Haptic and visual perception of roughness.
Identifieur interne : 000925 ( Ncbi/Merge ); précédent : 000924; suivant : 000926Haptic and visual perception of roughness.
Auteurs : Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest [Pays-Bas] ; Astrid M L. KappersSource :
- Acta psychologica [ 0001-6918 ] ; 2007.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
- methods : Physical Stimulation, Principal Component Analysis.
- physiology : Attention, Touch, Visual Perception.
- psychology : Students.
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male.
Abstract
In this study, we are interested in the following two questions: (1) how does perceived roughness correlate with physical roughness, and (2) how do visually and haptically perceived roughness compare? We used 96 samples of everyday materials, such as wood, paper, glass, sandpaper, ceramics, foams, textiles, etc. The samples were characterized by various different physical roughness measures, all determined from accurately measured roughness profiles. These measures consisted of spectral densities measured at different spatial scales and industrial roughness standards (R(a), R(q) and R(z)). In separate haptic and visual conditions, 12 naïve subjects were instructed to order the 96 samples according to perceived roughness. The rank orders of both conditions were correlated with the various physical roughness measures. With most physical roughness measures, haptic and visual correspondence with the physical ordering was about equal. With others, haptic correspondence was slightly better. It turned out that different subjects ordered the samples using different criteria; for some subjects the correlation was better with roughness measures that were based on higher spatial frequencies, while others seemed to be paying more attention to the lower spatial frequencies. Also, physical roughness was not found to be the same as perceived roughness.
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.002
PubMed: 16684497
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001797
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001797
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001443
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:16684497Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Haptic and visual perception of roughness.</title><author><name sortKey="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" sort="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" uniqKey="Bergmann Tiest W" first="Wouter M" last="Bergmann Tiest">Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands. W.M.BergmannTiest@phys.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement><region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M L" last="Kappers">Astrid M L. Kappers</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2007">2007</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.002</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:16684497</idno><idno type="pmid">16684497</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001797</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001797</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001443</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000925</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Haptic and visual perception of roughness.</title><author><name sortKey="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" sort="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" uniqKey="Bergmann Tiest W" first="Wouter M" last="Bergmann Tiest">Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><nlm:affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands. W.M.BergmannTiest@phys.uu.nl</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Pays-Bas</country><wicri:regionArea>Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht</wicri:regionArea><orgName type="university">Université d'Utrecht</orgName><placeName><settlement type="city">Utrecht</settlement><region nuts="2">Utrecht (province)</region></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M L" last="Kappers">Astrid M L. Kappers</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Acta psychologica</title><idno type="ISSN">0001-6918</idno><imprint><date when="2007" type="published">2007</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Attention (physiology)</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Physical Stimulation (methods)</term><term>Principal Component Analysis (methods)</term><term>Students (psychology)</term><term>Touch (physiology)</term><term>Visual Perception (physiology)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Physical Stimulation</term><term>Principal Component Analysis</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Attention</term><term>Touch</term><term>Visual Perception</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="psychology" xml:lang="en"><term>Students</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">In this study, we are interested in the following two questions: (1) how does perceived roughness correlate with physical roughness, and (2) how do visually and haptically perceived roughness compare? We used 96 samples of everyday materials, such as wood, paper, glass, sandpaper, ceramics, foams, textiles, etc. The samples were characterized by various different physical roughness measures, all determined from accurately measured roughness profiles. These measures consisted of spectral densities measured at different spatial scales and industrial roughness standards (R(a), R(q) and R(z)). In separate haptic and visual conditions, 12 naïve subjects were instructed to order the 96 samples according to perceived roughness. The rank orders of both conditions were correlated with the various physical roughness measures. With most physical roughness measures, haptic and visual correspondence with the physical ordering was about equal. With others, haptic correspondence was slightly better. It turned out that different subjects ordered the samples using different criteria; for some subjects the correlation was better with roughness measures that were based on higher spatial frequencies, while others seemed to be paying more attention to the lower spatial frequencies. Also, physical roughness was not found to be the same as perceived roughness.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">16684497</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2007</Year><Month>01</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2007</Year><Month>03</Month><Day>16</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0001-6918</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>124</Volume><Issue>2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2007</Year><Month>Feb</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Acta psychologica</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Acta Psychol (Amst)</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Haptic and visual perception of roughness.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>177-89</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>In this study, we are interested in the following two questions: (1) how does perceived roughness correlate with physical roughness, and (2) how do visually and haptically perceived roughness compare? We used 96 samples of everyday materials, such as wood, paper, glass, sandpaper, ceramics, foams, textiles, etc. The samples were characterized by various different physical roughness measures, all determined from accurately measured roughness profiles. These measures consisted of spectral densities measured at different spatial scales and industrial roughness standards (R(a), R(q) and R(z)). In separate haptic and visual conditions, 12 naïve subjects were instructed to order the 96 samples according to perceived roughness. The rank orders of both conditions were correlated with the various physical roughness measures. With most physical roughness measures, haptic and visual correspondence with the physical ordering was about equal. With others, haptic correspondence was slightly better. It turned out that different subjects ordered the samples using different criteria; for some subjects the correlation was better with roughness measures that were based on higher spatial frequencies, while others seemed to be paying more attention to the lower spatial frequencies. Also, physical roughness was not found to be the same as perceived roughness.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bergmann Tiest</LastName><ForeName>Wouter M</ForeName><Initials>WM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands. W.M.BergmannTiest@phys.uu.nl</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kappers</LastName><ForeName>Astrid M L</ForeName><Initials>AM</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2006</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>08</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Acta Psychol (Amst)</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0370366</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0001-6918</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D001288">Attention</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D010812">Physical Stimulation</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D025341">Principal Component Analysis</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013334">Students</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000523">psychology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014110">Touch</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D014796">Visual Perception</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2005</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>18</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="revised"><Year>2006</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>6</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2006</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>10</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="aheadofprint"><Year>2006</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>8</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2006</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2007</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>17</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2006</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>11</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0001-6918(06)00038-2</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.03.002</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16684497</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Pays-Bas</li></country><region><li>Utrecht (province)</li></region><settlement><li>Utrecht</li></settlement><orgName><li>Université d'Utrecht</li></orgName></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Kappers, Astrid M L" sort="Kappers, Astrid M L" uniqKey="Kappers A" first="Astrid M L" last="Kappers">Astrid M L. Kappers</name></noCountry><country name="Pays-Bas"><region name="Utrecht (province)"><name sortKey="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" sort="Bergmann Tiest, Wouter M" uniqKey="Bergmann Tiest W" first="Wouter M" last="Bergmann Tiest">Wouter M. Bergmann Tiest</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000925 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000925 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:16684497
|texte= Haptic and visual perception of roughness.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16684497" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Merge/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |