Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature
Identifieur interne : 000075 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 000074; suivant : 000076Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature
Auteurs : Ahmed M. Elshal ; Ramy Mekkawy ; Mahmoud Laymon ; Ahmed El-Assmy ; Ahmed R. El-NahasSource :
- Canadian Urological Association Journal [ 1911-6470 ] ; 2015.
Abstract
We assess different approaches to retrieve the enucleated adenoma after transurethral enucleation of the prostate, particularly using the holmium laser.
A retrospective review through our prospectively maintained database was performed looking for safety and efficacy of two morcellators. The enucleation phase of the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was classically performed followed by retrieval of the intravesical adenoma using either the Piranha (Wolf Inc., Knittlingen, Germany) or VersaCut (Lumenis) morcellator. A PubMed-MEDLINE search was conducted for all transurethral enucleation procedures and relevant data regarding methods of prostate tissue retrieval were extracted.
Strictly limiting the study to 3 reusable blades with each morcellator, we performed 67 and 55 consecutive procedures with Piranha and VersaCut, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two morcellators regarding perioperative complications, apart from 5 bladder mucosal injuries with the VersaCut (9%). Furthermore, there were similar retrieved tissue weight, mechanical problems-rate, catheter-time and hospital-stay in both morcellators. However, the Piranha morcellator needed significantly less morcellation-time, needed to use cold loop to remove non-morcellated pieces and to score the adenoma by laser for better bite of the adenoma, and had a higher median morcellation-rate 6.2 (rate: 2.8–12) g/min.
Despite little reporting on morcellation, we had data on the tissue retrieval rate (2.6 to 6.5 g/min with Piranha and 1.9 to 11 g/min with VersaCut. Furthermore, bladder mucosal injury was reported in 1.4% and 0.7 to 5.7% with Piranha and VersaCut, respectively; bladder perforation with VersaCut was experienced in about 0.1 to 1.5% of patients. Our study is limited by its non-randomization.
The Piranha morcellator was the most efficient and safe way to retrieve tissue after a transurethral enucleation of a prostate adenoma.
Url:
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3035
PubMed: 26425224
PubMed Central: 4581928
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000020
- to stream Pmc, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000020
- to stream Pmc, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000026
- to stream Ncbi, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A58
- to stream Ncbi, to step Curation: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A58
- to stream Ncbi, to step Checkpoint: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000A58
- to stream Main, to step Merge: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000075
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4581928Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature</title><author><name sortKey="Elshal, Ahmed M" sort="Elshal, Ahmed M" uniqKey="Elshal A" first="Ahmed M." last="Elshal">Ahmed M. Elshal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mekkawy, Ramy" sort="Mekkawy, Ramy" uniqKey="Mekkawy R" first="Ramy" last="Mekkawy">Ramy Mekkawy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Laymon, Mahmoud" sort="Laymon, Mahmoud" uniqKey="Laymon M" first="Mahmoud" last="Laymon">Mahmoud Laymon</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Assmy, Ahmed" sort="El Assmy, Ahmed" uniqKey="El Assmy A" first="Ahmed" last="El-Assmy">Ahmed El-Assmy</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Nahas, Ahmed R" sort="El Nahas, Ahmed R" uniqKey="El Nahas A" first="Ahmed R." last="El-Nahas">Ahmed R. El-Nahas</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">26425224</idno><idno type="pmc">4581928</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4581928</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4581928</idno><idno type="doi">10.5489/cuaj.3035</idno><date when="2015">2015</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000020</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000026</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Checkpoint">000026</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000A58</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000A58</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000A58</idno><idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1911-6470:2015:Elshal A:towards:optimizing:prostate</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">000075</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000075</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature</title><author><name sortKey="Elshal, Ahmed M" sort="Elshal, Ahmed M" uniqKey="Elshal A" first="Ahmed M." last="Elshal">Ahmed M. Elshal</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mekkawy, Ramy" sort="Mekkawy, Ramy" uniqKey="Mekkawy R" first="Ramy" last="Mekkawy">Ramy Mekkawy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Laymon, Mahmoud" sort="Laymon, Mahmoud" uniqKey="Laymon M" first="Mahmoud" last="Laymon">Mahmoud Laymon</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Assmy, Ahmed" sort="El Assmy, Ahmed" uniqKey="El Assmy A" first="Ahmed" last="El-Assmy">Ahmed El-Assmy</name></author><author><name sortKey="El Nahas, Ahmed R" sort="El Nahas, Ahmed R" uniqKey="El Nahas A" first="Ahmed R." last="El-Nahas">Ahmed R. El-Nahas</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Canadian Urological Association Journal</title><idno type="ISSN">1911-6470</idno><imprint><date when="2015">2015</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Introduction:</title><p>We assess different approaches to retrieve the enucleated adenoma after transurethral enucleation of the prostate, particularly using the holmium laser.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods:</title><p>A retrospective review through our prospectively maintained database was performed looking for safety and efficacy of two morcellators. The enucleation phase of the holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) was classically performed followed by retrieval of the intravesical adenoma using either the Piranha (Wolf Inc., Knittlingen, Germany) or VersaCut (Lumenis) morcellator. A PubMed-MEDLINE search was conducted for all transurethral enucleation procedures and relevant data regarding methods of prostate tissue retrieval were extracted.</p></sec><sec><title>Results:</title><p>Strictly limiting the study to 3 reusable blades with each morcellator, we performed 67 and 55 consecutive procedures with Piranha and VersaCut, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two morcellators regarding perioperative complications, apart from 5 bladder mucosal injuries with the VersaCut (9%). Furthermore, there were similar retrieved tissue weight, mechanical problems-rate, catheter-time and hospital-stay in both morcellators. However, the Piranha morcellator needed significantly less morcellation-time, needed to use cold loop to remove non-morcellated pieces and to score the adenoma by laser for better bite of the adenoma, and had a higher median morcellation-rate 6.2 (rate: 2.8–12) g/min.</p><p>Despite little reporting on morcellation, we had data on the tissue retrieval rate (2.6 to 6.5 g/min with Piranha and 1.9 to 11 g/min with VersaCut. Furthermore, bladder mucosal injury was reported in 1.4% and 0.7 to 5.7% with Piranha and VersaCut, respectively; bladder perforation with VersaCut was experienced in about 0.1 to 1.5% of patients. Our study is limited by its non-randomization.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion:</title><p>The Piranha morcellator was the most efficient and safe way to retrieve tissue after a transurethral enucleation of a prostate adenoma.</p></sec></div></front></TEI></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Terre/explor/ThuliumV1/Data/Main/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000075 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Terre
|area= ThuliumV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4581928
|texte= Towards optimizing prostate tissue retrieval following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): Assessment of two morcellators and review of literature
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:26425224" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a ThuliumV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.21. |  |