Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect

Identifieur interne : 000128 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000127; suivant : 000129

Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect

Auteurs : Louise Fryer ; Jonathan Freeman ; Linda Pring

Source :

RBID : Francis:14-0152595

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 0010-0277
A02 01      @0 CGTNAU
A03   1    @0 Cognition
A05       @2 132
A06       @2 2
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect
A11 01  1    @1 FRYER (Louise)
A11 02  1    @1 FREEMAN (Jonathan)
A11 03  1    @1 PRING (Linda)
A14 01      @1 Goldsmiths College, University of London @3 GBR @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A20       @1 164-173
A21       @1 2014
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 15966 @5 354000507548040040
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 3/4 p.
A47 01  1    @0 14-0152595
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Cognition
A66 01      @0 NLD
C01 01    ENG  @0 Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.
C02 01  X    @0 770B09F @1 II
C02 02  X    @0 770B05H @1 II
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Mot @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Word @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Palabra @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Vision @5 02
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Vision @5 02
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Visión @5 02
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Sensibilité tactile @5 03
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Tactile sensitivity @5 03
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 03
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Audition @5 04
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Hearing @5 04
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Audición @5 04
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Symbolisme @5 05
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Symbolism @5 05
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Simbolismo @5 05
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Perception intermodale @5 06
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Intermodal perception @5 06
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Percepción intermodal @5 06
C03 07  X  FRE  @0 Cécité @5 07
C03 07  X  ENG  @0 Blindness @5 07
C03 07  X  SPA  @0 Ceguera @5 07
C03 08  X  FRE  @0 Etude expérimentale @5 08
C03 08  X  ENG  @0 Experimental study @5 08
C03 08  X  SPA  @0 Estudio experimental @5 08
C03 09  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 18
C03 09  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 18
C03 09  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 18
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Langage @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Language @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Lenguaje @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Cognition @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Cognition @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Cognición @5 38
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Pathologie de l'oeil @5 39
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Eye disease @5 39
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Ojo patología @5 39
C07 04  X  FRE  @0 Trouble de la vision @5 40
C07 04  X  ENG  @0 Vision disorder @5 40
C07 04  X  SPA  @0 Trastorno visión @5 40
N21       @1 195

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST
ET : Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect
AU : FRYER (Louise); FREEMAN (Jonathan); PRING (Linda)
AF : Goldsmiths College, University of London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 132; No. 2; Pp. 164-173; Bibl. 3/4 p.
LA : Anglais
EA : Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.
CC : 770B09F; 770B05H
FD : Mot; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Audition; Symbolisme; Perception intermodale; Cécité; Etude expérimentale; Homme
FG : Langage; Cognition; Pathologie de l'oeil; Trouble de la vision
ED : Word; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Hearing; Symbolism; Intermodal perception; Blindness; Experimental study; Human
EG : Language; Cognition; Eye disease; Vision disorder
SD : Palabra; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Audición; Simbolismo; Percepción intermodal; Ceguera; Estudio experimental; Hombre
LO : INIST-15966.354000507548040040
ID : 14-0152595

Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0152595

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fryer, Louise" sort="Fryer, Louise" uniqKey="Fryer L" first="Louise" last="Fryer">Louise Fryer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Freeman, Jonathan" sort="Freeman, Jonathan" uniqKey="Freeman J" first="Jonathan" last="Freeman">Jonathan Freeman</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pring, Linda" sort="Pring, Linda" uniqKey="Pring L" first="Linda" last="Pring">Linda Pring</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0152595</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0152595</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000128</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fryer, Louise" sort="Fryer, Louise" uniqKey="Fryer L" first="Louise" last="Fryer">Louise Fryer</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Freeman, Jonathan" sort="Freeman, Jonathan" uniqKey="Freeman J" first="Jonathan" last="Freeman">Jonathan Freeman</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pring, Linda" sort="Pring, Linda" uniqKey="Pring L" first="Linda" last="Pring">Linda Pring</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Cognition</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Cognition</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0010-0277</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Blindness</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Hearing</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Intermodal perception</term>
<term>Symbolism</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Word</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Mot</term>
<term>Vision</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Audition</term>
<term>Symbolisme</term>
<term>Perception intermodale</term>
<term>Cécité</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0010-0277</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>CGTNAU</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>132</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>FRYER (Louise)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>FREEMAN (Jonathan)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>PRING (Linda)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Goldsmiths College, University of London</s1>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>164-173</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>15966</s2>
<s5>354000507548040040</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>3/4 p.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>14-0152595</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>NLD</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>770B09F</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC02 i1="02" i2="X">
<s0>770B05H</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Mot</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Word</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Palabra</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vision</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Visión</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Audition</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Hearing</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Audición</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Symbolisme</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Symbolism</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Simbolismo</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Perception intermodale</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Intermodal perception</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Percepción intermodal</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cécité</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Blindness</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ceguera</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Langage</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Language</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Lenguaje</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Pathologie de l'oeil</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Eye disease</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Ojo patología</s0>
<s5>39</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Trouble de la vision</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Vision disorder</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Trastorno visión</s0>
<s5>40</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>195</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>FRANCIS 14-0152595 INIST</NO>
<ET>Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect</ET>
<AU>FRYER (Louise); FREEMAN (Jonathan); PRING (Linda)</AU>
<AF>Goldsmiths College, University of London/Royaume-Uni (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Cognition; ISSN 0010-0277; Coden CGTNAU; Pays-Bas; Da. 2014; Vol. 132; No. 2; Pp. 164-173; Bibl. 3/4 p.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Since Köhler's experiments in the 1920s, researchers have demonstrated a correspondence between words and shapes. Dubbed the "Bouba-Kiki" effect, these auditory-visual associations extend across cultures and are thought to be universal. More recently the effect has been shown in other modalities including taste, suggesting the effect is independent of vision. The study presented here tested the "Bouba-Kiki" effect in the auditory-haptic modalities, using 2D cut-outs and 3D models based on Köhler's original drawings. Presented with shapes they could feel but not see, sighted participants showed a robust "Bouba-Kiki" effect. However, in a sample of people with a range of visual impairments, from congenital total blindness to partial sight, the effect was significantly less pronounced. The findings suggest that, in the absence of a direct visual stimulus, visual imagery plays a role in crossmodal integration.</EA>
<CC>770B09F; 770B05H</CC>
<FD>Mot; Vision; Sensibilité tactile; Audition; Symbolisme; Perception intermodale; Cécité; Etude expérimentale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Langage; Cognition; Pathologie de l'oeil; Trouble de la vision</FG>
<ED>Word; Vision; Tactile sensitivity; Hearing; Symbolism; Intermodal perception; Blindness; Experimental study; Human</ED>
<EG>Language; Cognition; Eye disease; Vision disorder</EG>
<SD>Palabra; Visión; Sensibilidad tactil; Audición; Simbolismo; Percepción intermodal; Ceguera; Estudio experimental; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-15966.354000507548040040</LO>
<ID>14-0152595</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000128 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0152595
   |texte=   Touching words is not enough: How visual experience influences haptic-auditory associations in the "Bouba-Kiki" effect
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024