In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development
Identifieur interne : 000168 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000167; suivant : 000169In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development
Auteurs : Creagh Cole ; Paul ScifleetSource :
- Literary and Linguistic Computing [ 0268-1145 ] ; 2006-06.
Abstract
The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fql017
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cole, Creagh" sort="Cole, Creagh" uniqKey="Cole C" first="Creagh" last="Cole">Creagh Cole</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Scifleet, Paul" sort="Scifleet, Paul" uniqKey="Scifleet P" first="Paul" last="Scifleet">Paul Scifleet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680</idno><date when="2006" year="2006">2006</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/llc/fql017</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000168</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Cole, Creagh" sort="Cole, Creagh" uniqKey="Cole C" first="Creagh" last="Cole">Creagh Cole</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Scifleet, Paul" sort="Scifleet, Paul" uniqKey="Scifleet P" first="Paul" last="Scifleet">Paul Scifleet</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Literary and Linguistic Computing</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Lit Linguist Computing</title><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4615</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2006-06">2006-06</date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="167">167</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno></series><idno type="istex">E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fql017</idno><idno type="local">fql017</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Creagh Cole</name><affiliations><json:string>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</json:string><json:string>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</json:string></affiliations></json:item><json:item><name>Paul Scifleet</name><affiliations><json:string>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</json:string><json:string>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>8.122</score><pdfVersion>1.5</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>539 x 697 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>false</refBibsNative><keywordCount>0</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1302</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>4770</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>30070</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>9</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>196</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>21</volume><publisherId><json:string>litlin</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>167</last><first>159</first></pages><issn><json:string>0268-1145</json:string></issn><issue>2</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1477-4615</json:string></eissn><title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>LINGUISTICS</json:string><json:string>LITERATURE</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2006</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2006</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/llc/fql017</json:string></doi><id>E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680</id><score>0.24611065</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt xml:id="ISTEX-API" resp="Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID" name="ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)"></respStmt><respStmt><resp>Références bibliographiques récupérées via GROBID</resp><name resp="ISTEX-API">ISTEX-API (INIST-CNRS)</name></respStmt></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>OUP</p></availability><date>2006-04-12</date></publicationStmt><notesStmt><note>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: c.cole@library.usyd.edu.au</note></notesStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a" type="main" xml:lang="en">In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Creagh</forename><surname>Cole</surname></persName><affiliation>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</affiliation></author><author><persName><forename type="first">Paul</forename><surname>Scifleet</surname></persName><affiliation>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Literary and Linguistic Computing</title><title level="j" type="abbrev">Lit Linguist Computing</title><idno type="pISSN">0268-1145</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4615</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2006-06"></date><biblScope unit="volume">21</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">2</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="159">159</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="167">167</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fql017</idno><idno type="local">fql017</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2006-04-12</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.</p></abstract></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2006-04-12">Created</change><change when="2006-06">Published</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-14">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-3-21">References added</change><change xml:id="refBibs-istex" who="#ISTEX-API" when="2016-07-27">References added</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="US-ASCII"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article xml:lang="en" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">litlin</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">litlin</journal-id><journal-title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Lit Linguist Computing</abbrev-journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0268-1145</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1477-4615</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="other">fql017</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/llc/fql017</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Cole</surname><given-names>Creagh</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</aff></contrib-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Scifleet</surname><given-names>Paul</given-names></name></contrib><aff>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</aff></contrib-group><author-notes><corresp><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. <bold>E-mail:</bold> <ext-link xlink:href="c.cole@library.usyd.edu.au" ext-link-type="email">c.cole@library.usyd.edu.au</ext-link></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>12</day><month>4</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>June</month><year>2006</year></pub-date><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>159</fpage><lpage>167</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2006</copyright-year></permissions><abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.</p></abstract><custom-meta-wrap><custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-fpage</meta-name><meta-value>159</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>cover-date</meta-name><meta-value>June 2006</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>hwp-legacy-dochead</meta-name><meta-value>Original Article</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-wrap></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo lang="en"><title>In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" lang="en" contentType="CDATA"><title>In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Creagh</namePart><namePart type="family">Cole</namePart><affiliation>Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</affiliation></name><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Paul</namePart><namePart type="family">Scifleet</namePart><affiliation>Discipline of Information Systems, Faculty of Economics & Business, The University of Sydney</affiliation><affiliation>Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia.</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2006-06</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2006-04-12</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2006</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract lang="en">The text ontology debates inspired by the descriptive encoding practices of the Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) community have been conducted between literary theorists concerned with the adequacy of such encoding to capture the interpretative and playful aspects of literary appreciation on the one hand, and those who regard encoding as one of the formal sciences and seek greater disambiguation in the interests of more efficient machine processing. We argue for a practice-oriented view that has not been represented adequately by either of these poles. Our position has received unexpected support from the systematic realist philosophy of John Anderson which we encountered in digitizing his lecture notes held by the University of Sydney Archives. The process of encoding the lecture notes informed our understanding of the problems of encoding primary source materials, but Anderson's realism also located the space we sought to occupy in the TEI debates between the technical, formal model of encoding and the anti-realist preferences of many literary scholars. In this article, we argue on the basis of our reflections the need for further empirical studies of real world encoding practices as these new documentary forms are integrated into existing institutional and informational processes.</abstract><note type="author-notes">Correspondence: Creagh Cole, Scholarly Electronic Text & Image Service, The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. E-mail: c.cole@library.usyd.edu.au</note><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="abbreviated"><title>Lit Linguist Computing</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0268-1145</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1477-4615</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">litlin</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">litlin</identifier><part><date>2006</date><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>21</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>2</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>159</start><end>167</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fql017</identifier><identifier type="local">fql017</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><covers><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/tiff</mimetype><extension>tiff</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/covers/tiff</uri></json:item></covers><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">LINGUISTICS</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">LITERATURE</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI><json:item><type>refBibs</type><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680/enrichments/refBibs</uri></json:item></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000168 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000168 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:E6A4D811F730EEAC4DE3D86A80627A3F4E79E680
|texte= In the Philosophy Room: Australian Realism and Digital Content Development
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |