Serveur d'exploration sur l'OCR

Attention, ce site est en cours de développement !
Attention, site généré par des moyens informatiques à partir de corpus bruts.
Les informations ne sont donc pas validées.

Requests for proposals for library automation.

Identifieur interne : 000205 ( Pmc/Checkpoint ); précédent : 000204; suivant : 000206

Requests for proposals for library automation.

Auteurs : D. Bolef ; T. Gardner

Source :

RBID : PMC:227166

Abstract

Many health sciences libraries are now considering integrated automated systems for an investment of several hundred thousand dollars. The request for proposals (RFPs) is the usual method of selecting candidate vendors for close inspection of promising systems. This paper draws upon the experience of the Library of Rush University and that of twelve other health sciences libraries. The libraries were interviewed by telephone using a short questionnaire that asked them to compare the RFPs with the systems actually obtained and their experiences in implementing them. The libraries were also asked, with the benefit of hindsight, what would they have done differently. Four vendors were also interviewed by telephone, in order to get their point of view.


Url:
PubMed: 3370380
PubMed Central: 227166


Affiliations:


Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)


Links to Exploration step

PMC:227166

Le document en format XML

<record>
<TEI>
<teiHeader>
<fileDesc>
<titleStmt>
<title xml:lang="en">Requests for proposals for library automation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bolef, D" sort="Bolef, D" uniqKey="Bolef D" first="D" last="Bolef">D. Bolef</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gardner, T" sort="Gardner, T" uniqKey="Gardner T" first="T" last="Gardner">T. Gardner</name>
</author>
</titleStmt>
<publicationStmt>
<idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno>
<idno type="pmid">3370380</idno>
<idno type="pmc">227166</idno>
<idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC227166</idno>
<idno type="RBID">PMC:227166</idno>
<date when="1988">1988</date>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000049</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000049</idno>
<idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Checkpoint">000205</idno>
</publicationStmt>
<sourceDesc>
<biblStruct>
<analytic>
<title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Requests for proposals for library automation.</title>
<author>
<name sortKey="Bolef, D" sort="Bolef, D" uniqKey="Bolef D" first="D" last="Bolef">D. Bolef</name>
</author>
<author>
<name sortKey="Gardner, T" sort="Gardner, T" uniqKey="Gardner T" first="T" last="Gardner">T. Gardner</name>
</author>
</analytic>
<series>
<title level="j">Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</title>
<idno type="ISSN">0025-7338</idno>
<imprint>
<date when="1988">1988</date>
</imprint>
</series>
</biblStruct>
</sourceDesc>
</fileDesc>
<profileDesc>
<textClass></textClass>
</profileDesc>
</teiHeader>
<front>
<div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">
<p>Many health sciences libraries are now considering integrated automated systems for an investment of several hundred thousand dollars. The request for proposals (RFPs) is the usual method of selecting candidate vendors for close inspection of promising systems. This paper draws upon the experience of the Library of Rush University and that of twelve other health sciences libraries. The libraries were interviewed by telephone using a short questionnaire that asked them to compare the RFPs with the systems actually obtained and their experiences in implementing them. The libraries were also asked, with the benefit of hindsight, what would they have done differently. Four vendors were also interviewed by telephone, in order to get their point of view.</p>
</div>
</front>
</TEI>
<pmc article-type="research-article">
<pmc-comment>The publisher of this article does not allow downloading of the full text in XML form.</pmc-comment>
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Bull Med Libr Assoc</journal-id>
<journal-title>Bulletin of the Medical Library Association</journal-title>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0025-7338</issn>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmid">3370380</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="pmc">227166</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Research Article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Requests for proposals for library automation.</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bolef</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gardner</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff>Library of Rush University, Chicago, Illinois 60612.</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="ppub">
<month>4</month>
<year>1988</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>76</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>141</fpage>
<lpage>145</lpage>
<abstract>
<p>Many health sciences libraries are now considering integrated automated systems for an investment of several hundred thousand dollars. The request for proposals (RFPs) is the usual method of selecting candidate vendors for close inspection of promising systems. This paper draws upon the experience of the Library of Rush University and that of twelve other health sciences libraries. The libraries were interviewed by telephone using a short questionnaire that asked them to compare the RFPs with the systems actually obtained and their experiences in implementing them. The libraries were also asked, with the benefit of hindsight, what would they have done differently. Four vendors were also interviewed by telephone, in order to get their point of view.</p>
</abstract>
</article-meta>
</front>
</pmc>
<affiliations>
<list></list>
<tree>
<noCountry>
<name sortKey="Bolef, D" sort="Bolef, D" uniqKey="Bolef D" first="D" last="Bolef">D. Bolef</name>
<name sortKey="Gardner, T" sort="Gardner, T" uniqKey="Gardner T" first="T" last="Gardner">T. Gardner</name>
</noCountry>
</tree>
</affiliations>
</record>

Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)

EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Ticri/CIDE/explor/OcrV1/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more

Ou

HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd -nk 000205 | SxmlIndent | more

Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri

{{Explor lien
   |wiki=    Ticri/CIDE
   |area=    OcrV1
   |flux=    Pmc
   |étape=   Checkpoint
   |type=    RBID
   |clé=     PMC:227166
   |texte=   Requests for proposals for library automation.
}}

Pour générer des pages wiki

HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/RBID.i   -Sk "pubmed:3370380" \
       | HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Checkpoint/biblio.hfd   \
       | NlmPubMed2Wicri -a OcrV1 

Wicri

This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32.
Data generation: Sat Nov 11 16:53:45 2017. Site generation: Mon Mar 11 23:15:16 2024