Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.
Identifieur interne : 000393 ( PubMed/Corpus ); précédent : 000392; suivant : 000394Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.
Auteurs : Bernd G M E. Blobel ; Peter PharowSource :
- Studies in health technology and informatics [ 0926-9630 ] ; 2008.
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- MESH :
Abstract
EHR systems are core applications in any eHealth/pHealth environment and represent basic services for health telematics platforms. Many projects are performed at the level of Standards Developing Organizations or national programs, respectively, for defining EHR architectures as well as related design, implementation, and deployment processes. Claiming to meet the challenge for semantic interoperability and offering the right pathway, the resulting documents and specifications are sometimes controversial and even inconsistent. Based on a long tradition in the EHR domain, on the collective experience of academic groups such as the EFMI EHR Working Group, and on an active involvement at CEN, ISO, HL7 and several national projects around the globe, an analysis and evaluation study has been performed using the Generic Component Model reference architecture. Strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches as well as migration pathways for re-using and harmonizing the available materials are offered.
PubMed: 18487757
Links to Exploration step
pubmed:18487757Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.</title><author><name sortKey="Blobel, Bernd G M E" sort="Blobel, Bernd G M E" uniqKey="Blobel B" first="Bernd G M E" last="Blobel">Bernd G M E. Blobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>eHealth Competence Center, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pharow, Peter" sort="Pharow, Peter" uniqKey="Pharow P" first="Peter" last="Pharow">Peter Pharow</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2008">2008</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:18487757</idno><idno type="pmid">18487757</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000393</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000393</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.</title><author><name sortKey="Blobel, Bernd G M E" sort="Blobel, Bernd G M E" uniqKey="Blobel B" first="Bernd G M E" last="Blobel">Bernd G M E. Blobel</name><affiliation><nlm:affiliation>eHealth Competence Center, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</nlm:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Pharow, Peter" sort="Pharow, Peter" uniqKey="Pharow P" first="Peter" last="Pharow">Peter Pharow</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Studies in health technology and informatics</title><idno type="ISSN">0926-9630</idno><imprint><date when="2008" type="published">2008</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer Systems</term><term>Efficiency, Organizational</term><term>Europe</term><term>Humans</term><term>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</term><term>Quality Assurance, Health Care</term><term>Semantics</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en"><term>Europe</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Computer Systems</term><term>Efficiency, Organizational</term><term>Humans</term><term>Medical Records Systems, Computerized</term><term>Quality Assurance, Health Care</term><term>Semantics</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">EHR systems are core applications in any eHealth/pHealth environment and represent basic services for health telematics platforms. Many projects are performed at the level of Standards Developing Organizations or national programs, respectively, for defining EHR architectures as well as related design, implementation, and deployment processes. Claiming to meet the challenge for semantic interoperability and offering the right pathway, the resulting documents and specifications are sometimes controversial and even inconsistent. Based on a long tradition in the EHR domain, on the collective experience of academic groups such as the EFMI EHR Working Group, and on an active involvement at CEN, ISO, HL7 and several national projects around the globe, an analysis and evaluation study has been performed using the Generic Component Model reference architecture. Strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches as well as migration pathways for re-using and harmonizing the available materials are offered.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Owner="NLM" Status="MEDLINE"><PMID Version="1">18487757</PMID><DateCreated><Year>2008</Year><Month>05</Month><Day>19</Day></DateCreated><DateCompleted><Year>2008</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>30</Day></DateCompleted><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0926-9630</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>136</Volume><PubDate><Year>2008</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Studies in health technology and informatics</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Stud Health Technol Inform</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>359-64</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>EHR systems are core applications in any eHealth/pHealth environment and represent basic services for health telematics platforms. Many projects are performed at the level of Standards Developing Organizations or national programs, respectively, for defining EHR architectures as well as related design, implementation, and deployment processes. Claiming to meet the challenge for semantic interoperability and offering the right pathway, the resulting documents and specifications are sometimes controversial and even inconsistent. Based on a long tradition in the EHR domain, on the collective experience of academic groups such as the EFMI EHR Working Group, and on an active involvement at CEN, ISO, HL7 and several national projects around the globe, an analysis and evaluation study has been performed using the Generic Component Model reference architecture. Strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches as well as migration pathways for re-using and harmonizing the available materials are offered.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Blobel</LastName><ForeName>Bernd G M E</ForeName><Initials>BG</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>eHealth Competence Center, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. bernd.blobel@klinik.uni-regensburg.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Pharow</LastName><ForeName>Peter</ForeName><Initials>P</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Stud Health Technol Inform</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>9214582</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0926-9630</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>T</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D003199">Computer Systems</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D017598">Efficiency, Organizational</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic" UI="D005060">Europe</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D006801">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D016347">Medical Records Systems, Computerized</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="Y" UI="D011785">Quality Assurance, Health Care</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName MajorTopicYN="N" UI="D012660">Semantics</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2008</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2008</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2008</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>20</Day><Hour>9</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18487757</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/PubMed/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000393 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000393 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Ticri/CIDE
|area= TelematiV1
|flux= PubMed
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:18487757
|texte= Analysis and evaluation of EHR approaches.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:18487757" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PubMed/Corpus/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a TelematiV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |