The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
Identifieur interne : 000037 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000036; suivant : 000038The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
Auteurs : A L Marcovich ; G. Kleinmann ; D. Epstein ; A. PollackSource :
- British Journal of Ophthalmology [ 0007-1161 ] ; 2006-10.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge. Methods: Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos. Results: Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance. Conclusions: Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.
Url:
DOI: 10.1136/bjo.2006.097857
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><author><name sortKey="Marcovich, A L" sort="Marcovich, A L" uniqKey="Marcovich A" first="A L" last="Marcovich">A L Marcovich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kleinmann, G" sort="Kleinmann, G" uniqKey="Kleinmann G" first="G" last="Kleinmann">G. Kleinmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Epstein, D" sort="Epstein, D" uniqKey="Epstein D" first="D" last="Epstein">D. Epstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pollack, A" sort="Pollack, A" uniqKey="Pollack A" first="A" last="Pollack">A. Pollack</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869</idno><date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000037</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><author><name sortKey="Marcovich, A L" sort="Marcovich, A L" uniqKey="Marcovich A" first="A L" last="Marcovich">A L Marcovich</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Kleinmann, G" sort="Kleinmann, G" uniqKey="Kleinmann G" first="G" last="Kleinmann">G. Kleinmann</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Epstein, D" sort="Epstein, D" uniqKey="Epstein D" first="D" last="Epstein">D. Epstein</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pollack, A" sort="Pollack, A" uniqKey="Pollack A" first="A" last="Pollack">A. Pollack</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">British Journal of Ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Br J Ophthalmol</title><idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2079</idno><imprint><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-10">2006-10</date><biblScope unit="volume">90</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1249">1249</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno></series><idno type="istex">5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</idno><idno type="href">bjophthalmol-90-1249.pdf</idno><idno type="PMID">16854825</idno><idno type="local">0901249</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0007-1161</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Aim: To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge. Methods: Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos. Results: Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance. Conclusions: Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>bmj</corpusName><author><json:item><name>A L Marcovich</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>G Kleinmann</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>D Epstein</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>A Pollack</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>IOL, intraocular lens</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>OVD, ophthalmic viscoelastic device</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><abstract>Aim: To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge. Methods: Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos. Results: Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance. Conclusions: Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>4.773</score><pdfVersion>1.2</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>3</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1616</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>1773</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>11342</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>3</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>259</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><pmid><json:string>16854825</json:string></pmid><genre.original><json:string>other</json:string></genre.original><genre><json:string>other</json:string></genre><host><volume>90</volume><pages><first>1249</first></pages><issn><json:string>0007-1161</json:string></issn><issue>10</issue><genre><json:string>Journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1468-2079</json:string></eissn><title>British Journal of Ophthalmology</title></host><publicationDate>2006</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</json:string></doi><id>5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869</id><score>1</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</pubPlace><availability><p>BMJ</p></availability><date>2006-07-19</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Correspondence to: A L Marcovich Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 76100, Israel;danaarie@barak.net.il</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title><author><persName><forename type="first">A L</forename><surname>Marcovich</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">G</forename><surname>Kleinmann</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">D</forename><surname>Epstein</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">A</forename><surname>Pollack</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">British Journal of Ophthalmology</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Br J Ophthalmol</title><idno type="pISSN">0007-1161</idno><idno type="eISSN">1468-2079</idno><imprint><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</publisher><pubPlace>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</pubPlace><date type="published" when="2006-10"></date><biblScope unit="volume">90</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">10</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1249">1249</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</idno><idno type="href">bjophthalmol-90-1249.pdf</idno><idno type="PMID">16854825</idno><idno type="local">0901249</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2006-07-19</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Aim: To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge. Methods: Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos. Results: Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance. Conclusions: Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity</term></item><item><term>IOL, intraocular lens</term></item><item><term>OVD, ophthalmic viscoelastic device</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2006-07-19">Created</change><change when="2006-10">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-14">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus bmj" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="archivearticle.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article xml:lang="en" article-type="other"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">bjophthalmol</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Br J Ophthalmol</journal-id><journal-title>British Journal of Ophthalmology</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Br J Ophthalmol</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0007-1161</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1468-2079</issn><publisher><publisher-name>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</publisher-name><publisher-loc>BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="other">0901249</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">bjophthalmol;90/10/1249</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">bjophthalmol;bjo.2006.097857</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">16854825</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">1249</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="other">bjo.2006.097857</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Clinical science</subject><subj-group><subject>Scientific reports</subject></subj-group></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Marcovich</surname><given-names>A L</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Kleinmann</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Epstein</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pollack</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><xref rid="AFF1">1</xref></contrib><aff id="AFF1"><label>1</label>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</aff><aff id="AFF2"><label>2</label>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp>Correspondence to: A L Marcovich Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 76100, Israel;<ext-link xlink:href="danaarie@barak.net.il" ext-link-type="email" xlink:type="simple">danaarie@barak.net.il</ext-link></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>10</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>19</day><month>7</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><volume>90</volume><volume-id pub-id-type="other">90</volume-id><volume-id pub-id-type="other">90</volume-id><issue>10</issue><issue-id pub-id-type="other">bjophthalmol;90/10</issue-id><issue-id pub-id-type="other">10</issue-id><issue-id pub-id-type="other">90/10</issue-id><fpage>1249</fpage><history><date date-type="accepted"><day>06</day><month>07</month><year>2006</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2006</copyright-year></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:role="full-text" xlink:href="bjophthalmol-90-1249.pdf"></self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Aim:</bold> To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge.</p><p><bold>Methods:</bold> Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos.</p><p><bold>Results:</bold> Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance.</p><p><bold>Conclusions:</bold> Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity</kwd><kwd>IOL, intraocular lens</kwd><kwd>OVD, ophthalmic viscoelastic device</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A L</namePart><namePart type="family">Marcovich</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">G</namePart><namePart type="family">Kleinmann</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Laboratories for Ophthalmic Devices Research, John A Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">D</namePart><namePart type="family">Epstein</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">A</namePart><namePart type="family">Pollack</namePart><affiliation>Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="other" displayLabel="other"></genre><originInfo><publisher>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-10</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2006-07-19</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Aim: To evaluate the outcome of surface deposits that occurred during implantation of hydrophylic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) through a hexagonal cartridge. Methods: Surface deposits were observed on the posterior surface of the ACR6D SE IOLs that were injected through a hexagonal cartridge filled with sodium hyaluronate 1%. All the patients were examined 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. The location of the deposits was recorded and photographed. The patients were questioned about blurred vision, glare or halos. Results: Linear or curly deposits were detected on the posterior surface of the IOL in six patients. In four patients, the deposits were peripheral and were observed 1 week postoperatively. In two patients, the deposits were noticed immediately after implantation. In one eye, they were misinterpreted as a crack in the IOL’s optic and were left in the eye. In the second patient the deposits were removed immediately after implantation with forceps. The deposits that were left after implantation (five eyes) did not resolve during 1 year of follow-up. None of the eyes developed abnormal inflammatory reaction. In three eyes the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 6/6. In the other three eyes the BCVA was 6/12. None of the patients experienced any visual disturbance. Conclusions: Implantation of the ACR6D SE IOL through a hexagonal cartridge can lead to the formation of deposits on the posterior surface of the lens. The deposits do not resolve and may resemble a crack in the IOL. The deposits left on the IOL had no clinical relevance in our patients.</abstract><note type="author-notes">Correspondence to: A L Marcovich Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot 76100, Israel;danaarie@barak.net.il</note><subject><genre>Keywords</genre><topic>BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity</topic><topic>IOL, intraocular lens</topic><topic>OVD, ophthalmic viscoelastic device</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>British Journal of Ophthalmology</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Br J Ophthalmol</title></titleInfo><genre type="Journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0007-1161</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1468-2079</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">bjophthalmol</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-nlm-ta">Br J Ophthalmol</identifier><part><date>2006</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>90</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>10</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1249</start></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1136/bjo.2006.097857</identifier><identifier type="href">bjophthalmol-90-1249.pdf</identifier><identifier type="PMID">16854825</identifier><identifier type="local">0901249</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright 2006 British Journal of Ophthalmology</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>BMJ</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><annexes><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/jpeg</mimetype><extension>jpeg</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869/annexes/jpeg</uri></json:item></annexes><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/HapticV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000037 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000037 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= HapticV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:5A1CCFD01417C9D88F4865C1E0B2F3F443855869
|texte= The course of surface deposits on a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens after implantation through a hexagonal cartridge
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.23. |  |