Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity
Identifieur interne : 002D13 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 002D12; suivant : 002D14Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity
Auteurs : Matthew RampleySource :
- Art History [ 0141-6790 ] ; 2003-04.
Abstract
The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><author><name sortKey="Rampley, Matthew" sort="Rampley, Matthew" uniqKey="Rampley M" first="Matthew" last="Rampley">Matthew Rampley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Edinburgh College of Art</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8</idno><date when="2003" year="2003">2003</date><idno type="doi">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">002D13</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><author><name sortKey="Rampley, Matthew" sort="Rampley, Matthew" uniqKey="Rampley M" first="Matthew" last="Rampley">Matthew Rampley</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Edinburgh College of Art</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Art History</title><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8365</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04">2003-04</date><biblScope unit="volume">26</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="214">214</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="237">237</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno></series><idno type="istex">8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AHIS02602010</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0141-6790</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Matthew Rampley</name><affiliations><json:string>Edinburgh College of Art</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>AHIS02602010</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.584</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>485 x 697 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>810</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10463</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>62837</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>24</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>132</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><genre.original><json:string>article</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>26</volume><publisherId><json:string>AHIS</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>24</total><last>237</last><first>214</first></pages><issn><json:string>0141-6790</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1467-8365</json:string></eissn><title>Art History</title><doi><json:string>10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>2003</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2003</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</json:string></doi><id>8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>2003</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Matthew</forename><surname>Rampley</surname></persName><affiliation>Edinburgh College of Art</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Art History</title><idno type="pISSN">0141-6790</idno><idno type="eISSN">1467-8365</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</idno><imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2003-04"></date><biblScope unit="volume">26</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="214">214</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="237">237</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</idno><idno type="ArticleID">AHIS02602010</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2003</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2003-04">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-4-23">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>Blackwell Publishing</publisherName><publisherLoc>Oxford, UK</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</doi><issn type="print">0141-6790</issn><issn type="electronic">1467-8365</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="AHIS"></id><id type="publisherDivision" value="ST"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" sort="ART HISTORY">Art History</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="04002"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/ahis.2003.26.issue-2</doi><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="26">26</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue" number="2">2</numbering></numberingGroup><coverDate startDate="2003-04">April 2003</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="3" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="AHIS02602010"></id><id type="supplier" value="02602010"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="24"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="tocHeading1">Original Articles</title></titleGroup><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="2004-02-03"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="2004-02-03"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:BPG_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:FullText result:FullText" date="2010-03-08"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-01"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-15"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst" number="214">214</numbering><numbering type="pageLast" number="237">237</numbering></numberingGroup><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:AHIS.AHIS02602010.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="6"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="0"></count><count type="formulaTotal" number="0"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="0"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="11633"></count><count type="linksCrossRef" number="92"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main">Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title><title type="shortAuthors">MAX DVOŘÁK</title><title type="short">ART HISTORY AND THE CRISIS OF MODERNITY</title></titleGroup><creators><creator creatorRole="author" xml:id="cr1" affiliationRef="#aff-1-1"><personName><givenNames>Matthew</givenNames><familyName>Rampley</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="aff-1-1"><unparsedAffiliation>Edinburgh College of Art</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><p>The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>ART HISTORY AND THE CRISIS OF MODERNITY</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Matthew</namePart><namePart type="family">Rampley</namePart><affiliation>Edinburgh College of Art</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Blackwell Publishing</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">Oxford, UK</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2003-04</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2003</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="figures">6</extent><extent unit="words">11633</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The work of Max Dvořák has seldom enjoyed the acclaim accorded to that of his Viennese colleague Alois Riegl, or contemporaries such as Aby Warburg and Heinrich Wölfflin. This paper argues for a reconsideration of his work, in which his ‘art history as the history of ideas’ is seen both as a lens through which Dvořák conducted a sustained commentary on the present, and also as a critique of modernity comparable to the social and economic theories of Ernst Troeltsch, Ferdinand Tönnies, Georg Simmel or Ernst Mach. The article argues that Dvořák's work offers an important example of the numerous intellectual and political tensions at work in the final years of the Habsburg monarchy. As such, the article aims to question the institutional frame within which much art‐historical writing is often analysed.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Art History</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0141-6790</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1467-8365</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8365</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">AHIS</identifier><part><date>2003</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>26</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>214</start><end>237</end><total>24</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1111/j.0141-6790.2003.02602010.x</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">AHIS02602010</identifier><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>Blackwell Publishing</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002D13 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 002D13 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:8C0FB5421DD0E6D0ABC42BC0969D8BDB934751A8
|texte= Max Dvořák: art history and the crisis of modernity
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |