Serveur d'exploration sur la télématique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians

Identifieur interne : 000384 ( PascalFrancis/Corpus ); précédent : 000383; suivant : 000385

Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians

Auteurs : H. Tankisi ; B. Johnsen ; A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen ; M. De Carvalho ; P. R. W. Fawcett ; A. Labarre-Vila ; R. Liguori ; W. Nix ; M. Olsen ; I. Schofield

Source :

RBID : Pascal:03-0193883

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.

Notice en format standard (ISO 2709)

Pour connaître la documentation sur le format Inist Standard.

pA  
A01 01  1    @0 1388-2457
A03   1    @0 Clin. neurophysiol.
A05       @2 114
A06       @2 3
A08 01  1  ENG  @1 Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians
A11 01  1    @1 TANKISI (H.)
A11 02  1    @1 JOHNSEN (B.)
A11 03  1    @1 FUGLSANG-FREDERIKSEN (A.)
A11 04  1    @1 DE CARVALHO (M.)
A11 05  1    @1 FAWCETT (P. R. W.)
A11 06  1    @1 LABARRE-VILA (A.)
A11 07  1    @1 LIGUORI (R.)
A11 08  1    @1 NIX (W.)
A11 09  1    @1 OLSEN (M.)
A11 10  1    @1 SCHOFIELD (I.)
A14 01      @1 Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000 @2 Aarhus @3 DNK @Z 1 aut. @Z 2 aut. @Z 3 aut.
A14 02      @1 Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria @2 Lisbon @3 PRT @Z 4 aut.
A14 03      @1 Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital @2 Newcastle upon Tyne @3 GBR @Z 5 aut. @Z 10 aut.
A14 04      @1 Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire @2 Grenoble @3 FRA @Z 6 aut.
A14 05      @1 Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna @2 Bologna @3 ITA @Z 7 aut.
A14 06      @1 FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics @2 Mainz @3 DEU @Z 8 aut.
A14 07      @1 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University @2 Aarhus @3 DNK @Z 9 aut.
A20       @1 496-503
A21       @1 2003
A23 01      @0 ENG
A43 01      @1 INIST @2 5626E @5 354000107730190110
A44       @0 0000 @1 © 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.
A45       @0 26 ref.
A47 01  1    @0 03-0193883
A60       @1 P
A61       @0 A
A64 01  1    @0 Clinical neurophysiology
A66 01      @0 IRL
C01 01    ENG  @0 Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.
C02 01  X    @0 002B17A08
C03 01  X  FRE  @0 Polyneuropathie périphérique @5 01
C03 01  X  ENG  @0 Polyneuropathy @5 01
C03 01  X  SPA  @0 Polineuropatía periférica @5 01
C03 02  X  FRE  @0 Electromyographie @5 04
C03 02  X  ENG  @0 Electromyography @5 04
C03 02  X  SPA  @0 Electromiografía @5 04
C03 03  X  FRE  @0 Europe @2 NG @5 16
C03 03  X  ENG  @0 Europe @2 NG @5 16
C03 03  X  SPA  @0 Europa @2 NG @5 16
C03 04  X  FRE  @0 Classification @5 17
C03 04  X  ENG  @0 Classification @5 17
C03 04  X  SPA  @0 Clasificación @5 17
C03 05  X  FRE  @0 Homme @5 20
C03 05  X  ENG  @0 Human @5 20
C03 05  X  SPA  @0 Hombre @5 20
C03 06  X  FRE  @0 Médecin @5 23
C03 06  X  ENG  @0 Physician @5 23
C03 06  X  SPA  @0 Médico @5 23
C07 01  X  FRE  @0 Système nerveux pathologie @5 37
C07 01  X  ENG  @0 Nervous system diseases @5 37
C07 01  X  SPA  @0 Sistema nervioso patología @5 37
C07 02  X  FRE  @0 Nerf périphérique pathologie @5 38
C07 02  X  ENG  @0 Peripheral nerve disease @5 38
C07 02  X  SPA  @0 Nervio periférico patología @5 38
C07 03  X  FRE  @0 Electrodiagnostic @5 45
C07 03  X  ENG  @0 Electrodiagnosis @5 45
C07 03  X  SPA  @0 Electrodiagnóstico @5 45
N21       @1 111
N82       @1 PSI

Format Inist (serveur)

NO : PASCAL 03-0193883 INIST
ET : Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians
AU : TANKISI (H.); JOHNSEN (B.); FUGLSANG-FREDERIKSEN (A.); DE CARVALHO (M.); FAWCETT (P. R. W.); LABARRE-VILA (A.); LIGUORI (R.); NIX (W.); OLSEN (M.); SCHOFIELD (I.)
AF : Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000/Aarhus/Danemark (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria/Lisbon/Portugal (4 aut.); Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital/Newcastle upon Tyne/Royaume-Uni (5 aut., 10 aut.); Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire/Grenoble/France (6 aut.); Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna/Bologna/Italie (7 aut.); FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics/Mainz/Allemagne (8 aut.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University/Aarhus/Danemark (9 aut.)
DT : Publication en série; Niveau analytique
SO : Clinical neurophysiology; ISSN 1388-2457; Irlande; Da. 2003; Vol. 114; No. 3; Pp. 496-503; Bibl. 26 ref.
LA : Anglais
EA : Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.
CC : 002B17A08
FD : Polyneuropathie périphérique; Electromyographie; Europe; Classification; Homme; Médecin
FG : Système nerveux pathologie; Nerf périphérique pathologie; Electrodiagnostic
ED : Polyneuropathy; Electromyography; Europe; Classification; Human; Physician
EG : Nervous system diseases; Peripheral nerve disease; Electrodiagnosis
SD : Polineuropatía periférica; Electromiografía; Europa; Clasificación; Hombre; Médico
LO : INIST-5626E.354000107730190110
ID : 03-0193883

Links to Exploration step

Pascal:03-0193883

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tankisi, H" sort="Tankisi, H" uniqKey="Tankisi H" first="H." last="Tankisi">H. Tankisi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Johnsen, B" sort="Johnsen, B" uniqKey="Johnsen B" first="B." last="Johnsen">B. Johnsen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fuglsang Frederiksen, A" sort="Fuglsang Frederiksen, A" uniqKey="Fuglsang Frederiksen A" first="A." last="Fuglsang-Frederiksen">A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Carvalho, M" sort="De Carvalho, M" uniqKey="De Carvalho M" first="M." last="De Carvalho">M. De Carvalho</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria</s1>
<s2>Lisbon</s2>
<s3>PRT</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fawcett, P R W" sort="Fawcett, P R W" uniqKey="Fawcett P" first="P. R. W." last="Fawcett">P. R. W. Fawcett</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Newcastle upon Tyne</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Labarre Vila, A" sort="Labarre Vila, A" uniqKey="Labarre Vila A" first="A." last="Labarre-Vila">A. Labarre-Vila</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire</s1>
<s2>Grenoble</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Liguori, R" sort="Liguori, R" uniqKey="Liguori R" first="R." last="Liguori">R. Liguori</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna</s1>
<s2>Bologna</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nix, W" sort="Nix, W" uniqKey="Nix W" first="W." last="Nix">W. Nix</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="06">
<s1>FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics</s1>
<s2>Mainz</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Olsen, M" sort="Olsen, M" uniqKey="Olsen M" first="M." last="Olsen">M. Olsen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schofield, I" sort="Schofield, I" uniqKey="Schofield I" first="I." last="Schofield">I. Schofield</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Newcastle upon Tyne</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">INIST</idno>
<idno type="inist">03-0193883</idno>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
<idno type="stanalyst">PASCAL 03-0193883 INIST</idno>
<idno type="RBID">Pascal:03-0193883</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PascalFrancis/Corpus">000384</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a">Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Tankisi, H" sort="Tankisi, H" uniqKey="Tankisi H" first="H." last="Tankisi">H. Tankisi</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Johnsen, B" sort="Johnsen, B" uniqKey="Johnsen B" first="B." last="Johnsen">B. Johnsen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fuglsang Frederiksen, A" sort="Fuglsang Frederiksen, A" uniqKey="Fuglsang Frederiksen A" first="A." last="Fuglsang-Frederiksen">A. Fuglsang-Frederiksen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="De Carvalho, M" sort="De Carvalho, M" uniqKey="De Carvalho M" first="M." last="De Carvalho">M. De Carvalho</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria</s1>
<s2>Lisbon</s2>
<s3>PRT</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Fawcett, P R W" sort="Fawcett, P R W" uniqKey="Fawcett P" first="P. R. W." last="Fawcett">P. R. W. Fawcett</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Newcastle upon Tyne</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Labarre Vila, A" sort="Labarre Vila, A" uniqKey="Labarre Vila A" first="A." last="Labarre-Vila">A. Labarre-Vila</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire</s1>
<s2>Grenoble</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Liguori, R" sort="Liguori, R" uniqKey="Liguori R" first="R." last="Liguori">R. Liguori</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna</s1>
<s2>Bologna</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Nix, W" sort="Nix, W" uniqKey="Nix W" first="W." last="Nix">W. Nix</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="06">
<s1>FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics</s1>
<s2>Mainz</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Olsen, M" sort="Olsen, M" uniqKey="Olsen M" first="M." last="Olsen">M. Olsen</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Schofield, I" sort="Schofield, I" uniqKey="Schofield I" first="I." last="Schofield">I. Schofield</name>
<affiliation>
<inist:fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Newcastle upon Tyne</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</inist:fA14>
</affiliation>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical neurophysiology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Clin. neurophysiol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1388-2457</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2003">2003</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
<seriesStmt>
<title level="j" type="main">Clinical neurophysiology</title>
<title level="j" type="abbreviated">Clin. neurophysiol.</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1388-2457</idno>
</seriesStmt>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Electromyography</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Human</term>
<term>Physician</term>
<term>Polyneuropathy</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="Pascal" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Polyneuropathie périphérique</term>
<term>Electromyographie</term>
<term>Europe</term>
<term>Classification</term>
<term>Homme</term>
<term>Médecin</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<inist>
<standard h6="B">
<pA>
<fA01 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>1388-2457</s0>
</fA01>
<fA03 i2="1">
<s0>Clin. neurophysiol.</s0>
</fA03>
<fA05>
<s2>114</s2>
</fA05>
<fA06>
<s2>3</s2>
</fA06>
<fA08 i1="01" i2="1" l="ENG">
<s1>Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians</s1>
</fA08>
<fA11 i1="01" i2="1">
<s1>TANKISI (H.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="02" i2="1">
<s1>JOHNSEN (B.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="03" i2="1">
<s1>FUGLSANG-FREDERIKSEN (A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="04" i2="1">
<s1>DE CARVALHO (M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="05" i2="1">
<s1>FAWCETT (P. R. W.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="06" i2="1">
<s1>LABARRE-VILA (A.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="07" i2="1">
<s1>LIGUORI (R.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="08" i2="1">
<s1>NIX (W.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="09" i2="1">
<s1>OLSEN (M.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA11 i1="10" i2="1">
<s1>SCHOFIELD (I.)</s1>
</fA11>
<fA14 i1="01">
<s1>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>1 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>2 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>3 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="02">
<s1>Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria</s1>
<s2>Lisbon</s2>
<s3>PRT</s3>
<sZ>4 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="03">
<s1>Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital</s1>
<s2>Newcastle upon Tyne</s2>
<s3>GBR</s3>
<sZ>5 aut.</sZ>
<sZ>10 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="04">
<s1>Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire</s1>
<s2>Grenoble</s2>
<s3>FRA</s3>
<sZ>6 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="05">
<s1>Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna</s1>
<s2>Bologna</s2>
<s3>ITA</s3>
<sZ>7 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="06">
<s1>FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics</s1>
<s2>Mainz</s2>
<s3>DEU</s3>
<sZ>8 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA14 i1="07">
<s1>Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University</s1>
<s2>Aarhus</s2>
<s3>DNK</s3>
<sZ>9 aut.</sZ>
</fA14>
<fA20>
<s1>496-503</s1>
</fA20>
<fA21>
<s1>2003</s1>
</fA21>
<fA23 i1="01">
<s0>ENG</s0>
</fA23>
<fA43 i1="01">
<s1>INIST</s1>
<s2>5626E</s2>
<s5>354000107730190110</s5>
</fA43>
<fA44>
<s0>0000</s0>
<s1>© 2003 INIST-CNRS. All rights reserved.</s1>
</fA44>
<fA45>
<s0>26 ref.</s0>
</fA45>
<fA47 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>03-0193883</s0>
</fA47>
<fA60>
<s1>P</s1>
</fA60>
<fA61>
<s0>A</s0>
</fA61>
<fA64 i1="01" i2="1">
<s0>Clinical neurophysiology</s0>
</fA64>
<fA66 i1="01">
<s0>IRL</s0>
</fA66>
<fC01 i1="01" l="ENG">
<s0>Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.</s0>
</fC01>
<fC02 i1="01" i2="X">
<s0>002B17A08</s0>
</fC02>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Polyneuropathie périphérique</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Polyneuropathy</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Polineuropatía periférica</s0>
<s5>01</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Electromyographie</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Electromyography</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Electromiografía</s0>
<s5>04</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Europe</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Europa</s0>
<s2>NG</s2>
<s5>16</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Classification</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="04" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Clasificación</s0>
<s5>17</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Homme</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Human</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="05" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Hombre</s0>
<s5>20</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Médecin</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Physician</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC03 i1="06" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Médico</s0>
<s5>23</s5>
</fC03>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Système nerveux pathologie</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Nervous system diseases</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="01" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Sistema nervioso patología</s0>
<s5>37</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Nerf périphérique pathologie</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Peripheral nerve disease</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="02" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Nervio periférico patología</s0>
<s5>38</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="FRE">
<s0>Electrodiagnostic</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="ENG">
<s0>Electrodiagnosis</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fC07 i1="03" i2="X" l="SPA">
<s0>Electrodiagnóstico</s0>
<s5>45</s5>
</fC07>
<fN21>
<s1>111</s1>
</fN21>
<fN82>
<s1>PSI</s1>
</fN82>
</pA>
</standard>
<server>
<NO>PASCAL 03-0193883 INIST</NO>
<ET>Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians</ET>
<AU>TANKISI (H.); JOHNSEN (B.); FUGLSANG-FREDERIKSEN (A.); DE CARVALHO (M.); FAWCETT (P. R. W.); LABARRE-VILA (A.); LIGUORI (R.); NIX (W.); OLSEN (M.); SCHOFIELD (I.)</AU>
<AF>Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Aarhus University Hospital, AKH, Nørrebrogade 44, 8000/Aarhus/Danemark (1 aut., 2 aut., 3 aut.); Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria/Lisbon/Portugal (4 aut.); Deportment of Clinical Neurophysiology, Newcastle General Hospital/Newcastle upon Tyne/Royaume-Uni (5 aut., 10 aut.); Laboratory of Electromyography, University of Grenoble, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire/Grenoble/France (6 aut.); Institute of Neurology, University of Bologna/Bologna/Italie (7 aut.); FDepartment of Neurology, University Clinics/Mainz/Allemagne (8 aut.); Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University/Aarhus/Danemark (9 aut.)</AF>
<DT>Publication en série; Niveau analytique</DT>
<SO>Clinical neurophysiology; ISSN 1388-2457; Irlande; Da. 2003; Vol. 114; No. 3; Pp. 496-503; Bibl. 26 ref.</SO>
<LA>Anglais</LA>
<EA>Objective: Considerable debate still exists regarding the classification of polyneuropathies (PNPs) into predominantly demyelinating, predominantly axonal loss, mixed or unclassified. This study was designed to determine the variation among physicians in the classification of PNPs by using the European Standardized Telematic tool to Evaluate Electromyography knowledge-based systems and Methods (ESTEEM) multicenter database. Methods: Seven physicians from 6 laboratories in Europe sent a total of 156 prospectively collected cases of PNP with electromyography (EMG) data including diagnosis (examination diagnosis) to the database. Each physician interpreted the electrophysiological data from all cases (interpretation diagnosis) and a final diagnosis was given at the consensus meetings of the group (consensus diagnosis). Results: Comparison of each physician's examination diagnosis with his/her interpretation diagnosis, i.e. intra-physician variation, showed a change towards less classified PNPs (P<0.05). Interpretation diagnoses showed large inter-physician variation in the classification of PNPs. The consensus group was more cautious than individual physicians in classifying PNPs as mixed and axonal. The probability of the consensus diagnosis increased with increasing number of abnormal motor and sensory segments tested. Conclusions: Recognition of variation in classification of PNP as shown in this study and suggesting standards of good clinical practice developed by a consensus group may increase the quality of EMG practice.</EA>
<CC>002B17A08</CC>
<FD>Polyneuropathie périphérique; Electromyographie; Europe; Classification; Homme; Médecin</FD>
<FG>Système nerveux pathologie; Nerf périphérique pathologie; Electrodiagnostic</FG>
<ED>Polyneuropathy; Electromyography; Europe; Classification; Human; Physician</ED>
<EG>Nervous system diseases; Peripheral nerve disease; Electrodiagnosis</EG>
<SD>Polineuropatía periférica; Electromiografía; Europa; Clasificación; Hombre; Médico</SD>
<LO>INIST-5626E.354000107730190110</LO>
<ID>03-0193883</ID>
</server>
</inist>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000384 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/PascalFrancis/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000384 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    TelematiV1
   |flux=    PascalFrancis
   |étape=   Corpus
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     Pascal:03-0193883
   |texte=   Variation in the classification of polyneuropathies among European physicians
}}

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Thu Nov 2 16:09:04 2017. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 16:42:28 2024