HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000396

Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics

Identifieur interne : 000396 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000395; suivant : 000397

Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics

Auteurs : Jenna Lüttgen ; Herbert Heuer

Source :

Experimental brain research [ 0014-4819 ] ; 2012.

RBID : Francis:12-0367477

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Apprentissage moteur, Précision, Homme, Perception haptique.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Accuracy, Haptic perception, Human, Motor learning.

Abstract

Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0014-4819`
A02	`01`			`@0 EXBRAP`
A03		`1`		`@0 Exp. brain res.`
A05				`@2 222`
A06				`@2 1-2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LÜTTGEN (Jenna)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 HEUER (Herbert)`
A14	`01`			`@1 IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67 @2 44139 Dortmund @3 DEU @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 1-9`
A21				`@1 2012`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 12535 @5 354000504498270010`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 3/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 12-0367477`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Experimental brain research`
A66	`01`			`@0 DEU`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B03D @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Apprentissage moteur @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Motor learning @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Aprendizaje motor @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Précision @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Accuracy @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Precisión @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 54`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 54`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 54`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception haptique @4 CD @5 96`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Haptic perception @4 CD @5 96`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Motricité @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Motricity @5 20`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Motricidad @5 20`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Processus acquisition @5 21`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Acquisition process @5 21`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Proceso adquisición @5 21`
N21				`@1 282`
N44	`01`			`@1 OTO`
N82				`@1 OTO`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 12-0367477 INIST
ET :	Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics
AU :	LÜTTGEN (Jenna); HEUER (Herbert)
AF :	IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67/44139 Dortmund/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2012; Vol. 222; No. 1-2; Pp. 1-9; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.
CC :	770B03D
FD :	Apprentissage moteur; Précision; Homme; Perception haptique
FG :	Motricité; Processus acquisition
ED :	Motor learning; Accuracy; Human; Haptic perception
EG :	Motricity; Acquisition process
SD :	Aprendizaje motor; Precisión; Hombre
LO :	INIST-12535.354000504498270010
ID :	12-0367477

Links to Exploration step

Francis:12-0367477

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67</s1>
<s2>44139 Dortmund</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67</s1>
<s2>44139 Dortmund</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">12-0367477</idno>
<date when="2012">2012</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 12-0367477 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:12-0367477</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000396</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics</title>
<author><name sortKey="Luttgen, Jenna" sort="Luttgen, Jenna" uniqKey="Luttgen J" first="Jenna" last="Lüttgen">Jenna Lüttgen</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67</s1>
<s2>44139 Dortmund</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Heuer, Herbert" sort="Heuer, Herbert" uniqKey="Heuer H" first="Herbert" last="Heuer">Herbert Heuer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67</s1>
<s2>44139 Dortmund</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint><date when="2012">2012</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy</term>
<term>Haptic perception</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Motor learning</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Apprentissage moteur</term>
<term>Précision</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Perception haptique</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>222</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>1-2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LÜTTGEN (Jenna)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>HEUER (Herbert)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67</s1>
<s2>44139 Dortmund</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>1-9</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2012</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000504498270010</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2012 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>12-0367477</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B03D</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Apprentissage moteur</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motor learning</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Aprendizaje motor</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Précision</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Accuracy</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Precisión</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>54</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception haptique</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Haptic perception</s0>
<s4>CD</s4>
<s5>96</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Motricité</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Motricity</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Motricidad</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Processus acquisition</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Acquisition process</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Proceso adquisición</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>282</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01"><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82><s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 12-0367477 INIST</NO>
<ET>Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics</ET>
<AU>LÜTTGEN (Jenna); HEUER (Herbert)</AU>
<AF>IfADo-Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors, Ardeystrasse 67/44139 Dortmund/Allemagne (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2012; Vol. 222; No. 1-2; Pp. 1-9; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Robotic guidance is an engineered form of haptic-guidance training and intended to enhance motor learning in rehabilitation, surgery, and sports. However, its benefits (and pitfalls) are still debated. Here, we investigate the effects of different presentation modes on the reproduction of a spatiotemporal movement pattern. In three different groups of participants, the movement was demonstrated in three different modalities, namely visual, haptic, and visuo-haptic. After demonstration, participants had to reproduce the movement in two alternating recall conditions: haptic and visuo-haptic. Performance of the three groups during recall was compared with regard to spatial and dynamic movement characteristics. After haptic presentation, participants showed superior dynamic accuracy, whereas after visual presentation, participants performed better with regard to spatial accuracy. Added visual feedback during recall always led to enhanced performance, independent of the movement characteristic and the presentation modality. These findings substantiate the different benefits of different presentation modes for different movement characteristics. In particular, robotic guidance is beneficial for the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics.</EA>
<CC>770B03D</CC>
<FD>Apprentissage moteur; Précision; Homme; Perception haptique</FD>
<FG>Motricité; Processus acquisition</FG>
<ED>Motor learning; Accuracy; Human; Haptic perception</ED>
<EG>Motricity; Acquisition process</EG>
<SD>Aprendizaje motor; Precisión; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000504498270010</LO>
<ID>12-0367477</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000396 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:12-0367477
   |texte=   Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics

Robotic guidance benefits the learning of dynamic, but not of spatial movement characteristics

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri