The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
Identifieur interne : 000954 ( Ncbi/Curation ); précédent : 000953; suivant : 000955The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
Auteurs : A L Marcovich ; G. Kleinmann ; D. Epstein ; A. PollackSource :
- The British Journal of Ophthalmology [ 0007-1161 ] ; 2006.
Abstract
To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge.
Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos.
Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL's optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow‐up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance.
Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.
Url:
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.097857
PubMed: 16854825
PubMed Central: 1857429
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000944
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000944
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :002510
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000954
Links to Exploration step
PMC:1857429Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><author><name sortKey="Marcovich, A L" sort="Marcovich, A L" uniqKey="Marcovich A" first="A L" last="Marcovich">A L Marcovich</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kleinmann, G" sort="Kleinmann, G" uniqKey="Kleinmann G" first="G" last="Kleinmann">G. Kleinmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Epstein, D" sort="Epstein, D" uniqKey="Epstein D" first="D" last="Epstein">D. Epstein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pollack, A" sort="Pollack, A" uniqKey="Pollack A" first="A" last="Pollack">A. Pollack</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">16854825</idno><idno type="pmc">1857429</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1857429</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:1857429</idno><idno type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</idno><date when="2006">2006</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000944</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000944</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">002510</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000954</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000954</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><author><name sortKey="Marcovich, A L" sort="Marcovich, A L" uniqKey="Marcovich A" first="A L" last="Marcovich">A L Marcovich</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kleinmann, G" sort="Kleinmann, G" uniqKey="Kleinmann G" first="G" last="Kleinmann">G. Kleinmann</name></author><author><name sortKey="Epstein, D" sort="Epstein, D" uniqKey="Epstein D" first="D" last="Epstein">D. Epstein</name></author><author><name sortKey="Pollack, A" sort="Pollack, A" uniqKey="Pollack A" first="A" last="Pollack">A. Pollack</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The British Journal of Ophthalmology</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2079</idno><imprint><date when="2006">2006</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Aim</title><p>To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL's optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow‐up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best‐corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</p></sec></div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Ncbi/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000954 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000954 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Ncbi
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:1857429
|texte= The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:16854825" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Ncbi/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a HapticV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |