Postoperative intraocular lens rotation
Identifieur interne : 008936 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 008935; suivant : 008937Postoperative intraocular lens rotation
Auteurs : C. K Patel [Niger] ; Sue Ormonde ; Paul H. Rosen ; Anthony J. BronSource :
- Ophthalmology [ 0161-6420 ] ; 1999.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
Objective To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).Design Randomized, controlled trial.Participants Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.Method Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted.Main outcome measures Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study.Results Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic IOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic IOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic IOLs (P = 0.0081).Conclusions Plate haptic IOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 002193
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 002193
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 003465
- to stream PubMed, to step Corpus: 001E74
- to stream PubMed, to step Curation: 001E74
- to stream PubMed, to step Checkpoint: 001C21
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: 000082
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: 000082
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: 000082
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697ALe document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K" last="Patel">C. K Patel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, Sue" sort="Ormonde, Sue" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="Sue" last="Ormonde">Sue Ormonde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul H" sort="Rosen, Paul H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul H" last="Rosen">Paul H. Rosen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, Anthony J" sort="Bron, Anthony J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="Anthony J" last="Bron">Anthony J. Bron</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003465</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0161-6420:1999:Patel C:postoperative:intraocular:lens</idno><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10571358</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E74</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001E74</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0161-6420:1999:Patel C:postoperative:intraocular:lens</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">008936</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K" last="Patel">C. K Patel</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Niger</country></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, Sue" sort="Ormonde, Sue" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="Sue" last="Ormonde">Sue Ormonde</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul H" sort="Rosen, Paul H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul H" last="Rosen">Paul H. Rosen</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, Anthony J" sort="Bron, Anthony J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="Anthony J" last="Bron">Anthony J. Bron</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">OPHTHA</title><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">106</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2190">2190</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="2196">2196</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno></series><idno type="istex">45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno><idno type="PII">S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term><term>Foreign-Body Migration (etiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Silicone Elastomers</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Silicone Elastomers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Foreign-Body Migration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).Design Randomized, controlled trial.Participants Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.Method Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted.Main outcome measures Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study.Results Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic IOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic IOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic IOLs (P = 0.0081).Conclusions Plate haptic IOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.</div></front></TEI><double doi="10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3"><ISTEX><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K" last="Patel">C. K Patel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, Sue" sort="Ormonde, Sue" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="Sue" last="Ormonde">Sue Ormonde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul H" sort="Rosen, Paul H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul H" last="Rosen">Paul H. Rosen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, Anthony J" sort="Bron, Anthony J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="Anthony J" last="Bron">Anthony J. Bron</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">002193</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">003465</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0161-6420:1999:Patel C:postoperative:intraocular:lens</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C. K" last="Patel">C. K Patel</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><country wicri:rule="url">Niger</country></affiliation><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, Sue" sort="Ormonde, Sue" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="Sue" last="Ormonde">Sue Ormonde</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, Paul H" sort="Rosen, Paul H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="Paul H" last="Rosen">Paul H. Rosen</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, Anthony J" sort="Bron, Anthony J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="Anthony J" last="Bron">Anthony J. Bron</name><affiliation><wicri:noCountry code="subField">England UK</wicri:noCountry></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">OPHTHA</title><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">106</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="2190">2190</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="2196">2196</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno></series><idno type="istex">45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno><idno type="PII">S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).Design Randomized, controlled trial.Participants Forty-eight patients attending for routine cataract surgery by phacoemulsification.Method Patients with cataract as the only ocular disease were randomly implanted with plate or loop haptic implants after uncomplicated phacoemulsification. The baseline position of the IOL was determined from a video frame acquired at the conclusion of surgery. Postoperative IOL position was documented using digital retroillumination images at 2 weeks and 6 months after surgery. Capsular fusion patterns were recorded using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Correlation of IOL rotation with axial length, capsular contraction, and fusion was attempted.Main outcome measures Early IOL rotation, occurring between surgery and 2 weeks after surgery, was graded as mild (<10°), moderate (10°< to <30°), or severe (>30°) by a semiobjective online comparison of the images. Late IOL rotation, occurring between 2 weeks and 6 months, was measured more precisely using software developed specifically for the study.Results Twenty-three patients were allocated the loop haptic and 25 the plate haptic IOL. The groups were comparable for demographic variables and numbers of patients excluded from analysis (P > 0.05). Five (24%) of 21 of plate haptic IOLs underwent severe early rotation compared to 2 (9%) of 22 loop haptics (P = 0.36). The median late rotation was 6.8° for loop haptics compared to 0.6° for plate haptics (P = 0.0073). Between 2 weeks and 6 months, anticlockwise rotation had occurred in 16 (89%) of 18 loop haptic IOLs compared to 11 (52%) of 21 plate haptic IOLs (P = 0.0081).Conclusions Plate haptic IOLs show greater rotational stability than do loop haptics made from polypropylene once capsular fusion has taken place. Loop haptics invariably rotate anticlockwise after 2 weeks.</div></front></TEI></ISTEX><PubMed><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation: a randomized comparison of plate and loop haptic implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C K" last="Patel">C K Patel</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary, England. ckpatel@ukgateway.net</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, S" sort="Ormonde, S" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="S" last="Ormonde">S. Ormonde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, P H" sort="Rosen, P H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="P H" last="Rosen">P H Rosen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, A J" sort="Bron, A J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="A J" last="Bron">A J Bron</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="1999">1999</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:10571358</idno><idno type="pmid">10571358</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90504-3</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">001E74</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">001E74</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">001C21</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000082</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">0161-6420:1999:Patel C:postoperative:intraocular:lens</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Postoperative intraocular lens rotation: a randomized comparison of plate and loop haptic implants.</title><author><name sortKey="Patel, C K" sort="Patel, C K" uniqKey="Patel C" first="C K" last="Patel">C K Patel</name><affiliation wicri:level="2"><nlm:affiliation>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary, England. ckpatel@ukgateway.net</nlm:affiliation><country>Royaume-Uni</country><placeName><region type="country">Angleterre</region></placeName><wicri:cityArea>Oxford Eye Hospital, Radcliffe Infirmary</wicri:cityArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ormonde, S" sort="Ormonde, S" uniqKey="Ormonde S" first="S" last="Ormonde">S. Ormonde</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rosen, P H" sort="Rosen, P H" uniqKey="Rosen P" first="P H" last="Rosen">P H Rosen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bron, A J" sort="Bron, A J" uniqKey="Bron A" first="A J" last="Bron">A J Bron</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Ophthalmology</title><idno type="ISSN">0161-6420</idno><imprint><date when="1999" type="published">1999</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term><term>Foreign-Body Migration (etiology)</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Silicone Elastomers</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" xml:lang="en"><term>Silicone Elastomers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="etiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Foreign-Body Migration</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Capsulorhexis</term><term>Humans</term><term>Lens Implantation, Intraocular</term><term>Lenses, Intraocular</term><term>Phacoemulsification</term><term>Postoperative Complications</term><term>Prospective Studies</term><term>Prosthesis Design</term><term>Rotation</term><term>Time Factors</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">To compare the postoperative rotation of plate and loop haptic implants of spherical power to ascertain the optimal design appropriate for toric intraocular lenses (IOLs).</div></front></TEI></PubMed></double></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 008936 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 008936 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:45E1E9A291CFDEE5ED3FD411E0248AE9B107697A
|texte= Postoperative intraocular lens rotation
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |