The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014
Identifieur interne : 000098 ( Pmc/Corpus ); précédent : 000097; suivant : 000099The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014
Auteurs : Lin Fritschi ; Julie Crewe ; Ellie Darcey ; Alison Reid ; Deborah C. Glass ; Geza P. Benke ; Tim Driscoll ; Susan Peters ; Si Si ; Michael J. Abramson ; Renee N. CareySource :
- BMC Pulmonary Medicine [ 1471-2466 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces.
We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group.
In the Australian Workplace Exposure Study – Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47 %) than women (40 %). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27 %), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25 %) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20 %).
This study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma.
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Url:
DOI: 10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6
PubMed: 27061283
PubMed Central: 4826519
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4826519Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014</title><author><name sortKey="Fritschi, Lin" sort="Fritschi, Lin" uniqKey="Fritschi L" first="Lin" last="Fritschi">Lin Fritschi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Crewe, Julie" sort="Crewe, Julie" uniqKey="Crewe J" first="Julie" last="Crewe">Julie Crewe</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Darcey, Ellie" sort="Darcey, Ellie" uniqKey="Darcey E" first="Ellie" last="Darcey">Ellie Darcey</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reid, Alison" sort="Reid, Alison" uniqKey="Reid A" first="Alison" last="Reid">Alison Reid</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Glass, Deborah C" sort="Glass, Deborah C" uniqKey="Glass D" first="Deborah C." last="Glass">Deborah C. Glass</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Benke, Geza P" sort="Benke, Geza P" uniqKey="Benke G" first="Geza P." last="Benke">Geza P. Benke</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Driscoll, Tim" sort="Driscoll, Tim" uniqKey="Driscoll T" first="Tim" last="Driscoll">Tim Driscoll</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peters, Susan" sort="Peters, Susan" uniqKey="Peters S" first="Susan" last="Peters">Susan Peters</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Si, Si" sort="Si, Si" uniqKey="Si S" first="Si" last="Si">Si Si</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abramson, Michael J" sort="Abramson, Michael J" uniqKey="Abramson M" first="Michael J." last="Abramson">Michael J. Abramson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carey, Renee N" sort="Carey, Renee N" uniqKey="Carey R" first="Renee N." last="Carey">Renee N. Carey</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">27061283</idno><idno type="pmc">4826519</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4826519</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4826519</idno><idno type="doi">10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000098</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000098</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014</title><author><name sortKey="Fritschi, Lin" sort="Fritschi, Lin" uniqKey="Fritschi L" first="Lin" last="Fritschi">Lin Fritschi</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Crewe, Julie" sort="Crewe, Julie" uniqKey="Crewe J" first="Julie" last="Crewe">Julie Crewe</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Darcey, Ellie" sort="Darcey, Ellie" uniqKey="Darcey E" first="Ellie" last="Darcey">Ellie Darcey</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Reid, Alison" sort="Reid, Alison" uniqKey="Reid A" first="Alison" last="Reid">Alison Reid</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Glass, Deborah C" sort="Glass, Deborah C" uniqKey="Glass D" first="Deborah C." last="Glass">Deborah C. Glass</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Benke, Geza P" sort="Benke, Geza P" uniqKey="Benke G" first="Geza P." last="Benke">Geza P. Benke</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Driscoll, Tim" sort="Driscoll, Tim" uniqKey="Driscoll T" first="Tim" last="Driscoll">Tim Driscoll</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff3">Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Peters, Susan" sort="Peters, Susan" uniqKey="Peters S" first="Susan" last="Peters">Susan Peters</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff4">School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Si, Si" sort="Si, Si" uniqKey="Si S" first="Si" last="Si">Si Si</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Abramson, Michael J" sort="Abramson, Michael J" uniqKey="Abramson M" first="Michael J." last="Abramson">Michael J. Abramson</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff2">Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Carey, Renee N" sort="Carey, Renee N" uniqKey="Carey R" first="Renee N." last="Carey">Renee N. Carey</name><affiliation><nlm:aff id="Aff1">School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</nlm:aff></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">BMC Pulmonary Medicine</title><idno type="eISSN">1471-2466</idno><imprint><date when="2016">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec><title>Background</title><p>There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In the Australian Workplace Exposure Study – Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47 %) than women (40 %). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27 %), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25 %) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20 %).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma.</p></sec><sec><title>Electronic supplementary material</title><p>The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chan Yeung, M" uniqKey="Chan Yeung M">M Chan-Yeung</name></author><author><name sortKey="Malo, J" uniqKey="Malo J">J Malo</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Toren, K" uniqKey="Toren K">K Toren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Blanc, Pd" uniqKey="Blanc P">PD Blanc</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Baur, X" uniqKey="Baur X">X Baur</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bakehe, P" uniqKey="Bakehe P">P Bakehe</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Newman Taylor, A" uniqKey="Newman Taylor A">A Newman Taylor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Nicholson, P" uniqKey="Nicholson P">P Nicholson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cullinan, P" uniqKey="Cullinan P">P Cullinan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boyle, C" uniqKey="Boyle C">C Boyle</name></author><author><name sortKey="Burge, P" uniqKey="Burge P">P Burge</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Rantanen, J" uniqKey="Rantanen J">J Rantanen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lehtinen, S" uniqKey="Lehtinen S">S Lehtinen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Skorge, Td" uniqKey="Skorge T">TD Skorge</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eagan, Tm" uniqKey="Eagan T">TM Eagan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Eide, Ge" uniqKey="Eide G">GE Eide</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gulsvik, A" uniqKey="Gulsvik A">A Gulsvik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bakke, Ps" uniqKey="Bakke P">PS Bakke</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hansell, A" uniqKey="Hansell A">A Hansell</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ghosh, Re" uniqKey="Ghosh R">RE Ghosh</name></author><author><name sortKey="Poole, S" uniqKey="Poole S">S Poole</name></author><author><name sortKey="Zock, Jp" uniqKey="Zock J">JP Zock</name></author><author><name sortKey="Weatherall, M" uniqKey="Weatherall M">M Weatherall</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vermeulen, R" uniqKey="Vermeulen R">R Vermeulen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kromhout, H" uniqKey="Kromhout H">H Kromhout</name></author><author><name sortKey="Travers, J" uniqKey="Travers J">J Travers</name></author><author><name sortKey="Beasley, R" uniqKey="Beasley R">R Beasley</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Fritschi, L" uniqKey="Fritschi L">L Fritschi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Friesen, Mc" uniqKey="Friesen M">MC Friesen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glass, D" uniqKey="Glass D">D Glass</name></author><author><name sortKey="Benke, G" uniqKey="Benke G">G Benke</name></author><author><name sortKey="Girschik, J" uniqKey="Girschik J">J Girschik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sadkowsky, T" uniqKey="Sadkowsky T">T Sadkowsky</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Abdolell, M" uniqKey="Abdolell M">M Abdolell</name></author><author><name sortKey="Leblanc, M" uniqKey="Leblanc M">M LeBlanc</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stephens, D" uniqKey="Stephens D">D Stephens</name></author><author><name sortKey="Harrison, Rv" uniqKey="Harrison R">RV Harrison</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Dal Grande, E" uniqKey="Dal Grande E">E Dal Grande</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chittleborough, Cr" uniqKey="Chittleborough C">CR Chittleborough</name></author><author><name sortKey="Campostrini, S" uniqKey="Campostrini S">S Campostrini</name></author><author><name sortKey="Tucker, G" uniqKey="Tucker G">G Tucker</name></author><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Aw" uniqKey="Taylor A">AW Taylor</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Siemiatycki, J" uniqKey="Siemiatycki J">J Siemiatycki</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Lamontagne, Ad" uniqKey="Lamontagne A">AD LaMontagne</name></author><author><name sortKey="Radi, S" uniqKey="Radi S">S Radi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Elder, Ds" uniqKey="Elder D">DS Elder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abramson, Mj" uniqKey="Abramson M">MJ Abramson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sim, M" uniqKey="Sim M">M Sim</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Esterhuizen, Tm" uniqKey="Esterhuizen T">TM Esterhuizen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hnizdo, E" uniqKey="Hnizdo E">E Hnizdo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Rees, D" uniqKey="Rees D">D Rees</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Piipari, R" uniqKey="Piipari R">R Piipari</name></author><author><name sortKey="Keskinen, H" uniqKey="Keskinen H">H Keskinen</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Elder, D" uniqKey="Elder D">D Elder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abramson, M" uniqKey="Abramson M">M Abramson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fish, D" uniqKey="Fish D">D Fish</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson, A" uniqKey="Johnson A">A Johnson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Mckenzie, D" uniqKey="Mckenzie D">D McKenzie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sim, M" uniqKey="Sim M">M Sim</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Bakerly, Nd" uniqKey="Bakerly N">ND Bakerly</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moore, Vc" uniqKey="Moore V">VC Moore</name></author><author><name sortKey="Vellore, Ad" uniqKey="Vellore A">AD Vellore</name></author><author><name sortKey="Jaakkola, Ms" uniqKey="Jaakkola M">MS Jaakkola</name></author><author><name sortKey="Robertson, As" uniqKey="Robertson A">AS Robertson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Burge, Ps" uniqKey="Burge P">PS Burge</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kwon, Sc" uniqKey="Kwon S">SC Kwon</name></author><author><name sortKey="Song, J" uniqKey="Song J">J Song</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kim, Yk" uniqKey="Kim Y">YK Kim</name></author><author><name sortKey="Calvert, Gm" uniqKey="Calvert G">GM Calvert</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Siemiatycki, J" uniqKey="Siemiatycki J">J Siemiatycki</name></author><author><name sortKey="Day, Ne" uniqKey="Day N">NE Day</name></author><author><name sortKey="Fabry, J" uniqKey="Fabry J">J Fabry</name></author><author><name sortKey="Cooper, Ja" uniqKey="Cooper J">JA Cooper</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kennedy, Sm" uniqKey="Kennedy S">SM Kennedy</name></author><author><name sortKey="Le Moual, N" uniqKey="Le Moual N">N Le Moual</name></author><author><name sortKey="Choudat, D" uniqKey="Choudat D">D Choudat</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kauffmann, F" uniqKey="Kauffmann F">F Kauffmann</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">BMC Pulm Med</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">BMC Pulm Med</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>BMC Pulmonary Medicine</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1471-2466</issn><publisher><publisher-name>BioMed Central</publisher-name><publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27061283</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4826519</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">212</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Fritschi</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name><address><phone>+61 8 9266 9476</phone><email>lin.fritschi@curtin.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Crewe</surname><given-names>Julie</given-names></name><address><email>JulieCrewe@lei.org.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Darcey</surname><given-names>Ellie</given-names></name><address><email>ellie.darcey@curtin.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Reid</surname><given-names>Alison</given-names></name><address><email>alison.reid@curtin.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Glass</surname><given-names>Deborah C.</given-names></name><address><email>deborah.glass@monash.edu</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Benke</surname><given-names>Geza P.</given-names></name><address><email>geza.benke@monash.edu</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Driscoll</surname><given-names>Tim</given-names></name><address><email>tim.driscoll@sydney.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Peters</surname><given-names>Susan</given-names></name><address><email>susan.peters@uwa.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>Si</given-names></name><address><email>si.si@curtin.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name><address><email>michael.abramson@monash.edu</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Carey</surname><given-names>Renee N.</given-names></name><address><email>renee.carey@curtin.edu.au</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="Aff1"></xref></contrib><aff id="Aff1"><label></label>School of Public Health, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, Western Australia 6845 Australia</aff><aff id="Aff2"><label></label>Monash Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria Australia</aff><aff id="Aff3"><label></label>Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia</aff><aff id="Aff4"><label></label>School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia Australia</aff></contrib-group><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>9</day><month>4</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="pmc-release"><day>9</day><month>4</month><year>2016</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><elocation-id>48</elocation-id><history><date date-type="received"><day>21</day><month>1</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>31</day><month>3</month><year>2016</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© Fritschi et al. 2016</copyright-statement><license license-type="OpenAccess"><license-p><bold>Open Access</bold>This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link>), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/">http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/</ext-link>) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract id="Abs1"><sec><title>Background</title><p>There is very little information available on a national level as to the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>We conducted a national telephone survey in Australia to investigate the prevalence of current occupational exposure to 277 asthmagens, assembled into 27 groups. Demographic and current job information were obtained. A web-based tool, OccIDEAS, was used to collect job task information and assign exposure to each asthmagen group.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>In the Australian Workplace Exposure Study – Asthma (AWES- Asthma) we interviewed 4878 participants (2441 male and 2437 female). Exposure to at least one asthmagen was more common among men (47 %) than women (40 %). Extrapolated to the Australian population, approximately 2.8 million men and 1.7 million women were estimated to be exposed. Among men, the most common exposures were bioaerosols (29 %) and metals (27 %), whilst the most common exposures among women were latex (25 %) and industrial cleaning and sterilising agents (20 %).</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusions</title><p>This study provides information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces which will be useful in setting priorities for control and prevention of occupational asthma.</p></sec><sec><title>Electronic supplementary material</title><p>The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12890-016-0212-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><title>Keywords</title><kwd>Occupational asthma</kwd><kwd>Surveillance</kwd><kwd>Workplace exposure</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><award-group><funding-source><institution-wrap><institution-id institution-id-type="FundRef">http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000925</institution-id><institution>National Health and Medical Research Council</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id>1056684</award-id><principal-award-recipient><name><surname>Fritschi</surname><given-names>Lin</given-names></name></principal-award-recipient></award-group><award-group><funding-source><institution>SafeWork Australia</institution></funding-source></award-group></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-copyright-statement</meta-name><meta-value>© The Author(s) 2016</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="Sec1"><title>Background</title><p>Work-related (or occupational) asthma is caused by exposure to agents in an occupational setting and includes both work-aggravated asthma (in which workplace exposures provoke or exacerbate symptoms of pre-existing asthma) and newly-occurring occupational asthma [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR1">1</xref>]. Occupational asthma is divided into two groups: allergic and non-allergic [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR2">2</xref>]. Allergic occupational asthma is caused by exposures to agents which sensitize the airways. The airways then react to subsequent additional exposure to that agent and may also react to other agents and triggers. Non-allergic occupational asthma is less common (perhaps 10 % of all occupational asthma) and is a result of exposure to high levels of a respiratory irritant (such as hydrogen chloride, ammonia, chlorine etc).</p><p>A review of international studies estimated that about 16–17 % of adult onset asthma was caused by occupational exposures [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR3">3</xref>]. Work-related asthma is one of the few preventable types of asthma. For example, a study in the aluminium industry showed that the incidence of occupational asthma in seven smelters had declined from 9.46/1000 per year in 1992 to 0.36/1000 per year in 2006; a 96.2 % reduction [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR4">4</xref>]. This reduction was ascribed to improvements in control of exposures, respiratory protection and pre-placement medical assessments.</p><p>Several hundred workplace agents have been found to cause occupational asthma, including organic dusts (e.g. wood, flour, animal dander), and chemicals such as isocyanates and glutaraldehyde [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR5">5</xref>]. Exposure to asthmagens may occur in many occupations including farming, painting, food preparation, nursing and laboratory work [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR6">6</xref>]. In Finland, it was estimated in 1992 that about 13 % of the workforce were exposed to allergens at work and 30 % were exposed to respiratory contaminants [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR7">7</xref>]. In the European Community Respiratory Health Survey, about half of the sample reported exposure to “vapors, gas, dust or fumes” in their current job [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>]. Similarly, about two thirds of a Norwegian cohort were assessed by a job exposure matrix as being exposed at some time during their working life to at least one of the following agents: biological dust, mineral dust, and gas and fumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>]. None of these studies identified specific asthmagens and not all dusts are asthmagenic. In New Zealand, 55 % of the population self-reported exposure to at least one group of asthmagens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR10">10</xref>]. There are currently no estimates of the number of people exposed to specific asthmagens in workplaces in Australia.</p><p>We recently developed a comprehensive and inclusive list of asthmagens relevant for Australian workplaces [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>]. It contained 277 asthmagens (in 27 groups) (Table <xref rid="Tab3" ref-type="table">3</xref>) which had been identified from a number of published sources and were all deemed to meet three criteria: (1) there was evidence that the agent was an asthmagen; (2) the agent was used in occupational circumstances; and (3) it was potentially present in Australian workplaces. We subsequently undertook a national cross-sectional survey (The Australian Workplace Exposures Study – Asthma or AWES-Asthma) in 2014 to investigate the prevalence of occupational exposures to these asthmagens. This paper reports the methods and results of this survey.</p></sec><sec id="Sec2"><title>Methods</title><sec id="Sec3"><title>Subject selection</title><p>The survey sample list was obtained from a commercial survey sampling company and included both landline and mobile telephone numbers, along with postal addresses and postcodes. We requested a randomized sample, stratified to be broadly proportional to the 2011 distribution of the Australian workforce by state and territory [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR12">12</xref>]. Unfortunately, we discovered after the data collection was complete that the sample provided was not random (56 % of the last names selected began with L and 25 % began with M). The effect of this on our results is not known but is not likely to be substantial.</p><p>Each number was telephoned and asked if there was anyone on that number aged 18 to 64 years and currently in paid employment (having worked for one hour or more for pay in the previous week [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR13">13</xref>]). Exclusion criteria were if the respondent did not have a sufficiently good understanding of spoken English, had a hearing disability or was too ill to complete the telephone survey. Due to the reluctance of male respondents to contribute to research surveys [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR14">14</xref>] and our previous experience [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR15">15</xref>] we used a modified interview request for landlines. That is, if there were both male and female eligible workers in a household, the interviewer would request a male in 6 out of 7 calls.</p></sec><sec id="Sec4"><title>Data collection</title><p>All data were collected by experienced telephone survey staff. Each interview was designed to be completed in less than 15 min. Phone calls were made between 9 am and 8 pm on weekday evenings and between 10 am and 5 pm on weekends.</p><p>The interviewers recorded demographic information including age, gender, country of birth, year of arrival in Australia, highest education level achieved, personal and co-workers’ smoking status, business size and whether the respondent was aware of dust or gas monitoring in their work spaces. From the respondent’s residential postcode, we derived the socio-economic indexes for areas (SEIFA) disadvantage score [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR16">16</xref>] and the accessibility/remoteness index of Australia (ARIA+) score [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR17">17</xref>].</p><p>Preliminary information on the main job for each person was collected to establish whether the respondent’s occupation corresponded to one of the categories of employment that were predetermined by occupational hygienists to be unlikely to result in exposure to any of the 277 asthmagens. These were: office and clerical workers, data processors, flight attendants or pilots, retail sales workers other than food outlets, customer service workers, bank or postal service staff, and correctional services officers. The respondents who were employed in any one of these categories were classified as unexposed and the interview ended at that point.</p><p>For the remaining workers, additional information regarding their current job was obtained, including job title, industry type, number of hours worked per week and weeks worked per year. Using this information about a person’s job and industry type, interviewers assigned the respondents to one of 52 job specific modules (JSMs) within the web-based tool OccIDEAS [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR18">18</xref>]. The JSMs were individually developed for specific jobs where it was considered that exposure to any of the asthmagens could occur and which were reasonably common in Australia. Where a job did not fit any of the 52 JSMs, a Generic JSM was assigned to collect information about tasks commonly carried out.</p></sec><sec id="Sec5"><title>Exposure assessments</title><p>Each JSM within OccIDEAS contained questions relating to specific tasks which had been identified as determinants of exposure to one or more of the asthmagen groups based on published literature, material data sheets and expert knowledge. Algorithms based on literature and expert opinion were used to assign the likelihood of exposure to each of the listed asthmagen groups (either ‘no’, ‘possible’ or ‘probable’). All automatic assessments were reviewed by project staff and rules were changed where necessary and appropriate. Any such changes were then applied to all assessments using the revised rule. The reviewers also used all available information to categorize the “possible” exposures into either probable or no exposure. Where the information was inadequate to be confident of exposure, we classified the remaining 873 possible assessments as unexposed (0.7 % of all assessments).</p></sec><sec id="Sec6"><title>Statistical analysis</title><p>Each of the respondents’ job titles were coded using the Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations (ANZSCO) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR19">19</xref>]. These codes were then classified into 24 occupational groups (Table <xref rid="Tab1" ref-type="table">1</xref>), containing occupations which were broadly similar with regard to exposure to the asthmagen groups.<table-wrap id="Tab1"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Comparisons between the AWES-Asthma sample and the Australian workforce [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR23">23</xref>] by gender</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th></th><th colspan="4">Males</th><th></th><th colspan="4">Females</th><th></th></tr><tr><th>Demographic Characteristic</th><th colspan="2">AWES Sample</th><th colspan="2">Australian Census</th><th><italic>p</italic>-value</th><th colspan="2">AWES Sample</th><th colspan="2">Australian Census</th><th><italic>p</italic>-value</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th></th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Total</td><td>2 441</td><td></td><td>5 040 849</td><td></td><td></td><td>2 437</td><td></td><td>4 441 578</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Age</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><0.001</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><0.001</td></tr><tr><td>18–34 years</td><td>301</td><td>12 %</td><td>1 844 844</td><td>37 %</td><td></td><td>227</td><td>9 %</td><td>1 634 880</td><td>37 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>35–50 years</td><td>1 050</td><td>43 %</td><td>1 957 490</td><td>39 %</td><td></td><td>1 115</td><td>46 %</td><td>1 751 048</td><td>39 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>51–64 years</td><td>1 090</td><td>45 %</td><td>1 238 515</td><td>25 %</td><td></td><td>1 095</td><td>45 %</td><td>1 055 650</td><td>24 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>State</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.0</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.0</td></tr><tr><td>New South Wales</td><td>767</td><td>31 %</td><td>1 573 658</td><td>31 %</td><td></td><td>760</td><td>31 %</td><td>1 388 132</td><td>31 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Victoria</td><td>595</td><td>24 %</td><td>1 272 872</td><td>25 %</td><td></td><td>637</td><td>26 %</td><td>1 121 241</td><td>25 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Queensland</td><td>471</td><td>19 %</td><td>1 012 186</td><td>20 %</td><td></td><td>481</td><td>20 %</td><td>901 345</td><td>20 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>South Australia</td><td>166</td><td>7 %</td><td>367 283</td><td>7 %</td><td></td><td>180</td><td>7 %</td><td>328 939</td><td>7 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Western Australia</td><td>308</td><td>13 %</td><td>563 640</td><td>11 %</td><td></td><td>259</td><td>11 %</td><td>469 323</td><td>11 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Tasmania</td><td>61</td><td>2 %</td><td>105 692</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>46</td><td>2 %</td><td>98 326</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Australian Capital Territory</td><td>47</td><td>2 %</td><td>95 380</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>44</td><td>2 %</td><td>90 729</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Northern Territory</td><td>26</td><td>1 %</td><td>50 138</td><td>1 %</td><td></td><td>30</td><td>1 %</td><td>43 543</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Country of Birth</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.06</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.10</td></tr><tr><td>Australia</td><td>1 913</td><td>78 %</td><td>3 529 539</td><td>70 %</td><td></td><td>1 937</td><td>79 %</td><td>3 178 745</td><td>72 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>524</td><td>21 %</td><td>1 511 310</td><td>30 %</td><td></td><td>496</td><td>20 %</td><td>1 262 833</td><td>28 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Education</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.12</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.12</td></tr><tr><td>High school or lower</td><td>962</td><td>39 %</td><td>1 949 397</td><td>39 %</td><td></td><td>806</td><td>33 %</td><td>1 822 204</td><td>41 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Vocational/Trade</td><td>720</td><td>29 %</td><td>1 904 288</td><td>38 %</td><td></td><td>684</td><td>28 %</td><td>1 269 804</td><td>29 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Bachelor or higher</td><td>758</td><td>31 %</td><td>1 187 164</td><td>24 %</td><td></td><td>946</td><td>39 %</td><td>1 349 570</td><td>30 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Socioeconomic status</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.57</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.32</td></tr><tr><td>Highest Quintile (Most advantaged)</td><td>560</td><td>23 %</td><td>1 403 088</td><td>28 %</td><td></td><td>519</td><td>21 %</td><td>1 288 370</td><td>29 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Fourth</td><td>483</td><td>20 %</td><td>1 146 277</td><td>23 %</td><td></td><td>515</td><td>21 %</td><td>1 018 968</td><td>23 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Third</td><td>519</td><td>21 %</td><td>1 026 527</td><td>21 %</td><td></td><td>523</td><td>21 %</td><td>900 151</td><td>20 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Second</td><td>522</td><td>21 %</td><td>785 385</td><td>16 %</td><td></td><td>504</td><td>21 %</td><td>683 200</td><td>16 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Lowest (Least advantaged)</td><td>348</td><td>14 %</td><td>626 538</td><td>13 %</td><td></td><td>374</td><td>15 %</td><td>509 704</td><td>12 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Remoteness</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><0.001</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td><0.001</td></tr><tr><td>Major City</td><td>1 232</td><td>50 %</td><td>3 617 002</td><td>72 %</td><td></td><td>1 216</td><td>50 %</td><td>3 207 391</td><td>72 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Inner regional</td><td>933</td><td>38 %</td><td>858 019</td><td>17 %</td><td></td><td>945</td><td>39 %</td><td>766 516</td><td>17 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Outer regional/Remote/Very remote</td><td>276</td><td>11 %</td><td>556 727</td><td>11 %</td><td></td><td>276</td><td>11 %</td><td>462 011</td><td>10 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Occupation Group</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.66</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>0.46</td></tr><tr><td>Allied health</td><td>11</td><td>0 %</td><td>56 186</td><td>1 %</td><td></td><td>34</td><td>1 %</td><td>142 242</td><td>3 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Carers</td><td>16</td><td>1 %</td><td>50 425</td><td>1 %</td><td></td><td>108</td><td>4 %</td><td>287 442</td><td>7 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Cleaning</td><td>36</td><td>1 %</td><td>67 601</td><td>1 %</td><td></td><td>71</td><td>3 %</td><td>112 962</td><td>3 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Construction</td><td>185</td><td>8 %</td><td>481 448</td><td>10 %</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>0 %</td><td>23 653</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Education</td><td>88</td><td>4 %</td><td>137 470</td><td>3 %</td><td></td><td>343</td><td>14 %</td><td>364 921</td><td>9 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Electric/electronic</td><td>75</td><td>3 %</td><td>210 123</td><td>5 %</td><td></td><td>0</td><td>0 %</td><td>7 064</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Farming/Animal Worker</td><td>178</td><td>7 %</td><td>142 114</td><td>3 %</td><td></td><td>60</td><td>2 %</td><td>68 626</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Food preparation</td><td>79</td><td>3 %</td><td>169 586</td><td>4 %</td><td></td><td>71</td><td>3 %</td><td>115 877</td><td>3 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Food Service</td><td>18</td><td>1 %</td><td>90 777</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>42</td><td>2 %</td><td>159 860</td><td>4 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Gardening</td><td>62</td><td>3 %</td><td>113 707</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>17</td><td>1 %</td><td>18 715</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Hairdressers</td><td>2</td><td>0 %</td><td>10 931</td><td>0 %</td><td></td><td>22</td><td>1 %</td><td>70 677</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Manager-Administration</td><td>871</td><td>36 %</td><td>1 123 391</td><td>24 %</td><td>0.01</td><td>1 129</td><td>46 %</td><td>1 654 232</td><td>39 %</td><td>0.15</td></tr><tr><td>Manufacturing</td><td>64</td><td>3 %</td><td>155 192</td><td>3 %</td><td></td><td>22</td><td>1 %</td><td>72 262</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mechanical Workers</td><td>64</td><td>3 %</td><td>111 689</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>1</td><td>0 %</td><td>1 681</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Metal Workers</td><td>82</td><td>3 %</td><td>174 438</td><td>4 %</td><td></td><td>2</td><td>0 %</td><td>2 574</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Mining</td><td>27</td><td>1 %</td><td>67 135</td><td>1 %</td><td></td><td>0</td><td>0 %</td><td>6 181</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Nurse/Medical</td><td>45</td><td>2 %</td><td>81 407</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>227</td><td>9 %</td><td>290 228</td><td>7 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other</td><td>23</td><td>1 %</td><td>151 785</td><td>3 %</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>0 %</td><td>96 719</td><td>2 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Painting/Printing</td><td>45</td><td>2 %</td><td>102 195</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>4</td><td>0 %</td><td>23 348</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Retail</td><td>143</td><td>6 %</td><td>485 707</td><td>10 %</td><td></td><td>205</td><td>8 %</td><td>585 503</td><td>14 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Security/safety</td><td>48</td><td>2 %</td><td>115 691</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>7</td><td>0 %</td><td>26 264</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Technical/engineering</td><td>37</td><td>2 %</td><td>87 799</td><td>2 %</td><td></td><td>40</td><td>2 %</td><td>62 513</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Transport</td><td>166</td><td>7 %</td><td>339 713</td><td>7 %</td><td></td><td>18</td><td>1 %</td><td>36 282</td><td>1 %</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wood workers</td><td>76</td><td>3 %</td><td>135 873</td><td>3 %</td><td></td><td>2</td><td>0 %</td><td>2 816</td><td>0 %</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></p><p>All analyses were conducted using Stata v14 [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR20">20</xref>]. Prevalence of any exposure was defined as the proportion of respondents assessed as being probably exposed to at least one of the listed asthmagens in their current job. A dichotomous measure of exposure was used. Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using logistic regression to determine which, if any, demographic factors were associated with any exposure. For the continuous variable age we categorized the data using cut-offs of 35 and 50 based on the methods of Abdolell [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR21">21</xref>].</p><p>We stratified all analyses by gender due to the different profiles of occupation and exposure between genders. Where there was a statistically significant difference between our sample and the labour force, we used raked-weighting [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR22">22</xref>] to adjust the survey data such that the data structure was made similar to the national labour force population structure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR23">23</xref>] in terms of sociodemographic indicators (age group and remoteness for both genders and administrative job (yes/no) for women).</p><p>As a visual demonstration of the patterns of exposure among the occupational groups, we calculated Euclidean distances. To do this we compared the differences between prevalences in groups and ranked the groups according to the size of those differences. First we compared the prevalence of all exposures combined in each occupational group with the prevalence of all exposures combined in the manager/administration group (which had low prevalence of exposure). Next we examined each occupational group in turn and compared the prevalence of each exposure group with the prevalence of the asthmagen group “Drugs” (which had low prevalence in all occupational groups). Euclidean distances are used to group similar ranked cells on both axes. In the upper right corner, occupational and asthmagen groups with the highest prevalence are clustered together.</p></sec><sec id="Sec7"><title>Ethics, consent and permissions</title><p>This study was approved by the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee. Informed consent by all participants was presumed by the approval to proceed with the survey questions after a description of the study had been provided.</p></sec></sec><sec id="Sec8"><title>Results</title><p>A total of 38,051 telephone numbers were called over the 6 month period of the survey. No response was recorded after 10 call attempts from 10,284 households (“unknown households”), 21,429 contacts were deemed ineligible and 1318 refused to participate (Fig. <xref rid="Fig1" ref-type="fig">1</xref>). Job information was incomplete for 118 people who were interviewed. Complete interviews were obtained from 4878 workers (2441 males and 2437 females) resulting in a response fraction (completed interviews/eligible and unknown households) of 29 % and a cooperation fraction (completed interviews/eligible households) of 77 %.<fig id="Fig1"><label>Fig. 1</label><caption><p>Flow chart of responses to telephone survey cohort</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="12890_2016_212_Fig1_HTML" id="MO1"></graphic></fig></p><p>The study population was similar to the Australian working population in terms of state of residence, country of birth (Australia or other), education and socioeconomic status of residence (Table <xref rid="Tab1" ref-type="table">1</xref>). Our sample under-represented younger workers (18–34 years), and those living in major cities. Among occupational groups, our sample over-represented manager/administration workers among males.</p><p>Amongst males, in the unadjusted analyses, exposure was more common amongst those aged less than 35 years, those born in Australia, those with a vocational qualification or no post-secondary qualifications, those living in Victoria, those in the lowest SEIFA residential quintiles and those living outside major cities (Table <xref rid="Tab2" ref-type="table">2</xref>). When we adjusted for demographic characteristics and occupational groups, exposure to at least one asthmagen was significantly more common among men with a vocational qualification and those living in Victoria or Tasmania. Among females, after adjustment, only living in an outer regional/remote or very remote area was statistically associated with a higher prevalence of exposure to at least one asthmagen (Table <xref rid="Tab2" ref-type="table">2</xref>).<table-wrap id="Tab2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for association between demographic characteristics and probable exposure</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th></th><th colspan="3">Males</th><th colspan="3">Females</th></tr><tr><th></th><th>Exposed (%)</th><th>Unadjusted OR (CI)</th><th>Adjusted OR (CI)<sup>a</sup></th><th>Exposed (%)</th><th>Unadjusted OR (CI)</th><th>Adjusted OR (CI)<sup>a</sup></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Age (years) Linear</td><td></td><td><bold>0.99(0.98,0.999)</bold></td><td></td><td></td><td>1.01(0.99,1.02)</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Age (men)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18–34 years</td><td>53.2</td><td><bold>1.30(1.03,1.68)</bold></td><td>1.32(0.85,2.04)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>35–64 years</td><td>46.3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Age (women)</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>18–50 years</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>37.9</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>51–64 years</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>43.3</td><td><bold>1.25(1.06,1.47)</bold></td><td>1.06(0.77,1.46)</td></tr><tr><td>Country of birth</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Australia</td><td>49.2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>41.5</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td>other</td><td>39.9</td><td><bold>0.68(0.56,0.83)</bold></td><td>1.40(0.97,2.03)</td><td>36.1</td><td><bold>0.80(0.65,0.98)</bold></td><td>0.87(0.58,1.32)</td></tr><tr><td>Highest education level</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td> Bachelor or higher</td><td>28.5</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>41.6</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td> Vocational/trade/TAFE</td><td>59.2</td><td><bold>3.64(2.93,4.52)</bold></td><td><bold>1.90(1.24,2.92)</bold></td><td>40.8</td><td>0.96(0.79,1.18)</td><td>1.30(0.86,1.96)</td></tr><tr><td> High school or lower</td><td>53.6</td><td><bold>2.86(2.33,3.50)</bold></td><td>1.34(0.88,2.05)</td><td>38.4</td><td>0.87(0.72,1.06)</td><td>1.13(0.71,1.78)</td></tr><tr><td> refused</td><td>18.2</td><td>0.56(0.12,2.60)</td><td><bold>0.12(0.02,0.91)</bold></td><td>50.0</td><td>1.40(0.40,4.87)</td><td>2.55(0.31,20.97)</td></tr><tr><td>State of residence</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td> New South Wales</td><td>41.7</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>35.9</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td> Victoria</td><td>61.3</td><td><bold>2.22(1.78,2.76)</bold></td><td><bold>1.84(1.19,2.85)</bold></td><td>49.1</td><td><bold>1.72(1.39,2.14)</bold></td><td>0.76(0.47,1.25)</td></tr><tr><td> Queensland</td><td>45.4</td><td>1.18(0.43,3.22)</td><td>1.03(0.69,1.53)</td><td>37.4</td><td>1.06(0.39,2.90)</td><td>0.94(0.59,1.50)</td></tr><tr><td> Western Australia</td><td>40.3</td><td>0.94(0.72,1.23)</td><td>0.78(0.49,1.23)</td><td>40.2</td><td>1.20(0.90,1.60)</td><td>0.45(0.53,1.67)</td></tr><tr><td> South Australia</td><td>40.4</td><td>0.99(0.92,1.06)</td><td>1.49(0.81,2.74)</td><td>39.4</td><td>1.03(0.96,1.10)</td><td>0.97(0.52,1.84)</td></tr><tr><td> Tasmania</td><td>49.2</td><td>1.35(0.80,1.28)</td><td><bold>3.26(1.27,8.36)</bold></td><td>34.8</td><td>0.95(0.51,1.78)</td><td>0.33(0.08,1.31)</td></tr><tr><td> Australian Capital Territory</td><td>44.7</td><td>1.13(0.62,2.04)</td><td>2.07(0.65,6.60)</td><td>38.6</td><td>1.12(0.60,2.10)</td><td>1.44(0.45,4.59)</td></tr><tr><td> Northern Territory</td><td>38.5</td><td>0.87(0.39,1.95)</td><td>0.33(0.09,1.16)</td><td>33.3</td><td>0.89(0.41,1.93)</td><td>1.72(0.41,7.16)</td></tr><tr><td>SES of residential area</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td> Highest quintile<sup>b</sup></td><td>38.2</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>33.3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td> Fourth</td><td>41.8</td><td>1.16(0.91,1.49)</td><td>0.86(0.55,1.34)</td><td>38.6</td><td>1.26(0.98,1.62)</td><td>1.17(0.72,1.91)</td></tr><tr><td> Third</td><td>51.4</td><td><bold>1.71(1.34,2.18)</bold></td><td>1.02(0.66,1.58)</td><td>37.9</td><td>1.22(0.95,1.57)</td><td>1.00(0.61,1.67)</td></tr><tr><td> Second</td><td>51.3</td><td><bold>1.72(1.35,2.19)</bold></td><td>0.72(0.45,1.14)</td><td>46.2</td><td><bold>1.72(1.34,2.21)</bold></td><td>1.24(0.74,2.08)</td></tr><tr><td> Lowest</td><td>54.6</td><td><bold>1.94(1.48,2.55)</bold></td><td>0.66(0.40,1.09)</td><td>48.4</td><td><bold>1.88(1.43,2.46)</bold></td><td>1.66(0.93,2.95)</td></tr><tr><td> unknown</td><td>100</td><td></td><td></td><td>0</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Remoteness</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td> Major cities</td><td>37.3</td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td>34.6</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><td> Inner regional</td><td>55.1</td><td><bold>2.06(1.73,2.45)</bold></td><td>1.04(0.70,1.53)</td><td>45.3</td><td><bold>1.56(1.31,1.86)</bold></td><td>1.23(0.78,1.92)</td></tr><tr><td> Outer regional/Remote/very remote</td><td>64.1</td><td><bold>3.00(2.29,3.94)</bold></td><td>1.47(0.84,2.56)</td><td>48.9</td><td><bold>1.81(1.39,2.35)</bold></td><td><bold>2.48(1.30,4.72)</bold></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p><sup>a</sup> Adjusted for occupational group and all other demographic characteristics</p><p><sup>b</sup> SES – socioeconomic status (2 quintiles calculated from deciles of Areas Index of Relative Socio-economic Disadvantage [ABS])</p><p>Bold denotes statistically significant differences</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></p><p>As well as the above analysis of exposure to any asthmagen group, we also examined the patterns of exposure to individual agents. Exposure to one or more asthmagens was more common among males (47 %) than females (40 %). When extrapolated to the Australian population, about 4.4 million people (2.8 million males and 1.7 million females) were estimated to be exposed to one or more asthmagen at work. Amongst occupational groups with more than 50 male respondents, exposure to at least one of the asthmagens was most common among farmers and animal workers (97 % exposed), metal workers (96 %), wood workers (96 %), food preparation workers (92 %) and mechanical workers (92 %). Amongst females, the occupational groups with the highest prevalence of exposure were farmers and animal workers (100 %), carers (99 %), cleaners (96 %), food preparation workers (96 %) and nurses (92 %).</p><p>The most common asthmagen exposures among males (Table <xref rid="Tab3" ref-type="table">3</xref>) were bioaerosols (29 % of the Australian workforce), metals (27 %), arthropods/mites (25 %), and latex (22 %). Among females (Table <xref rid="Tab4" ref-type="table">4</xref>) the most common exposures were latex (25 %), industrial cleaning and sterilizing agents (20 %), bioaerosols (18 %) and arthropods/mites (16 %). Exposure to isocyanates, which are well-recognized asthmagens, was relatively rare (4 % among men and <1 % among women).<table-wrap id="Tab3"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Prevalence of probable exposure to each asthmagen group in the AWES-Asthma sample and approximate prevalence of exposure in the male Australian working population. CI confidence interval</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th></th><th colspan="2">Sample</th><th colspan="3">Extrapolated to Australian working population<sup>a</sup></th></tr><tr><th>Asthmagen group</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>CI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Any asthmagen</td><td>1 151</td><td>47.2</td><td>2 781 500</td><td>55</td><td>52 to 58</td></tr><tr><td>Bioaerosols</td><td>633</td><td>25.9</td><td>1 483 000</td><td>29</td><td>27 to 32</td></tr><tr><td>Metals</td><td>563</td><td>23.1</td><td>1 358 500</td><td>27</td><td>25 to 30</td></tr><tr><td>Arthropods or mites</td><td>518</td><td>21.2</td><td>1 234 500</td><td>24</td><td>22 to 27</td></tr><tr><td>Latex</td><td>451</td><td>18.5</td><td>1 115 500</td><td>22</td><td>20 to 25</td></tr><tr><td>Aldehydes</td><td>364</td><td>14.9</td><td>829 700</td><td>16</td><td>14 to 19</td></tr><tr><td>Industrial cleaning and sterilising agents</td><td>264</td><td>10.8</td><td>683 000</td><td>14</td><td>12 to 16</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from animals</td><td>328</td><td>13.4</td><td>655 800</td><td>13</td><td>11 to 15</td></tr><tr><td>Ammonia</td><td>309</td><td>12.7</td><td>564 600</td><td>11</td><td>10 to 13</td></tr><tr><td>Acrylates</td><td>206</td><td>8.4</td><td>526 800</td><td>10</td><td>9 to 12</td></tr><tr><td>Epoxy</td><td>174</td><td>7.1</td><td>486 400</td><td>10</td><td>8 to 12</td></tr><tr><td>Anhydrides</td><td>191</td><td>7.8</td><td>433 500</td><td>9</td><td>7 to 10</td></tr><tr><td>Other Reactive Chemicals</td><td>142</td><td>5.8</td><td>366 500</td><td>7</td><td>6 to 9</td></tr><tr><td>Foods</td><td>121</td><td>5.0</td><td>359 900</td><td>7</td><td>6 to 9</td></tr><tr><td>Biological Enzymes</td><td>136</td><td>5.6</td><td>357 400</td><td>7</td><td>6 to 9</td></tr><tr><td>Isocyanates</td><td>106</td><td>4.3</td><td>283 300</td><td>6</td><td>4 to 7</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from Plants-Other</td><td>188</td><td>7.7</td><td>270 200</td><td>5</td><td>4 to 7</td></tr><tr><td>Flour</td><td>74</td><td>3.0</td><td>239 400</td><td>5</td><td>4 to 6</td></tr><tr><td>Acids</td><td>96</td><td>3.9</td><td>218 300</td><td>4</td><td>3 to 6</td></tr><tr><td>Soldering</td><td>75</td><td>3.1</td><td>214 700</td><td>4</td><td>3 to 6</td></tr><tr><td>Wood Dusts</td><td>86</td><td>3.5</td><td>200 100</td><td>4</td><td>3 to 5</td></tr><tr><td>Amines</td><td>47</td><td>1.9</td><td>123 500</td><td>2</td><td>2 to 4</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from fish/shellfish</td><td>36</td><td>1.5</td><td>113 400</td><td>2</td><td>2 to 3</td></tr><tr><td>Pesticides</td><td>59</td><td>2.4</td><td>112 400</td><td>2</td><td>2 to 3</td></tr><tr><td>Flowers</td><td>23</td><td>0.9</td><td>36 800</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ethylene Oxide</td><td>14</td><td>0.6</td><td>34 300</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Drugs</td><td>7</td><td>0.3</td><td>20 200</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reactive dyes</td><td>4</td><td>0.2</td><td>45</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p><sup>a</sup> Using age, remoteness and manager status for raked weighting</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><table-wrap id="Tab4"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Prevalence of probable exposure to each asthmagen group the AWES-Asthma sample and approximate prevalence of exposure in the female Australian working population. CI confidence interval</p></caption><table frame="hsides" rules="groups"><thead><tr><th></th><th colspan="2">Sample</th><th colspan="3">Extrapolated to the Australian working population<sup>a</sup></th></tr><tr><th>Asthmagen group</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>n</th><th>%</th><th>CI</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td>Any asthmagen</td><td>984</td><td>40.4</td><td>1 656 300</td><td>37</td><td>34 to 40</td></tr><tr><td>Latex</td><td>601</td><td>24.7</td><td>980 700</td><td>22</td><td>20 to 25</td></tr><tr><td>Industrial cleaning and sterilising agents</td><td>491</td><td>20.2</td><td>823 500</td><td>19</td><td>16 to 21</td></tr><tr><td>Bioaerosols</td><td>439</td><td>18.0</td><td>728 900</td><td>16</td><td>14 to 19</td></tr><tr><td>Arthropods or mites</td><td>398</td><td>16.3</td><td>676 900</td><td>15</td><td>13 to 18</td></tr><tr><td>Biological Enzymes</td><td>279</td><td>11.5</td><td>467 300</td><td>11</td><td>9 to 12</td></tr><tr><td>Foods</td><td>247</td><td>10.1</td><td>445 900</td><td>10</td><td>8 to 12</td></tr><tr><td>Ammonia</td><td>252</td><td>10.3</td><td>373 500</td><td>8</td><td>7 to 10</td></tr><tr><td>Flour</td><td>212</td><td>8.7</td><td>358 900</td><td>8</td><td>7 to 10</td></tr><tr><td>Aldehydes</td><td>201</td><td>8.3</td><td>307 800</td><td>7</td><td>6 to 8</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from animals</td><td>218</td><td>9.0</td><td>282 900</td><td>6</td><td>5 to 8</td></tr><tr><td>Metals</td><td>153</td><td>6.3</td><td>220 700</td><td>5</td><td>4 to 6</td></tr><tr><td>Flowers</td><td>85</td><td>3.5</td><td>147 500</td><td>3</td><td>2 to 5</td></tr><tr><td>Acrylates</td><td>65</td><td>2.7</td><td>125 300</td><td>3</td><td>2 to 4</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from fish/shellfish</td><td>64</td><td>2.6</td><td>105 300</td><td>2</td><td>2 to 3</td></tr><tr><td>Pesticides</td><td>51</td><td>2.1</td><td>75 500</td><td>2</td><td>1 to 3</td></tr><tr><td>Derived from Plants-Other</td><td>55</td><td>2.3</td><td>62 600</td><td>1</td><td>1 to 2</td></tr><tr><td>Acids</td><td>38</td><td>1.6</td><td>53 700</td><td>1</td><td>1 to 2</td></tr><tr><td>Amines</td><td>21</td><td>0.9</td><td>51 100</td><td>1</td><td>1 to 2</td></tr><tr><td>Drugs</td><td>7</td><td>0.3</td><td>24 400</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Epoxy</td><td>19</td><td>0.8</td><td>22 700</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Isocyanates</td><td>11</td><td>0.5</td><td>11 500</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Other Reactive Chemicals</td><td>5</td><td>0.2</td><td>7 600</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Reactive dyes</td><td>4</td><td>0.2</td><td>36</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Ethylene Oxide</td><td>4</td><td>0.2</td><td>36</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Anhydrides</td><td>2</td><td>0.1</td><td>13</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Soldering</td><td>1</td><td>0.0</td><td>4</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr><tr><td>Wood Dusts</td><td>3</td><td>0.1</td><td>1</td><td><1</td><td></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p><sup>a</sup> Using age, remoteness and manager status for raked weighting</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap></p><p>Additional file <xref rid="MOESM1" ref-type="media">1</xref>: Figure S1A shows the patterns for males, sorted by the two Euclidean distances, such that asthmagen groups with similar profiles of prevalence of exposure across all occupational groups are neighbours. In Additional file <xref rid="MOESM1" ref-type="media">1</xref>: Figure S1B, the patterns for females are shown, in the same order as for the males. In men, the occupational groups with highest prevalence of exposures are farming, food preparation, wood work, painting/printing and carers. In women, they are farming, food preparation, wood work, hairdressers, and cleaning. In men, bioaerosols, metal, arthropods, latex and aldehydes are the most common asthmagen groups, and in women they are latex, cleaning agents, arthropods, bioaerosols and ammonia.</p><p>In the lower left corner occupational and asthmagen groups with the lowest prevalence are clustered together. In men the occupational groups with low prevalences are security/safety, retail, transport, metal workers, and managers. In women they are education, manufacturing, mining, retail, transport, and manager. The asthmagen groups with the lowest prevalence in men were medicinal drugs, reactive dyes, ethylene oxide, flowers and pesticides and in women they were drugs, reactive dyes, epoxy, anhydrides and solder flux.</p><p>The Additional file <xref rid="MOESM1" ref-type="media">1</xref> also shows the agents to which workers within each occupational group are simultaneously exposed, e.g. male metal workers are not only exposed to metal, but also to bioaerosols, aldehydes, acrylates, epoxy and anhydrides.</p><p>With regard to agents, the large molecular weight organic agents such as bioaerosols and arthropods and mites were more prevalent than exposure to smaller-molecular weight agents although exposure to metals was common among men in occupational groups such as farming, painting/printing, electrical, metal and mechanical workers (Additional file <xref rid="MOESM1" ref-type="media">1</xref>).</p><p>The most common exposure in our study was bioaerosols (29 % males, 16 % females). This group included moulds such as <italic>Alternaria, Chrysonilia sitophilia, Neurospora</italic> and <italic>Penicillium</italic>, where exposure was likely to have occurred mainly when people were in contact with rotting foodstuffs. In addition, cutting oils potentially contaminated with bacteria were included in this group. Exposure to bioaerosols was common in a wide range of jobs including farming and gardening, food preparation and service, cleaning, carers, and metal/electronics work.</p><p>Similar occupational groups were exposed to the arthropods/mites group which included all types of mite as well as caddisflies, crickets and locusts, flour moths, fruit flies, mealworms, sheep blowflies, and silkworms. This exposure was found for 25 % of males and 16 % of females.</p><p>Metal exposure included exposure to the metal or compounds of aluminium, chromium, cobalt, nickel, platinum, rhodium, titanium, tin, tungsten carbide, vanadium, stainless steel, or zinc oxide, as well as gas metal arc welding on uncoated mild steel and welding fumes. About 26 % of males and 6 % females, mainly tradespeople, were exposed to one or more of these metals.</p></sec><sec id="Sec9"><title>Discussion</title><p>This study provides much-needed information about the prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in Australian workplaces. These results will have significant implications for the prevention of occupational asthma, as they provide an important input to the determination of where to focus regulatory activities and inform strategies for risk reduction.</p><p>We found that about 47 % of males and 40 % of females were currently likely to be exposed to one or more asthmagens in their jobs. A multinational study found that 26 % of subjects reported occupational exposure in their current job to “vapors, gas, dust or fumes” [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>]. Our study investigated a wide range of exposures that were not included in this multinational study (such as latex, arthropods and mites, animal products, and various foods) so this may account for our prevalence being higher. In a Norwegian cohort, a job exposure matrix was applied to all jobs held for the previous 10 years to estimate exposure to biological dust, mineral dust and gas or fumes [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR9">9</xref>]. Exposure to any of the agents was seen in 62.4 % of men and 58.6 % of women at some time during the past 10 years. Job exposure matrices assign all people in the same job the same exposure [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR24">24</xref>] whereas our study was able to differentiate between workers in the same job who carried out different tasks.</p><p>Latex exposure was one of the few exposures found as commonly amongst females (25 %) as males (22 %). Latex exposure was assigned to respondents who reported wearing latex gloves, regardless of whether the gloves were powdered or not. Latex exposure is known to cause asthma, and efforts have been made to reduce exposure, including introducing powder-free latex gloves or replacement with nitrile gloves [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR25">25</xref>]. Exposure still seems relatively common in Australia, although it is unknown how well workers were able to differentiate the different types of glove.</p><p>Registries of occupational asthma have found common agents to be: isocyanates and latex in South Africa [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR26">26</xref>]; moulds, animal epithelia and flour, grain and grain mites in Finland [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR27">27</xref>]; wood dust in Australia [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR28">28</xref>]; and isocyanates, metal working fluids, adhesives, chrome, latex and glutaraldehyde in the United Kingdom [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR29">29</xref>]. Physician reporting of occupational asthma to voluntary registries is known to be an under-representation of the total number of cases, and may be biased by diagnosis being related to the presence of a commonly recognized or deemed cause [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR28">28</xref>]. A South Korean study which collected data from a range of sources (including physicians, surveillance systems and compensation schemes) found the most common agents to be isocyanates, flour/grain, metal, reactive dyes, and solvents [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR30">30</xref>].</p><p>We used an automated version of the expert assessment method to obtain our estimates of exposure. It is not practical to monitor exposure in individual workplaces on a national level to estimate prevalence of exposure. Other estimates have been based on self-reported exposures but have been shown to result in reporting bias [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR8">8</xref>] and there are concerns that workers do not always know the specific components of materials with which they work. Job Exposure Matrices have also been used, but these result in all the workers in a particular job being allocated the same exposure, ignoring inter-individual variability, potentially resulting in an overestimation of the exposure prevalence. The expert assessment method used in this study [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR31">31</xref>] differentiates between people in the same job by asking respondents about tasks and processes. Experts then review the answers and assign exposures. We used OccIDEAS, which is based on this expert method, but automates the exposure assessment by using algorithms to assign the same exposure to the same combination of answers without the need for manual review of every case. This method provides individualized and consistent exposure assessment of all respondents based on their self-reported occupational tasks.</p><sec id="Sec10"><title>Limitations</title><p>We attempted to obtain a random sample of the population for this study. The distribution of our sample was reasonably similar to the Australian labour force, and we weighted by age group and remoteness when extrapolating our numbers. However, we only discovered the erroneous method of “random sampling” used by the commercial company after the data collection was complete. There is no way to know what bias arises from our sample over-representing people with last names beginning with L and M only. Some ethnicities may be under- or over-represented (e.g. Lee/Li or names with the prefix Mac or Mc) but this is difficult to quantify. Additional exploration of the data collected on country of birth found no differences of note between our sample and the Australian working population. Further, there is no reason to think that people with particular initials are preferentially selected into particular occupations, so we think it unlikely to bias the results.</p><p>We had no response to our phone call for about a quarter of the sample of phone numbers. We attempted to contact each number 10 times, and phone calls were made at different times of the day and on weekdays as well as weekends. However, it is likely that there was some selection bias with regard to particular occupations, particularly those who work away from home for extended periods such as long-haul truck drivers, and fly-in fly-out mine workers.</p><p>We decided to develop 27 groups for the 277 asthmagens [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR11">11</xref>] and based our groups broadly on the ones used in a previous job exposure matrix [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CR32">32</xref>]. This meant, for example, that exposure to the group “Derived from animals” could have meant the person was exposed to any or all of 13 agents in the group including bat guano, casein, mice, frogs or cattle. We felt this was preferable to assessing each of the 277 asthmagens separately or concentrating only on a small number of specific agents. Further analyses of these data could examine exposure to one or more of the groups in more detail, including which of the specific agents were most common.</p></sec></sec><sec id="Sec11"><title>Conclusions</title><p>Occupational asthma is an ideal candidate for prevention and these results present clear opportunities for policy action which would be of practical benefit. We contend that these decisions should be based on evidence as to which agents are most commonly encountered in workplaces and which workers are most likely to be exposed to one or more asthmagens (e.g. farmers) which have not previously been available. Our study has provided some of this evidence and further analysis will show whether available controls are being used.</p><p>For pulmonary medicine specialists, our study provides an overall picture of which asthmagens are found in which occupations. While the pattern of use of some agents, such as isocyanates and latex, are well understood, our study provides a wider range range of possible causes for physicians to consider in their consultations with patients.</p><sec id="Sec12"><title>Ethics approval and consent to participate</title><p>This study was approved by the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee.</p></sec></sec><sec id="Sec13"><title>Availability of data and materials</title><p>The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are available upon request to the corresponding author.</p></sec></body><back><app-group><app id="App1"><sec id="Sec14"><title>Additional file</title><p><media position="anchor" xlink:href="12890_2016_212_MOESM1_ESM.pdf" id="MOESM1"><label>Additional file 1: Figure S1.</label><caption><p>Occupational groups by asthmagen groups for (A) men, and (B) women. Groups are sorted by decreasing Euclidean distances in men as a measure of similar exposure and displayed for women using the same order of occupational groups and asthmagen groups as for men. The size of the dots represents the prevalence of exposure in each cell. (EtOH - Ethylene oxide, d – derived, Reactives – Other reactive chemicals, Cleaning – Industrial cleaning and sterilizing agents, Arthropods – Arthropods and Mites). (PDF 135 kb)</p></caption></media></p></sec></app></app-group><glossary><title>Abbreviations</title><def-list><def-item><term>ANZSCO</term><def><p>Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>ARIA+</term><def><p>Accessibility/remoteness index of Australia</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>AWES</term><def><p>Australian Workplace Exposures Study</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>CI</term><def><p>confidence interval</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>JSM</term><def><p>job specific module</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>OR</term><def><p>odds ratio</p></def></def-item><def-item><term>SEIFA</term><def><p>socio-economic indexes for areas disadvantage score</p></def></def-item></def-list></glossary><fn-group><fn><p><bold>Competing interests</bold></p><p>The authors declare that they have no competing interests.</p></fn><fn><p><bold>Authors’ contributions</bold></p><p>LF drafted this manuscript, directed the study and is responsible for its overall design. RNC and ED conducted statistical analyses under the direct supervision of LF. RNC, TD, DCG, AR, GPB, SP, JC and MJA were each involved in the design of the study. All authors provided feedback on the draft of this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.</p></fn></fn-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We gratefully acknowledge the advice provided by: Dr Jonathan Burdon, Dr Ryan Hoy, Dr Jan-Paul Zock, Associate Professor Jeremy Beach, Sandy Ashton, and Dr Jenny Job and Brett Bissett at SafeWork Australia. We thank Dr Ines Florath for analysis and the development of the Similarity Exposure Profiles.</p><sec id="FPar1"><title>Funding</title><p>This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council (# 1056684) and SafeWork Australia. Lin Fritschi is supported by fellowships from the NHMRC and Cancer Council Western Australia.</p></sec></ack><ref-list id="Bib1"><title>References</title><ref id="CR1"><label>1.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chan-Yeung</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Malo</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Aetiological agents in occupational asthma</article-title><source>Eur Respir J</source><year>1994</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>346</fpage><lpage>71</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1183/09031936.94.07020346</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8162990</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Hoy RF, Burgess JA, Benke G, Matheson M, Morrison S, Gurrin L, Walters EH, Dharmage SC, Abramson MJ. Occupational Exposures and the Development of New-onset Asthma: A Population-based Cohort Study From the Ages of 13 to 44 Years. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55:235–9.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR3"><label>3.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toren</surname><given-names>K</given-names></name><name><surname>Blanc</surname><given-names>PD</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Asthma caused by occupational exposures is common - a systematic analysis of estimates of the population-attributable fraction</article-title><source>BMC Pulm Med</source><year>2009</year><volume>9</volume><fpage>7</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2466-9-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19178702</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Donoghue AM, Frisch N, Ison M, Walpole G, Capil R, Curl C, Di Corleto R, Hanna B, Robson R, Viljoen D. Occupational asthma in the aluminum smelters of Australia and New Zealand: 1991–2006. Am J Ind Med. 2011;54:224–31.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR5"><label>5.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baur</surname><given-names>X</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakehe</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Allergens causing occupational asthma: an evidence-based evaluation of the literature</article-title><source>Int Arch Occup Environ Health</source><year>2014</year><volume>87</volume><fpage>339</fpage><lpage>63</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00420-013-0866-9</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23595938</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR6"><label>6.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newman Taylor</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Nicholson</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Cullinan</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Boyle</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Burge</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name></person-group><source>Guidelines for the prevention, identification and management of occupational asthma: Evidence review and recommendations</source><year>2004</year><publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc><publisher-name>British Occupational Health Research Foundation</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR7"><label>7.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rantanen</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Lehtinen</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name></person-group><source>Work environment and occupational health in Finland</source><year>1992</year><publisher-loc>Helsinki</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Finnish Institute of Occupational Health</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">de Vocht F, Zock J-P, Kromhout H, Sunyer J, Anto JM, Burney P, Kogevinas M. Comparison of self-reported occupational exposure with a job exposure matrix in an international community-based study on asthma. Am J Ind Med. 2005;47:434–42.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR9"><label>9.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Skorge</surname><given-names>TD</given-names></name><name><surname>Eagan</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Eide</surname><given-names>GE</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulsvik</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakke</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Occupational exposure and incidence of respiratory disorders in a general population</article-title><source>Scand J Work Environ Health</source><year>2009</year><volume>35</volume><fpage>454</fpage><lpage>61</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5271/sjweh.1352</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19806271</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR10"><label>10.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hansell</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Ghosh</surname><given-names>RE</given-names></name><name><surname>Poole</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Zock</surname><given-names>JP</given-names></name><name><surname>Weatherall</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Vermeulen</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Kromhout</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name><name><surname>Travers</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Beasley</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Occupational risk factors for chronic respiratory disease in a New Zealand population using lifetime occupational history</article-title><source>J Occup Environ Med</source><year>2014</year><volume>56</volume><fpage>270</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/01.jom.0000438382.33221.dc</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24327054</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Crewe J, Carey R, Glass D, Peters S, Abramson MJ, Benke G, Reid A, Driscoll T, Fritschi L. A comprehensive list of asthmagens to inform health interventions in the Australian workplace. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40:170-73.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR12"><label>12.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>ABS: Australian Bureau of Statistics</collab></person-group><source>Labour Force Australia</source><year>2011</year><publisher-loc>Canberra</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Australian Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">ABS: Labour Force Survey Standard Products and Data Item Guide. (Statistics ABo ed. Canberra: Australian Government Printer; 2015.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Galea S, Tracy M: Participation Rates in Epidemiologic Studies. Ann. Epidemiol. 2007;17:643–653.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">Carey RN, Driscoll TR, Peters S, Glass DC, Reid A, Benke G, Fritschi L. Estimated prevalence of exposure to occupational carcinogens in Australia (2011–2012). Occup Environ Med. 2014;71:55–62.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR16"><label>16.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>ABS</collab></person-group><source>Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA)</source><year>2011</year><publisher-loc>Canberra</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Australian Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR17"><label>17.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>ABS</collab></person-group><source>Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) - Remoteness structure</source><year>2011</year><publisher-loc>Canberra</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Australian Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR18"><label>18.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fritschi</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Friesen</surname><given-names>MC</given-names></name><name><surname>Glass</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Benke</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Girschik</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadkowsky</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>OccIDEAS: Retrospective Occupational Exposure Assessment in Community-Based Studies Made Easier</article-title><source>J Environ Public Health</source><year>2009</year><volume>2009</volume><fpage>5</fpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2009/957023</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR19"><label>19.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>ABS</collab></person-group><source>ANZSCO -- Australian and New Zealand Standard Classification of Occupations, Version 1.2</source><year>2013</year><publisher-loc>Canberra</publisher-loc><publisher-name>Australian Bureau of Statistics</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR20"><label>20.</label><element-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>StataCorp</collab></person-group><source>Stata Statistical Software: Release 14</source><year>2015</year><publisher-loc>College Station</publisher-loc><publisher-name>StataCorp LP</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR21"><label>21.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdolell</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>LeBlanc</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Stephens</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Harrison</surname><given-names>RV</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Binary partitioning for continuous longitudinal data: categorizing a prognostic variable</article-title><source>Stat Med</source><year>2002</year><volume>21</volume><fpage>3395</fpage><lpage>409</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/sim.1266</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12407680</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR22"><label>22.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dal Grande</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Chittleborough</surname><given-names>CR</given-names></name><name><surname>Campostrini</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Tucker</surname><given-names>G</given-names></name><name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>AW</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Health Estimates Using Survey Raked-Weighting Techniques in an Australian Population Health Surveillance System</article-title><source>Am J Epidemiol</source><year>2015</year><volume>182</volume><fpage>544</fpage><lpage>56</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aje/kwv080</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26306665</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation publication-type="other">ABS: Labour Force, Australia, Nov 2014. (Statistics ABo ed. Canberra 2014.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="CR24"><label>24.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siemiatycki</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Discovering occupational carcinogens in population-based case-control studies: review of findings from an exposure-based approach and a methodologic comparison of alternative data collection strategies</article-title><source>Recent Results Cancer Res</source><year>1990</year><volume>120</volume><fpage>25</fpage><lpage>38</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-84068-5_2</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">2236876</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR25"><label>25.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>LaMontagne</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Radi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Elder</surname><given-names>DS</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>MJ</given-names></name><name><surname>Sim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Primary prevention of latex related sensitisation and occupational asthma: a systematic review</article-title><source>Occup Environ Med</source><year>2006</year><volume>63</volume><fpage>359</fpage><lpage>64</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/oem.2005.025221</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16469822</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR26"><label>26.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Esterhuizen</surname><given-names>TM</given-names></name><name><surname>Hnizdo</surname><given-names>E</given-names></name><name><surname>Rees</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Occurrence and causes of occupational asthma in South Africa--results from SORDSA’s Occupational Asthma Registry, 1997–1999</article-title><source>S Afr Med J</source><year>2001</year><volume>91</volume><fpage>509</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11455716</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR27"><label>27.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Piipari</surname><given-names>R</given-names></name><name><surname>Keskinen</surname><given-names>H</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Agents causing occupational asthma in Finland in 1986–2002: cow epithelium bypassed by moulds from moisture-damaged buildings</article-title><source>Clin Exp Allergy</source><year>2005</year><volume>35</volume><fpage>1632</fpage><lpage>7</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02386.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16393330</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR28"><label>28.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elder</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Abramson</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Fish</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Johnson</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>McKenzie</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Sim</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Surveillance of Australian workplace Based Respiratory Events (SABRE): notifications for the first 3.5 years and validation of occupational asthma cases</article-title><source>Occup Med-Oxford</source><year>2004</year><volume>54</volume><fpage>395</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/occmed/kqh050</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR29"><label>29.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bakerly</surname><given-names>ND</given-names></name><name><surname>Moore</surname><given-names>VC</given-names></name><name><surname>Vellore</surname><given-names>AD</given-names></name><name><surname>Jaakkola</surname><given-names>MS</given-names></name><name><surname>Robertson</surname><given-names>AS</given-names></name><name><surname>Burge</surname><given-names>PS</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Fifteen-year trends in occupational asthma: data from the Shield surveillance scheme</article-title><source>Occup Med (Lond)</source><year>2008</year><volume>58</volume><fpage>169</fpage><lpage>74</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/occmed/kqn007</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18308695</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR30"><label>30.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kwon</surname><given-names>SC</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Kim</surname><given-names>YK</given-names></name><name><surname>Calvert</surname><given-names>GM</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Work-Related Asthma in Korea - Findings from the Korea Work-Related Asthma Surveillance (KOWAS) program, 2004–2009</article-title><source>Allergy, Asthma Immunol Res</source><year>2015</year><volume>7</volume><fpage>51</fpage><lpage>9</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4168/aair.2015.7.1.51</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25553263</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR31"><label>31.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Siemiatycki</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Day</surname><given-names>NE</given-names></name><name><surname>Fabry</surname><given-names>J</given-names></name><name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>JA</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Discovering carcinogens in the occupational environment: a novel epidemiologic approach</article-title><source>J Natl Cancer Inst</source><year>1981</year><volume>66</volume><fpage>217</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">6935472</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="CR32"><label>32.</label><element-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kennedy</surname><given-names>SM</given-names></name><name><surname>Le Moual</surname><given-names>N</given-names></name><name><surname>Choudat</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Kauffmann</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group><article-title>Development of an asthma specific job exposure matrix and its application in the epidemiological study of genetics and environment in asthma (EGEA)</article-title><source>Occup Environ Med</source><year>2000</year><volume>57</volume><fpage>635</fpage><lpage>41</lpage><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/oem.57.9.635</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10935945</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Terre/explor/CobaltMaghrebV1/Data/Pmc/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000098 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000098 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Terre
|area= CobaltMaghrebV1
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4826519
|texte= The estimated prevalence of exposure to asthmagens in the Australian workforce, 2014
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27061283" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a CobaltMaghrebV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |