial; Modelo teórico; Categorización; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-15647.354000502882170090 |
ID : | 12-0328614 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:12-0328614Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities</title>
<author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Forster">Jens Forster</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Becker, Daniela" sort="Becker, Daniela" uniqKey="Becker D" first="Daniela" last="Becker">Daniela Becker</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0328614</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 12-0328614 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:12-0328614</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000399</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities</title>
<author><name sortKey="Forster, Jens" sort="Forster, Jens" uniqKey="Forster J" first="Jens" last="Forster">Jens Forster</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Becker, Daniela" sort="Becker, Daniela" uniqKey="Becker D" first="Daniela" last="Becker">Daniela Becker</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">European journal of social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. j. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">European journal of social psychology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Eur. j. soc. psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0046-2772</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Categorization</term>
<term>Curiosity</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Information processing</term>
<term>Priming effect</term>
<term>Sensorial perception</term>
<term>Stimulus modality</term>
<term>Theoretical model</term>
<term>Time interval</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Traitement information</term>
<term>Effet amorçage</term>
<term>Intervalle temps</term>
<term>Curiosité</term>
<term>Modalité stimulus</term>
<term>Perception sensorielle</term>
<term>Modèle théorique</term>
<term>Catégorisation</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Four studies examined the effect of primed temporal distance on global versus local perception, using auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory stimuli. The studies show that thinking of the more distant (versus proximal) future facilitated Gestalt perception and impaired perception of details across all four modalities: Participants thinking about the distant future listened more to the Gestalt than to the details of an artificial poem, they grasped more the overall shape than the single parts of a set of boxes, they tasted more the overall flavor than the ingredients of a müsli, and they smelled more the general aroma than the ingredients of everyday objects. The participants' self-reported curiosity mediated our results, which is consistent with Novelty Categorization Theory. Moreover, the results are discussed within the framework of Construal Level Theory of psychological distance and GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>
.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0046-2772</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>EJSPA6</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Eur. j. soc. psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>42</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Mental Time Travel: Social Psychological Perspectives on a Fundamental Human Capacity</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>FORSTER (Jens)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>BECKER (Daniela)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>EPSTUDE (Kai)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>PEETZ (Johanna)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Amsterdam</s1>
<s2>Amsterdam</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA15 i1="01"><s1>Department of Psychology, University of Groningen</s1>
<s2>9712 Ts Groningen</s2>
<s3>NLD</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA15 i1="02"><s1>Psychology Department, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive</s1>
<s2>Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6</s2>
<s3>CAN</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA15>
<fA20><s1>334-341</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15647</s2>
<s5>354000502882170090</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0328614</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>European journal of social psychology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Four studies examined the effect of primed temporal distance on global versus local perception, using auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory stimuli. The studies show that thinking of the more distant (versus proximal) future facilitated Gestalt perception and impaired perception of details across all four modalities: Participants thinking about the distant future listened more to the Gestalt than to the details of an artificial poem, they grasped more the overall shape than the single parts of a set of boxes, they tasted more the overall flavor than the ingredients of a müsli, and they smelled more the general aroma than the ingredients of everyday objects. The participants' self-reported curiosity mediated our results, which is consistent with Novelty Categorization Theory. Moreover, the results are discussed within the framework of Construal Level Theory of psychological distance and GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>
.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B08I</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Traitement information</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Information processing</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Procesamiento información</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Effet amorçage</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Priming effect</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Efecto priming</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Intervalle temps</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Time interval</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Intervalo tiempo</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Curiosité</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Curiosity</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Curiosidad</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modalité stimulus</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus modality</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modalidad estímulo</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception sensorielle</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Sensorial perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción sensorial</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Modèle théorique</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Theoretical model</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Modelo teórico</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Catégorisation</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Categorization</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Categorización</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>254</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 12-0328614 INIST</NO>
<ET>When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities</ET>
<AU>FORSTER (Jens); BECKER (Daniela); EPSTUDE (Kai); PEETZ (Johanna)</AU>
<AF>University of Amsterdam/Amsterdam/Pays-Bas (1 aut., 2 aut.); Department of Psychology, University of Groningen/9712 Ts Groningen/Pays-Bas (1 aut.); Psychology Department, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive/Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6/Canada (2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>European journal of social psychology; ISSN 0046-2772; Coden EJSPA6; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2012; Vol. 42; No. 3; Pp. 334-341; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Four studies examined the effect of primed temporal distance on global versus local perception, using auditory, haptic, gustatory, and olfactory stimuli. The studies show that thinking of the more distant (versus proximal) future facilitated Gestalt perception and impaired perception of details across all four modalities: Participants thinking about the distant future listened more to the Gestalt than to the details of an artificial poem, they grasped more the overall shape than the single parts of a set of boxes, they tasted more the overall flavor than the ingredients of a müsli, and they smelled more the general aroma than the ingredients of everyday objects. The participants' self-reported curiosity mediated our results, which is consistent with Novelty Categorization Theory. Moreover, the results are discussed within the framework of Construal Level Theory of psychological distance and GLOMO<sup>sys</sup>
.</EA>
<CC>770B08I</CC>
<FD>Traitement information; Effet amorçage; Intervalle temps; Curiosité; Modalité stimulus; Perception sensorielle; Modèle théorique; Catégorisation; Homme</FD>
<FG>Cognition</FG>
<ED>Information processing; Priming effect; Time interval; Curiosity; Stimulus modality; Sensorial perception; Theoretical model; Categorization; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition</EG>
<SD>Procesamiento información; Efecto priming; Intervalo tiempo; Curiosidad; Modalidad estímulo; Percepción sensorial; Modelo teórico; Categorización; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-15647.354000502882170090</LO>
<ID>12-0328614</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000399 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000399 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:12-0328614 |texte= When curiosity kills no cat-but mediates the relation between distant future thoughts and global processing across sensory modalities }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |