Serveur d'exploration sur les dispositifs haptiques

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Identifieur interne : 000A10 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 000A09; suivant : 000A11

Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.

Auteurs : Myriam Levy [Canada] ; Stéphanie Bourgeon ; C Elaine Chapman

Source :

RBID : pubmed:17051380

English descriptors

Abstract

The aim of this study was to define the relative contribution of self-generated cutaneous and proprioceptive feedback to haptic shape discrimination by systematically constraining the exploratory strategy. Subjects (n = 23) explored pairs of two-dimensional (2-D) angles (standard angle, 90 degrees; comparison angles, 91 degrees -103 degrees) placed at arm's length from the subject, and identified the larger angle of each pair. The exploratory strategies included a reference condition, dynamic scan of the index finger over the entire object [combined cutaneous and proprioceptive (shoulder) feedback], and modified conditions, static touch of the intersection of the two bars that formed the angle using the index finger (cutaneous feedback) and dynamic scans of the object using a hand-held tool (proprioceptive feedback, shoulder). Discrimination thresholds (75% correct) were very similar for dynamic and static touch with the index finger. Thresholds varied as a function of the static contact duration (<1 s, 7.2 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees; approximately 3 s, 4.2 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees), but were not different from the reference condition (6.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees). The higher threshold with short static touch likely reflects movement-related gating of self-generated tactile inputs. Together, the results suggested that cutaneous feedback alone may be sufficient to explain 2-D angle discrimination, because the added proprioceptive feedback did not improve performance. Also, threshold did not vary with the number of dynamic scans (one or two), suggesting that the critical information was gathered on the first pass over the angle. In contrast, when the angles were explored with the tool, the threshold increased relative to the corresponding reference condition from the same session (tool, 9.6 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees; dynamic scan with the finger, 6.2 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees). Thus, performance was poorer with proprioceptive feedback alone, suggesting that cutaneous feedback was relatively more important for 2-D haptic angle discrimination in the present experiment.

DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0728-8
PubMed: 17051380

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

pubmed:17051380

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Levy, Myriam" sort="Levy, Myriam" uniqKey="Levy M" first="Myriam" last="Levy">Myriam Levy</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, Département de physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Station Centre Ville, PO Box 6128, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, Département de physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Station Centre Ville, PO Box 6128, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>QC H3C 3J7</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bourgeon, Stephanie" sort="Bourgeon, Stephanie" uniqKey="Bourgeon S" first="Stéphanie" last="Bourgeon">Stéphanie Bourgeon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chapman, C Elaine" sort="Chapman, C Elaine" uniqKey="Chapman C" first="C Elaine" last="Chapman">C Elaine Chapman</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2007">2007</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00221-006-0728-8</idno>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:17051380</idno>
<idno type="pmid">17051380</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001742</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001742</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001441</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000A10</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000A10</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Levy, Myriam" sort="Levy, Myriam" uniqKey="Levy M" first="Myriam" last="Levy">Myriam Levy</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1">
<nlm:affiliation>Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, Département de physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Station Centre Ville, PO Box 6128, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Groupe de recherche sur le système nerveux central, Département de physiologie, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Station Centre Ville, PO Box 6128, Montréal, QC H3C 3J7</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>QC H3C 3J7</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bourgeon, Stephanie" sort="Bourgeon, Stephanie" uniqKey="Bourgeon S" first="Stéphanie" last="Bourgeon">Stéphanie Bourgeon</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Chapman, C Elaine" sort="Chapman, C Elaine" uniqKey="Chapman C" first="C Elaine" last="Chapman">C Elaine Chapman</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Experimental brain research</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0014-4819</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2007" type="published">2007</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Discrimination (Psychology) (physiology)</term>
<term>Feedback</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Nonlinear Dynamics</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
<term>Proprioception</term>
<term>Psychomotor Performance</term>
<term>Psychophysics</term>
<term>Reaction Time</term>
<term>Sensory Thresholds</term>
<term>Skin (innervation)</term>
<term>Space Perception (physiology)</term>
<term>Touch</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="innervation" xml:lang="en">
<term>Skin</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en">
<term>Discrimination (Psychology)</term>
<term>Space Perception</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Adult</term>
<term>Analysis of Variance</term>
<term>Feedback</term>
<term>Female</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Male</term>
<term>Nonlinear Dynamics</term>
<term>Orientation</term>
<term>Proprioception</term>
<term>Psychomotor Performance</term>
<term>Psychophysics</term>
<term>Reaction Time</term>
<term>Sensory Thresholds</term>
<term>Touch</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The aim of this study was to define the relative contribution of self-generated cutaneous and proprioceptive feedback to haptic shape discrimination by systematically constraining the exploratory strategy. Subjects (n = 23) explored pairs of two-dimensional (2-D) angles (standard angle, 90 degrees; comparison angles, 91 degrees -103 degrees) placed at arm's length from the subject, and identified the larger angle of each pair. The exploratory strategies included a reference condition, dynamic scan of the index finger over the entire object [combined cutaneous and proprioceptive (shoulder) feedback], and modified conditions, static touch of the intersection of the two bars that formed the angle using the index finger (cutaneous feedback) and dynamic scans of the object using a hand-held tool (proprioceptive feedback, shoulder). Discrimination thresholds (75% correct) were very similar for dynamic and static touch with the index finger. Thresholds varied as a function of the static contact duration (<1 s, 7.2 degrees +/- 0.6 degrees; approximately 3 s, 4.2 degrees +/- 0.5 degrees), but were not different from the reference condition (6.0 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees). The higher threshold with short static touch likely reflects movement-related gating of self-generated tactile inputs. Together, the results suggested that cutaneous feedback alone may be sufficient to explain 2-D angle discrimination, because the added proprioceptive feedback did not improve performance. Also, threshold did not vary with the number of dynamic scans (one or two), suggesting that the critical information was gathered on the first pass over the angle. In contrast, when the angles were explored with the tool, the threshold increased relative to the corresponding reference condition from the same session (tool, 9.6 degrees +/- 0.9 degrees; dynamic scan with the finger, 6.2 degrees +/- 1.0 degrees). Thus, performance was poorer with proprioceptive feedback alone, suggesting that cutaneous feedback was relatively more important for 2-D haptic angle discrimination in the present experiment.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000A10 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000A10 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    HapticV1
   |flux=    Ncbi
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:17051380
   |texte=   Haptic discrimination of two-dimensional angles: influence of exploratory strategy.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:17051380" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23.
Data generation: Mon Jun 13 01:09:46 2016. Site generation: Wed Mar 6 09:54:07 2024