Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector
Identifieur interne : 003537 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 003536; suivant : 003538Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector
Auteurs : Christoph W. FaschingerSource :
- Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery [ 0886-3350 ] ; 2000.
Abstract
Purpose To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.Methods This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.Results Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.Conclusions The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.
Url:
DOI: 10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title><author><name sortKey="Faschinger, Christoph W" sort="Faschinger, Christoph W" uniqKey="Faschinger C" first="Christoph W" last="Faschinger">Christoph W. Faschinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>1 The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12</idno><date when="2001" year="2001">2001</date><idno type="doi">10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">003537</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title><author><name sortKey="Faschinger, Christoph W" sort="Faschinger, Christoph W" uniqKey="Faschinger C" first="Christoph W" last="Faschinger">Christoph W. Faschinger</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>1 The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000">2000</date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="845">845</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="849">849</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></series><idno type="istex">B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(00)00804-X</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0886-3350</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Purpose To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.Methods This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.Results Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.Conclusions The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>elsevier</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Christoph W Faschinger MD</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</json:string><json:string>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</json:string><json:string>1 The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Article</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Purpose To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.Methods This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.Results Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.Conclusions The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.452</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>586 x 785 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1224</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>2244</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>14187</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>5</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>184</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(00)00804-X</json:string></pii><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>27</volume><pii><json:string>S0886-3350(00)X0026-0</json:string></pii><pages><last>849</last><first>845</first></pages><issn><json:string>0886-3350</json:string></issn><issue>6</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><publicationDate>2001</publicationDate></host><categories><wos><json:string>OPHTHALMOLOGY</json:string><json:string>SURGERY</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2000</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2001</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</json:string></doi><id>B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><availability><p>ELSEVIER</p></availability><date>2001</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note type="content">Section title: Article</note><note type="content">Figure 1: (Faschinger) Schematic drawing of the single-piece acrylic Inject-A (left) and EasAcryl (right) IOLs.</note><note type="content">Figure 2: (Faschinger) For folding, the IOL is placed on the central hinge and on both troughs, which are filled with a viscoelastic material. Then, the IOL is pressed slightly downward with a blunt double-spatula-like instrument and the cartridge wings are closed. To prevent surface changes, the spatula is lifted, not withdrawn, with both tips on the lens surface.</note><note type="content">Figure 3: (Faschinger) The injector system used to implant the acrylic IOLs comprises the cartridge (bottom), the blunt double-spatula-like instrument (middle), and the handpiece (top).</note><note type="content">Figure 4: (Faschinger) An EasAcryl IOL with multiple white lines on the posterior surface in the direction of the push after implantation by an injector system (first postoperative day).</note><note type="content">Figure 5: (Faschinger) An EasAcryl IOL with white lines on the anterior surface with an undamaged zone in the center (first postoperative day).</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Christoph W</forename><surname>Faschinger</surname></persName><roleName type="degree">MD</roleName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</affiliation><affiliation>1 The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">JCRS</title><idno type="pISSN">0886-3350</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(00)X0026-0</idno><imprint><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><date type="published" when="2000"></date><biblScope unit="volume">27</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="845">845</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="849">849</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</idno><idno type="PII">S0886-3350(00)00804-X</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2001</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Purpose To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.Methods This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.Results Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.Conclusions The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Article category</head><item><term>Article</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2000-10-16">Registration</change><change when="2000">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Elsevier, elements deleted: ce:floats; body; tail"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//ES//DTD journal article DTD version 4.5.2//EN//XML" URI="art452.dtd" name="istex:docType"><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr1" NDATA="IMAGE" name="GR1"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr2" NDATA="IMAGE" name="GR2"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr3" NDATA="IMAGE" name="GR3"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr4" NDATA="IMAGE" name="GR4"></istex:entity><istex:entity SYSTEM="gr5" NDATA="IMAGE" name="GR5"></istex:entity></istex:docType><istex:document><converted-article version="4.5.2" docsubtype="fla" xml:lang="en"><item-info><jid>JCRS</jid><aid>976</aid><ce:pii>S0886-3350(00)00804-X</ce:pii><ce:doi>10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</ce:doi><ce:copyright type="society" year="2001">ASCRS and ESCRS</ce:copyright><ce:doctopics><ce:doctopic><ce:text>Article</ce:text></ce:doctopic></ce:doctopics></item-info><head><ce:dochead><ce:textfn>Article</ce:textfn></ce:dochead><ce:title>Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</ce:title><ce:author-group><ce:author><ce:given-name>Christoph W</ce:given-name><ce:surname>Faschinger</ce:surname><ce:degrees>MD</ce:degrees><ce:cross-ref refid="AFF1"><ce:sup>a</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="FN1"><ce:sup>1</ce:sup></ce:cross-ref><ce:cross-ref refid="CORR1">*</ce:cross-ref></ce:author><ce:affiliation id="AFF1"><ce:label>a</ce:label><ce:textfn>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</ce:textfn></ce:affiliation><ce:correspondence id="CORR1"><ce:label>*</ce:label><ce:text>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</ce:text></ce:correspondence><ce:footnote id="FN1"><ce:label>1</ce:label><ce:note-para>The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</ce:note-para></ce:footnote></ce:author-group><ce:date-accepted day="16" month="10" year="2000"></ce:date-accepted><ce:abstract><ce:section-title>Abstract</ce:section-title><ce:abstract-sec><ce:section-title>Purpose</ce:section-title><ce:simple-para>To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec><ce:abstract-sec><ce:section-title>Setting</ce:section-title><ce:simple-para>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec><ce:abstract-sec><ce:section-title>Methods</ce:section-title><ce:simple-para>This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec><ce:abstract-sec><ce:section-title>Results</ce:section-title><ce:simple-para>Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec><ce:abstract-sec><ce:section-title>Conclusions</ce:section-title><ce:simple-para>The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.</ce:simple-para></ce:abstract-sec></ce:abstract></head></converted-article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Christoph W</namePart><namePart type="family">Faschinger</namePart><namePart type="termsOfAddress">MD</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria</affiliation><affiliation>Reprint requests to Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christoph Faschinger, Universitäts-Augenklinik, Auenbruggerplatz 4, A-8036 Graz, Austria</affiliation><affiliation>1 The author has no financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="Full-length article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>ELSEVIER</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2000</dateIssued><dateValid encoding="w3cdtf">2000-10-16</dateValid><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2001</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Purpose To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector.Setting Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.Methods This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector.Results Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack.Conclusions The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs’ hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.</abstract><note type="content">Section title: Article</note><note type="content">Figure 1: (Faschinger) Schematic drawing of the single-piece acrylic Inject-A (left) and EasAcryl (right) IOLs.</note><note type="content">Figure 2: (Faschinger) For folding, the IOL is placed on the central hinge and on both troughs, which are filled with a viscoelastic material. Then, the IOL is pressed slightly downward with a blunt double-spatula-like instrument and the cartridge wings are closed. To prevent surface changes, the spatula is lifted, not withdrawn, with both tips on the lens surface.</note><note type="content">Figure 3: (Faschinger) The injector system used to implant the acrylic IOLs comprises the cartridge (bottom), the blunt double-spatula-like instrument (middle), and the handpiece (top).</note><note type="content">Figure 4: (Faschinger) An EasAcryl IOL with multiple white lines on the posterior surface in the direction of the push after implantation by an injector system (first postoperative day).</note><note type="content">Figure 5: (Faschinger) An EasAcryl IOL with white lines on the anterior surface with an undamaged zone in the center (first postoperative day).</note><subject><genre>Article category</genre><topic>Article</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of Cataract & Refractive Surgery</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>JCRS</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><originInfo><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">200106</dateIssued></originInfo><identifier type="ISSN">0886-3350</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(00)X0026-0</identifier><part><date>200106</date><detail type="volume"><number>27</number><caption>vol.</caption></detail><detail type="issue"><number>6</number><caption>no.</caption></detail><extent unit="issue pages"><start>795</start><end>962</end></extent><extent unit="pages"><start>845</start><end>849</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00804-X</identifier><identifier type="PII">S0886-3350(00)00804-X</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="">© 2001ASCRS and ESCRS</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>ELSEVIER</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>ASCRS and ESCRS, ©2001</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">OPHTHALMOLOGY</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">SURGERY</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 003537 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 003537 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:B5A6A1052E36ACF42156BCC2D5EB6BD29B174F12
|texte= Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |