A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product
Identifieur interne : 003E48 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 003E47; suivant : 003E49A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product
Auteurs : Chai Oo Lee [Corée du Sud] ; Youngbo Suh [Corée du Sud] ; In Ki Kim [Corée du Sud] ; Ji Yung Park [Corée du Sud] ; Myung Hwan Yun [Corée du Sud]Source :
- Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries [ 1090-8471 ] ; 2010-09.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
This study aims to suggest a systematic framework to evaluate design concepts for a new product at the concept‐development phase. It focuses especially on evaluating design concepts based on user requirements and implicit tasks, defining trends in technology alternatives, and relating users' perceived value to product functionality. The potential user needs and functional requirements were identified through scenario‐based analysis and hierarchical task analysis. Technology alternatives were also investigated to support users in performing the required tasks effectively and efficiently. For a quantifiable evaluation measure, customer‐perceived value (CPV) attributes were used to evaluate the benefits and costs of the current design concept as compared to perceived alternatives. A case study was conducted to evaluate the design concepts of a new computer‐supported cooperative work (CSCW)‐based system with a tangible user interface, which was designed to support group decision‐making activities, such as business meetings. At the concept‐development phase, engineering specifications are not determined, and cost cannot be precisely estimated. Thus, while we dealt with design‐concept evaluation, we had no choice but to exclude cost attributes, such as monetary expenditure. It is still expected that our framework would be effective in incorporating user‐centered design perspectives early in the process of new product development. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20193
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000D34
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000D34
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000B87
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:512D2C6735E14DA18F68F77BC680324B2D019742Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product</title><author><name sortKey="Lee, Chai Oo" sort="Lee, Chai Oo" uniqKey="Lee C" first="Chai Oo" last="Lee">Chai Oo Lee</name></author><author><name sortKey="Suh, Youngbo" sort="Suh, Youngbo" uniqKey="Suh Y" first="Youngbo" last="Suh">Youngbo Suh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, In Ki" sort="Kim, In Ki" uniqKey="Kim I" first="In Ki" last="Kim">In Ki Kim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Ji Yung" sort="Park, Ji Yung" uniqKey="Park J" first="Ji Yung" last="Park">Ji Yung Park</name></author><author><name sortKey="Yun, Myung Hwan" sort="Yun, Myung Hwan" uniqKey="Yun M" first="Myung Hwan" last="Yun">Myung Hwan Yun</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:512D2C6735E14DA18F68F77BC680324B2D019742</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/hfm.20193</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/512D2C6735E14DA18F68F77BC680324B2D019742/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000D34</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000D34</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000B87</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1090-8471:2010:Lee C:a:systematic:framework</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">003E48</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product</title><author><name sortKey="Lee, Chai Oo" sort="Lee, Chai Oo" uniqKey="Lee C" first="Chai Oo" last="Lee">Chai Oo Lee</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Séoul</settlement></placeName><orgName type="university">Université nationale de Séoul</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Suh, Youngbo" sort="Suh, Youngbo" uniqKey="Suh Y" first="Youngbo" last="Suh">Youngbo Suh</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Korea Institute for Defense Analyses, Seoul</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Séoul</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, In Ki" sort="Kim, In Ki" uniqKey="Kim I" first="In Ki" last="Kim">In Ki Kim</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Séoul</settlement></placeName><orgName type="university">Université nationale de Séoul</orgName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Ji Yung" sort="Park, Ji Yung" uniqKey="Park J" first="Ji Yung" last="Park">Ji Yung Park</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Korea Institute of Science and Technology, Seoul</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Séoul</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Yun, Myung Hwan" sort="Yun, Myung Hwan" uniqKey="Yun M" first="Myung Hwan" last="Yun">Myung Hwan Yun</name><affiliation wicri:level="4"><country xml:lang="fr">Corée du Sud</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul</wicri:regionArea><placeName><settlement type="city">Séoul</settlement></placeName><orgName type="university">Université nationale de Séoul</orgName></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Hum. Factors Man.</title><idno type="ISSN">1090-8471</idno><idno type="eISSN">1520-6564</idno><imprint><publisher>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><pubPlace>Hoboken</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2010-09">2010-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">20</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="424">424</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="442">442</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">1090-8471</idno></series><idno type="istex">512D2C6735E14DA18F68F77BC680324B2D019742</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/hfm.20193</idno><idno type="ArticleID">HFM20193</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1090-8471</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Concept evaluation</term><term>Conceptual design</term><term>Customer‐perceived value</term><term>Scenario of use</term><term>Technology trends analysis</term></keywords></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">This study aims to suggest a systematic framework to evaluate design concepts for a new product at the concept‐development phase. It focuses especially on evaluating design concepts based on user requirements and implicit tasks, defining trends in technology alternatives, and relating users' perceived value to product functionality. The potential user needs and functional requirements were identified through scenario‐based analysis and hierarchical task analysis. Technology alternatives were also investigated to support users in performing the required tasks effectively and efficiently. For a quantifiable evaluation measure, customer‐perceived value (CPV) attributes were used to evaluate the benefits and costs of the current design concept as compared to perceived alternatives. A case study was conducted to evaluate the design concepts of a new computer‐supported cooperative work (CSCW)‐based system with a tangible user interface, which was designed to support group decision‐making activities, such as business meetings. At the concept‐development phase, engineering specifications are not determined, and cost cannot be precisely estimated. Thus, while we dealt with design‐concept evaluation, we had no choice but to exclude cost attributes, such as monetary expenditure. It is still expected that our framework would be effective in incorporating user‐centered design perspectives early in the process of new product development. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003E48 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 003E48 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Merge
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:512D2C6735E14DA18F68F77BC680324B2D019742
|texte= A systematic framework for evaluating design concepts of a new product
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |