Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?

Identifieur interne : 003021 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 003020; suivant : 003022

From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?

Auteurs : Valérian Chambon [France, Royaume-Uni] ; Nura Sidarus [Royaume-Uni] ; Patrick Haggard [Royaume-Uni]

Source :

RBID : PMC:4030148

Abstract

Sense of agency refers to the feeling of controlling an external event through one’s own action. On one influential view, agency depends on how predictable the consequences of one’s action are, getting stronger as the match between predicted and actual effect of an action gets closer. Thus, sense of agency arises when external events that follow our action are consistent with predictions of action effects made by the motor system while we perform or simply intend to perform an action. According to this view, agency is inferred retrospectively, after an action has been performed and its consequences are known. In contrast, little is known about whether and how internal processes involved in the selection of actions may influence subjective sense of control, in advance of the action itself, and irrespective of effect predictability. In this article, we review several classes of behavioral and neuroimaging data suggesting that earlier processes, linked to fluency of action selection, prospectively contribute to sense of agency. These findings have important implications for better understanding human volition and abnormalities of action experience.


Url:
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320
PubMed: 24860486
PubMed Central: 4030148

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:4030148

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, Valerian" sort="Chambon, Valerian" uniqKey="Chambon V" first="Valérian" last="Chambon">Valérian Chambon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff1">
<institution>Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, INSERM U960</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff2">
<institution>Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure-EHESS, CNRS UMR-8129</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sidarus, Nura" sort="Sidarus, Nura" uniqKey="Sidarus N" first="Nura" last="Sidarus">Nura Sidarus</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, Patrick" sort="Haggard, Patrick" uniqKey="Haggard P" first="Patrick" last="Haggard">Patrick Haggard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">24860486</idno>
<idno type="pmc">4030148</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4030148</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:4030148</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320</idno>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">002677</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">002677</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000C25</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">003021</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, Valerian" sort="Chambon, Valerian" uniqKey="Chambon V" first="Valérian" last="Chambon">Valérian Chambon</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff1">
<institution>Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, INSERM U960</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff2">
<institution>Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure-EHESS, CNRS UMR-8129</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">France</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sidarus, Nura" sort="Sidarus, Nura" uniqKey="Sidarus N" first="Nura" last="Sidarus">Nura Sidarus</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, Patrick" sort="Haggard, Patrick" uniqKey="Haggard P" first="Patrick" last="Haggard">Patrick Haggard</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:aff id="aff3">
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</nlm:aff>
<country xml:lang="fr">Royaume-Uni</country>
<wicri:regionArea></wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:regionArea># see nlm:aff region in country</wicri:regionArea>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Frontiers in Human Neuroscience</title>
<idno type="eISSN">1662-5161</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2014">2014</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Sense of agency refers to the feeling of controlling an external event through one’s own action. On one influential view, agency depends on how predictable the consequences of one’s action are, getting stronger as the match between predicted and actual effect of an action gets closer. Thus, sense of agency arises when external events that follow our action are consistent with predictions of action effects made by the motor system while we perform or simply intend to perform an action. According to this view, agency is inferred
<italic>retrospectively</italic>
, after an action has been performed and its consequences are known. In contrast, little is known about whether and how internal processes involved in the selection of actions may influence subjective sense of control, in advance of the action itself, and irrespective of effect predictability. In this article, we review several classes of behavioral and neuroimaging data suggesting that earlier processes, linked to fluency of action selection,
<italic>prospectively</italic>
contribute to sense of agency. These findings have important implications for better understanding human volition and abnormalities of action experience.</p>
</div>
</front>
<back>
<div1 type="bibliography">
<listBibl>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aarts, H" uniqKey="Aarts H">H. Aarts</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Custers, R" uniqKey="Custers R">R. Custers</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wegner, D M" uniqKey="Wegner D">D. M. Wegner</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ackerman, J M" uniqKey="Ackerman J">J. M. Ackerman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nocera, C C" uniqKey="Nocera C">C. C. Nocera</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bargh, J A" uniqKey="Bargh J">J. A. Bargh</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Alloy, L B" uniqKey="Alloy L">L. B. Alloy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Abramson, L Y" uniqKey="Abramson L">L. Y. Abramson</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Arango Mu Oz, S" uniqKey="Arango Mu Oz S">S. Arango-Muñoz</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Blakemore, S J" uniqKey="Blakemore S">S.-J. Blakemore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frith, C D" uniqKey="Frith C">C. D. Frith</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolpert, D M" uniqKey="Wolpert D">D. M. Wolpert</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Filevich, E" uniqKey="Filevich E">E. Filevich</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wenke, D" uniqKey="Wenke D">D. Wenke</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fleming, S M" uniqKey="Fleming S">S. M. Fleming</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Prinz, W" uniqKey="Prinz W">W. Prinz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Charles, L" uniqKey="Charles L">L. Charles</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Opstal, F" uniqKey="Opstal F">F. Opstal</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Marti, S" uniqKey="Van Marti S">S. van Marti</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dehaene, S" uniqKey="Dehaene S">S. Dehaene</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Csikszentmihalyi, M" uniqKey="Csikszentmihalyi M">M. Csikszentmihalyi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Damen, T G E" uniqKey="Damen T">T. G. E. Damen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Baaren, R B" uniqKey="Van Baaren R">R. B. van Baaren</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dijksterhuis, A" uniqKey="Dijksterhuis A">A. Dijksterhuis</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="David, N" uniqKey="David N">N. David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Cohen, M X" uniqKey="Cohen M">M. X. Cohen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Newen, A" uniqKey="Newen A">A. Newen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bewernick, B H" uniqKey="Bewernick B">B. H. Bewernick</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shah, N J" uniqKey="Shah N">N. J. Shah</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fink, G R" uniqKey="Fink G">G. R. Fink</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="David, N" uniqKey="David N">N. David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Newen, A" uniqKey="Newen A">A. Newen</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vogeley, K" uniqKey="Vogeley K">K. Vogeley</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="David, N" uniqKey="David N">N. David</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stenzel, A" uniqKey="Stenzel A">A. Stenzel</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schneider, T R" uniqKey="Schneider T">T. R. Schneider</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Engel, A K" uniqKey="Engel A">A. K. Engel</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dehaene, S" uniqKey="Dehaene S">S. Dehaene</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Naccache, L" uniqKey="Naccache L">L. Naccache</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Le Clec, G" uniqKey="Le Clec G">G. Le Clec’H</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Koechlin, E" uniqKey="Koechlin E">E. Koechlin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mueller, M" uniqKey="Mueller M">M. Mueller</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dehaene Lambertz, G" uniqKey="Dehaene Lambertz G">G. Dehaene-Lambertz</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Demanet, J" uniqKey="Demanet J">J. Demanet</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Muhle Karbe, P S" uniqKey="Muhle Karbe P">P. S. Muhle-Karbe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lynn, M T" uniqKey="Lynn M">M. T. Lynn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Blotenberg, I" uniqKey="Blotenberg I">I. Blotenberg</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Brass, M" uniqKey="Brass M">M. Brass</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Engbert, K" uniqKey="Engbert K">K. Engbert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wohlschl Ger, A" uniqKey="Wohlschl Ger A">A. Wohlschläger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farrer, C" uniqKey="Farrer C">C. Farrer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frith, C D" uniqKey="Frith C">C. D. Frith</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farrer, C" uniqKey="Farrer C">C. Farrer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Franck, N" uniqKey="Franck N">N. Franck</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Georgieff, N" uniqKey="Georgieff N">N. Georgieff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frith, C D" uniqKey="Frith C">C. D. Frith</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Decety, J" uniqKey="Decety J">J. Decety</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jeannerod, M" uniqKey="Jeannerod M">M. Jeannerod</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farrer, C" uniqKey="Farrer C">C. Farrer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frey, S H" uniqKey="Frey S">S. H. Frey</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Horn, J D" uniqKey="Van Horn J">J. D. Van Horn</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tunik, E" uniqKey="Tunik E">E. Tunik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Turk, D" uniqKey="Turk D">D. Turk</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Inati, S" uniqKey="Inati S">S. Inati</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farrer, C" uniqKey="Farrer C">C. Farrer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Valentin, G" uniqKey="Valentin G">G. Valentin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hupe, J M" uniqKey="Hupe J">J. M. Hupé</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fleming, S M" uniqKey="Fleming S">S. M. Fleming</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mars, R B" uniqKey="Mars R">R. B. Mars</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gladwin, T E" uniqKey="Gladwin T">T. E. Gladwin</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fourneret, P" uniqKey="Fourneret P">P. Fourneret</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jeannerod, M" uniqKey="Jeannerod M">M. Jeannerod</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Franck, N" uniqKey="Franck N">N. Franck</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Farrer, C" uniqKey="Farrer C">C. Farrer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Georgieff, N" uniqKey="Georgieff N">N. Georgieff</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marie Cardine, M" uniqKey="Marie Cardine M">M. Marie-Cardine</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dalery, J" uniqKey="Dalery J">J. Daléry</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="D Amato, T" uniqKey="D Amato T">T. d’ Amato</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frith, C D" uniqKey="Frith C">C. D. Frith</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Friston, K" uniqKey="Friston K">K. Friston</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Liddle, P F" uniqKey="Liddle P">P. F. Liddle</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Frackowiak, R S J" uniqKey="Frackowiak R">R. S. J. Frackowiak</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Clark, S" uniqKey="Clark S">S. Clark</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kalogeras, J" uniqKey="Kalogeras J">J. Kalogeras</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hagura, N" uniqKey="Hagura N">N. Hagura</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kanai, R" uniqKey="Kanai R">R. Kanai</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Orgs, G" uniqKey="Orgs G">G. Orgs</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Leube, D T" uniqKey="Leube D">D. T. Leube</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Knoblich, G" uniqKey="Knoblich G">G. Knoblich</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Erb, M" uniqKey="Erb M">M. Erb</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Grodd, W" uniqKey="Grodd W">W. Grodd</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bartels, M" uniqKey="Bartels M">M. Bartels</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kircher, T T" uniqKey="Kircher T">T. T. Kircher</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Linser, K" uniqKey="Linser K">K. Linser</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Goschke, T" uniqKey="Goschke T">T. Goschke</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Macdonald, P A" uniqKey="Macdonald P">P. A. MacDonald</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Paus, T" uniqKey="Paus T">T. Paus</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Marti, S" uniqKey="Marti S">S. Marti</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sackur, J" uniqKey="Sackur J">J. Sackur</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sigman, M" uniqKey="Sigman M">M. Sigman</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dehaene, S" uniqKey="Dehaene S">S. Dehaene</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mcguire, J T" uniqKey="Mcguire J">J. T. McGuire</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Botvinick, M M" uniqKey="Botvinick M">M. M. Botvinick</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Metcalfe, J" uniqKey="Metcalfe J">J. Metcalfe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Greene, M J" uniqKey="Greene M">M. J. Greene</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Miall, R C" uniqKey="Miall R">R. C. Miall</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolpert, D M" uniqKey="Wolpert D">D. M. Wolpert</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Miele, D B" uniqKey="Miele D">D. B. Miele</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wager, T D" uniqKey="Wager T">T. D. Wager</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mitchell, J P" uniqKey="Mitchell J">J. P. Mitchell</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Metcalfe, J" uniqKey="Metcalfe J">J. Metcalfe</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moore, J W" uniqKey="Moore J">J. W. Moore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fletcher, P C" uniqKey="Fletcher P">P. C. Fletcher</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moore, J W" uniqKey="Moore J">J. W. Moore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moore, J W" uniqKey="Moore J">J. W. Moore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Obhi, S S" uniqKey="Obhi S">S. S. Obhi</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moore, J W" uniqKey="Moore J">J. W. Moore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wegner, D M" uniqKey="Wegner D">D. M. Wegner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Morsella, E" uniqKey="Morsella E">E. Morsella</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wilson, L E" uniqKey="Wilson L">L. E. Wilson</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Berger, C C" uniqKey="Berger C">C. C. Berger</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Honhongva, M" uniqKey="Honhongva M">M. Honhongva</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gazzaley, A" uniqKey="Gazzaley A">A. Gazzaley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bargh, J A" uniqKey="Bargh J">J. A. Bargh</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Murphy, M" uniqKey="Murphy M">M. Murphy</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="White, R" uniqKey="White R">R. White</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nahab, F B" uniqKey="Nahab F">F. B. Nahab</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kundu, P" uniqKey="Kundu P">P. Kundu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gallea, C" uniqKey="Gallea C">C. Gallea</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kakareka, J" uniqKey="Kakareka J">J. Kakareka</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pursley, R" uniqKey="Pursley R">R. Pursley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pohida, T" uniqKey="Pohida T">T. Pohida</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Oppenheimer, D M" uniqKey="Oppenheimer D">D. M. Oppenheimer</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Pacherie, E" uniqKey="Pacherie E">E. Pacherie</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sato, A" uniqKey="Sato A">A. Sato</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schlaghecken, F" uniqKey="Schlaghecken F">F. Schlaghecken</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Eimer, M" uniqKey="Eimer M">M. Eimer</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schlaghecken, F" uniqKey="Schlaghecken F">F. Schlaghecken</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rowley, L" uniqKey="Rowley L">L. Rowley</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sembi, S" uniqKey="Sembi S">S. Sembi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Simmons, R" uniqKey="Simmons R">R. Simmons</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Whitcomb, D" uniqKey="Whitcomb D">D. Whitcomb</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sidarus, N" uniqKey="Sidarus N">N. Sidarus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chambon, V" uniqKey="Chambon V">V. Chambon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Steinhauser, M" uniqKey="Steinhauser M">M. Steinhauser</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Kiesel, A" uniqKey="Kiesel A">A. Kiesel</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Stenner, M P" uniqKey="Stenner M">M. P. Stenner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bauer, M" uniqKey="Bauer M">M. Bauer</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sidarus, N" uniqKey="Sidarus N">N. Sidarus</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Heinze, H J" uniqKey="Heinze H">H. J. Heinze</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dolan, R J" uniqKey="Dolan R">R. J. Dolan</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Synofzik, M" uniqKey="Synofzik M">M. Synofzik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Thier, P" uniqKey="Thier P">P. Thier</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Lindner, A" uniqKey="Lindner A">A. Lindner</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Synofzik, M" uniqKey="Synofzik M">M. Synofzik</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Vosgerau, G" uniqKey="Vosgerau G">G. Vosgerau</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Newen, A" uniqKey="Newen A">A. Newen</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Van Der Weiden, A" uniqKey="Van Der Weiden A">A. van der Weiden</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Aarts, H" uniqKey="Aarts H">H. Aarts</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ruys, K I" uniqKey="Ruys K">K. I. Ruys</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Voss, M" uniqKey="Voss M">M. Voss</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Moore, J" uniqKey="Moore J">J. Moore</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Hauser, M" uniqKey="Hauser M">M. Hauser</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gallinat, J" uniqKey="Gallinat J">J. Gallinat</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Heinz, A" uniqKey="Heinz A">A. Heinz</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wegner, D" uniqKey="Wegner D">D. Wegner</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wegner, D" uniqKey="Wegner D">D. Wegner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wheatley, T" uniqKey="Wheatley T">T. Wheatley</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wenke, D" uniqKey="Wenke D">D. Wenke</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fleming, S M" uniqKey="Fleming S">S. M. Fleming</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Witt, J K" uniqKey="Witt J">J. K. Witt</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Sugovic, M" uniqKey="Sugovic M">M. Sugovic</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolpe, N" uniqKey="Wolpe N">N. Wolpe</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Haggard, P" uniqKey="Haggard P">P. Haggard</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Siebner, H R" uniqKey="Siebner H">H. R. Siebner</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Rowe, J B" uniqKey="Rowe J">J. B. Rowe</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Wolpert, D M" uniqKey="Wolpert D">D. M. Wolpert</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Ghahramani, Z" uniqKey="Ghahramani Z">Z. Ghahramani</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Jordan, M I" uniqKey="Jordan M">M. I. Jordan</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<author>
<name sortKey="Yu, A J" uniqKey="Yu A">A. J. Yu</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Dayan, P" uniqKey="Dayan P">P. Dayan</name>
</author>
</analytic>
</biblStruct>
</listBibl>
</div1>
</back>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="review-article">
<pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Front Hum Neurosci</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">Front Hum Neurosci</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Hum. Neurosci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Human Neuroscience</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1662-5161</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">24860486</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4030148</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnhum.2014.00320</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Neuroscience</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Review Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>Valérian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002">
<sup></sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://community.frontiersin.org/people/u/125655"></uri>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sidarus</surname>
<given-names>Nura</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002">
<sup></sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://community.frontiersin.org/people/u/144433"></uri>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>Patrick</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://community.frontiersin.org/people/u/1717"></uri>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Laboratoire de Neurosciences Cognitives, INSERM U960</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure-EHESS, CNRS UMR-8129</institution>
<country>Paris, France</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London</institution>
<country>London, UK</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: James W. Moore, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Chloe Farrer, CNRS, France; Anouk Van Der Weiden, University Medical Center Utrecht, Netherlands</p>
</fn>
<corresp id="fn001">*Correspondence: Valérian Chambon, Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure-EHESS, CNRS UMR-8129, 29, Rue d’Ulm, Paris 75005, France e-mail:
<email xlink:type="simple">valerian.chambon@ens.fr</email>
; Nura Sidarus, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, Alexandra House, 17 Queen Square, London WC1N 3AR,UK e-mail:
<email xlink:type="simple">n.sidarus.11@ucl.ac.uk</email>
</corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>These authors have contributed equally to this work.</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003">
<p>This article was submitted to the journal Frontiers in Human Neuroscience</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>5</month>
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2014</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>8</volume>
<elocation-id>320</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>3</month>
<year>2014</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>4</month>
<year>2014</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright © 2014 Chambon, Sidarus and Haggard.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2014</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Sense of agency refers to the feeling of controlling an external event through one’s own action. On one influential view, agency depends on how predictable the consequences of one’s action are, getting stronger as the match between predicted and actual effect of an action gets closer. Thus, sense of agency arises when external events that follow our action are consistent with predictions of action effects made by the motor system while we perform or simply intend to perform an action. According to this view, agency is inferred
<italic>retrospectively</italic>
, after an action has been performed and its consequences are known. In contrast, little is known about whether and how internal processes involved in the selection of actions may influence subjective sense of control, in advance of the action itself, and irrespective of effect predictability. In this article, we review several classes of behavioral and neuroimaging data suggesting that earlier processes, linked to fluency of action selection,
<italic>prospectively</italic>
contribute to sense of agency. These findings have important implications for better understanding human volition and abnormalities of action experience.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>fluency</kwd>
<kwd>action selection</kwd>
<kwd>agency</kwd>
<kwd>angular gyrus</kwd>
<kwd>human volition</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"></fig-count>
<table-count count="0"></table-count>
<equation-count count="0"></equation-count>
<ref-count count="71"></ref-count>
<page-count count="9"></page-count>
<word-count count="7968"></word-count>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Action-effect link and comparator models: a retrospective account of agency</title>
<p>Agency is a key component of action experience. In a nutshell, agency refers to the sense of controlling one’s own actions and, through these actions, events in the outside world. We rarely have an intense, clear phenomenology of agency, but we clearly recognize failures of agency when we experience actions that do not unfold as expected or fail to produce intended effects. One might even say that our sense of “authorship” becomes apparent only when it is falsified, resulting in a break of the flow from intentions to action effects that normally characterize experience. Thus, determining where the sense of agency comes from requires properly specifying where the break may occur along the intention-action-effect chain. Identifying the break may in turn depend on how we choose to specify the chain, and on the causal relation between its constituents (intention, action, effect).</p>
<p>On one influential view, agency implies a control mechanism that causally relates actions to their effects. More specifically, it implies a mechanism that has goals, and that controls actions to achieve them. This mechanism was first, and successfully, formalized as a
<italic>comparator model</italic>
(Wolpert et al.,
<xref rid="B71" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>
; Miall and Wolpert,
<xref rid="B42" ref-type="bibr">1996</xref>
). In its first incarnation, a comparator model translates intentions into outcomes, by continually monitoring whether action consequences occur, or do not occur, as predicted. Though originally formulated as models of motor control (Wolpert et al.,
<xref rid="B71" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>
), comparator models have also been increasingly used to explain the subjective sense of agency (e.g., Blakemore et al.,
<xref rid="B4" ref-type="bibr">2001</xref>
). On the comparator account, agency is computed by matching predicted and actually experienced consequences of movement. In this framework, action effects are precisely those sensory events that can be predicted from one’s intentions, using the specific intermediate mechanism of the comparator model (Wolpert et al.,
<xref rid="B71" ref-type="bibr">1995</xref>
; Figure
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1A</xref>
). Thus, the comparator model allows for two specific predictions. First, sense of agency should be strong when there is a close match between the predicted and the actual sensory consequences of an action, and should be reduced when predicted and experienced consequences do not match. Second, sense of agency necessarily occurs
<italic>late</italic>
, i.e., after an action has been performed, and sensory evidence about the consequences of action becomes available.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold>
Intention-Action-Effect chain. The action-selection processes operate between the formation of the initial intention and action execution. Dysfluency of action selection signals a break in the intention-action link, that occurs prior to the action and its sensory consequences. After the action has been selected, predicted and perceived consequences of this action are compared. On the comparator account (in bold), sense of agency is strong when there is a match between predicted and actually experienced consequences of an action, and is reduced in the case of a mismatch.
<bold>(B)</bold>
Example trial from the prime-target incompatible condition, adapted from Chambon et al. (
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Participants were instructed to respond to the target stimulus, and were not informed of the presence of the arrow primes. Action effects consisted of colored circles that appeared on the screen after a varying delay. In this condition, sense of agency decreases relative to the compatible condition, even though predicted and perceived action effects are the same (yellow circles).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnhum-08-00320-g0001"></graphic>
</fig>
<p>This view has received considerable empirical support from studies showing that spatial and temporal discrepancies between making an action and viewing visual feedback of the action reduce the sense that the observed action is one’s own. Thus, introducing a spatial transformation between an action and its visual consequences reduces participants’ sense of agency in proportion to the mismatch induced. In one typical task, participants received distorted visual feedback of their hand moving a joystick. When the movement of the virtual hand did not correspond to the subjects’ movement (Farrer and Frith,
<xref rid="B23" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>
), or when an angular bias was introduced between the subject’s and the virtual hand’s movement, participants more readily attributed it to another agent (Fourneret and Jeannerod,
<xref rid="B28" ref-type="bibr">1998</xref>
; Farrer et al.,
<xref rid="B24" ref-type="bibr">2003</xref>
; Synofzik et al.,
<xref rid="B61" ref-type="bibr">2006</xref>
; David et al.,
<xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>
). Note that manipulating temporal relations between actions and outcomes had similar effects (Franck et al.,
<xref rid="B29" ref-type="bibr">2001</xref>
; Leube et al.,
<xref rid="B36" ref-type="bibr">2003</xref>
; MacDonald and Paus,
<xref rid="B38" ref-type="bibr">2003</xref>
; David et al.,
<xref rid="B14" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>
,
<xref rid="B16" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>
; Farrer et al.,
<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
). The so-called “intentional binding” effect provides another line of evidence for the role of temporal contiguity between action and outcome in the building of agency. The intentional binding effect has been first reported by Haggard et al. (
<xref rid="B34" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>
): it refers to the subjective compression of the temporal interval between a voluntary action and its external sensory consequences. Thus, actions are perceived as shifted in time towards the outcomes that they cause, while outcomes are perceived as shifted back in time towards the actions that cause them (see Moore and Obhi,
<xref rid="B46" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
, for a review). This temporal attraction is absent in cases of involuntary or passive movement. Equally, when participants simply judge the interval between action and effect, their judgments show a perceptual compression absent for equivalent passive movements (Engbert et al.,
<xref rid="B22" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
). The intentional binding effect would constitute an implicit, but reliable, measure of agency, as it only occurs when events in the external environment are precisely recognized as the
<italic>consequences</italic>
of one’s action.</p>
<p>On comparator accounts, a positive sense of agency is the default operation when no mismatch between predicted and current states occurs (see Synofzik et al.,
<xref rid="B62" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
). It is the experiential output of sub-personal processes that mostly run outside consciousness. Crucially, although sense of agency relies on real-time motor signals, it can only be computed after those signals are compared with reafferent feedback. Thus, a reliable, explicit sense of agency may only be formed when reafferent (visual, motor, or proprioceptive) signals become available for matching with intentions. Thus, one cannot feel agency over any event until that event has been registered and processed in the brain. As a consequence, agency can only be
<italic>retrospectively</italic>
attributed, although it is informed by
<italic>on-line</italic>
signals about motor guidance and control (Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
).</p>
<p>Note the retrospective account on agency has several advantages. First, it is grounded on several classes of converging behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Second, it primarily relies on a computational model that provides a convincing explanation for the link between action and effect: action effects are sensory events that can be predicted from one’s action plans. However, an alternative possibility, that sense of agency is also generated
<italic>prospectively</italic>
, in advance of the action itself and before knowing the actual effect of actions, has received recent support (Wenke et al.,
<xref rid="B68" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). On this view, selecting between alternative possible actions might itself generate a sense of agency. This view places a new emphasis on the intention-action, rather than the action-effect, link—i.e., on the process through which intentions are transformed into specific actions, to achieve desired effects. Importantly, this view suggests that agency may depend on real-time, prospective signals arising from internal circuits of action preparation, rather than on a
<italic>post-hoc</italic>
, retrospective comparison between predicted and current states of the environment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2">
<title>Intention-action link and selection fluency: a prospective account of agency</title>
<p>Previous studies have shown that judgments of agency tend to be related to how participants think that they perform in a task (Metcalfe and Greene,
<xref rid="B41" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>
). Similarly, errors in task performance may lead to a
<italic>feeling</italic>
of dysfluency during the task, without any explicit awareness of an error, and without the ability to explicitly report the error. Thus, a feeling that something went “wrong” during the control of instrumental action may be sufficient to modulate later judgments of control, even without being able to identify or explicitly report the error. The term “epistemic feeling” has been coined to describe this subjective, on-line, experience of an error (Arango-Muñoz,
<xref rid="B50" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
; Charles et al.,
<xref rid="B11" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Importantly, such on-line experience strongly influences the sense of agency, as shown by recent priming studies. Thus, Wenke and colleagues showed that the sense of agency could be modulated by using subliminal priming to affect the
<italic>fluency</italic>
of action selection processes (Wenke et al.,
<xref rid="B68" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
; Haggard and Chambon,
<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
, for a review). Interestingly, this procedure enabled a manipulation of the subjective sense of agency, without manipulating the
<italic> predictability</italic>
of action outcomes. In this experiment, participants pressed left or right keys in response to left- or right-pointing arrow targets. Prior to the target, subliminal left or right arrow primes were presented, unbeknownst to the subject. Prime arrow directions were either identical (compatible condition) or opposite (incompatible condition) to the subsequent target (Figure
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1B</xref>
). Responding to the target caused the appearance of a color after a jittered delay. The color patch can thus be considered as the action outcome. The specific color shown depended on whether the participant’s action was compatible or incompatible with the preceding subliminal prime, but did not depend on the prime identity or the chosen action alternative alone. Unlike previous studies, therefore, the primes did not predict action effects, nor could any specific color be predicted on the basis of the action chosen. Participants rated how much control they experienced over the different colors at the end of each block (Wenke et al.,
<xref rid="B68" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
).</p>
<p>Analyses of reaction times (RTs) showed that compatible primes facilitated responding whereas incompatible primes interfered with response selection. More importantly, priming also modulated the sense of agency over action effects: participants experienced more control over colors that followed actions compatible with the preceding primes than over colors that followed prime-incompatible actions. Thus subliminal priming made action selection processes more or less
<italic>fluent</italic>
, and this modulation of fluency affected the sense of agency over action outcomes.
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0001">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</p>
<p>These results have several important cognitive implications. First, they suggest that the sense of agency depends strongly on processes of action selection that necessarily occur before action itself. Second, strong sense of agency may be associated with fluent, uncontested action selection. In contrast, conflict between alternative possible actions, such as that caused by incompatible subliminal priming, may reduce the feeling of control over action outcomes. Third, this prospective contribution of action selection processes to sense of agency is distinct from predicting the outcomes of action, since action outcomes were equally (un-) predictable for compatible and incompatible primes. That is, these primes did not prime effects of action as in previous studies (e.g., Wegner and Wheatley,
<xref rid="B67" ref-type="bibr">1999</xref>
; Aarts et al.,
<xref rid="B1" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>
; Linser and Goschke,
<xref rid="B37" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>
; Sato,
<xref rid="B55" ref-type="bibr">2009</xref>
). Therefore, participants could not retrospectively base their control judgements on match between primes and effects alone. Rather, their stronger experience of control when primes were compatible could only be explained by the fluency of action selection—i.e., by a signal experienced
<italic>before</italic>
the action was made, and the effect was displayed.</p>
<p>Finally, participants did not consciously perceive the subliminal primes. Therefore, participants’ sense of agency could not be based on (conscious) beliefs about the primes. Instead, action priming itself presumably directly influenced the subjective sense of agency. Pacherie (Pacherie,
<xref rid="B54" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
; see also Synofzik et al.,
<xref rid="B62" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
) has suggested that action selection conflict need not necessarily be conscious (Morsella et al.,
<xref rid="B49" ref-type="bibr">2009</xref>
). Such conflict may elicit the feeling “that something is wrong”, without necessarily leading to knowledge about
<italic> what</italic>
is wrong. Wenke et al.’s study shows that subjects can rely on this
<italic>implicit</italic>
<italic>feeling</italic>
to make judgments about their own control over action effects
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0002">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Dissociating prospective sense of agency from motor performance</title>
<p>Wenke et al.’s findings suggest that monitoring fluency signals generated
<italic>during</italic>
action selection could be an important marker for the experience of agency. However, it is also possible that participants might have estimated agency based on implicit monitoring of their own performance, such as their RTs. Since RTs are lower on compatibly primed trials (Dehaene et al.,
<xref rid="B18" ref-type="bibr">1998</xref>
; Schlaghecken and Eimer,
<xref rid="B56" ref-type="bibr">2000</xref>
; Schlaghecken et al.,
<xref rid="B57" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
), participants would therefore feel more control on compatible trials, because they respond more rapidly. On this second view, agency would depend on
<italic>retrospective</italic>
monitoring of action execution performance (Marti et al.,
<xref rid="B39" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
), not on
<italic>prospective</italic>
monitoring of premotor fluency signals.</p>
<p>To distinguish between these two accounts of sense of agency, we used an experimental procedure that dissociated fluency of action selection from performance monitoring (Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
). Specifically, we increased the interval between mask and target to take advantage of a Negative Compatibility Effect (NCE) in priming. Longer mask-target latencies
<italic>increase</italic>
RTs following compatible primes, relative to incompatible primes (Schlaghecken et al.,
<xref rid="B57" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
). By combining this factor with Wenke et al.’s design for assessing sense of agency, it was possible to directly compare the contrasting retrospective (performance monitoring) and prospective (action selection) accounts. Specifically, if sense of agency depends on selection fluency, it should be greater when actions are compatibly (fluent condition) versus incompatibly (dysfluent condition) primed, irrespective of whether priming benefits (faster RTs) or impairs (slower RTs) performance. Alternatively, if sense of agency depends only on performance monitoring, it should be stronger for rapid versus slower responding, irrespective of whether priming is compatible or incompatible with the action executed.</p>
<p>Crucially, reversing the normal relationship between prime-target compatibility and RTs did not alter subjective sense of agency. Thus, in compatible NCE trials, participants experienced
<italic>stronger</italic>
control despite
<italic>slower</italic>
response times and higher error rates, compared to incompatible NCE trials (Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
; see also Stenner et al.,
<xref rid="B60" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>
). These results suggest that the feeling of control normally experienced by subjects on compatible trials does not depend on retrospectively monitoring performance, thereby strengthening the evidence for a prospective contribution of action selection fluency to sense of agency.</p>
<p>In both Wenke et al.’s (
<xref rid="B68" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
) and Chambon and Haggard’s (
<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
), experiments, priming did not influence the actual objective level of control that participants had over the colors presented after their actions. Indeed, the contingency between action and color effect was similar for compatibly-primed and incompatibly-primed trials. Importantly, the prospective sense of control identified in these experiments is therefore an illusion of control, since it is not based on differences in the actual statistical relation between action and effect. In other words, action selection is irrelevant to actual action-effect contingency, and thus to the agent’s actual ability to drive external events. Although illusory, this prospective sense of control may nevertheless be a convenient proxy for actual control, because agents often just know what to do and what will happen next in most everyday life situations. In that sense,
<italic>fluent</italic>
action selection is generally a good
<italic>advance predictor</italic>
of actual statistical control over the external environment (Haggard and Chambon,
<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
; Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B6" ref-type="bibr">2014</xref>
). Prospective agency might thus reflect a learned experiential metacognition: if we can fluently select an appropriate action, then we are likely to get what we want, or fulfill our intentions.</p>
<p>As suggested above, internal signals of premotor fluency might not produce a strong conscious experience with distinctive content, but might influence the experience of surrounding events. Thus, fluency of action selection would not be experienced as such, but would presumably be experienced as something that goes “right” or “wrong” in the control of instrumental action, and thus seems relevant to sense of agency. In that sense, signals relating to the fluency of action selection would not be perceived for what they really are, but (mis-)attributed to the processes of actually controlling the action. Such a misattribution may foster the subject not to adjust her behavior accordingly. Indeed, it has been shown that behavioral adjustment does not only depend on the presence or absence of an error, but also on its cause (e.g., me vs. not-me) (Steinhauser and Kiesel,
<xref rid="B59" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>
). Thus, if participants misattribute dysfluency to lack of control on the selected action, and misattribute fluency to the process of actually controlling the action, then they should adjust their behavior less in the dysfluent, than in the fluent, condition—despite the fact that control is equally illusory in both conditions. Future work is required to test this assumption directly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4">
<title>Neural substrates of prospective (fluency-based) agency</title>
<p>Taken together, these findings suggest that neural activity in action preparation circuits
<italic>prospectively</italic>
informs agency, independent of outcome predictability, and actual performance. Tracking dysfluency in action selection networks (Miele et al.,
<xref rid="B43" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>
; Nahab et al.,
<xref rid="B52" ref-type="bibr">2011</xref>
) could be the basis for this prospective sense of agency. Recently, we adapted the prospective agency paradigm for functional neuroimaging (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Specifically, we studied whether the angular gyrus (AG), a parietal brain region which has been shown to compute
<italic>retrospective</italic>
agency by monitoring mismatches between actions and subsequent outcomes (Farrer et al.,
<xref rid="B24" ref-type="bibr">2003</xref>
,
<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
), may also code for a
<italic>prospective</italic>
sense of agency, by monitoring action selection processes in advance of the action itself, and independently of action outcomes.</p>
<p>Behavioral results replicated those of Wenke and colleagues. Again, participants experienced greater control over action effects when the action was compatibly versus incompatibly primed (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). More importantly, this prospective contribution of action-selection processes to sense of agency was accounted for by exchange of signals between specific frontal action selection areas and the parietal cortex. First, we found that activity in the AG was sensitive to mismatches, but not matches, between prime arrow and actual response to the target arrow. Moreover, this activity due to the prime-target mismatch predicted the magnitude of subsequent sense of agency: for incompatible trials only, activity in the AG decreased as sense of control over outcomes increased. Importantly, this neural coding of non-agency occurred at the time of action selection
<italic>only</italic>
, as in Wenke et al.’s original experiment.</p>
<p>Second, connectivity analyses (psycho-physiological interaction) revealed that activity in the AG (signaling non-agency) in incompatible trials was negatively correlated with activity in the dorso-lateral prefrontal area (DLPFC; Figure
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2A</xref>
). Previous studies of willed action also noticed the same frontoparietal correlation, namely, that increased activity in DLPFC was associated with decreased activity in the AG (Frith et al.,
<xref rid="B30" ref-type="bibr">1991</xref>
). Our results are directly analogous: compatible primes might partly engage circuits for willed action, while prime-target incompatibility might relatively decrease activity in this circuit (Wenke et al.,
<xref rid="B68" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). Thus, DLPFC
<italic>deactivation</italic>
would signal dysfluency in the selection of willed action, as a consequence of prime-target incompatibility. Decreased DLPFC activity due to incompatible primes would in turn result in a concomitant increase in AG activity and a subjective loss of control. Overall, this suggests that AG may monitor signals relating to fluency or dysfluency of action selection emanating from DLFPC and use them to (pre)construct an experience of agency. Importantly, under this interpretation, this monitoring of fluency signals by AG would occur
<italic>prior</italic>
to actions and their sensory consequences. This prospective contribution of AG to sense of agency can thus be distinguished from other functions such as action outcome monitoring. Interestingly, Farrer et al. (
<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
) demonstrated a role of AG in action outcome monitoring, but found a bilateral AG activation, which was slightly more ventral than the AG found here. In Farrer et al.’s study, AG activation varied with mismatch between predicted and actual sensory consequences of an action, while AG activation in Chambon et al.’s study was elicited by a mismatch between a prime-induced intention and response to a target (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). The different localization found in these two studies could thus reflect a subdivision within the inferior parietal cortex, with more dorsal AG being involved in detecting mismatch between intention and action, independent of action consequences (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
), while more ventral AG would be involved in retrospectively comparing predicted and actual consequences of an action (Farrer et al.,
<xref rid="B25" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold>
Sense of agency is accounted for by exchange of signals across a prefrontal-parietal network: decreased DLPFC activity (in blue) due to incompatible primes results in a concomitant increase in AG activity (in yellow), and a subjective loss of control. The right chart shows a negative modulation of AG activity as a function of the level of experienced control (from low to high; adapted from Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
).
<bold>(B)</bold>
TMS-induced disruption of left AG at the time of action selection abolishes the compatibility effect on sense of agency (right chart).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fnhum-08-00320-g0002"></graphic>
</fig>
<p>Monitoring of fluency signals by AG might provide the subject with an on-line, subjective marker of volition, prior to action itself. As such, this finding sketches an important qualification of recent
<italic>post-hoc</italic>
determinist views of action control (Ackerman et al.,
<xref rid="B2" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). In its strongest form, determinist views suggest that human behavior is unconsciously determined by subtle changes in the stimulus environment. On this view, individuals are not even aware of how their behavior is shaped and transformed, although they can retrospectively integrate general information about past actions and environmental cues to make inferences and narrative explanations about their own behavior (Wegner,
<xref rid="B66" ref-type="bibr">2002</xref>
). While participants, in both Wenke’s and Chambon’s experiments, did not have any conscious experience of the subliminal primes, they did have a real-time
<italic>subjective experience</italic>
of their own action generation, which reflected the prime’s capacity to influence action selection. In this respect, the ability to monitor fluency signals generated
<italic>during</italic>
action selection in AG might be an important part of what makes our action intentional, and thus a key component of the experience of agency—defined as the feeling that we are intentionally making things happen by our own choices and actions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>A causal evidence for the role of AG in the coding of prospective agency</title>
<p>Although informative, this fMRI study was nevertheless limited in two key ways. First, the evidence was indirect, because of the correlational nature of fMRI. Secondly, it was not possible to pinpoint the precise
<italic>time</italic>
at which AG is involved in the prospective coding of agency owing to the relatively poor temporal resolution of fMRI. As we saw, the issue of timing is important for understanding
<italic>where</italic>
the sense of agency is computed within the intention-action-effect chain.</p>
<p>We recently addressed these two limitations by combining single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with subliminal priming of action selection and judgements of control over action effects. On two distinct experiments we assessed the effects of TMS over left AG on action selection processing, by linking TMS to either (i) the presentation of the arrow target; (ii) to action execution; or (iii) to the presentation of the action effect (color patch). We made specific predictions based on our previous fMRI findings. Because AG activation correlated with sense of agency only on incompatible trials, we assumed that this area monitored signals relating to selection fluency generated by DLPFC (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). In this case, applying TMS over AG should prevent this region from monitoring any signals from DLPFC, and hence reduce the tendency for incompatibility primes to influence judgements of control.</p>
<p>Consistent with these predictions, we found that TMS over left AG abolished the compatibility effect (i.e., the difference between compatible and incompatible conditions) on sense of agency at the time of action selection
<italic>only</italic>
(Figure
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2B</xref>
), while TMS delivered shortly after presentation of the action effect did not alter experienced agency. Importantly, TMS had no effect on RTs. This suggests that TMS-induced disruption of AG did not interfere with action selection processing itself, but rather interfered with a circuit that monitors selection fluency to pre-construct the experience of control.</p>
<p>Previously it is has been suggested that the AG is involved in the retrospective construction of sense of agency by monitoring the consistency between predicted and actual sensory consequences of movements (David et al.,
<xref rid="B15" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
, for a review). When these predictions are violated sense of agency is reduced, and AG activity is increased. Results from our TMS study do not disagree with this view of AG function, but point to an additional role: by monitoring the consistency between action plans and required actions, the AG is also involved in
<italic>earlier</italic>
prospective aspects of sense of agency, relating to action selection and action programming.</p>
<p>Note the prospective
<italic>and</italic>
retrospective mechanisms have some general features in common. Both involve monitoring action-related signals or “cues” (such as re-afferent sensory feedback) as they become available, and comparing them with other relevant information for consistency (see Moore et al.,
<xref rid="B48" ref-type="bibr">2009</xref>
). We suggest that monitoring and checking is a very general function of the AG during instrumental action. Initial action intentions, such as those caused by subliminal primes in the series of studies described above, could be checked for compatibility with the action subsequently performed. These action selection cues may provide an important “online” marker of control as the action is unfolding. Not only would this provide an estimate of agency without the need to wait until sensory feedback becomes available but, as we have suggested (Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
), it may protect against aberrant experiences of agency. For example, the sense of agency in patients with schizophrenia is characterised by excessive reliance on re-afferent sensory information generated by their actions, presumably due to poor, or unreliable, action selection processing (Voss et al.,
<xref rid="B65" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). Prospective signals—such as fluency signals—may indeed provide an important counterweight to re-afferent information, and hence may protect against xenopathic experiences (e.g., loss of control over one’s actions and thoughts) such as those experienced in passivity symptoms. At the same time, excessive reliance on these prospective signals may produce the opposite delusion of omnipotence, in which the mere decision to act is incorrectly assumed to produce successful action outcomes. This latter illusion appears to be common in historical despots but is interestingly absent in depressed people (Alloy and Abramson,
<xref rid="B3" ref-type="bibr">1979</xref>
). A robust and reliable sense of agency may thus require a balanced—and probably context-dependent—mixture of both prospective and retrospective components. Future work is required to test whether other (contextual of individual) factors may influence the interplay between these two components. For example, it has been convincingly suggested that priming effects on the experience of agency depend on the
<italic>level</italic>
at which the agent represents her behavior (van der Weiden et al.,
<xref rid="B64" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). Thus, while some people represent their own behavior at a low-level (i.e., the instrumental level: in terms of
<italic>how</italic>
an action is done), some others represent their behavior at a higher level (i.e., the outcome level: in terms of
<italic>why</italic>
an action is done). Interestingly, the former may depend more heavily on prospective cues to agency (e.g., selection fluency), whereas the latter may show excessive reliance on retrospective information—i.e., on general information about past actions and outcome-related cues.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Linking fluency to outcome predictability</title>
<p>Recent accounts of agency have highlighted that it results from the integration of various cues (Synofzik et al.,
<xref rid="B62" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
; Moore and Fletcher,
<xref rid="B44" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
), which may emerge at different times (Farrer et al.,
<xref rid="B26" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Namely, it has been suggested that several agency cues may be weighted by their reliability in order to obtain a “Bayesian optimal” estimate of true agency (Moore and Fletcher,
<xref rid="B44" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
). This view has received some support as studies have shown, for example, that changes in action-contingency affected the weighting of predictive and postdictive cues (Moore and Haggard,
<xref rid="B45" ref-type="bibr">2008</xref>
; Wolpe et al.,
<xref rid="B70" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). As outcome predictability was reduced, there was a greater reliance on
<italic>post-hoc</italic>
, inferential processes.</p>
<p>In the action priming studies described above, outcomes were fully contingent on a given action, in order to hold outcome predictability constant. However, it remained unclear whether action selection fluency would still be a relevant cue to agency in a context of greater uncertainty about action-outcome relations. Given our previous proposal that action selection fluency could serve as an advance predictor of successful action (Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
), one might predict that reducing action-outcome contingency would reduce the contribution of the prospective (fluency-based) relative to the retrospective (outcome-based) cue, to sense of agency. That is, if the outcome monitoring revealed that the action was in fact unsuccessful—i.e., outcomes did not match expectations, then the fluency of action selection would no longer be relevant.</p>
<p>To test this, we adapted our previous paradigm (e.g., Chambon et al.,
<xref rid="B10" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
) to involve a reduced contingency between actions and outcomes (Sidarus et al.,
<xref rid="B58" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Thus, a given action was associated with two possible colored outcomes on 66% of trials, but these colors would appear after the alternative action on the remaining 33% of trials. This allowed us to create situations in which outcomes could either match or mismatch expectations, given action-outcome contingencies. In addition, these outcomes would follow actions that were either compatibly or incompatibly primed. Therefore, we could assess the relative contribution of a prospective cue—action selection fluency, with a retrospective cue—outcome monitoring.</p>
<p>Results showed that participants’ sense of agency was sensitive to manipulations of both the prospective and the retrospective cues. Compatibly primed actions were associated with higher control ratings than incompatibly primed actions. Additionally, participants reported a stronger sense of agency when the outcome was expected, compared to when the outcome was unexpected. More importantly, there was an interaction between the two variables. Incompatible action priming led to a significant reduction in control ratings when outcomes were unexpected, but not when outcomes were expected. At the same time, unexpected outcomes only reduced control ratings significantly when they followed incompatibly primed actions, and not compatibly primed actions (Sidarus et al.,
<xref rid="B58" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
). Thus, contrary to our predictions, selection fluency had a larger impact on sense of agency when outcomes were unexpected.</p>
<p>These findings reiterate the importance of action selection processes to the sense of agency. Even though outcomes were less predictable than in previous studies, we still found a similar effect of action priming on control ratings. What is more, the interaction between selection fluency and outcome expectation suggests that the sense of agency does not merely reflect information about action-outcome relations (e.g., Metcalfe and Greene,
<xref rid="B41" ref-type="bibr">2007</xref>
). The sense of agency was drastically reduced only when both action selection was dysfluent
<italic>and</italic>
the outcome was unexpected. Prospective cues related to action selection fluency may thus make an independent contribution to the sense of agency from retrospective, outcome-based, cues.</p>
<p>Our findings are also not fully compatible with the cue integration models presently proposed for agency computation (Moore and Fletcher,
<xref rid="B44" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
). Within this framework, it is the reliability of a given cue that determines its impact on the resulting sense of agency. Reliability is, however, a feature of the distribution of events. Thus, changes in cue reliability can only be assessed over a number of trials. Instead, our results suggest that the specific information carried by a given cue in a single trial can alter its weight relative to other cues. More complex Bayesian models of cue integration might be able to encompass these dynamic changes in cue weight. Yet, as mentioned above, perhaps a complete account of the sense of agency cannot be provided by simply maximising information about action-outcome relations.</p>
<p>These results overall support the idea that agency is the “default” assumption, which is only falsified, or reduced, when there is “sufficient” evidence against it.
<xref ref-type="fn" rid="fn0003">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
In some circumstances, it might be adaptive to maintain a sense of agency in the face of unexpected outcomes. Our environment mostly does not afford us fully predictable and contingent relations between actions and outcomes, but rather these tend to be probabilistic in nature. As such, we can learn these predictive relations, but we must also admit that predictions may be violated either due to the known statistical relations (e.g., when it is 66%), or due to random or outlier events. This type of
<italic>expected uncertainty</italic>
(Yu and Dayan,
<xref rid="B72" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>
) suggests that a mismatch between prediction and outcome does not always imply that the environment has changed, and one is not in control. In these situations, agency may be retained depending on information from other available cues, namely internal signals related to action selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Action selection, agency, and expertise</title>
<p>Interestingly, the experience associated to selection fluency (at least partly) overlaps with the phenomenal properties of what has been formalized as “flow” in positive psychology (Csikszentmihalyi,
<xref rid="B12" ref-type="bibr">1990</xref>
). The flow is a particular mental state, described by expert people as a feeling of mindfulness and total commitment to the task at hand, often associated with an experience of a dilation of subjective time (Witt and Sugovic,
<xref rid="B69" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
; see also Hagura et al.,
<xref rid="B35" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
). In some professional tennis players, for example, this feeling of “flow”, resulting from a fluently selected (and perfectly executed) backhand stroke, may be associated with a “premonitory” anticipation of
<italic>where</italic>
the ball is going to hit the ground (Murphy and White,
<xref rid="B51" ref-type="bibr">1978</xref>
). Consistently, our findings suggest that people may use the
<italic>fluency</italic>
(or ease) with which an action is selected as a good advance predictor of actual statistical control over the external environment.</p>
<p>Two hypotheses can be considered to account for the use of fluency signals in daily life. Using these signals adequately could first require learning
<italic>stable</italic>
relations between actions (e.g., the backhand stroke) and outcomes (e.g., where the tennis ball hit the court on average after that specific backhand). Indeed, simply having a feeling of fluently knowing which action to select does not guarantee the correct action outcome. Thus, fluency-based behaviors might only develop with expertise, once the brain has shifted from supervisory control to automatic or expert control. Under the expert regime, fluency would be used as an
<italic>implicit</italic>
<italic>proxy</italic>
for the current status (success or failure) of the action unfolding (Haggard and Chambon,
<xref rid="B32" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
), and would substitute for explicit monitoring of the action-effect link through short-circuiting the process of “checking” the actual consequences of our actions.</p>
<p>In contrast, an alternative hypothesis would propose that we learn in our everyday lives to use fluency of action selection as a reliable cue to agency. Fluency signals may become a heuristics for assessing one’s control over the external world, and we might even rely more on this heuristics in novel or uncertain situations. Before we know the statistical contingency between an action and its outcome in a given situation, we still have a sense of agency over what we do. Hence, we might rely on selection fluency to guide this sense of agency, until the more reliable action-outcome contingency cue is available. Although the Sidarus et al. (
<xref rid="B58" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
) study may provide some support for this alternative hypothesis, further research is needed to explore how the role of different agency cues may shift over time, during the learning of action-outcome relations. Similarly, high levels of expertise in complex tasks may involve the recruitment of different processes, and also affect the types of cues that inform the sense of agency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8">
<title>Conflict of interest statement</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<p>Valérian Chambon was supported by a Post-doctoral Fellowship of the Région Île-de-France (Paris), and by ANR-10-LABX-0087 IEC and ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL*. Nura Sidarus was supported by UCL Impact Scholarship and the Belgian Science Policy Office project “Mechanisms of conscious and unconscious learning” (IAP P7/33). Patrick Haggard was supported by an ESRC Professorial Fellowship, an ESRC/ESF ECRP Research Project, an ERC Advanced Grant (HUMVOL) and by EU FP7 Project VERE, Work Package 1.</p>
</ack>
<fn-group>
<fn id="fn0001">
<p>
<sup>1</sup>
Subliminal priming would facilitate action selection by reducing conflict between alternative action programmes (Fleming et al.,
<xref rid="B27" ref-type="bibr">2009</xref>
). This facilitation of premotor processing would precisely be experienced as a feeling of action fluency, while the opposite effect of conflict between alternative actions would be experienced as dysfluency. Note this suggestion is analogous to the wellaccepted way that the feeling of “effort” is seen, as the experiential output of an increased demand in cognitive control (McGuire and Botvinick,
<xref rid="B40" ref-type="bibr">2010</xref>
). Conversely, the literature usually defines fluency as an experiential consequence of smooth, effortless cognitive processing (e.g., Oppenheimer, 2008). In this sense, both terms are interchangeable—a fluent processing is an effortless processing–, and both may prospectively inform agency (e.g., Demanet et al.,
<xref rid="B19" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0002">
<p>
<sup>2</sup>
We take that selection fluency does not require to be explicitly represented to informconscious experience of action. In fact, recent data suggest that fluency signals need to be kept implicit in order to influence agency on compatible trials–i.e., in order to be mistaken for actual control over action effects. Indeed, when primes are consciously perceived (i.e., presented at a supraliminal threshold), the compatibility effect is reversed: sense of agency is higher on incompatible trials (Damen et al., 2014).</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fn0003">
<p>
<sup>3</sup>
Whereas subjects experience less control when presented with incompatibly vs. neutrally-primed (using “neutral” primes constructed by superimposing left- and right-oriented primes), they do not feel more control when compatibly vs. neutrally-primed (Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B7" ref-type="bibr">2012</xref>
). These results are consistent with previous accounts suggesting that agency is a default experience. On this view, sense of agency would only really become apparent as a sense of non-agency, when the normal flow from our intentions to the effects of our actions is broken (Haggard,
<xref rid="B33" ref-type="bibr">2005</xref>
; Chambon and Haggard,
<xref rid="B8" ref-type="bibr">2013</xref>
).</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aarts</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Custers</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wegner</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2005</year>
).
<article-title>On the inference of personal authorship: enhancing experienced agency by priming effect information</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>14</volume>
,
<fpage>439</fpage>
<lpage>458</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2004.11.001</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16091264</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ackerman</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nocera</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bargh</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions</article-title>
.
<source>Science</source>
<volume>328</volume>
,
<fpage>1712</fpage>
<lpage>1715</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1189993</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20576894</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alloy</surname>
<given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abramson</surname>
<given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1979</year>
).
<article-title>Judgment of contingency in depressed and nondepressed students: sadder but wiser?</article-title>
<source>J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.</source>
<volume>108</volume>
,
<fpage>441</fpage>
<lpage>485</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0096-3445.108.4.441</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">528910</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arango-Muñoz</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Two levels of metacognition</article-title>
.
<source>Philosophia</source>
<volume>39</volume>
,
<fpage>71</fpage>
<lpage>82</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11406-010-9279-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blakemore</surname>
<given-names>S.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frith</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolpert</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2001</year>
).
<article-title>The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroreport</source>
<volume>12</volume>
,
<fpage>1879</fpage>
<lpage>1884</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00001756-200107030-00023</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11435916</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filevich</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2014</year>
). “
<article-title>What is the human sense of agency and is it metacognitive?</article-title>
,” in
<source>The Neuroscience of Metacognition</source>
, eds
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Fleming</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frith</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<publisher-loc>Berlin Heidelberg</publisher-loc>
:
<publisher-name>Springer-Verlag</publisher-name>
),
<fpage>321</fpage>
<lpage>342</lpage>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2012</year>
).
<article-title>Sense of control depends on fluency of action selection, not motor performance</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>125</volume>
,
<fpage>441</fpage>
<lpage>451</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22902284</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
). “
<article-title>Premotor or ldeomotor: how does the experience of action come about?</article-title>
,” in
<source>Action Science: Foundations of an Emerging Discipline</source>
, eds
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Prinz</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beisert</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herwig</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA</publisher-loc>
:
<publisher-name>MIT Press</publisher-name>
),
<fpage>359</fpage>
<lpage>380</lpage>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wenke</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fleming</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prinz</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>An online neural substrate for sense of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Cereb. Cortex</source>
<volume>23</volume>
,
<fpage>1031</fpage>
<lpage>1037</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhs059</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22510529</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Charles</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Opstal</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Marti</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dehaene</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>Distinct brain mechanisms for conscious versus subliminal error detection</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroimage</source>
<volume>73</volume>
,
<fpage>80</fpage>
<lpage>94</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.054</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23380166</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Csikszentmihalyi</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1990</year>
).
<source>Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience.</source>
<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>
:
<publisher-name>Harper and Row</publisher-name>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Damen</surname>
<given-names>T. G. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Baaren</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dijksterhuis</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2014</year>
).
<article-title>You should read this! Perceiving and acting upon action primes influences one’s sense of agency</article-title>
.
<source>J. Exp. Soc. Psychol.</source>
<volume>50</volume>
,
<fpage>21</fpage>
<lpage>26</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jesp.2013.09.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>David</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cohen</surname>
<given-names>M. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bewernick</surname>
<given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname>
<given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fink</surname>
<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal></etal>
</person-group>
(
<year>2007</year>
).
<article-title>The extrastriate cortex distinguishes between the consequences of one’s own and others’ behavior</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroimage</source>
<volume>36</volume>
,
<fpage>1004</fpage>
<lpage>1014</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.030</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17478105</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>David</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogeley</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>The “sense of agency” and its underlying cognitive and neural mechanisms</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>17</volume>
,
<fpage>523</fpage>
<lpage>534</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.004</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18424080</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>David</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stenzel</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname>
<given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engel</surname>
<given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2011</year>
).
<article-title>The feeling of agency: empirical indicators for a pre-reflective level of action awareness</article-title>
.
<source>Front. Psychol.</source>
<volume>2</volume>
:
<fpage>149</fpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00149</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21779268</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dehaene</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naccache</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le Clec’H</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koechlin</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dehaene-Lambertz</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal></etal>
</person-group>
(
<year>1998</year>
).
<article-title>Imaging unconscious semantic priming</article-title>
.
<source>Nature</source>
<volume>395</volume>
,
<fpage>597</fpage>
<lpage>600</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/26967</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9783584</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Demanet</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muhle-Karbe</surname>
<given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynn</surname>
<given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blotenberg</surname>
<given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brass</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>Power to the will: how exerting physical effort boosts the sense of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>129</volume>
,
<fpage>574</fpage>
<lpage>578</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.020</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24060604</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Engbert</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wohlschläger</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>Who is causing what? The sense of agency is relational and efferent-triggered</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>107</volume>
,
<fpage>693</fpage>
<lpage>704</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.021</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17825813</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frith</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2002</year>
).
<article-title>Experiencing oneself vs another person as being the cause of an action: the neural correlates of the experience of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroimage</source>
<volume>15</volume>
,
<fpage>596</fpage>
<lpage>603</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/nimg.2001.1009</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11848702</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franck</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Georgieff</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frith</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Decety</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeannerod</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2003</year>
).
<article-title>Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroimage</source>
<volume>18</volume>
,
<fpage>324</fpage>
<lpage>333</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1053-8119(02)00041-1</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12595186</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname>
<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Horn</surname>
<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tunik</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turk</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inati</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal></etal>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations</article-title>
.
<source>Cereb. Cortex</source>
<volume>18</volume>
,
<fpage>254</fpage>
<lpage>261</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhm050</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17490989</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valentin</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hupé</surname>
<given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>The time windows of the sense of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>22</volume>
,
<fpage>1431</fpage>
<lpage>1441</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.010</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24161792</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fleming</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mars</surname>
<given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gladwin</surname>
<given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2009</year>
).
<article-title>When the brain changes its mind: flexibility of action selection in instructed and free choices</article-title>
.
<source>Cereb. Cortex</source>
<volume>19</volume>
,
<fpage>2352</fpage>
<lpage>2360</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhn252</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19211661</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fourneret</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeannerod</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1998</year>
).
<article-title>Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects</article-title>
.
<source>Neuropsychologia</source>
<volume>36</volume>
,
<fpage>1133</fpage>
<lpage>1140</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00006-2</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9842759</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Franck</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Georgieff</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marie-Cardine</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daléry</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>d’ Amato</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal></etal>
</person-group>
(
<year>2001</year>
).
<article-title>Defective recognition of one’s own actions in patients with schizophrenia</article-title>
.
<source>Am. J. Psychiatry</source>
<volume>158</volume>
,
<fpage>454</fpage>
<lpage>459</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1176/appi.ajp.158.3.454</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11229988</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Frith</surname>
<given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friston</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liddle</surname>
<given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frackowiak</surname>
<given-names>R. S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1991</year>
).
<article-title>Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET</article-title>
.
<source>Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.</source>
<volume>244</volume>
,
<fpage>241</fpage>
<lpage>246</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.1991.0077</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">1679944</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2012</year>
).
<article-title>Sense of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Curr. Biol.</source>
<volume>22</volume>
,
<fpage>R390</fpage>
<lpage>R392</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cub.2012.02.040</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22625851</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2005</year>
).
<article-title>Conscious intention and motor cognition</article-title>
.
<source>Trends Cogn. Sci.</source>
<volume>9</volume>
,
<fpage>290</fpage>
<lpage>295</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tics.2005.04.012</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15925808</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalogeras</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2002</year>
).
<article-title>Voluntary action and conscious awareness</article-title>
.
<source>Nat. Neurosci.</source>
<volume>5</volume>
,
<fpage>382</fpage>
<lpage>385</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nn827</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11896397</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hagura</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanai</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orgs</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2012</year>
).
<article-title>Ready steady slow: action preparation slows the subjective passage of time</article-title>
.
<source>Proc. Biol. Sci.</source>
<volume>279</volume>
,
<fpage>4399</fpage>
<lpage>4406</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2012.1339</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22951740</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leube</surname>
<given-names>D. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knoblich</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erb</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grodd</surname>
<given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bartels</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kircher</surname>
<given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2003</year>
).
<article-title>The neural correlates of perceiving one’s own movements</article-title>
.
<source>Neuroimage</source>
<volume>20</volume>
,
<fpage>2084</fpage>
<lpage>2090</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.07.033</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14683712</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Linser</surname>
<given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goschke</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2007</year>
).
<article-title>Unconscious modulation of the conscious experience of voluntary control</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>104</volume>
,
<fpage>459</fpage>
<lpage>475</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2006.07.009</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16996491</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>MacDonald</surname>
<given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paus</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2003</year>
).
<article-title>The role of parietal cortex in awareness of self-generated movements: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study</article-title>
.
<source>Cereb. Cortex</source>
<volume>13</volume>
,
<fpage>962</fpage>
<lpage>967</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/13.9.962</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12902395</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marti</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sackur</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sigman</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dehaene</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Mapping introspection’s blind spot: reconstruction of dual-task phenomenology using quantified introspection</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>115</volume>
,
<fpage>303</fpage>
<lpage>313</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.003</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20129603</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McGuire</surname>
<given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Botvinick</surname>
<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Prefrontal cortex, cognitive control and the registration of decision costs</article-title>
.
<source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source>
<volume>107</volume>
,
<fpage>7922</fpage>
<lpage>7926</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0910662107</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20385798</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Metcalfe</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Greene</surname>
<given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2007</year>
).
<article-title>Metacognition of agency</article-title>
.
<source>J. Exp. Psychol. Gen.</source>
<volume>136</volume>
,
<fpage>184</fpage>
<lpage>199</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037/0096-3445.136.2.184</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17500645</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miall</surname>
<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wolpert</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1996</year>
).
<article-title>Forward models for physiological motor control</article-title>
.
<source>Neural Netw.</source>
<volume>9</volume>
,
<fpage>1265</fpage>
<lpage>1279</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0893-6080(96)00035-4</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12662535</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miele</surname>
<given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wager</surname>
<given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname>
<given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Metcalfe</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2011</year>
).
<article-title>Dissociating neural correlates of action monitoring and metacognition of agency</article-title>
.
<source>J. Cogn. Neurosci.</source>
<volume>23</volume>
,
<fpage>3620</fpage>
<lpage>3636</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1162/jocn_a_00052</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21563889</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fletcher</surname>
<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2012</year>
).
<article-title>Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>21</volume>
,
<fpage>59</fpage>
<lpage>68</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2011.08.010</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21920777</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>Awareness of action: inference and prediction</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>17</volume>
,
<fpage>136</fpage>
<lpage>144</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2006.12.004</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17306565</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Obhi</surname>
<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2012</year>
).
<article-title>Intentional binding and the sense of agency: a review</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>21</volume>
,
<fpage>546</fpage>
<lpage>561</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.002</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22240158</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wegner</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2009</year>
).
<article-title>Modulating the sense of agency with external cues</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>18</volume>
,
<fpage>1056</fpage>
<lpage>1064</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2009.05.004</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19515577</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morsella</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname>
<given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname>
<given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Honhongva</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gazzaley</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bargh</surname>
<given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2009</year>
).
<article-title>Subjective aspects of cognitive control at different stages of processing</article-title>
.
<source>Atten. Percept. Psychophys.</source>
<volume>71</volume>
,
<fpage>1807</fpage>
<lpage>1824</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/app.71.8.1807</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19933564</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1978</year>
).
<source>In the Zone, Transcendent Experience in Sports.</source>
<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>
:
<publisher-name>Penguin Arkana</publisher-name>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nahab</surname>
<given-names>F. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kundu</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallea</surname>
<given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kakareka</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pursley</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pohida</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal></etal>
</person-group>
(
<year>2011</year>
).
<article-title>The neural processes underlying self-agency</article-title>
.
<source>Cereb. Cortex</source>
<volume>21</volume>
,
<fpage>48</fpage>
<lpage>55</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/cercor/bhq059</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20378581</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oppenheimer</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>The secret life of fluency</article-title>
.
<source>Trends Cogn. Sci.</source>
<volume>12</volume>
,
<fpage>237</fpage>
<lpage>241</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18468944</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pacherie</surname>
<given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>The phenomenology of action: a conceptual framework</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>107</volume>
,
<fpage>179</fpage>
<lpage>217</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17950720</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2009</year>
).
<article-title>Both motor prediction and conceptual congruency between preview and action-effect contribute to explicit judgment of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>110</volume>
,
<fpage>74</fpage>
<lpage>83</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2008.10.011</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19038380</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schlaghecken</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eimer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2000</year>
).
<article-title>A central-peripheral asymmetry in masked priming</article-title>
.
<source>Percept. Psychophys.</source>
<volume>62</volume>
,
<fpage>1367</fpage>
<lpage>1382</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/bf03212139</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11143449</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schlaghecken</surname>
<given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowley</surname>
<given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sembi</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simmons</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whitcomb</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>The negative compatibility effect: a case for self-inhibition</article-title>
.
<source>Adv. Cogn. Psychol.</source>
<volume>3</volume>
,
<fpage>227</fpage>
<lpage>240</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/v10053-008-0027-y</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20517511</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sidarus</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chambon</surname>
<given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>Priming of action increases sense of control over unexpected outcomes</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>22</volume>
,
<fpage>1403</fpage>
<lpage>1411</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2013.09.008</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24185190</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steinhauser</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiesel</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2011</year>
).
<article-title>Performance monitoring and the causal attribution of errors</article-title>
.
<source>Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci.</source>
<volume>11</volume>
,
<fpage>309</fpage>
<lpage>320</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/s13415-011-0033-2</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21573741</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stenner</surname>
<given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauer</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sidarus</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heinze</surname>
<given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dolan</surname>
<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2014</year>
).
<article-title>Subliminal action priming modulates the perceived intensity of sensory action consequences</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>130</volume>
,
<fpage>227</fpage>
<lpage>235</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.008</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24333539</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Synofzik</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thier</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindner</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2006</year>
).
<article-title>Internalizing agency of self-action: perception of one’s own hand movements depends on an adaptable prediction about the sensory action outcome</article-title>
.
<source>J. Neurophysiol.</source>
<volume>96</volume>
,
<fpage>1592</fpage>
<lpage>1601</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1152/jn.00104.2006</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16738220</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Synofzik</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vosgerau</surname>
<given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newen</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2008</year>
).
<article-title>Beyond the comparator model: a multifactorial two-step account of agency</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>17</volume>
,
<fpage>219</fpage>
<lpage>239</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.010</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17482480</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van der Weiden</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aarts</surname>
<given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruys</surname>
<given-names>K. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Reflecting on the action or its outcome: behavior representation level modulates high level outcome priming effects on self-agency experiences</article-title>
.
<source>Conscious. Cogn.</source>
<volume>19</volume>
,
<fpage>21</fpage>
<lpage>32</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.concog.2009.12.004</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20071196</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Voss</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hauser</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallinat</surname>
<given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heinz</surname>
<given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Altered awareness of action in schizophrenia: a specific deficit in predicting action consequences</article-title>
.
<source>Brain</source>
<volume>133</volume>
,
<fpage>3104</fpage>
<lpage>3112</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/brain/awq152</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20685805</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wegner</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2002</year>
).
<source>The Illusion of Conscious Will.</source>
<publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA: MIT Press</publisher-loc>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wegner</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wheatley</surname>
<given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1999</year>
).
<article-title>Apparent mental causation: sources of the experience of will</article-title>
.
<source>Am. Psychol.</source>
<volume>54</volume>
,
<fpage>480</fpage>
<lpage>492</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1037//0003-066x.54.7.480</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10424155</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wenke</surname>
<given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fleming</surname>
<given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Subliminal priming of actions influences sense of control over effects of action</article-title>
.
<source>Cognition</source>
<volume>115</volume>
,
<fpage>26</fpage>
<lpage>38</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.016</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19945697</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Witt</surname>
<given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sugovic</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2010</year>
).
<article-title>Performance and ease influence perceived speed</article-title>
.
<source>Perception</source>
<volume>39</volume>
,
<fpage>1341</fpage>
<lpage>1353</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1068/p6699</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21180356</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolpe</surname>
<given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggard</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siebner</surname>
<given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowe</surname>
<given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2013</year>
).
<article-title>Cue integration and the perception of action in intentional binding</article-title>
.
<source>Exp. Brain Res.</source>
<volume>229</volume>
,
<fpage>467</fpage>
<lpage>474</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00221-013-3419-2</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23371752</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolpert</surname>
<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghahramani</surname>
<given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jordan</surname>
<given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>1995</year>
).
<article-title>An internal model for sensorimotor integration</article-title>
.
<source>Science</source>
<volume>29</volume>
,
<fpage>1880</fpage>
<lpage>1882</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.7569931</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">7569931</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dayan</surname>
<given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
(
<year>2005</year>
).
<article-title>Uncertainty, neuromodulation and attention</article-title>
.
<source>Neuron</source>
<volume>46</volume>
,
<fpage>681</fpage>
<lpage>692</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026</pub-id>
<pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15944135</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</pmc>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>France</li>
<li>Royaume-Uni</li>
</country>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="France">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Chambon, Valerian" sort="Chambon, Valerian" uniqKey="Chambon V" first="Valérian" last="Chambon">Valérian Chambon</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Chambon, Valerian" sort="Chambon, Valerian" uniqKey="Chambon V" first="Valérian" last="Chambon">Valérian Chambon</name>
</country>
<country name="Royaume-Uni">
<noRegion>
<name sortKey="Chambon, Valerian" sort="Chambon, Valerian" uniqKey="Chambon V" first="Valérian" last="Chambon">Valérian Chambon</name>
</noRegion>
<name sortKey="Haggard, Patrick" sort="Haggard, Patrick" uniqKey="Haggard P" first="Patrick" last="Haggard">Patrick Haggard</name>
<name sortKey="Sidarus, Nura" sort="Sidarus, Nura" uniqKey="Sidarus N" first="Nura" last="Sidarus">Nura Sidarus</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003021 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003021 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Merge
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:4030148
   |texte=   From action intentions to action effects: how does the sense of agency come about?
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:24860486" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024