Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task

Identifieur interne : 000157 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000156; suivant : 000158

The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task

Auteurs : Laura Marchal-Crespo ; Mark Van Raai ; Georg Rauter ; Peter Wolf ; Robert Riener

Source :

RBID : Pascal:13-0353202

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0014-4819
A02 01      @0 EXBRAP
A03   1    @0 Exp. brain res.
A05       @2 231
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task
A11 01  1    @1 MARCHAL-CRESPO (Laura)
A11 02  1    @1 VAN RAAI (Mark)
A11 03  1    @1 RAUTER (Georg)
A11 04  1    @1 WOLF (Peter)
A11 05  1    @1 RIENER (Robert)
A14 01      @1 Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich @2 Zurich @3 CHE @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A14 02      @1 Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich @2 Zurich @3 CHE @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut. @Z 4 aut. @Z 5 aut.
A20       @1 277-291
A21       @1 2013
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 12535 @5 354000504243580030
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 1 p.1/4
A47 01  1    @0 13-0353202
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Experimental brain research
A66 01      @0 DEU
C01 01    ENG  @0 While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.
C02 01  X    @0 002A25
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Apprentissage moteur @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Motor learning @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Aprendizaje motor @5 01
N21       @1 336
N44 01      @1 OTO
N82       @1 OTO

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 13-0353202 INIST
ET : The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task
AU : MARCHAL-CRESPO (Laura); VAN RAAI (Mark); RAUTER (Georg); WOLF (Peter); RIENER (Robert)
AF : Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich/Zurich/Suisse (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich/Zurich/Suisse (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2013; Vol. 231; No. 3; Pp. 277-291; Bibl. 1 p.1/4
LA : Anglais
EA : While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.
CC : 002A25
FD : Apprentissage moteur
ED : Motor learning
SD : Aprendizaje motor
LO : INIST-12535.354000504243580030
ID : 13-0353202

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:13-0353202

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marchal Crespo, Laura" sort="Marchal Crespo, Laura" uniqKey="Marchal Crespo L" first="Laura" last="Marchal-Crespo">Laura Marchal-Crespo</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Raai, Mark" sort="Van Raai, Mark" uniqKey="Van Raai M" first="Mark" last="Van Raai">Mark Van Raai</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rauter, Georg" sort="Rauter, Georg" uniqKey="Rauter G" first="Georg" last="Rauter">Georg Rauter</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolf, Peter" sort="Wolf, Peter" uniqKey="Wolf P" first="Peter" last="Wolf">Peter Wolf</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Riener, Robert" sort="Riener, Robert" uniqKey="Riener R" first="Robert" last="Riener">Robert Riener</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">13-0353202</idno>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 13-0353202 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:13-0353202</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000157</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marchal Crespo, Laura" sort="Marchal Crespo, Laura" uniqKey="Marchal Crespo L" first="Laura" last="Marchal-Crespo">Laura Marchal-Crespo</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Raai, Mark" sort="Van Raai, Mark" uniqKey="Van Raai M" first="Mark" last="Van Raai">Mark Van Raai</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rauter, Georg" sort="Rauter, Georg" uniqKey="Rauter G" first="Georg" last="Rauter">Georg Rauter</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolf, Peter" sort="Wolf, Peter" uniqKey="Wolf P" first="Peter" last="Wolf">Peter Wolf</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Riener, Robert" sort="Riener, Robert" uniqKey="Riener R" first="Robert" last="Riener">Robert Riener</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2013">2013</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Experimental brain research</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Exp. brain res.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Motor learning</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Apprentissage moteur</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0014-4819</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>EXBRAP</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Exp. brain res.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>231</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>MARCHAL-CRESPO (Laura)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>VAN RAAI (Mark)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>RAUTER (Georg)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>WOLF (Peter)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>RIENER (Robert)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich</s1>
<s2>Zurich</s2>
<s3>CHE</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>277-291</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2013</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>12535</s2>
<s5>354000504243580030</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2013 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>1 p.1/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>13-0353202</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Experimental brain research</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>DEU</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002A25</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Apprentissage moteur</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Motor learning</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Aprendizaje motor</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>336</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 13-0353202 INIST</NO>
<ET>The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task</ET>
<AU>MARCHAL-CRESPO (Laura); VAN RAAI (Mark); RAUTER (Georg); WOLF (Peter); RIENER (Robert)</AU>
<AF>Sensory-Motor Systems (SMS) Lab, Institute of Robotics and Intelligent Systems (IRIS), ETH Zurich/Zurich/Suisse (2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.); Medical Faculty, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich/Zurich/Suisse (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut., 4 aut., 5 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Experimental brain research; ISSN 0014-4819; Coden EXBRAP; Allemagne; Da. 2013; Vol. 231; No. 3; Pp. 277-291; Bibl. 1 p.1/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>While haptic guidance can improve ongoing performance of a motor task, several studies have found that it ultimately impairs motor learning. However, some recent studies suggest that the haptic demonstration of optimal timing, rather than movement magnitude, enhances learning in subjects trained with haptic guidance. Timing of an action plays a crucial role in the proper accomplishment of many motor skills, such as hitting a moving object (discrete timing task) or learning a velocity profile (time-critical tracking task). The aim of the present study is to evaluate which feedback conditions-visual or haptic guidance-optimize learning of the discrete and continuous elements of a timing task. The experiment consisted in performing a fast tennis forehand stroke in a virtual environment. A tendon-based parallel robot connected to the end of a racket was used to apply haptic guidance during training. In two different experiments, we evaluated which feedback condition was more adequate for learning: (1) a time-dependent discrete task-learning to start a tennis stroke and (2) a tracking task-learning to follow a velocity profile. The effect that the task difficulty and subject's initial skill level have on the selection of the optimal training condition was further evaluated. Results showed that the training condition that maximizes learning of the discrete time-dependent motor task depends on the subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance was especially suitable for less-skilled subjects and in especially difficult discrete tasks, while visual feedback seems to benefit more skilled subjects. Additionally, haptic guidance seemed to promote learning in a time-critical tracking task, while visual feedback tended to deteriorate the performance independently of the task difficulty and subjects' initial skill level. Haptic guidance outperformed visual feedback, although additional studies are needed to further analyze the effect of other types of feedback visualization on motor learning of time-critical tasks.</EA>
<CC>002A25</CC>
<FD>Apprentissage moteur</FD>
<ED>Motor learning</ED>
<SD>Aprendizaje motor</SD>
<LO>INIST-12535.354000504243580030</LO>
<ID>13-0353202</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000157 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:13-0353202
   |texte=   The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024