Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics
Identifieur interne : 000F92 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000F91; suivant : 000F93Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics
Auteurs : Richard M. ZanerSource :
- The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy [ 0360-5310 ] ; 1993-02.
Abstract
Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/jmp/18.1.9
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Zaner, Richard M" sort="Zaner, Richard M" uniqKey="Zaner R" first="Richard M." last="Zaner">Richard M. Zaner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9</idno><date when="1993" year="1993">1993</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000F92</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Istex" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="ISTEX">000F92</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Zaner, Richard M" sort="Zaner, Richard M" uniqKey="Zaner R" first="Richard M." last="Zaner">Richard M. Zaner</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</title><idno type="ISSN">0360-5310</idno><idno type="eISSN">1744-5019</idno><imprint><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1993-02">1993-02</date><biblScope unit="volume">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="31">31</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0360-5310</idno></series><idno type="istex">744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0360-5310</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Richard M. Zaner</name><affiliations><json:string>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Articles</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Casuistry</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>clinical ethics</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>consultation</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>decision-making</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>dialogue</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>facilitator</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>practical reason</value></json:item><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>relationships</value></json:item></subject><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.14</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>396 x 604.8 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>9</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>612</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>7923</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>46901</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>23</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>95</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>18</volume><publisherId><json:string>jmp</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>31</last><first>9</first></pages><issn><json:string>0360-5310</json:string></issn><issue>1</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1744-5019</json:string></eissn><title>The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL</json:string><json:string>ETHICS</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>1993</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1993</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</json:string></doi><id>744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9</id><score>0.08992638</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><availability><p>OUP</p></availability><date>1993</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Richard M.</forename><surname>Zaner</surname></persName><affiliation>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</title><idno type="pISSN">0360-5310</idno><idno type="eISSN">1744-5019</idno><imprint><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><date type="published" when="1993-02"></date><biblScope unit="volume">18</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="9">9</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="31">31</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1993</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Articles</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><head>Keywords</head><item><term>Casuistry</term></item><item><term>clinical ethics</term></item><item><term>consultation</term></item><item><term>decision-making</term></item><item><term>dialogue</term></item><item><term>facilitator</term></item><item><term>practical reason</term></item><item><term>relationships</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1993-02">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-15">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-21">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-07-28">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">jmp</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="archive">jmp</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jmp</journal-id><journal-title>The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0360-5310</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1744-5019</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The University of Chicago Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Zaner</surname><given-names>Richard M.</given-names></name><degrees>Ph.D.</degrees><xref ref-type="aff" rid="au1"></xref></contrib><aff id="au1"><institution>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University</institution> <addr-line>Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</addr-line></aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>2</month><year>1993</year></pub-date><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>9</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><copyright-statement>© 1993 by The Society for Health and Human Values</copyright-statement><copyright-year>1993</copyright-year><abstract><p>Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Casuistry</kwd><kwd>clinical ethics</kwd><kwd>consultation</kwd><kwd>decision-making</kwd><kwd>dialogue</kwd><kwd>facilitator</kwd><kwd>practical reason</kwd><kwd>relationships</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Richard M.</namePart><namePart type="family">Zaner</namePart><affiliation>Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN. 37232, U.S.A.</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><subject><topic>Articles</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>The University of Chicago Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1993-02</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1993</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>Four prominent views of the nature and methods of clinical ethics (especially in consultation forums) are reviewed; each is then submitted to a criticism intended to show both weaknesses and strengths. It is argued that clinical ethics needs to be responsive to the specific complexities of clinical situations. For this, the need for an expanded notion of practical reason within unique situations is emphasized, one whose aim is to facilitate decision-making on the part of those directly responsible for them and consonant with their own respective moral frameworks and conceptions of what is most worthwhile.</abstract><subject><genre>keywords</genre><topic>Casuistry</topic><topic>clinical ethics</topic><topic>consultation</topic><topic>decision-making</topic><topic>dialogue</topic><topic>facilitator</topic><topic>practical reason</topic><topic>relationships</topic></subject><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0360-5310</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1744-5019</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">jmp</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">jmp</identifier><part><date>1993</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>18</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>1</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>9</start><end>31</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/jmp/18.1.9</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© 1993 by The Society for Health and Human Values</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><annexes><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9/annexes/pdf</uri></json:item></annexes><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/EpistemeV1/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000F92 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000F92 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= EpistemeV1
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:744BA1CA747FC161EB79BF8CF191AA43E84A97C9
|texte= Voices and Time: The Venture of Clinical Ethics
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |