Curation
Accueil
Racine
Curation
Exploration
Accueil
Racine
Accueil
Racine

Serveur d'exploration sur la télématique

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Categorizing the telehealth policy response of countries and their implications for complementarity of telehealth policy.

Identifieur interne : 002770 ( Main/Curation ); précédent : 002769; suivant : 002771

Categorizing the telehealth policy response of countries and their implications for complementarity of telehealth policy.

Auteurs : Sunil Varghese [Canada] ; Richard E. Scott

Source :

RBID : pubmed:15104917

Descripteurs français

English descriptors

Abstract

Developing countries are exploring the role of telehealth to overcome the challenges of providing adequate health care services. However, this process faces disparities, and no complementarity in telehealth policy development. Telehealth has the potential to transcend geopolitical boundaries, yet telehealth policy developed in one jurisdiction may hamper applications in another. Understanding such policy complexities is essential for telehealth to realize its full global potential. This study investigated 12 East Asian countries that may represent a microcosm of the world, to determine if the telehealth policy response of countries could be categorized, and whether any implications could be identified for the development of complementary telehealth policy. The countries were Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Three categories of country response were identified in regard to national policy support and development. The first category was "None" (Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam) where international partners, driven by humanitarian concerns, lead telehealth activity. The second category was "Proactive" (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand) where national policies were designed with the view that telehealth initiatives are a component of larger development objectives. The third was "Reactive" (Hong Kong and Japan), where policies were only proffered after telehealth activities were sustainable. It is concluded that although complementarity of telehealth policy development is not occurring, increased interjurisdictional telehealth activity, regional clusters, and concerted and coordinated effort amongst researchers, practitioners, and policy makers may alter this trend.

DOI: 10.1089/153056204773644599
PubMed: 15104917

Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)

Links to Exploration step

pubmed:15104917

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Categorizing the telehealth policy response of countries and their implications for complementarity of telehealth policy.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Varghese, Sunil" sort="Varghese, Sunil" uniqKey="Varghese S" first="Sunil" last="Varghese">Sunil Varghese</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>Global e-Health Research and Training Program, Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Global e-Health Research and Training Program, Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Calgary</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Calgary</settlement>
<region type="state">Alberta</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scott, Richard E" sort="Scott, Richard E" uniqKey="Scott R" first="Richard E" last="Scott">Richard E. Scott</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno>
<date when="2004">2004</date>
<idno type="RBID">pubmed:15104917</idno>
<idno type="pmid">15104917</idno>
<idno type="doi">10.1089/153056204773644599</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Corpus">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Curation">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="PubMed" wicri:step="Curation">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/PubMed/Checkpoint">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Checkpoint" wicri:step="PubMed">000578</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Merge">000370</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Curation">000370</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Ncbi/Checkpoint">000370</idno>
<idno type="wicri:doubleKey">1530-5627:2004:Varghese S:categorizing:the:telehealth</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Merge">002803</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002770</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en">Categorizing the telehealth policy response of countries and their implications for complementarity of telehealth policy.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Varghese, Sunil" sort="Varghese, Sunil" uniqKey="Varghese S" first="Sunil" last="Varghese">Sunil Varghese</name>
<affiliation wicri:level="4">
<nlm:affiliation>Global e-Health Research and Training Program, Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB, Canada.</nlm:affiliation>
<country xml:lang="fr">Canada</country>
<wicri:regionArea>Global e-Health Research and Training Program, Health Telematics Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary AB</wicri:regionArea>
<orgName type="university">Université de Calgary</orgName>
<placeName>
<settlement type="city">Calgary</settlement>
<region type="state">Alberta</region>
</placeName>
</affiliation>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Scott, Richard E" sort="Scott, Richard E" uniqKey="Scott R" first="Richard E" last="Scott">Richard E. Scott</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association</title>
<idno type="ISSN">1530-5627</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="2004" type="published">2004</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass>
<keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en">
<term>Asia, Southeastern</term>
<term>Cooperative Behavior</term>
<term>Developing Countries</term>
<term>Diffusion of Innovation</term>
<term>Far East</term>
<term>Health Policy</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interinstitutional Relations</term>
<term>National Health Programs</term>
<term>Telemedicine (economics)</term>
<term>Telemedicine (legislation & jurisprudence)</term>
<term>Telemedicine (organization & administration)</term>
<term>Telemedicine (standards)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Asie du Sud-Est</term>
<term>Comportement coopératif</term>
<term>Diffusion des innovations</term>
<term>Extrême-Orient</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Pays en voie de développement</term>
<term>Politique de santé</term>
<term>Programmes nationaux de santé</term>
<term>Relations interinstitutionnelles</term>
<term>Télémédecine (législation et jurisprudence)</term>
<term>Télémédecine (normes)</term>
<term>Télémédecine (organisation et administration)</term>
<term>Télémédecine (économie)</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" xml:lang="en">
<term>Asia, Southeastern</term>
<term>Far East</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="economics" xml:lang="en">
<term>Telemedicine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="legislation & jurisprudence" xml:lang="en">
<term>Telemedicine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="législation et jurisprudence" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Télémédecine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="normes" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Télémédecine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organisation et administration" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Télémédecine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="organization & administration" xml:lang="en">
<term>Telemedicine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="standards" xml:lang="en">
<term>Telemedicine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="économie" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Télémédecine</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en">
<term>Cooperative Behavior</term>
<term>Developing Countries</term>
<term>Diffusion of Innovation</term>
<term>Health Policy</term>
<term>Humans</term>
<term>Interinstitutional Relations</term>
<term>National Health Programs</term>
</keywords>
<keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr">
<term>Asie du Sud-Est</term>
<term>Comportement coopératif</term>
<term>Diffusion des innovations</term>
<term>Extrême-Orient</term>
<term>Humains</term>
<term>Pays en voie de développement</term>
<term>Politique de santé</term>
<term>Programmes nationaux de santé</term>
<term>Relations interinstitutionnelles</term>
</keywords>
</textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Developing countries are exploring the role of telehealth to overcome the challenges of providing adequate health care services. However, this process faces disparities, and no complementarity in telehealth policy development. Telehealth has the potential to transcend geopolitical boundaries, yet telehealth policy developed in one jurisdiction may hamper applications in another. Understanding such policy complexities is essential for telehealth to realize its full global potential. This study investigated 12 East Asian countries that may represent a microcosm of the world, to determine if the telehealth policy response of countries could be categorized, and whether any implications could be identified for the development of complementary telehealth policy. The countries were Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. Three categories of country response were identified in regard to national policy support and development. The first category was "None" (Cambodia, Myanmar, and Vietnam) where international partners, driven by humanitarian concerns, lead telehealth activity. The second category was "Proactive" (China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand) where national policies were designed with the view that telehealth initiatives are a component of larger development objectives. The third was "Reactive" (Hong Kong and Japan), where policies were only proffered after telehealth activities were sustainable. It is concluded that although complementarity of telehealth policy development is not occurring, increased interjurisdictional telehealth activity, regional clusters, and concerted and coordinated effort amongst researchers, practitioners, and policy makers may alter this trend.</div>
</front>
</TEI>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/TelematiV1/Data/Main/Curation

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002770 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 002770 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    TelematiV1
   |flux=    Main
   |étape=   Curation
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     pubmed:15104917
   |texte=   Categorizing the telehealth policy response of countries and their implications for complementarity of telehealth policy.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:15104917" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Curation/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a TelematiV1
Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31.
Data generation: Thu Nov 2 16:09:04 2017. Site generation: Sun Mar 10 16:42:28 2024