Mixed messages from multiple information sources on invasive species: a case of too much of a good thing?
Identifieur interne : 000777 ( Main/Merge ); précédent : 000776; suivant : 000778Mixed messages from multiple information sources on invasive species: a case of too much of a good thing?
Auteurs : Philip E. Hulme ; Carolin Weser [Nouvelle-Zélande]Source :
- Diversity and Distributions [ 1366-9516 ] ; 2011-11.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
Abstract
Aim The increasing number and availability of online databases of alien species beg a question of their comparability given most do not adopt standard criteria in the definition of species status or taxonomic treatment and vary in their comprehensiveness. In this study, we compare the consistency of two major European databases for the regions they have in common. We assess whether they use consistent terminology to classify species status, provide similar taxonomic classification and coverage, deliver comparable estimates of alien richness per country and identify comparable correlates of alien richness.
Url:
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00800.x
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Istex, to step Corpus: 000507
- to stream Istex, to step Curation: 000507
- to stream Istex, to step Checkpoint: 000195
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:139B4D5733533DF77043D8F5EB0FA88F23A29952Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Mixed messages from multiple information sources on invasive species: a case of too much of a good thing?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hulme, Philip E" sort="Hulme, Philip E" uniqKey="Hulme P" first="Philip E." last="Hulme">Philip E. Hulme</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weser, Carolin" sort="Weser, Carolin" uniqKey="Weser C" first="Carolin" last="Weser">Carolin Weser</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno>
<idno type="RBID">ISTEX:139B4D5733533DF77043D8F5EB0FA88F23A29952</idno>
<date when="2011" year="2011">2011</date>
<idno type="doi">10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00800.x</idno>
<idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/139B4D5733533DF77043D8F5EB0FA88F23A29952/fulltext/pdf</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000507</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Curation">000507</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Checkpoint">000195</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1366-9516:2011:Hulme P:mixed:messages:from</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000777</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">Mixed messages from multiple information sources on invasive species: a case of too much of a good thing?</title>
<author><name sortKey="Hulme, Philip E" sort="Hulme, Philip E" uniqKey="Hulme P" first="Philip E." last="Hulme">Philip E. Hulme</name>
</author>
<author><name sortKey="Weser, Carolin" sort="Weser, Carolin" uniqKey="Weser C" first="Carolin" last="Weser">Carolin Weser</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="1"><country xml:lang="fr">Nouvelle-Zélande</country>
<wicri:regionArea>The Bio‐Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury</wicri:regionArea>
<wicri:noRegion>Canterbury</wicri:noRegion>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<monogr></monogr>
<series><title level="j">Diversity and Distributions</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1366-9516</idno>
<idno type="eISSN">1472-4642</idno>
<imprint><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher>
<pubPlace>Oxford, UK</pubPlace>
<date type="published" when="2011-11">2011-11</date>
<biblScope unit="volume">17</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">6</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" from="1152">1152</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="page" to="1160">1160</biblScope>
</imprint>
<idno type="ISSN">1366-9516</idno>
</series>
<idno type="istex">139B4D5733533DF77043D8F5EB0FA88F23A29952</idno>
<idno type="DOI">10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00800.x</idno>
<idno type="ArticleID">DDI800</idno>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">1366-9516</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Biodiversity indicators</term>
<term>biological invasions</term>
<term>cyber‐infrastructure</term>
<term>database interoperability</term>
<term>exotic species</term>
<term>socio‐economy</term>
<term>species area relationship</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
<langUsage><language ident="en">en</language>
</langUsage>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front><div type="abstract">Aim The increasing number and availability of online databases of alien species beg a question of their comparability given most do not adopt standard criteria in the definition of species status or taxonomic treatment and vary in their comprehensiveness. In this study, we compare the consistency of two major European databases for the regions they have in common. We assess whether they use consistent terminology to classify species status, provide similar taxonomic classification and coverage, deliver comparable estimates of alien richness per country and identify comparable correlates of alien richness.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>
Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/CyberinfraV1/Data/Main/Merge
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000777 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Merge/biblio.hfd -nk 000777 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien |wiki= Ticri/CIDE |area= CyberinfraV1 |flux= Main |étape= Merge |type= RBID |clé= ISTEX:139B4D5733533DF77043D8F5EB0FA88F23A29952 |texte= Mixed messages from multiple information sources on invasive species: a case of too much of a good thing? }}
This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.25. |