Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.
Identifieur interne : 000190 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000189; suivant : 000191Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.
Auteurs : Gian Maria Galeazzi ; Silvia Ferrari ; Andrew Mackinnon ; Marco RigatelliSource :
- Psychosomatics [ 0033-3182 ]
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, International Classification of Diseases (standards), Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Prevalence, Psychophysiologic Disorders (diagnosis), Psychophysiologic Disorders (epidemiology), Referral and Consultation, Reproducibility of Results, Research.
- MESH :
- diagnosis : Psychophysiologic Disorders.
- epidemiology : Psychophysiologic Disorders.
- standards : International Classification of Diseases.
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Prevalence, Referral and Consultation, Reproducibility of Results, Research.
Abstract
The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) have been proposed by an international group of psychosomatic investigators as an operationalized tool for the assessment of psychological distress in medical patients. The aims of the present study were to evaluate interrater reliability, the distribution of DCPR syndromes, and their relationship with ICD-10 diagnostic categories. One hundred consecutive patients who were referred for psychiatric consultation in a university general hospital consented to assessment for DCPR syndromes as elicited in a joint interview conducted by two researchers. The results showed excellent interrater agreement, with kappa values for the 11 DCPR syndromes ranging from 0.69 to 0.97. More patients met criteria for one or more of the DCPR (87%) than for an ICD-10 diagnosis (75%). Four DCPR syndromes were particularly prevalent: demoralization, alexithymia, illness denial, and type A behavior. DCPR criteria appear to be a useful, reliable, and promising approach in the assessment and description of psychological distress in medical patients. They may serve as a focus of intervention studies in this population.
DOI: 10.1176/appi.psy.45.5.386
PubMed: 15345783
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:15345783Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Galeazzi, Gian Maria" sort="Galeazzi, Gian Maria" uniqKey="Galeazzi G" first="Gian Maria" last="Galeazzi">Gian Maria Galeazzi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Neuroscience TCR, Section of Psychiatry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. galeazzi@unimo.it</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Silvia" sort="Ferrari, Silvia" uniqKey="Ferrari S" first="Silvia" last="Ferrari">Silvia Ferrari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mackinnon, Andrew" sort="Mackinnon, Andrew" uniqKey="Mackinnon A" first="Andrew" last="Mackinnon">Andrew Mackinnon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rigatelli, Marco" sort="Rigatelli, Marco" uniqKey="Rigatelli M" first="Marco" last="Rigatelli">Marco Rigatelli</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="????"><PubDate><MedlineDate>2004 Sep-Oct</MedlineDate></PubDate></date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15345783</idno><idno type="pmid">15345783</idno><idno type="doi">10.1176/appi.psy.45.5.386</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000190</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000190</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.</title><author><name sortKey="Galeazzi, Gian Maria" sort="Galeazzi, Gian Maria" uniqKey="Galeazzi G" first="Gian Maria" last="Galeazzi">Gian Maria Galeazzi</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Neuroscience TCR, Section of Psychiatry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. galeazzi@unimo.it</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ferrari, Silvia" sort="Ferrari, Silvia" uniqKey="Ferrari S" first="Silvia" last="Ferrari">Silvia Ferrari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mackinnon, Andrew" sort="Mackinnon, Andrew" uniqKey="Mackinnon A" first="Andrew" last="Mackinnon">Andrew Mackinnon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rigatelli, Marco" sort="Rigatelli, Marco" uniqKey="Rigatelli M" first="Marco" last="Rigatelli">Marco Rigatelli</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Psychosomatics</title><idno type="ISSN">0033-3182</idno></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>International Classification of Diseases (standards)</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Observer Variation</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Psychophysiologic Disorders (diagnosis)</term><term>Psychophysiologic Disorders (epidemiology)</term><term>Referral and Consultation</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Research</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="diagnosis" xml:lang="en"><term>Psychophysiologic Disorders</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Psychophysiologic Disorders</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en"><term>International Classification of Diseases</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Adult</term><term>Aged</term><term>Aged, 80 and over</term><term>Female</term><term>Humans</term><term>Male</term><term>Middle Aged</term><term>Observer Variation</term><term>Prevalence</term><term>Referral and Consultation</term><term>Reproducibility of Results</term><term>Research</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) have been proposed by an international group of psychosomatic investigators as an operationalized tool for the assessment of psychological distress in medical patients. The aims of the present study were to evaluate interrater reliability, the distribution of DCPR syndromes, and their relationship with ICD-10 diagnostic categories. One hundred consecutive patients who were referred for psychiatric consultation in a university general hospital consented to assessment for DCPR syndromes as elicited in a joint interview conducted by two researchers. The results showed excellent interrater agreement, with kappa values for the 11 DCPR syndromes ranging from 0.69 to 0.97. More patients met criteria for one or more of the DCPR (87%) than for an ICD-10 diagnosis (75%). Four DCPR syndromes were particularly prevalent: demoralization, alexithymia, illness denial, and type A behavior. DCPR criteria appear to be a useful, reliable, and promising approach in the assessment and description of psychological distress in medical patients. They may serve as a focus of intervention studies in this population.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">15345783</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2004</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>03</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2004</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2004</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>17</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0033-3182</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>45</Volume><Issue>5</Issue><PubDate><MedlineDate>2004 Sep-Oct</MedlineDate></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Psychosomatics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Psychosomatics</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>386-93</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>The Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research (DCPR) have been proposed by an international group of psychosomatic investigators as an operationalized tool for the assessment of psychological distress in medical patients. The aims of the present study were to evaluate interrater reliability, the distribution of DCPR syndromes, and their relationship with ICD-10 diagnostic categories. One hundred consecutive patients who were referred for psychiatric consultation in a university general hospital consented to assessment for DCPR syndromes as elicited in a joint interview conducted by two researchers. The results showed excellent interrater agreement, with kappa values for the 11 DCPR syndromes ranging from 0.69 to 0.97. More patients met criteria for one or more of the DCPR (87%) than for an ICD-10 diagnosis (75%). Four DCPR syndromes were particularly prevalent: demoralization, alexithymia, illness denial, and type A behavior. DCPR criteria appear to be a useful, reliable, and promising approach in the assessment and description of psychological distress in medical patients. They may serve as a focus of intervention studies in this population.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Galeazzi</LastName><ForeName>Gian Maria</ForeName><Initials>GM</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Consultation/Liaison Psychiatry Service, Department of Neuroscience TCR, Section of Psychiatry, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy. galeazzi@unimo.it</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ferrari</LastName><ForeName>Silvia</ForeName><Initials>S</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Mackinnon</LastName><ForeName>Andrew</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Rigatelli</LastName><ForeName>Marco</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>Psychosomatics</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>0376506</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0033-3182</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000328">Adult</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000368">Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D000369">Aged, 80 and over</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D005260">Female</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D038801">International Classification of Diseases</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000592">standards</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008297">Male</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D008875">Middle Aged</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015588">Observer Variation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015995">Prevalence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D011602">Psychophysiologic Disorders</DescriptorName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000175">diagnosis</QualifierName><QualifierName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="Q000453">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012017">Referral and Consultation</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D015203">Reproducibility of Results</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D012106">Research</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2004</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2004</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2004</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>4</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15345783</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1176/appi.psy.45.5.386</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0033-3182(04)70152-8</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Lorraine/explor/LrgpV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000190 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000190 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Lorraine
|area= LrgpV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15345783
|texte= Interrater reliability, prevalence, and relation to ICD-10 diagnoses of the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychosomatic Research in consultation-liaison psychiatry patients.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15345783" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a LrgpV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |