HapticV1, PascalFrancis, Corpus, bibRecord, 000120

Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts

Identifieur interne : 000120 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000119; suivant : 000121

Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts

Auteurs : Rebecca Lawson

Source :

Attention, perception & psychophysics [ 1943-3921 ] ; 2014.

RBID : Francis:14-0187476

Descripteurs français

Pascal (Inist)
- Familiarité stimulus, Main, Pied, Sensibilité tactile, Forme stimulus, Corps, Objet, Reconnaissance, Généralisation, Etude expérimentale, Homme.

English descriptors

KwdEn :
- Body, Experimental study, Foot, Generalization, Hand, Human, Object, Recognition, Stimulus familiarity, Stimulus shape, Tactile sensitivity.

Abstract

The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

A01	`01`	`1`		`@0 1943-3921`
A03		`1`		`@0 Atten. percept. psychophys.`
A05				`@2 76`
A06				`@2 2`
A08	`01`	`1`	`ENG`	`@1 Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts`
A11	`01`	`1`		`@1 LAWSON (Rebecca)`
A14	`01`			`@1 School of Psychology, University of Liverpool @2 Liverpool @3 GBR @Z 1 aut.`
A20				`@1 541-558`
A21				`@1 2014`
A23	`01`			`@0 ENG`
A43	`01`			`@1 INIST @2 14257 @5 354000501838140210`
A44				`@0 0000 @1 © 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.`
A45				`@0 1 p.3/4`
A47	`01`	`1`		`@0 14-0187476`
A60				`@1 P`
A61				`@0 A`
A64	`01`	`1`		`@0 Attention, perception & psychophysics`
A66	`01`			`@0 USA`
C01	`01`		`ENG`	@0 The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.
C02	`01`	`X`		`@0 770B05E @1 II`
C03	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Familiarité stimulus @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stimulus familiarity @5 01`
C03	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Familiaridad estímulo @5 01`
C03	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Main @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Hand @5 02`
C03	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Mano @5 02`
C03	`03`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Pied @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Foot @5 03`
C03	`03`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Pie @5 03`
C03	`04`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Sensibilité tactile @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Tactile sensitivity @5 04`
C03	`04`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Sensibilidad tactil @5 04`
C03	`05`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Forme stimulus @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Stimulus shape @5 05`
C03	`05`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Forma estímulo @5 05`
C03	`06`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Corps @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Body @5 06`
C03	`06`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cuerpo @5 06`
C03	`07`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Objet @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Object @5 07`
C03	`07`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Objeto @5 07`
C03	`08`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Reconnaissance @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Recognition @5 08`
C03	`08`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Reconocimiento @5 08`
C03	`09`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Généralisation @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Generalization @5 09`
C03	`09`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Generalización @5 09`
C03	`10`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Etude expérimentale @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Experimental study @5 10`
C03	`10`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Estudio experimental @5 10`
C03	`11`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Homme @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Human @5 18`
C03	`11`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Hombre @5 18`
C07	`01`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Perception @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Perception @5 37`
C07	`01`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Percepción @5 37`
C07	`02`	`X`	`FRE`	`@0 Cognition @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`ENG`	`@0 Cognition @5 38`
C07	`02`	`X`	`SPA`	`@0 Cognición @5 38`
N21				`@1 237`

Format Inist (serveur)

NO :	FRANCIS 14-0187476 INIST
ET :	Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts
AU :	LAWSON (Rebecca)
AF :	School of Psychology, University of Liverpool/Liverpool/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)
DT :	Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO :	Attention, perception & psychophysics; ISSN 1943-3921; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 76; No. 2; Pp. 541-558; Bibl. 1 p.3/4
LA :	Anglais
EA :	The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.
CC :	770B05E
FD :	Familiarité stimulus; Main; Pied; Sensibilité tactile; Forme stimulus; Corps; Objet; Reconnaissance; Généralisation; Etude expérimentale; Homme
FG :	Perception; Cognition
ED :	Stimulus familiarity; Hand; Foot; Tactile sensitivity; Stimulus shape; Body; Object; Recognition; Generalization; Experimental study; Human
EG :	Perception; Cognition
SD :	Familiaridad estímulo; Mano; Pie; Sensibilidad tactil; Forma estímulo; Cuerpo; Objeto; Reconocimiento; Generalización; Estudio experimental; Hombre
LO :	INIST-14257.354000501838140210
ID :	14-0187476

Links to Exploration step

Francis:14-0187476

Le document en format XML

<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool</s1>
<s2>Liverpool</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">14-0187476</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">FRANCIS 14-0187476 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Francis:14-0187476</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000120</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a">Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts</title>
<author><name sortKey="Lawson, Rebecca" sort="Lawson, Rebecca" uniqKey="Lawson R" first="Rebecca" last="Lawson">Rebecca Lawson</name>
<affiliation><inist:fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool</s1>
<s2>Liverpool</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series><title level="j" type="main">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Atten. percept. psychophys. </title>
<idno type="ISSN">1943-3921</idno>
<imprint><date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><title level="j" type="main">Attention, perception & psychophysics</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Atten. percept. psychophys. </title>
<idno type="ISSN">1943-3921</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Body</term>
<term>Experimental study</term>
<term>Foot</term>
<term>Generalization</term>
<term>Hand</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Object</term>
<term>Recognition</term>
<term>Stimulus familiarity</term>
<term>Stimulus shape</term>
<term>Tactile sensitivity</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr"><term>Familiarité stimulus</term>
<term>Main</term>
<term>Pied</term>
<term>Sensibilité tactile</term>
<term>Forme stimulus</term>
<term>Corps</term>
<term>Objet</term>
<term>Reconnaissance</term>
<term>Généralisation</term>
<term>Etude expérimentale</term>
<term>Homme</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist><standard h6="B"><pA><fA01 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>1943-3921</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1"><s0>Atten. percept. psychophys. </s0>
</fA03>
<fA05><s2>76</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06><s2>2</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG"><s1>Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1"><s1>LAWSON (Rebecca)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01"><s1>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool</s1>
<s2>Liverpool</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20><s1>541-558</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21><s1>2014</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01"><s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01"><s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>14257</s2>
<s5>354000501838140210</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44><s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2014 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45><s0>1 p.3/4</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>14-0187476</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60><s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61><s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1"><s0>Attention, perception & psychophysics</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01"><s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG"><s0>The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X"><s0>770B05E</s0>
<s1>II</s1>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Familiarité stimulus</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus familiarity</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Familiaridad estímulo</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Main</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Hand</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Mano</s0>
<s5>02</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Pied</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Foot</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Pie</s0>
<s5>03</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Sensibilité tactile</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Tactile sensitivity</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Sensibilidad tactil</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Forme stimulus</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Stimulus shape</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Forma estímulo</s0>
<s5>05</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Corps</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Body</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cuerpo</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Objet</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Object</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Objeto</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Reconnaissance</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Recognition</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Reconocimiento</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Généralisation</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Generalization</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Generalización</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Etude expérimentale</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Experimental study</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Estudio experimental</s0>
<s5>10</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Human</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Perception</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Percepción</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG"><s0>Cognition</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA"><s0>Cognición</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21><s1>237</s1>
</fN21>
</pA>
</standard>
<server><NO>FRANCIS 14-0187476 INIST</NO>
<ET>Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts</ET>
<AU>LAWSON (Rebecca)</AU>
<AF>School of Psychology, University of Liverpool/Liverpool/Royaume-Uni (1 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Attention, perception & psychophysics; ISSN 1943-3921; Etats-Unis; Da. 2014; Vol. 76; No. 2; Pp. 541-558; Bibl. 1 p.3/4</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>The limits of generalization of our 3-D shape recognition system to identifying objects by touch was investigated by testing exploration at unusual locations and using untrained effectors. In Experiments 1 and 2, people found identification by hand of real objects, plastic 3-D models of objects, and raised line drawings placed in front of themselves no easier than when exploration was behind their back. Experiment 3 compared one-handed, two-handed, one-footed, and two-footed haptic object recognition of familiar objects. Recognition by foot was slower (7 vs. 13 s) and much less accurate (9 % vs. 47 % errors) than recognition by either one or both hands. Nevertheless, item difficulty was similar across hand and foot exploration, and there was a strong correlation between an individual's hand and foot performance. Furthermore, foot recognition was better with the largest 20 of the 80 items (32 % errors), suggesting that physical limitations hampered exploration by foot. Thus, object recognition by hand generalized efficiently across the spatial location of stimuli, while object recognition by foot seemed surprisingly good given that no prior training was provided. Active touch (haptics) thus efficiently extracts 3-D shape information and accesses stored representations of familiar objects from novel modes of input.</EA>
<CC>770B05E</CC>
<FD>Familiarité stimulus; Main; Pied; Sensibilité tactile; Forme stimulus; Corps; Objet; Reconnaissance; Généralisation; Etude expérimentale; Homme</FD>
<FG>Perception; Cognition</FG>
<ED>Stimulus familiarity; Hand; Foot; Tactile sensitivity; Stimulus shape; Body; Object; Recognition; Generalization; Experimental study; Human</ED>
<EG>Perception; Cognition</EG>
<SD>Familiaridad estímulo; Mano; Pie; Sensibilidad tactil; Forma estímulo; Cuerpo; Objeto; Reconocimiento; Generalización; Estudio experimental; Hombre</SD>
<LO>INIST-14257.354000501838140210</LO>
<ID>14-0187476</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000120 | SxmlIndent | more

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000120 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Francis:14-0187476
   |texte=   Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts
}}

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024

	Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques
	Attention, ce site est en cours de développement ! Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts. Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts

Recognizing familiar objects by hand and foot: Haptic shape perception generalizes to inputs from unusual locations and untrained body parts

Source :

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Format Inist (serveur)

Links to Exploration step

Le document en format XML

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri