A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance
Identifieur interne : 001445 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 001444; suivant : 001446A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance
Auteurs : John W. Philbeck ; Adam J. Woods ; Carly Kontra ; Petra ZdenkovaSource :
- Behavior research methods [ 1554-351X ] ; 2010.
Abstract
Blindwalking has become a common measure of perceived absolute distance and location, but it requires a relatively large testing space and cannot be used with people for whom walking is difficult or impossible. In the present article, we describe an alternative response type that is closely matched to blindwalking in several important respects but is less resource intensive. In the
Url:
DOI: 10.3758/BRM.42.1.148
PubMed: 20160295
PubMed Central: 2883722
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: 000F23
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: 000F23
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: 001F76
Links to Exploration step
PMC:2883722Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance</title><author><name sortKey="Philbeck, John W" sort="Philbeck, John W" uniqKey="Philbeck J" first="John W." last="Philbeck">John W. Philbeck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Woods, Adam J" sort="Woods, Adam J" uniqKey="Woods A" first="Adam J." last="Woods">Adam J. Woods</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kontra, Carly" sort="Kontra, Carly" uniqKey="Kontra C" first="Carly" last="Kontra">Carly Kontra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zdenkova, Petra" sort="Zdenkova, Petra" uniqKey="Zdenkova P" first="Petra" last="Zdenkova">Petra Zdenkova</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">20160295</idno><idno type="pmc">2883722</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2883722</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:2883722</idno><idno type="doi">10.3758/BRM.42.1.148</idno><date when="2010">2010</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000F23</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000F23</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">001F76</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">001445</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance</title><author><name sortKey="Philbeck, John W" sort="Philbeck, John W" uniqKey="Philbeck J" first="John W." last="Philbeck">John W. Philbeck</name></author><author><name sortKey="Woods, Adam J" sort="Woods, Adam J" uniqKey="Woods A" first="Adam J." last="Woods">Adam J. Woods</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kontra, Carly" sort="Kontra, Carly" uniqKey="Kontra C" first="Carly" last="Kontra">Carly Kontra</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zdenkova, Petra" sort="Zdenkova, Petra" uniqKey="Zdenkova P" first="Petra" last="Zdenkova">Petra Zdenkova</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Behavior research methods</title><idno type="ISSN">1554-351X</idno><idno type="eISSN">1554-3528</idno><imprint><date when="2010">2010</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p id="P1">Blindwalking has become a common measure of perceived absolute distance and location, but it requires a relatively large testing space and cannot be used with people for whom walking is difficult or impossible. In the present article, we describe an alternative response type that is closely matched to blindwalking in several important respects but is less resource intensive. In the <italic>blindpulling</italic> technique, participants view a target, then close their eyes and pull a length of tape or rope between the hands to indicate the remembered target distance. As with blindwalking, this response requires integration of cyclical, bilateral limb movements over time. Blindpulling and blindwalking responses are tightly linked across a range of viewing conditions, and blindpulling is accurate when prior exposure to visually guided pulling is provided. Thus, blindpulling shows promise as a measure of perceived distance that may be used in nonambulatory populations and when the space available for testing is limited.</p></div></front></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article" xml:lang="EN"><pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<pmc-dir>properties manuscript</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-journal-id">101244316</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="pubmed-jr-id">32541</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Behav Res Methods</journal-id><journal-title>Behavior research methods</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">1554-351X</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1554-3528</issn></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">20160295</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">2883722</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3758/BRM.42.1.148</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="manuscript">NIHMS209485</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Philbeck</surname><given-names>John W.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Woods</surname><given-names>Adam J.</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Kontra</surname><given-names>Carly</given-names></name></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zdenkova</surname><given-names>Petra</given-names></name></contrib><aff id="A1">George Washington University, Washington, D.C.</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp id="CR1">Address correspondence concerning this article to J. W. Philbeck, Department of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G. Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20052 (<email>philbeck@gwu.edu</email>).</corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="nihms-submitted"><day>2</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>2</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>11</day><month>6</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>148</fpage><lpage>160</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p id="P1">Blindwalking has become a common measure of perceived absolute distance and location, but it requires a relatively large testing space and cannot be used with people for whom walking is difficult or impossible. In the present article, we describe an alternative response type that is closely matched to blindwalking in several important respects but is less resource intensive. In the <italic>blindpulling</italic> technique, participants view a target, then close their eyes and pull a length of tape or rope between the hands to indicate the remembered target distance. As with blindwalking, this response requires integration of cyclical, bilateral limb movements over time. Blindpulling and blindwalking responses are tightly linked across a range of viewing conditions, and blindpulling is accurate when prior exposure to visually guided pulling is provided. Thus, blindpulling shows promise as a measure of perceived distance that may be used in nonambulatory populations and when the space available for testing is limited.</p></abstract><contract-num rid="NS1">R01 NS052137-04
||NS</contract-num><contract-sponsor id="NS1">National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke : NINDS</contract-sponsor></article-meta></front></pmc><affiliations><list></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Kontra, Carly" sort="Kontra, Carly" uniqKey="Kontra C" first="Carly" last="Kontra">Carly Kontra</name><name sortKey="Philbeck, John W" sort="Philbeck, John W" uniqKey="Philbeck J" first="John W." last="Philbeck">John W. Philbeck</name><name sortKey="Woods, Adam J" sort="Woods, Adam J" uniqKey="Woods A" first="Adam J." last="Woods">Adam J. Woods</name><name sortKey="Zdenkova, Petra" sort="Zdenkova, Petra" uniqKey="Zdenkova P" first="Petra" last="Zdenkova">Petra Zdenkova</name></noCountry></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 001445 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 001445 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:2883722
|texte= A comparison of blindpulling and blindwalking as measures of perceived absolute distance
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:20160295" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |