HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000247

The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception

Identifieur interne : 000247 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000246; suivant : 000248

The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception

Auteurs : Guy A. H. Taylor-Covill ; Frank F. Eves

Source :

Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2013.

RBID : Francis:13-0333138

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Précision, Sensibilité tactile, Proprioception, Etude expérimentale, Perception espace, Orientation spatiale, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Accuracy, Experimental study, Human, Proprioception, Space perception, Spatial orientation, Tactile sensitivity.

Abstract

In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 0001-6918`
A02	`01`			`@0 APSOAZ`
A03		`1`		`@0 Acta psychol.`
A05				`@2 144`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 TAYLOR-COVILL (Guy A. H.)`
A11	`02`	`1`		`@1 EVES (Frank F.)`
A14	`01`			`@1 University of Birmingham @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut.`
A20				`@1 444-450`
A21				`@1 2013`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 2174 @5 354000504208360270`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1/4 p.`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 13-0333138`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Acta psychologica`
A66	`01`			`@0 GBR`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B05E @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Précision @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Accuracy @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Precisión @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sensibilité tactile @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tactile sensitivity @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Proprioception @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Proprioception @5 04`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Propiocepción @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 05`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception espace @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Space perception @5 06`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción espacio @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Orientation spatiale @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Spatial orientation @5 07`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Orientación espacial @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 38`
N21				`@1 315`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 13-0333138 INIST
ET :	The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception
AU :	TAYLOR-COVILL (Guy A. H.); EVES (Frank F.)
AF :	University of Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 144; No. 2; Pp. 444-450; Bibl. 1/4 p.
LA :	Anglais
EA :	In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.
CC :	770B05E
FD :	Précision; Sensibilité tactile; Proprioception; Etude expérimentale; Perception espace; Orientation spatiale; Homme
FG :	Cognition; Perception
ED :	Accuracy; Tactile sensitivity; Proprioception; Experimental study; Space perception; Spatial orientation; Human
EG :	Cognition; Perception
SD :	Precisión; Sensibilidad tactil; Propiocepción; Estudio experimental; Percepción espacio; Orientación espacial; Hombre
LO :	INIST-2174.354000504208360270
ID :	13-0333138

Links to Exploration step

Francis:13-0333138

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception</title>
<author><name sortKey="Taylor Covill, Guy A H" sort="Taylor Covill, Guy A H" uniqKey="Taylor Covill G" first="Guy A. H." last="Taylor-Covill">Guy A. H. Taylor-Covill</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Birmingham</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eves, Frank F" sort="Eves, Frank F" uniqKey="Eves F" first="Frank F." last="Eves">Frank F. Eves</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Birmingham</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0333138</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 13-0333138 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:13-0333138</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000247</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception</title>
<author><name sortKey="Taylor Covill, Guy A H" sort="Taylor Covill, Guy A H" uniqKey="Taylor Covill G" first="Guy A. H." last="Taylor-Covill">Guy A. H. Taylor-Covill</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Birmingham</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Eves, Frank F" sort="Eves, Frank F" uniqKey="Eves F" first="Frank F." last="Eves">Frank F. Eves</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Birmingham</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
<imprint><date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Acta psychologica</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Acta psychol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Accuracy</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Proprioception</term>
<term>Space perception</term>
<term>Spatial orientation</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Précision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Proprioception</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Perception espace</term>
<term>Orientation spatiale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0001-6918</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>APSOAZ</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Acta psychol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>144</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>TAYLOR-COVILL (Guy A. H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>EVES (Frank F.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>University of Birmingham</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>444-450</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>2174</s2>
<s5>354000504208360270</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>13-0333138</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Acta psychologica</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>GBR</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B05E</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Précision</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Accuracy</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Precisión</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Proprioception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Proprioception</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Propiocepción</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception espace</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Space perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción espacio</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Orientation spatiale</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Spatial orientation</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Orientación espacial</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>315</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 13-0333138 INIST</NO>
<ET>The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception</ET>
<AU>TAYLOR-COVILL (Guy A. H.); EVES (Frank F.)</AU>
<AF>University of Birmingham/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Acta psychologica; ISSN 0001-6918; Coden APSOAZ; Royaume-Uni; Da. 2013; Vol. 144; No. 2; Pp. 444-450; Bibl. 1/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>In two recent issues of Acta, the widely accepted view of Proffitt (2006), that 'haptic' measures of perceived geographical slant are generally accurate, and dissociated from explicit overestimates, came under intense scrutiny (Durgin, Hajnal, Li, Tonge, and Stigliani, 2010; 2011). Durgin and colleagues' challenge to this account centred on the claim that Proffitt's haptic' measure of geographical slant, the palm-board, may be accidently accurate due to restricted movements available at the wrist. Two experiments reported here compare the accuracy of Proffitt's palm-board with an alternative measure of geographical slant perception, the Palm-Controlled Inclinometer (PCI), which allows participants to use wrist, elbow and shoulder movements to match slant with their hand. Participants (N = 320) made slant judgements using both measures, across five hills and five staircases with 32 participants for each stimulus angle (4.5°-31°). Results for the palm-board replicated those of Proffitt and co-workers, overestimation at shallow angles (≤14°), contrasted with underestimation at steeper angles (≥23°), whereas estimates made using the PCI had a greater degree of accuracy for steeper slopes. A follow-up experiment tested the accuracy of the palm-board and PCI for surfaces in near space to repeat the design of Durgin et al. (2010, experiment 1). Participants (N = 20) used the palm-board and PCI to judge the angle of slanted blocks (25°, 30°). As with traversable slopes, PCI judgements did not differ from the actual angle of the blocks whereas the palm-board measure underestimated. 'Haptic' measures of geographical slant perception can be accurate for relatively steep slopes, in both near and far space.</EA>
<CC>770B05E</CC>
<FD>Précision; Sensibilité tactile; Proprioception; Etude expérimentale; Perception espace; Orientation spatiale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Cognition; Perception</FG>
<ED>Accuracy; Tactile sensitivity; Proprioception; Experimental study; Space perception; Spatial orientation; Human</ED>
<EG>Cognition; Perception</EG>
<SD>Precisión; Sensibilidad tactil; Propiocepción; Estudio experimental; Percepción espacio; Orientación espacial; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-2174.354000504208360270</LO>
<ID>13-0333138</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000247 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000247 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:13-0333138
   |texte=   The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception

The accuracy of 'haptically' measured geographical slant perception

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri