Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect
Identifieur interne : 000128 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000127; suivant : 000129Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect
Auteurs : Louise Fryer ; Jonathan Freeman ; Linda PringSource :
- Cognition [ 0010-0277 ] ; 2014.
Descripteurs français
- Pascal (Inist)
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.
Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)
Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.
pA |
|
---|
Format Inist (serveur)
NO : | FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST |
---|---|
ET : | Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect |
AU : | FRYER (Louise); FREEMAN (Jonathan); PRING (Linda) |
AF : | Goldsmiths College, University of London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.) |
DT : | Publication en série; Niveau analytique |
SO : | Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 132; No. 2; Pp. 164-173; Bibl. 3/4 p. |
LA : | Anglais |
EA : | Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration. |
CC : | 770B09F; 770B05H |
FD : | Mot; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Audition; Symbolisme; Perception intermodale; Cécité; Etude expérimentale; Homme |
FG : | Langage; Cognition; Pathologie de l'oeil; Trouble de la vision |
ED : | Word; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Hearing; Symbolism; Intermodal perception; Blindness; Experimental study; Human |
EG : | Language; Cognition; Eye disease; Vision disorder |
SD : | Palabra; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Audición; Simbolismo; Percepción intermodal; Ceguera; Estudio experimental; Hombre |
LO : | INIST-15966.354000507548040040 |
ID : | 14-0152595 |
Links to Exploration step
Francis:14-0152595Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fryer, Louise" sort="Fryer, Louise" uniqKey="Fryer L" first="Louise" last="Fryer">Louise Fryer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Freeman, Jonathan" sort="Freeman, Jonathan" uniqKey="Freeman J" first="Jonathan" last="Freeman">Jonathan Freeman</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pring, Linda" sort="Pring, Linda" uniqKey="Pring L" first="Linda" last="Pring">Linda Pring</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0152595</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0152595</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000128</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</title>
<author><name sortKey="Fryer, Louise" sort="Fryer, Louise" uniqKey="Fryer L" first="Louise" last="Fryer">Louise Fryer</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Freeman, Jonathan" sort="Freeman, Jonathan" uniqKey="Freeman J" first="Jonathan" last="Freeman">Jonathan Freeman</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Pring, Linda" sort="Pring, Linda" uniqKey="Pring L" first="Linda" last="Pring">Linda Pring</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Blindness</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hearing</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intermodal perception</term>
<term>Symbolism</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Word</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Mot</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Audition</term>
<term>Symbolisme</term>
<term>Perception intermodale</term>
<term>Cécité</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>0010-0277</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01"><s0>CGTNAU</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>132</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>FRYER (Louise)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1"><s1>FREEMAN (Jonathan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1"><s1>PRING (Linda)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>164-173</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15966</s2>
<s5>354000507548040040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0152595</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B09F</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X"><s0>770B05H</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Mot</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Word</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Palabra</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Audition</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hearing</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Audición</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Symbolisme</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Symbolism</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Simbolismo</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception intermodale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Intermodal perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción intermodal</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cécité</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Blindness</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ceguera</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Langage</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Language</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Lenguaje</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pathologie de l'oeil</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Eye disease</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Ojo patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Trouble de la vision</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Vision disorder</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Trastorno visión</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>195</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST</NO>
<ET>Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</ET>
<AU>FRYER (Louise); FREEMAN (Jonathan); PRING (Linda)</AU>
<AF>Goldsmiths College, University of London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 132; No. 2; Pp. 164-173; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</EA>
<CC>770B09F; 770B05H</CC>
<FD>Mot; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Audition; Symbolisme; Perception intermodale; Cécité; Etude expérimentale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Langage; Cognition; Pathologie de l'oeil; Trouble de la vision</FG>
<ED>Word; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Hearing; Symbolism; Intermodal perception; Blindness; Experimental study; Human</ED>
<EG>Language; Cognition; Eye disease; Vision disorder</EG>
<SD>Palabra; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Audición; Simbolismo; Percepción intermodal; Ceguera; Estudio experimental; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-15966.354000507548040040</LO>
<ID>14-0152595</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= HapticV1 |flux= PascalFrancis |étape= Corpus |type= RBID |clé= Francis:14-0152595 |texte= Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |