Serveur d'exploration Cyberinfrastructure

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Identifieur interne : 000074 ( PascalFrancis/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000073; suivant : 000075

Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope

Auteurs : Richard A. Shaw [États-Unis] ; Deborah Levine [États-Unis] ; Timothy Axelrod [États-Unis] ; Russ R. Laher [États-Unis] ; Vince G. Mannings [États-Unis]

Source :

RBID : Pascal:11-0004522

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

LSST will have a Science Data Quality Assessment (SDQA) subsystem for the assessment of the data products that will be produced during the course of a 10 yr survey. The LSST will produce unprecedented volumes of astronomical data as it surveys the accessible sky every few nights. The SDQA subsystem will enable comparisons of the science data with expectations from prior experience and models, and with established requirements for the survey. While analogous systems have been built for previous large astronomical surveys, SDQA for LSST must meet a unique combination of challenges. Chief among them will be the extraordinary data rate and volume, which restricts the bulk of the quality computations to the automated processing stages, as revisiting the pixels for a post-facto evaluation is prohibitively expensive. The identification of appropriate scientific metrics is driven by the breadth of the expected science, the scope of the time-domain survey, the need to tap the widest possible pool of scientific expertise, and the historical tendency of new quality metrics to be crafted and refined as experience grows. Prior experience suggests that contemplative, off-line quality analyses are essential to distilling new automated quality metrics, so the SDQA architecture must support integrability with a variety of custom and community-based tools, and be flexible to embrace evolving QA demands. Finally, the time-domain nature of LSST means every exposure may be useful for some scientific purpose, so the model of quality thresholds must be sufficiently rich to reflect the quality demands of diverse science aims.


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

Pascal:11-0004522

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shaw, Richard A" sort="Shaw, Richard A" uniqKey="Shaw R" first="Richard A." last="Shaw">Richard A. Shaw</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85719</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Arizona</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Levine, Deborah" sort="Levine, Deborah" uniqKey="Levine D" first="Deborah" last="Levine">Deborah Levine</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Axelrod, Timothy" sort="Axelrod, Timothy" uniqKey="Axelrod T" first="Timothy" last="Axelrod">Timothy Axelrod</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LSST Corporation, 933 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85721</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Arizona</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Laher, Russ R" sort="Laher, Russ R" uniqKey="Laher R" first="Russ R." last="Laher">Russ R. Laher</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mannings, Vince G" sort="Mannings, Vince G" uniqKey="Mannings V" first="Vince G." last="Mannings">Vince G. Mannings</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">11-0004522</idno>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 11-0004522 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:11-0004522</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000132</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Curation">000113</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint">000074</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Shaw, Richard A" sort="Shaw, Richard A" uniqKey="Shaw R" first="Richard A." last="Shaw">Richard A. Shaw</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85719</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Arizona</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Levine, Deborah" sort="Levine, Deborah" uniqKey="Levine D" first="Deborah" last="Levine">Deborah Levine</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Axelrod, Timothy" sort="Axelrod, Timothy" uniqKey="Axelrod T" first="Timothy" last="Axelrod">Timothy Axelrod</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LSST Corporation, 933 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85721</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Arizona</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Laher, Russ R" sort="Laher, Russ R" uniqKey="Laher R" first="Russ R." last="Laher">Russ R. Laher</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Mannings, Vince G" sort="Mannings, Vince G" uniqKey="Mannings V" first="Vince G." last="Mannings">Vince G. Mannings</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="2">
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
<country>États-Unis</country>
<placeName>
<region type="state">Californie</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0277-786X</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2010">2010</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0277-786X</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Astrophysics</term>
<term>Automatic processing</term>
<term>Data integrity</term>
<term>Indirect method</term>
<term>Integrability</term>
<term>Metric</term>
<term>Modeling</term>
<term>Night</term>
<term>Off line</term>
<term>Product data management PDM</term>
<term>Quality control</term>
<term>Sky</term>
<term>Telescope</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Intégrité donnée</term>
<term>Contrôle qualité</term>
<term>Système gestion donnée technique SGDT</term>
<term>Traitement automatique</term>
<term>Télescope</term>
<term>Astrophysique</term>
<term>Ciel</term>
<term>Nuit</term>
<term>Métrique</term>
<term>Modélisation</term>
<term>Méthode indirecte</term>
<term>Hors ligne</term>
<term>Intégrabilité</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">LSST will have a Science Data Quality Assessment (SDQA) subsystem for the assessment of the data products that will be produced during the course of a 10 yr survey. The LSST will produce unprecedented volumes of astronomical data as it surveys the accessible sky every few nights. The SDQA subsystem will enable comparisons of the science data with expectations from prior experience and models, and with established requirements for the survey. While analogous systems have been built for previous large astronomical surveys, SDQA for LSST must meet a unique combination of challenges. Chief among them will be the extraordinary data rate and volume, which restricts the bulk of the quality computations to the automated processing stages, as revisiting the pixels for a post-facto evaluation is prohibitively expensive. The identification of appropriate scientific metrics is driven by the breadth of the expected science, the scope of the time-domain survey, the need to tap the widest possible pool of scientific expertise, and the historical tendency of new quality metrics to be crafted and refined as experience grows. Prior experience suggests that contemplative, off-line quality analyses are essential to distilling new automated quality metrics, so the SDQA architecture must support integrability with a variety of custom and community-based tools, and be flexible to embrace evolving QA demands. Finally, the time-domain nature of LSST means every exposure may be useful for some scientific purpose, so the model of quality thresholds must be sufficiently rich to reflect the quality demands of diverse science aims.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>0277-786X</s0>
</fA01>
<fA02 i1="01">
<s0>PSISDG</s0>
</fA02>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>7740</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s3>p. 2</s3>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope</s1>
</fA08>
<fA09 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Software and cyberinfrastructure for astronomy : 27-30 June 2010, San Diego, California, United States</s1>
</fA09>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>SHAW (Richard A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>LEVINE (Deborah)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>AXELROD (Timothy)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>LAHER (Russ R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>MANNINGS (Vince G.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA12 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>RADZIWILL (Nicole M.)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA12 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>BRIDGER (Alan)</s1>
<s9>ed.</s9>
</fA12>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>National Optical Astronomy Observatory, 950 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85719</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>IPAC/California Institute of Technology, M/S 100-22</s1>
<s2>Pasadena, CA 91125</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>LSST Corporation, 933 N. Cherry Avenue</s1>
<s2>Tucson, AZ 85721</s2>
<s3>USA</s3>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA18 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>SPIE</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<s9>org-cong.</s9>
</fA18>
<fA18 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>American Astronomical Society</s1>
<s3>USA</s3>
<s9>org-cong.</s9>
</fA18>
<fA20>
<s2>77400H.1-77400H.8</s2>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2010</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA25 i1="01">
<s1>SPIE</s1>
<s2>Bellingham, Wash.</s2>
</fA25>
<fA26 i1="01">
<s0>978-0-8194-8230-3</s0>
</fA26>
<fA26 i1="02">
<s0>0-8194-8230-7</s0>
</fA26>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>21760</s2>
<s5>354000174702880140</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2011 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>14 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>11-0004522</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
<s2>C</s2>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>USA</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>LSST will have a Science Data Quality Assessment (SDQA) subsystem for the assessment of the data products that will be produced during the course of a 10 yr survey. The LSST will produce unprecedented volumes of astronomical data as it surveys the accessible sky every few nights. The SDQA subsystem will enable comparisons of the science data with expectations from prior experience and models, and with established requirements for the survey. While analogous systems have been built for previous large astronomical surveys, SDQA for LSST must meet a unique combination of challenges. Chief among them will be the extraordinary data rate and volume, which restricts the bulk of the quality computations to the automated processing stages, as revisiting the pixels for a post-facto evaluation is prohibitively expensive. The identification of appropriate scientific metrics is driven by the breadth of the expected science, the scope of the time-domain survey, the need to tap the widest possible pool of scientific expertise, and the historical tendency of new quality metrics to be crafted and refined as experience grows. Prior experience suggests that contemplative, off-line quality analyses are essential to distilling new automated quality metrics, so the SDQA architecture must support integrability with a variety of custom and community-based tools, and be flexible to embrace evolving QA demands. Finally, the time-domain nature of LSST means every exposure may be useful for some scientific purpose, so the model of quality thresholds must be sufficiently rich to reflect the quality demands of diverse science aims.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>001D02B07D</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="3" l="FRE">
<s0>Intégrité donnée</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="3" l="ENG">
<s0>Data integrity</s0>
<s5>06</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Contrôle qualité</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Quality control</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Control de calidad</s0>
<s5>07</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Système gestion donnée technique SGDT</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Product data management PDM</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema gestión dato técnico</s0>
<s5>08</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Traitement automatique</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Automatic processing</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Tratamiento automático</s0>
<s5>09</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Télescope</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Telescope</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Telescopio</s0>
<s5>18</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Astrophysique</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Astrophysics</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Astrofísica</s0>
<s5>19</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Ciel</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Sky</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="07" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Cielo</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Nuit</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Night</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="08" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Noche</s0>
<s5>21</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Métrique</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Metric</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="09" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Métrico</s0>
<s5>22</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Modélisation</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Modeling</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="10" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Modelización</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Méthode indirecte</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Indirect method</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="11" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Método indirecto</s0>
<s5>24</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Hors ligne</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Off line</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="12" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Fuera linea</s0>
<s5>25</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Intégrabilité</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Integrability</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="13" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Integrabilidad</s0>
<s5>26</s5>
</fC03>
<fN21>
<s1>003</s1>
</fN21>
<fN44 i1="01">
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN44>
<fN82>
<s1>OTO</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
<pR>
<fA30 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Software and cyberinfrastructure for astronomy</s1>
<s3>San Diego CA USA</s3>
<s4>2010</s4>
</fA30>
</pR>
</standard>
</inist>
<affiliations>
<list>
<country>
<li>États-Unis</li>
</country>
<region>
<li>Arizona</li>
<li>Californie</li>
</region>
</list>
<tree>
<country name="États-Unis">
<region name="Arizona">
<name sortKey="Shaw, Richard A" sort="Shaw, Richard A" uniqKey="Shaw R" first="Richard A." last="Shaw">Richard A. Shaw</name>
</region>
<name sortKey="Axelrod, Timothy" sort="Axelrod, Timothy" uniqKey="Axelrod T" first="Timothy" last="Axelrod">Timothy Axelrod</name>
<name sortKey="Laher, Russ R" sort="Laher, Russ R" uniqKey="Laher R" first="Russ R." last="Laher">Russ R. Laher</name>
<name sortKey="Levine, Deborah" sort="Levine, Deborah" uniqKey="Levine D" first="Deborah" last="Levine">Deborah Levine</name>
<name sortKey="Mannings, Vince G" sort="Mannings, Vince G" uniqKey="Mannings V" first="Vince G." last="Mannings">Vince G. Mannings</name>
</country>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000074 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000074 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    CyberinfraV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:11-0004522
   |texte=   Science Data Quality Assessment for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25.
Data generation: Thu Oct 27 09:30:58 2016. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 23:08:40 2024