Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.
Identifieur interne : 000150 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000149; suivant : 000151Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.
Auteurs : Digna M A. Kamalski ; Jeroen P M. Peters ; Tjeerd De Boorder ; Sjaak F L. Klis ; Wilko GrolmanSource :
- Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology [ 1537-4505 ] ; 2014.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Action Potentials, Animals, Cochlea (radiation effects), Cochlea (surgery), Ear, Inner (surgery), Evoked Potentials, Auditory (physiology), Fenestration, Labyrinth (adverse effects), Guinea Pigs, Laser Therapy (adverse effects), Laser Therapy (methods), Lasers, Solid-State (adverse effects), Stapes Surgery (methods).
- MESH :
- adverse effects : Fenestration, Labyrinth, Laser Therapy, Lasers, Solid-State.
- methods : Laser Therapy, Stapes Surgery.
- physiology : Evoked Potentials, Auditory.
- radiation effects : Cochlea.
- surgery : Cochlea, Ear, Inner.
- Action Potentials, Animals, Guinea Pigs.
Abstract
Making a cochleostomy with a laser can affect the inner ear function.
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000491
PubMed: 25122147
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:25122147Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.</title><author><name sortKey="Kamalski, Digna M A" sort="Kamalski, Digna M A" uniqKey="Kamalski D" first="Digna M A" last="Kamalski">Digna M A. Kamalski</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>*Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, †Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, and ‡Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peters, Jeroen P M" sort="Peters, Jeroen P M" uniqKey="Peters J" first="Jeroen P M" last="Peters">Jeroen P M. Peters</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Boorder, Tjeerd" sort="De Boorder, Tjeerd" uniqKey="De Boorder T" first="Tjeerd" last="De Boorder">Tjeerd De Boorder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Klis, Sjaak F L" sort="Klis, Sjaak F L" uniqKey="Klis S" first="Sjaak F L" last="Klis">Sjaak F L. Klis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grolman, Wilko" sort="Grolman, Wilko" uniqKey="Grolman W" first="Wilko" last="Grolman">Wilko Grolman</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2014">2014</date><idno type="doi">10.1097/MAO.0000000000000491</idno><idno type="RBID">pubmed:25122147</idno><idno type="pmid">25122147</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000150</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000150</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.</title><author><name sortKey="Kamalski, Digna M A" sort="Kamalski, Digna M A" uniqKey="Kamalski D" first="Digna M A" last="Kamalski">Digna M A. Kamalski</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>*Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, †Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, and ‡Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peters, Jeroen P M" sort="Peters, Jeroen P M" uniqKey="Peters J" first="Jeroen P M" last="Peters">Jeroen P M. Peters</name></author><author><name sortKey="De Boorder, Tjeerd" sort="De Boorder, Tjeerd" uniqKey="De Boorder T" first="Tjeerd" last="De Boorder">Tjeerd De Boorder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Klis, Sjaak F L" sort="Klis, Sjaak F L" uniqKey="Klis S" first="Sjaak F L" last="Klis">Sjaak F L. Klis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Grolman, Wilko" sort="Grolman, Wilko" uniqKey="Grolman W" first="Wilko" last="Grolman">Wilko Grolman</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology</title><idno type="eISSN">1537-4505</idno><imprint><date when="2014" type="published">2014</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Action Potentials</term><term>Animals</term><term>Cochlea (radiation effects)</term><term>Cochlea (surgery)</term><term>Ear, Inner (surgery)</term><term>Evoked Potentials, Auditory (physiology)</term><term>Fenestration, Labyrinth (adverse effects)</term><term>Guinea Pigs</term><term>Laser Therapy (adverse effects)</term><term>Laser Therapy (methods)</term><term>Lasers, Solid-State (adverse effects)</term><term>Stapes Surgery (methods)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="adverse effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Fenestration, Labyrinth</term><term>Laser Therapy</term><term>Lasers, Solid-State</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="methods" xml:lang="en"><term>Laser Therapy</term><term>Stapes Surgery</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="physiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Evoked Potentials, Auditory</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="radiation effects" xml:lang="en"><term>Cochlea</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="surgery" xml:lang="en"><term>Cochlea</term><term>Ear, Inner</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Action Potentials</term><term>Animals</term><term>Guinea Pigs</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Making a cochleostomy with a laser can affect the inner ear function.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">25122147</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2014</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>15</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>09</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1537-4505</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>35</Volume><Issue>8</Issue><PubDate><Year>2014</Year><Month>Sep</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Otol. Neurotol.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>1306-11</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1097/MAO.0000000000000491</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="HYPOTHESIS" NlmCategory="OBJECTIVE">Making a cochleostomy with a laser can affect the inner ear function.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">Different types of lasers can be used to create a fenestration in the footplate of the stapes during stapedotomy. Because of variations in absorption spectra of the laser light in various tissues or fluids, each laser has its own characteristics and possible side effects.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="MATERIALS AND METHODS" NlmCategory="METHODS">The basal turns of the cochleae of 20 guinea pigs were fenestrated using 4 types of lasers (thulium, KTP, CO2, diode; all groups n = 4). A control group (n = 4) was included to correct for the effects of the surgery alone. At 3 different time points, acoustically evoked compound action potentials (CAPs) were recorded at 5 frequencies and at different sound pressure levels. N1-P2 amplitudes were measured, and subsequently, thresholds were calculated. A repeated measures analysis of variance was used to investigate differences between groups.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="RESULTS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">There was a decrease in CAP amplitudes and an increase in CAP thresholds after cochleostomy with each laser. The increase in thresholds was significantly larger for higher frequencies. The thulium laser evoked the largest threshold shifts, the KTP laser the smallest with the CO2, and diode lasers in intermediate positions. Overall, there was an increase in latencies after treatment.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSION" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">Laser treatment on or near the cochlea can cause damage to the sensitivity of the cochlea for sound. The thulium laser seems to be the worst choice in this respect.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kamalski</LastName><ForeName>Digna M A</ForeName><Initials>DM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>*Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, †Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, and ‡Department of Medical Technology and Clinical Physics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Peters</LastName><ForeName>Jeroen P M</ForeName><Initials>JP</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>de Boorder</LastName><ForeName>Tjeerd</ForeName><Initials>T</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Klis</LastName><ForeName>Sjaak F L</ForeName><Initials>SF</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Grolman</LastName><ForeName>Wilko</ForeName><Initials>W</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Otol Neurotol</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>100961504</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1531-7129</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000200">Action Potentials</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000818">Animals</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003051">Cochlea</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000528">radiation effects</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000601">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D007758">Ear, Inner</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000601">surgery</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005072">Evoked Potentials, Auditory</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000502">physiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005276">Fenestration, Labyrinth</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000009">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006168">Guinea Pigs</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D053685">Laser Therapy</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000009">adverse effects</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D053844">Lasers, Solid-State</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="Q000009">adverse effects</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D013201">Stapes Surgery</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000379">methods</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2014</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2014</Year><Month>8</Month><Day>15</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2015</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>10</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1097/MAO.0000000000000491</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">00129492-201409000-00002</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">25122147</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Terre/explor/ThuliumV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000150 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000150 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Terre
|area= ThuliumV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:25122147
|texte= Influence of laser-assisted cochleostomy on acoustically evoked compound action potentials in the guinea pig.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:25122147" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a ThuliumV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |