A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
Identifieur interne : 000192 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000191; suivant : 000193A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
Auteurs : Kathleen Burnett ; Kwong Bor Ng ; Soyeon ParkSource :
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science [ 0002-8231 ] ; 1999.
Abstract
Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.
Url:
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><author><name sortKey="Burnett, Kathleen" sort="Burnett, Kathleen" uniqKey="Burnett K" first="Kathleen" last="Burnett">Kathleen Burnett</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ng, Kwong Bor" sort="Ng, Kwong Bor" uniqKey="Ng K" first="Kwong Bor" last="Ng">Kwong Bor Ng</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Soyeon" sort="Park, Soyeon" uniqKey="Park S" first="Soyeon" last="Park">Soyeon Park</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</idno><date when="1999" year="1999">1999</date><idno type="doi">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000192</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><author><name sortKey="Burnett, Kathleen" sort="Burnett, Kathleen" uniqKey="Burnett K" first="Kathleen" last="Burnett">Kathleen Burnett</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Ng, Kwong Bor" sort="Ng, Kwong Bor" uniqKey="Ng K" first="Kwong Bor" last="Ng">Kwong Bor Ng</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Park, Soyeon" sort="Park, Soyeon" uniqKey="Park S" first="Soyeon" last="Park">Soyeon Park</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.</title><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno><idno type="eISSN">1097-4571</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999">1999</date><biblScope unit="volume">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1209">1209</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1217">1217</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno></series><idno type="istex">C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ASI6</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0002-8231</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>wiley</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Kathleen Burnett</name><affiliations><json:string>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Kwong Bor Ng</name><affiliations><json:string>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Soyeon Park</name><affiliations><json:string>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><articleId><json:string>ASI6</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>6.56</score><pdfVersion>1.3</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>612 x 792 pts (letter)</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>921</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>5733</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>39549</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>130</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><genre><json:string>article</json:string></genre><host><volume>50</volume><publisherId><json:string>ASI</json:string></publisherId><pages><total>9</total><last>1217</last><first>1209</first></pages><issn><json:string>0002-8231</json:string></issn><issue>13</issue><author><json:item><name>Zorana Ercegovac</name><affiliations><json:string>University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095‐1521</json:string><json:string>InfoEN Associates, Box 66276, Los Angeles, CA 90066</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><value>metadata</value></json:item><json:item><value>metadata standards</value></json:item><json:item><value>comparison</value></json:item><json:item><value>Research</value></json:item></subject><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1097-4571</json:string></eissn><title>Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title><doi><json:string>10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571</json:string></doi></host><publicationDate>1999</publicationDate><copyrightDate>1999</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13>1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</json:string></doi><id>C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</id><score>0.23073985</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><availability><p>WILEY</p></availability><date>1999</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Kathleen</forename><surname>Burnett</surname></persName><note type="correspondence"><p>Correspondence: Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</p></note><affiliation>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Kwong Bor</forename><surname>Ng</surname></persName><affiliation>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Soyeon</forename><surname>Park</surname></persName><affiliation>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.</title><idno type="pISSN">0002-8231</idno><idno type="eISSN">1097-4571</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571</idno><imprint><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><pubPlace>New York</pubPlace><date type="published" when="1999"></date><biblScope unit="volume">50</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">13</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="1209">1209</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="1217">1217</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</idno><idno type="ArticleID">ASI6</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>1999</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>index-terms</head><item><term>metadata</term></item><item><term>metadata standards</term></item><item><term>comparison</term></item></list></keywords></textClass><textClass><keywords scheme="Journal Subject"><list><head>article-category</head><item><term>Research</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="1999">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="Wiley, elements deleted: body"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:document><component version="2.0" type="serialArticle" xml:lang="en"><header><publicationMeta level="product"><publisherInfo><publisherName>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisherName><publisherLoc>New York</publisherLoc></publisherInfo><doi registered="yes">10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571</doi><issn type="print">0002-8231</issn><issn type="electronic">1097-4571</issn><idGroup><id type="product" value="ASI"></id></idGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en" sort="JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE">Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title><title type="short">J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.</title></titleGroup></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="part" position="130"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<>1.0.CO;2-F</doi><titleGroup><title type="specialIssueTitle">Integrating Multiple Overlapping Metadata Standards</title></titleGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="journalVolume" number="50">50</numbering><numbering type="journalIssue">13</numbering></numberingGroup><creators><creator xml:id="sped1" creatorRole="sponsoringEditor" affiliationRef="#sp1 #sp2"><personName><givenNames>Zorana</givenNames><familyName>Ercegovac</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="sp1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095‐1521</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="sp2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>InfoEN Associates, Box 66276, Los Angeles, CA 90066</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><coverDate startDate="1999">1999</coverDate></publicationMeta><publicationMeta level="unit" type="article" position="6" status="forIssue"><doi origin="wiley" registered="yes">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</doi><idGroup><id type="unit" value="ASI6"></id></idGroup><countGroup><count type="pageTotal" number="9"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="articleCategory">Research</title><title type="tocHeading1">Research</title></titleGroup><copyright ownership="publisher">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</copyright><eventGroup><event type="firstOnline" date="1999-10-06"></event><event type="publishedOnlineFinalForm" date="1999-10-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:JWSART34_TO_WML3G version:2.3.2 mode:FullText source:HeaderRef result:HeaderRef" date="2010-03-11"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WILEY_ML3G_TO_WILEY_ML3GV2 version:3.8.8" date="2014-01-06"></event><event type="xmlConverted" agent="Converter:WML3G_To_WML3G version:4.1.7 mode:FullText,remove_FC" date="2014-10-30"></event></eventGroup><numberingGroup><numbering type="pageFirst">1209</numbering><numbering type="pageLast">1217</numbering></numberingGroup><correspondenceTo>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</correspondenceTo><subjectInfo><subject href="psi.asis.org">metadata</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org">metadata standards</subject><subject href="psi.asis.org">comparison</subject></subjectInfo><linkGroup><link type="toTypesetVersion" href="file:ASI.ASI6.pdf"></link></linkGroup></publicationMeta><contentMeta><countGroup><count type="figureTotal" number="0"></count><count type="tableTotal" number="1"></count><count type="referenceTotal" number="44"></count><count type="wordTotal" number="6483"></count></countGroup><titleGroup><title type="main" xml:lang="en">A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title></titleGroup><creators><creator xml:id="au1" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af1" corresponding="yes"><personName><givenNames>Kathleen</givenNames><familyName>Burnett</familyName></personName><contactDetails><email>burnett@lis.fsu.edu</email></contactDetails></creator><creator xml:id="au2" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af2"><personName><givenNames>Kwong Bor</givenNames><familyName>Ng</familyName></personName></creator><creator xml:id="au3" creatorRole="author" affiliationRef="#af3"><personName><givenNames>Soyeon</givenNames><familyName>Park</familyName></personName></creator></creators><affiliationGroup><affiliation xml:id="af1" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af2" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation><affiliation xml:id="af3" countryCode="US" type="organization"><unparsedAffiliation>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</unparsedAffiliation></affiliation></affiliationGroup><abstractGroup><abstract type="main" xml:lang="en"><title type="main">Abstract</title><p>Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</p></abstract></abstractGroup></contentMeta></header></component></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA" lang="en"><title>A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kathleen</namePart><namePart type="family">Burnett</namePart><affiliation>Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</affiliation><description>Correspondence: Florida State University, School of Information Studies, Tallahassee, FL 32306‐2100</description><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Kwong Bor</namePart><namePart type="family">Ng</namePart><affiliation>Queens College, City University of New York, Flushing, NY 11367</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Soyeon</namePart><namePart type="family">Park</namePart><affiliation>Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies, New Brunswick, NJ 08904</affiliation><role><roleTerm type="text">author</roleTerm></role></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="article" displayLabel="article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</publisher><place><placeTerm type="text">New York</placeTerm></place><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">1999</dateIssued><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">1999</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType><extent unit="tables">1</extent><extent unit="references">44</extent><extent unit="words">6483</extent></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">Metadata has taken on a more significant role than ever before in the emerging digital library context because the effective organization of networked information clearly depends on the effective management and organization of metadata. The issue of metadata has been approached variously by different intellectual communities. The two main approaches may be characterized as: (1) the bibliographic control approach (origins and major proponents in library science); and (2) data management approach (origins and major proponents in computer science). This article examines the different conceptual foundations and orientations of the two major approaches contributing to the metadata discussion. An examination of the on‐going efforts to establish metadata standards, and comparison of different metadata formats, supports a proposal for an integrated concept of metadata to facilitate the merging of the two approaches.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Journal of the American Society for Information Science</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Zorana</namePart><namePart type="family">Ercegovac</namePart><affiliation>University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095‐1521</affiliation><affiliation>InfoEN Associates, Box 66276, Los Angeles, CA 90066</affiliation></name><genre type="journal">journal</genre><subject><genre>index-terms</genre><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org">metadata</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org">metadata standards</topic><topic authorityURI="psi.asis.org">comparison</topic></subject><subject><genre>article-category</genre><topic>Research</topic></subject><identifier type="ISSN">0002-8231</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1097-4571</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(ISSN)1097-4571</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">ASI</identifier><part><date>1999</date><detail type="title"><title>Integrating Multiple Overlapping Metadata Standards</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>50</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>13</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>1209</start><end>1217</end><total>9</total></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:13<1209::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-Y</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">ASI6</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>WILEY</recordContentSource><recordOrigin>John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</recordOrigin></recordInfo></mods></metadata><enrichments><json:item><type>multicat</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1/enrichments/multicat</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000192 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000192 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:C0A0B1A148FE73D00A2085080961025EAB4399F1
|texte= A comparison of the two traditions of metadata development
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |