The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts
Identifieur interne : 000159 ( Istex/Corpus ); précédent : 000158; suivant : 000160The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts
Auteurs : Desmond SchmidtSource :
- Literary and Linguistic Computing [ 0268-1145 ] ; 2010-09.
Abstract
Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a documents logical structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.
Url:
DOI: 10.1093/llc/fqq007
Links to Exploration step
ISTEX:F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4Le document en format XML
<record><TEI wicri:istexFullTextTei="biblStruct"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title>The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Schmidt, Desmond" sort="Schmidt, Desmond" uniqKey="Schmidt D" first="Desmond" last="Schmidt">Desmond Schmidt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: schmidda@qut.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">ISTEX</idno><idno type="RBID">ISTEX:F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4</idno><date when="2010" year="2010">2010</date><idno type="doi">10.1093/llc/fqq007</idno><idno type="url">https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/fulltext/pdf</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Istex/Corpus">000159</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title level="a">The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title><author wicri:is="90%"><name sortKey="Schmidt, Desmond" sort="Schmidt, Desmond" uniqKey="Schmidt D" first="Desmond" last="Schmidt">Desmond Schmidt</name><affiliation><mods:affiliation>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</mods:affiliation></affiliation><affiliation><mods:affiliation>E-mail: schmidda@qut.edu.au</mods:affiliation></affiliation></author></analytic><monogr></monogr><series><title level="j">Literary and Linguistic Computing</title><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4615</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2010-09">2010-09</date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="337">337</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="356">356</biblScope></imprint><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno></series><idno type="istex">F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fqq007</idno><idno type="ArticleID">fqq007</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc><seriesStmt><idno type="ISSN">0268-1145</idno></seriesStmt></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract">Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a documents logical structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.</div></front></TEI><istex><corpusName>oup</corpusName><author><json:item><name>Desmond Schmidt</name><affiliations><json:string>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</json:string><json:string>E-mail: schmidda@qut.edu.au</json:string></affiliations></json:item></author><subject><json:item><lang><json:string>eng</json:string></lang><value>Original Articles</value></json:item></subject><articleId><json:string>fqq007</json:string></articleId><language><json:string>eng</json:string></language><originalGenre><json:string>research-article</json:string></originalGenre><abstract>Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a documents logical structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.</abstract><qualityIndicators><score>7.588</score><pdfVersion>1.4</pdfVersion><pdfPageSize>538.583 x 697.323 pts</pdfPageSize><refBibsNative>true</refBibsNative><keywordCount>1</keywordCount><abstractCharCount>1151</abstractCharCount><pdfWordCount>10441</pdfWordCount><pdfCharCount>66745</pdfCharCount><pdfPageCount>20</pdfPageCount><abstractWordCount>174</abstractWordCount></qualityIndicators><title>The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title><genre><json:string>research-article</json:string></genre><host><volume>25</volume><publisherId><json:string>litlin</json:string></publisherId><pages><last>356</last><first>337</first></pages><issn><json:string>0268-1145</json:string></issn><issue>3</issue><genre><json:string>journal</json:string></genre><language><json:string>unknown</json:string></language><eissn><json:string>1477-4615</json:string></eissn><title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</title></host><categories><wos><json:string>LINGUISTICS</json:string><json:string>LITERATURE</json:string></wos></categories><publicationDate>2010</publicationDate><copyrightDate>2010</copyrightDate><doi><json:string>10.1093/llc/fqq007</json:string></doi><id>F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4</id><score>0.25091672</score><fulltext><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/fulltext/pdf</uri></json:item><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>application/zip</mimetype><extension>zip</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/fulltext/zip</uri></json:item><istex:fulltextTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/fulltext/tei"><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title level="a">The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title></titleStmt><publicationStmt><authority>ISTEX</authority><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><availability><p>OUP</p></availability><date>2010-04-16</date></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct type="inbook"><analytic><title level="a">The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title><author><persName><forename type="first">Desmond</forename><surname>Schmidt</surname></persName><email>schmidda@qut.edu.au</email><affiliation>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</affiliation></author></analytic><monogr><title level="j">Literary and Linguistic Computing</title><idno type="pISSN">0268-1145</idno><idno type="eISSN">1477-4615</idno><imprint><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><date type="published" when="2010-09"></date><biblScope unit="volume">25</biblScope><biblScope unit="issue">3</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" from="337">337</biblScope><biblScope unit="page" to="356">356</biblScope></imprint></monogr><idno type="istex">F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4</idno><idno type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fqq007</idno><idno type="ArticleID">fqq007</idno></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><creation><date>2010-04-16</date></creation><langUsage><language ident="en">en</language></langUsage><abstract><p>Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a documents logical structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.</p></abstract><textClass><keywords scheme="keyword"><list><item><term>Original Articles</term></item></list></keywords></textClass></profileDesc><revisionDesc><change when="2010-04-16">Created</change><change when="2010-09">Published</change></revisionDesc></teiHeader></istex:fulltextTEI><json:item><original>false</original><mimetype>text/plain</mimetype><extension>txt</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/fulltext/txt</uri></json:item></fulltext><metadata><istex:metadataXml wicri:clean="corpus oup" wicri:toSee="no header"><istex:xmlDeclaration>version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"</istex:xmlDeclaration><istex:docType PUBLIC="-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" URI="journalpublishing.dtd" name="istex:docType"></istex:docType><istex:document><article article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">litlin</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">litlin</journal-id><journal-title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</journal-title><issn pub-type="ppub">0268-1145</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1477-4615</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/llc/fqq007</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">fqq007</article-id><article-categories><subj-group><subject>Original Articles</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>Desmond</given-names></name></contrib></contrib-group><aff>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</aff><author-notes><corresp><bold>Correspondence:</bold> Desmond Schmidt, Information Security Institute, 126 Margaret Street, Brisbane, Queensland, 4001, Australia <bold>E-mail:</bold> <email>schmidda@qut.edu.au</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><month>9</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>16</day><month>4</month><year>2010</year></pub-date><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><issue-title>Journal of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities</issue-title><fpage>337</fpage><lpage>356</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>© The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2010</copyright-year></permissions><abstract><p>Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a document’s ‘logical’ structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.</p></abstract></article-meta></front></article></istex:document></istex:metadataXml><mods version="3.6"><titleInfo><title>The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title></titleInfo><titleInfo type="alternative" contentType="CDATA"><title>The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts</title></titleInfo><name type="personal"><namePart type="given">Desmond</namePart><namePart type="family">Schmidt</namePart><affiliation>Information Security Institute, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia</affiliation><affiliation>E-mail: schmidda@qut.edu.au</affiliation></name><typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource><genre type="research-article" displayLabel="research-article"></genre><subject><topic>Original Articles</topic></subject><originInfo><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><dateIssued encoding="w3cdtf">2010-09</dateIssued><dateCreated encoding="w3cdtf">2010-04-16</dateCreated><copyrightDate encoding="w3cdtf">2010</copyrightDate></originInfo><language><languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm><languageTerm type="code" authority="rfc3066">en</languageTerm></language><physicalDescription><internetMediaType>text/html</internetMediaType></physicalDescription><abstract>Embedded generalized markup, as applied by digital humanists to the recording and studying of our textual cultural heritage, suffers from a number of serious technical drawbacks. As a result of its evolution from early printer control languages, generalized markup can only express a documents logical structure via a repertoire of permissible printed format structures. In addition to the well-researched overlap problem, the embedding of markup codes into texts that never had them when written leads to a number of further difficulties: the inclusion of potentially obsolescent technical and subjective information into texts that are supposed to be archivable for the long term, the manual encoding of information that could be better computed automatically, and the obscuring of the text by highly complex technical data. Many of these problems can be alleviated by asserting a separation between the versions of which many cultural heritage texts are composed, and their content. In this way the complex interconnections between versions can be handled automatically, leaving only simple markup for individual versions to be handled by the user.</abstract><relatedItem type="host"><titleInfo><title>Literary and Linguistic Computing</title></titleInfo><genre type="journal">journal</genre><identifier type="ISSN">0268-1145</identifier><identifier type="eISSN">1477-4615</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID">litlin</identifier><identifier type="PublisherID-hwp">litlin</identifier><part><date>2010</date><detail type="title"><title>Journal of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities</title></detail><detail type="volume"><caption>vol.</caption><number>25</number></detail><detail type="issue"><caption>no.</caption><number>3</number></detail><extent unit="pages"><start>337</start><end>356</end></extent></part></relatedItem><identifier type="istex">F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4</identifier><identifier type="DOI">10.1093/llc/fqq007</identifier><identifier type="ArticleID">fqq007</identifier><accessCondition type="use and reproduction" contentType="copyright">The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ALLC and ACH. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org</accessCondition><recordInfo><recordContentSource>OUP</recordContentSource></recordInfo></mods></metadata><covers><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/tiff</mimetype><extension>tiff</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/covers/tiff</uri></json:item></covers><annexes><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/jpeg</mimetype><extension>jpeg</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/annexes/jpeg</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>image/gif</mimetype><extension>gif</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/annexes/gif</uri></json:item><json:item><original>true</original><mimetype>application/pdf</mimetype><extension>pdf</extension><uri>https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/annexes/pdf</uri></json:item></annexes><enrichments><istex:catWosTEI uri="https://api.istex.fr/document/F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4/enrichments/catWos"><teiHeader><profileDesc><textClass><classCode scheme="WOS">LINGUISTICS</classCode><classCode scheme="WOS">LITERATURE</classCode></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader></istex:catWosTEI></enrichments><serie></serie></istex></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Ticri/explor/TeiVM2/Data/Istex/Corpus
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000159 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Istex/Corpus/biblio.hfd -nk 000159 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Ticri
|area= TeiVM2
|flux= Istex
|étape= Corpus
|type= RBID
|clé= ISTEX:F4113A3958C0A461179818E675591966FE17E0D4
|texte= The inadequacy of embedded markup for cultural heritage texts
}}
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.31. |  |